Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 布丹主權概念發展之研究
On the Development of Jean Bodin’s Idea of Sovereignty
作者 蔣馥朵
貢獻者 蕭高彥
蔣馥朵
關鍵詞 布丹
主權
憲政主義
絕對主義
立法權
日期 2012
上傳時間 1-Apr-2013 14:40:36 (UTC+8)
摘要 《邦國論六卷》卷帙浩瀚,是布丹留名於政治思想史之作,其中主權概念的闡述更對現代國家理論建構不可或缺。而布丹在十年前於《理解歷史的簡易方法》中也已經簡要討論過主權概念。兩部著作間的理論連貫性引起某些討論;部分學者認為兩書間理路一致,細節差異微不足道,但也有學者認為《理解歷史的簡易方法》屬於十六世紀憲政主義傳統,《邦國論六卷》中的絕對主義為一理論斷裂的結果。然而檢視十六世紀憲政思想著作後可以發現,其脈絡下的君主,不但受到神法與自然法的限制,更必須遵守政治共同體內之既有法律,無法完全掌握立法權。另一方面,布丹早期雖然認為君主的加冕誓詞,令王國既有法律成為一實在限制,但卻也同意身為立法者的主權君主地位必然凌駕於法律之上,可以視情形廢除、修訂,甚至是頒佈新法。布丹在《邦國論六卷》中,則以釐清法律與契約差異的方式來解決這個理論矛盾,並呈現出與憲政精神截然不同的主權理論:主權者雖然仍要受到自然法、神法以及規範王位傳承的根本法等限制,但以上約束全不構成臣民挑戰君主的理由。布丹的絕對主義傾向,與其說是前後期理論斷裂,毋寧是內部邏輯趨於一致的結果。
參考文獻 一、布丹著作

1966 Method for the Easy Comprehension of History, translated by Beatrice Reynolds. New York: Octagon.
1988 Les Six Livres de la République, edited by Christiane Frémont, Marie-Dominique Couzinet, Henri Rochais, Paris: Fayard.
1992 On Sovereignty: Four chapters from the Six Books of the Commonwealth, edited and translated by Julian H. Franklin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2008 《主權論》讓 • 博丹著,朱利安 • H. 富蘭克林編,李衛海,錢俊文譯,北京:北京大學出版社。

二、西文書目

Allen
1967 “Jean Bodin,” The Social and Political Ideas of Some Great Thinkers of
the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, ed. F. J. C. Hearnshaw, New York: Barnes & Noble.
Arendt, Hannah
1990 “Philosophy and Politics,” Social Research 57, 1.
Aristotle
1984 The Politics, translated by Carnes Lord. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Beaud, Olivier
1994 La Puissance de L’Etat, Paris : Presses universitaires de France.
Berns, Thomas
2000 “Bodin: La Souveraineté Saisie par Ses Marques,” Bibliothèque
d`Humanisme et Renaissance, T. 62, No. 3 (2000), pp. 611-623.
Church, William Farr
1941 Constitutional Thought in Sixteenth-Century France: A Study in the
Evolution of Ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Eulau, Heinz H. F.
1942 “The Depersonalization of the Concept of Sovereignty,” The Journal of
Politics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 3-19.
Franklin, Julian
1969 Constitutionalism and Resistance in the Sixteenth Century Three
Treatises by Hotman, Beza, & Mornay Julian H. Franklin trans. & ed., New York : Pegasus.
1973 Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
2001 “The Question of Sovereignty in Bodin’s Account of Sovereignty, in
Anthony T Grafton & J. H. M. ed., Historians and Ideologues, Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp.40-48.
Gilmore, Myron Piper
1941 Arguments from Roman Law in Political Thought 1200-1600. New York:
Russell& Russell.
Holmes, Stephen
1995 “The Constitution of Sovereignty in Jean Bodin,” Passions and
Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Holt, Mack P.
1995 The French Wars of Religion, 1562-1629. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hutton, Ronald
2007 The Druids. London: Hambledon Continuum.
Jacobsen, Mogens Chrom
2000 Jean Bodin et le dilemme de la philosophie politique moderne.
København : Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.
Keohane, Nannerl O.
1980 Philosophy and the state in France : the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
King, Preston
1973 The Ideology of Order: A Comparative Analysis of Jean Bodin and
Thomas Hobbes. London: George Allen & Unwin ltd.
Lewis, J. U.
1968 “Jean Bodin’s ‘Logic if Sovereignty’” , Political Studies, 16,pp. 206-22.
Mesnard, Pierre
1977 L’essor de la Philosophie Politique au XVIe Siècle. Paris: Vrin.
Mousnier, Roland
1979 The Institutions of France under the Absolute Monarchy, 1598-1789.
Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Neumann, Franz
1986 The Rule of Law: Political Theory and the Legal System in Modern
Society. Heidelberg: Berg Publisher.
Reynolds, Beatrice
1931 Proponents of Limited Monarchy in Sixteenth Century France: Francis
Hotman and Jean Bodin, New York: Columbia University Press.
Schmitt, Carl
1985 Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shepard, Max Adams
1930 “Sovereignty at the Crossroads: A Study of Bodin,” Political Science
Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 580-603.
Seyssel, Claude de
1981 The Monarchy of France. Translated by J. H. Hexter. New Haven and
London: Yale University Press.
Skinner, Quentin
2002 Visions of Politics: Volume II: Renaissance Virtues, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Spitz, Jean-Fabien
1998 Bodin et la souveraineté. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Strauss, Leo
1984 The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Owen Ulph,
1947, “Jean Bodin and the Estates-General of 1576,” Jean Bodin, ed. Julian
Franklin, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Veogelin, Eric
1998 History of Political Ideas v. 5 Religion and the Rise of modernity in The
Collected Works of Eric Veogelin, edited by James L. Wiser. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press

