1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 技術密集度對海外子公司進入模式的影響
The Effects of Technology Intensity on Overseas Subsidiary Entry Modes of Taiwan Industry
作者 楊彩燕
貢獻者 翁永和
楊彩燕
關鍵詞 進入模式
技術密集度
中介變數
中介效果
日期 2012
上傳時間 1-Apr-2013 14:41:13 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究以技術密集度高低層次代表技術水準產出狀況，探討我國製造業廠商對外直接投資時，對股權進入模式之影響程度及其扮演角色。研究主題導入社會科學的中介概念，運用經濟部2007年「製造業對外投資實況調查」問卷資料，除分析廠商特性、投資動機等因素與進入模式關係外，假設以廠商技術密集度高低層次作為中介變數，進一步驗證各項因素中透過中介變數，對進入模式選擇的影響程度。本研究所設定的被解釋變數是將進入模式區分為獨資或合資兩種狀況，故利用probit model進行實證分析。本研究發現「投資年資」、「地區鄰近」、「單一投資地區」、「技術密集度高低層次」、「廠商規模」、「低勞工成本誘因」、「母國技術支援」、「高污染產業」及「勞力密集度」等變數，對廠商海外子公司進入模式具顯著水準。再經由社會科學研究方法進行中介效果驗證流程，驗證技術密集度高低層次具有部分中介效果，並與「投資年資」、「單一投資地區」及「高污染產業」之交乘項結果，對股權進入模式的影響具有顯著性水準。
參考文獻 中文部分
     王聖文（2012），《我國廠商對外投資時間與廠商營運之關係探討究》，政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
     李文瑞（2000），「廠商海外投資股權模式關鍵影響因素之研究」，《管理評論》，19（3），25-49。
     李博志與林子敬（1996），「對中國成衣和紡織業競爭力的評估」，《中華管理學報》，7（1），17-30。
     吳統雄教學研究網站，http://tx.liberal.ntu.edu.tw，取用日期：2012年12月。
     高長與陳威如（1998），「台商赴大陸投資所有權進入模式決定因素的分析」，《管理學報》，15（3），393-418。
     翁景民與曾義明（1995），「國際進入模式決策之折衷理論暨國際進入模式組合之研究」，《臺大管理論叢》，6（2），25-60。
     陳世傑、李文瑞、胡秀華、黃啟瑞與陳律瑞（2008），「台商技術特性、廠商特性與決策者特質對廠商大陸市場進入模式之影響」，《中山管理評論》，16（3），575-612。
     蔡宜臻、邱俊榮（2009），「跨國廠商的進入模式－直接投資、出口與授權決策」，《中央研究院經濟研究所經濟論文》，37（1），1-26。
     歐陽勛與黃仁德（2006），《國際貿易理論與政策》，567-594，臺北：三民書局。
     鐘美芳（2009），「多國籍廠商進入決策與技術外溢效果分析」，《東吳經濟商學學報》，第六十五期，83-108。
     英文部分
     Agarwal, S. and S. N. Ramaswami (1992), “Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Location and Internalization Factors,” Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 1-27.
     Anderson, E. and H. Gatignon (1986), “Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions,” Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1-26.
     Baron, M. R. and D. A. Kenny (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
     Beata, K. S. (2000), Technological Leadership and Foreign Investors’ Choice of Entry Mode, The World Band, NW, Washington.
     Blodgett, L. L. (1991), “Partner Contribution As Predictors of Equity Share in International Joint Ventures,” Journal of international Business Studies, 22(1), 63-78.
     Buckley, P. J. and M. C. Casson (1976), “A Long-Run Theory of the Multinational Enterprise,” The Future of Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan, 32-65.
     Caves, R. E. (1971), “International Corporations: The Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment,” Economica, 38(149), 1-27.
     Caves, R. E. (1982), Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Dikova, D. and A. V. Witteloostuijn (2007), “Foreign Direct Investment Mode Choice: Entry and Establishment Modes in Transition Economies,” Journal of international Business Studies, 38(6), 1013-1033.