三、中文書目

史金納 (Quentin Skinner)
2004 《現代政治思想的基礎 (卷二):宗教改革》,台北:左岸文化。
施密特 (Carl Schmitt)
2004 《憲法學說》,劉楓譯,台北:聯經。
2005 《政治的概念》,劉宗坤譯,上海:上海人民。
2006 《論斷與概念》,朱雁冰譯,上海:上海人民。
陳秀鳳
2005 政權“神聖化”?-以法蘭克國王祝聖典禮為中心的探討,新史學16卷
4期。
2007a 神聖性王權“世俗化”-中世紀晚期法學思想與法蘭西王權關係的探
討,新史學18卷3期。
2007b “法蘭西貴族”團與法蘭西王權關係的探討 臺灣師大歷史學報 第38
期。
薩孟武
1993 《西洋政治思想史》,台北:三民書局。
賽班
1991《西洋政治思想史》,台北:桂冠。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
政治研究所
96252015
101
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096252015
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蕭高彥zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蔣馥朵zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 蔣馥朵zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2012en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Apr-2013 14:40:36 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Apr-2013 14:40:36 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Apr-2013 14:40:36 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0096252015en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/57593-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 政治研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96252015zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 《邦國論六卷》卷帙浩瀚,是布丹留名於政治思想史之作,其中主權概念的闡述更對現代國家理論建構不可或缺。而布丹在十年前於《理解歷史的簡易方法》中也已經簡要討論過主權概念。兩部著作間的理論連貫性引起某些討論;部分學者認為兩書間理路一致,細節差異微不足道,但也有學者認為《理解歷史的簡易方法》屬於十六世紀憲政主義傳統,《邦國論六卷》中的絕對主義為一理論斷裂的結果。然而檢視十六世紀憲政思想著作後可以發現,其脈絡下的君主,不但受到神法與自然法的限制,更必須遵守政治共同體內之既有法律,無法完全掌握立法權。另一方面,布丹早期雖然認為君主的加冕誓詞,令王國既有法律成為一實在限制,但卻也同意身為立法者的主權君主地位必然凌駕於法律之上,可以視情形廢除、修訂,甚至是頒佈新法。布丹在《邦國論六卷》中,則以釐清法律與契約差異的方式來解決這個理論矛盾,並呈現出與憲政精神截然不同的主權理論:主權者雖然仍要受到自然法、神法以及規範王位傳承的根本法等限制,但以上約束全不構成臣民挑戰君主的理由。布丹的絕對主義傾向,與其說是前後期理論斷裂,毋寧是內部邏輯趨於一致的結果。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 緒論-------------------------------------------------------1

第一節 前言------------------------------------------------1
第二節 布丹著作與生平簡介-------------------------------------2
第三節 問題意識與文獻檢閱-------------------------------------5
第四節 章節安排--------------------------------------------10

第一章 十六世紀法國憲政思想----------------------------------12

第一節 《法蘭西君主國》---------------------------------------12
第二節 《法蘭克高盧》----------------------------------------21

第二章 《理解歷史的簡易方法》與主權理論-------------------------31

第一節 政治共同體之要素--------------------------------------32
第二節 國家體制分類-----------------------------------------36
第三節 主權理論--------------------------------------------44

第三章 《邦國論六卷》與主權理論-------------------------------53

第一節 主權理論--------------------------------------------53
第二節 主權者與法律-----------------------------------------60
第三節 主權者與政治共同體------------------------------------68


結論------------------------------------------------------84

參考書目---------------------------------------------------89
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096252015en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 布丹zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 主權zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 憲政主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 絕對主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 立法權zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 布丹主權概念發展之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) On the Development of Jean Bodin’s Idea of Sovereigntyen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、布丹著作