     Dunning, J. H. (1980), “Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests,” Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9–31.
     Farge, N. and L. T. Wells (1982), “Bargaining Power of Multinationals and Host Governments, ” Journal of international Business Studies, 13(2), 9-23.
     Filatotchev, I., C. Piga, and N. Dyomina (2003), “Network positioning and R&D Activity: A Study of Italian Groups,” R&D Management, 33(1), 37-48.
     Ford, D. (1988), “Develop Your Technology Strategy,” Long Range Planning, 21(5), 85-91.
     Gatignon, H. and E. Anderson (1988), “The Multinational Corporation`s Degree of Control Over Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation,” Journal of Low, Economics, and Organization, 4(2), 305-336.
     Gomes-Casseres, B. (1990), “Firm Ownership Preferences and Host Government Restrictions: An Integrated Approach,” Journal of international Business Studies, 21(1), 1-22.
     Hashai N., C. G. Asmussen, G. R. G. Benito and B. Petersen (2010), “Technological Knowledge Intensity and Entry Mode Diversity,” Manag Int Rev 50, 659-681.
     Hennart, J. F. (1991), “The Transaction Cost Theory of Joint-Ventures: an Empirical Study of Japanese Subsidiaries in the United States,” Management Science, 37(4), 483-497.
     Hennart, J. F. and Y. R. Park (1993), “Greenfield vs. Acquisition: The Strategy of Japanese Investors in the United States,” Management Science, 39(9), 1054-1070.
     Hill, C. W. L. (1997), International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace, (2nd ed.), New York, IRWIN.
     Hill, C. W. L., P. Hwang and W. C. Kim (1990), “An Eclectic Theory of the Choice of International Entry Mode,” Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 117-128.
     Hymer, S. (1960), The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1976.
     Kogut, B. and H. Singh (1988), “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode,” Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432.
     Lecraw, D. J. (1984), “Bargaining Power, Ownership, and Profitability of Transnational Corporations in Developing Countries,” Journal of International Business Studies, 15(1), 27–43.
     Lieberman, M. B. and D. B. Montgomery (1988), “First-Mover Advantages,” Strategic Management Journal, 9 (Special Issue), 41–58.
     Meyer, K. E. (1998), Direct Investment in Economies in Transition, Aldershot: Elgar.
     Motta, M. (1992), “Multinational Firms and the Tariff-jumping Argument: A game Theoretic Analysis with some Unconventional Conclusions,” European Economic Review, 36(8), 1557-1557.
     Noori, H. (1990), Managing the Dynamics of New Technology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 143-157.
     Pan, Y. and D. K. Tse (2000), “The Hierarchica Model of Market Entry Modes,” Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 535-544.
     Rugman, A. M. (1981), “Inside the Multinationals,” Columbia University Press, 54-60.
     Schoenecker, T. S. and A. C. Cooper (1998), “The Role of Firm Resources and Organizational Attributes in Determining Entry Timing: A Cross-Industry Study,” Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1127–1143.
     Tan, B. and I. Vertinsky (1996), “Foreign Direct Investment by Japanese Electronics Firms in the United States and Canada: Modeling the Timing of Entry,” Journal of International Business Studies, 27(4), 655–681.
     Teece, D. J. (1977), “Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-how,” Economic Journal, 87(346), 242-261.
     Vernon, R. (1966), “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190-207.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
99921036
101
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099921036
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 翁永和zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 楊彩燕zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 楊彩燕zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2012en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Apr-2013 14:41:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Apr-2013 14:41:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Apr-2013 14:41:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0099921036en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/57599-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 行政管理碩士學程zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99921036zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以技術密集度高低層次代表技術水準產出狀況，探討我國製造業廠商對外直接投資時，對股權進入模式之影響程度及其扮演角色。研究主題導入社會科學的中介概念，運用經濟部2007年「製造業對外投資實況調查」問卷資料，除分析廠商特性、投資動機等因素與進入模式關係外，假設以廠商技術密集度高低層次作為中介變數，進一步驗證各項因素中透過中介變數，對進入模式選擇的影響程度。本研究所設定的被解釋變數是將進入模式區分為獨資或合資兩種狀況，故利用probit model進行實證分析。本研究發現「投資年資」、「地區鄰近」、「單一投資地區」、「技術密集度高低層次」、「廠商規模」、「低勞工成本誘因」、「母國技術支援」、「高污染產業」及「勞力密集度」等變數，對廠商海外子公司進入模式具顯著水準。再經由社會科學研究方法進行中介效果驗證流程，驗證技術密集度高低層次具有部分中介效果，並與「投資年資」、「單一投資地區」及「高污染產業」之交乘項結果，對股權進入模式的影響具有顯著性水準。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 摘要 I
     目錄 II
     表目錄 IV
     第一章 緒論 1
     第一節 研究動機與目的 1
     第二節 研究方法 2
     第三節 研究架構 3
     第二章 文獻探討 4
     第一節 對外直接投資定義及理論 4
     第二節 技術密集度對進入模式影響之相關理論文獻 5
     第三章 對外投資現況分析 14
     第四章 實證模型設定 24
     第一節 變數說明及預期影響方向 24
     第二節 實證模型的建立 30
     第五章 實證模型結果分析 32
     第一節 實證變數的基本統計量 32
     第二節 實證分析－基本模型 33
     第三節 邊際效果分析－基本模型 36
     第四節 中介變數之中介效果驗證說明 38
     第五節 實證分析－考慮中介變數 39
     第六節 邊際效果分析－考慮中介變數 42
     第六章 結論與建議 45
     第一節 結論 45
     第二節 未來研究方向與建議 47
     參考文獻 48		zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099921036en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 進入模式zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 技術密集度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中介變數zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中介效果zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 技術密集度對海外子公司進入模式的影響zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Effects of Technology Intensity on Overseas Subsidiary Entry Modes of Taiwan Industryen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分
     王聖文（2012），《我國廠商對外投資時間與廠商營運之關係探討究》，政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
     李文瑞（2000），「廠商海外投資股權模式關鍵影響因素之研究」，《管理評論》，19（3），25-49。
     李博志與林子敬（1996），「對中國成衣和紡織業競爭力的評估」，《中華管理學報》，7（1），17-30。
     吳統雄教學研究網站，http://tx.liberal.ntu.edu.tw，取用日期：2012年12月。
     高長與陳威如（1998），「台商赴大陸投資所有權進入模式決定因素的分析」，《管理學報》，15（3），393-418。
     翁景民與曾義明（1995），「國際進入模式決策之折衷理論暨國際進入模式組合之研究」，《臺大管理論叢》，6（2），25-60。
     陳世傑、李文瑞、胡秀華、黃啟瑞與陳律瑞（2008），「台商技術特性、廠商特性與決策者特質對廠商大陸市場進入模式之影響」，《中山管理評論》，16（3），575-612。
     蔡宜臻、邱俊榮（2009），「跨國廠商的進入模式－直接投資、出口與授權決策」，《中央研究院經濟研究所經濟論文》，37（1），1-26。
     歐陽勛與黃仁德（2006），《國際貿易理論與政策》，567-594，臺北：三民書局。
     鐘美芳（2009），「多國籍廠商進入決策與技術外溢效果分析」，《東吳經濟商學學報》，第六十五期，83-108。
     英文部分
     Agarwal, S. and S. N. Ramaswami (1992), “Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Location and Internalization Factors,” Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 1-27.
     Anderson, E. and H. Gatignon (1986), “Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions,” Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1-26.
     Baron, M. R. and D. A. Kenny (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
     Beata, K. S. (2000), Technological Leadership and Foreign Investors’ Choice of Entry Mode, The World Band, NW, Washington.