1966 Method for the Easy Comprehension of History, translated by Beatrice Reynolds. New York: Octagon.
1988 Les Six Livres de la République, edited by Christiane Frémont, Marie-Dominique Couzinet, Henri Rochais, Paris: Fayard.
1992 On Sovereignty: Four chapters from the Six Books of the Commonwealth, edited and translated by Julian H. Franklin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2008 《主權論》讓 • 博丹著,朱利安 • H. 富蘭克林編,李衛海,錢俊文譯,北京:北京大學出版社。

二、西文書目

Allen
1967 “Jean Bodin,” The Social and Political Ideas of Some Great Thinkers of
the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, ed. F. J. C. Hearnshaw, New York: Barnes & Noble.
Arendt, Hannah
1990 “Philosophy and Politics,” Social Research 57, 1.
Aristotle
1984 The Politics, translated by Carnes Lord. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Beaud, Olivier
1994 La Puissance de L’Etat, Paris : Presses universitaires de France.
Berns, Thomas
2000 “Bodin: La Souveraineté Saisie par Ses Marques,” Bibliothèque
d`Humanisme et Renaissance, T. 62, No. 3 (2000), pp. 611-623.
Church, William Farr
1941 Constitutional Thought in Sixteenth-Century France: A Study in the
Evolution of Ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Eulau, Heinz H. F.
1942 “The Depersonalization of the Concept of Sovereignty,” The Journal of
Politics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 3-19.
Franklin, Julian
1969 Constitutionalism and Resistance in the Sixteenth Century Three
Treatises by Hotman, Beza, & Mornay Julian H. Franklin trans. & ed., New York : Pegasus.
1973 Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
2001 “The Question of Sovereignty in Bodin’s Account of Sovereignty, in
Anthony T Grafton & J. H. M. ed., Historians and Ideologues, Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp.40-48.
Gilmore, Myron Piper
1941 Arguments from Roman Law in Political Thought 1200-1600. New York:
Russell& Russell.
Holmes, Stephen
1995 “The Constitution of Sovereignty in Jean Bodin,” Passions and
Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Holt, Mack P.
1995 The French Wars of Religion, 1562-1629. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hutton, Ronald
2007 The Druids. London: Hambledon Continuum.
Jacobsen, Mogens Chrom
2000 Jean Bodin et le dilemme de la philosophie politique moderne.
København : Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.
Keohane, Nannerl O.
1980 Philosophy and the state in France : the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
King, Preston
1973 The Ideology of Order: A Comparative Analysis of Jean Bodin and
Thomas Hobbes. London: George Allen & Unwin ltd.
Lewis, J. U.
1968 “Jean Bodin’s ‘Logic if Sovereignty’” , Political Studies, 16,pp. 206-22.
Mesnard, Pierre
1977 L’essor de la Philosophie Politique au XVIe Siècle. Paris: Vrin.
Mousnier, Roland
1979 The Institutions of France under the Absolute Monarchy, 1598-1789.
Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Neumann, Franz
1986 The Rule of Law: Political Theory and the Legal System in Modern
Society. Heidelberg: Berg Publisher.
Reynolds, Beatrice
1931 Proponents of Limited Monarchy in Sixteenth Century France: Francis
Hotman and Jean Bodin, New York: Columbia University Press.
Schmitt, Carl
1985 Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shepard, Max Adams
1930 “Sovereignty at the Crossroads: A Study of Bodin,” Political Science
Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 580-603.
Seyssel, Claude de
1981 The Monarchy of France. Translated by J. H. Hexter. New Haven and
London: Yale University Press.
Skinner, Quentin
2002 Visions of Politics: Volume II: Renaissance Virtues, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Spitz, Jean-Fabien
1998 Bodin et la souveraineté. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Strauss, Leo
1984 The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Owen Ulph,
1947, “Jean Bodin and the Estates-General of 1576,” Jean Bodin, ed. Julian
Franklin, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Veogelin, Eric
1998 History of Political Ideas v. 5 Religion and the Rise of modernity in The
Collected Works of Eric Veogelin, edited by James L. Wiser. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press

三、中文書目

史金納 (Quentin Skinner)
2004 《現代政治思想的基礎 (卷二):宗教改革》,台北:左岸文化。
施密特 (Carl Schmitt)
2004 《憲法學說》,劉楓譯,台北:聯經。
2005 《政治的概念》,劉宗坤譯,上海:上海人民。
2006 《論斷與概念》,朱雁冰譯,上海:上海人民。
陳秀鳳
2005 政權“神聖化”?-以法蘭克國王祝聖典禮為中心的探討,新史學16卷
4期。
2007a 神聖性王權“世俗化”-中世紀晚期法學思想與法蘭西王權關係的探
討,新史學18卷3期。
2007b “法蘭西貴族”團與法蘭西王權關係的探討 臺灣師大歷史學報 第38
期。
薩孟武
1993 《西洋政治思想史》,台北:三民書局。
賽班
1991《西洋政治思想史》,台北:桂冠。
zh_TW