     Blodgett, L. L. (1991), “Partner Contribution As Predictors of Equity Share in International Joint Ventures,” Journal of international Business Studies, 22(1), 63-78.
     Buckley, P. J. and M. C. Casson (1976), “A Long-Run Theory of the Multinational Enterprise,” The Future of Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan, 32-65.
     Caves, R. E. (1971), “International Corporations: The Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment,” Economica, 38(149), 1-27.
     Caves, R. E. (1982), Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Dikova, D. and A. V. Witteloostuijn (2007), “Foreign Direct Investment Mode Choice: Entry and Establishment Modes in Transition Economies,” Journal of international Business Studies, 38(6), 1013-1033.
     Dunning, J. H. (1980), “Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests,” Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9–31.
     Farge, N. and L. T. Wells (1982), “Bargaining Power of Multinationals and Host Governments, ” Journal of international Business Studies, 13(2), 9-23.
     Filatotchev, I., C. Piga, and N. Dyomina (2003), “Network positioning and R&D Activity: A Study of Italian Groups,” R&D Management, 33(1), 37-48.
     Ford, D. (1988), “Develop Your Technology Strategy,” Long Range Planning, 21(5), 85-91.
     Gatignon, H. and E. Anderson (1988), “The Multinational Corporation`s Degree of Control Over Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation,” Journal of Low, Economics, and Organization, 4(2), 305-336.
     Gomes-Casseres, B. (1990), “Firm Ownership Preferences and Host Government Restrictions: An Integrated Approach,” Journal of international Business Studies, 21(1), 1-22.
     Hashai N., C. G. Asmussen, G. R. G. Benito and B. Petersen (2010), “Technological Knowledge Intensity and Entry Mode Diversity,” Manag Int Rev 50, 659-681.
     Hennart, J. F. (1991), “The Transaction Cost Theory of Joint-Ventures: an Empirical Study of Japanese Subsidiaries in the United States,” Management Science, 37(4), 483-497.
     Hennart, J. F. and Y. R. Park (1993), “Greenfield vs. Acquisition: The Strategy of Japanese Investors in the United States,” Management Science, 39(9), 1054-1070.
     Hill, C. W. L. (1997), International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace, (2nd ed.), New York, IRWIN.
     Hill, C. W. L., P. Hwang and W. C. Kim (1990), “An Eclectic Theory of the Choice of International Entry Mode,” Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 117-128.
     Hymer, S. (1960), The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1976.
     Kogut, B. and H. Singh (1988), “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode,” Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432.
     Lecraw, D. J. (1984), “Bargaining Power, Ownership, and Profitability of Transnational Corporations in Developing Countries,” Journal of International Business Studies, 15(1), 27–43.
     Lieberman, M. B. and D. B. Montgomery (1988), “First-Mover Advantages,” Strategic Management Journal, 9 (Special Issue), 41–58.
     Meyer, K. E. (1998), Direct Investment in Economies in Transition, Aldershot: Elgar.
     Motta, M. (1992), “Multinational Firms and the Tariff-jumping Argument: A game Theoretic Analysis with some Unconventional Conclusions,” European Economic Review, 36(8), 1557-1557.
     Noori, H. (1990), Managing the Dynamics of New Technology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 143-157.
     Pan, Y. and D. K. Tse (2000), “The Hierarchica Model of Market Entry Modes,” Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 535-544.
     Rugman, A. M. (1981), “Inside the Multinationals,” Columbia University Press, 54-60.
     Schoenecker, T. S. and A. C. Cooper (1998), “The Role of Firm Resources and Organizational Attributes in Determining Entry Timing: A Cross-Industry Study,” Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1127–1143.
     Tan, B. and I. Vertinsky (1996), “Foreign Direct Investment by Japanese Electronics Firms in the United States and Canada: Modeling the Timing of Entry,” Journal of International Business Studies, 27(4), 655–681.
     Teece, D. J. (1977), “Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-how,” Economic Journal, 87(346), 242-261.
     Vernon, R. (1966), “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190-207.		zh_TW