1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 商學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 廠商選擇產品創新策略之影響因素 —以台灣B2B製造業為例
The Determinants of Making Product Innovation Strategies - An Empirical Study of Taiwan B2B Manufacturing Industry
作者 王威林
貢獻者 許牧彥
王威林
關鍵詞 產品創新
快速追隨者
聚焦利基
低破式創新
創新策略
Product Innovation
Fast Second
Focus
Disruptive Innovation
Innovation Strategy
日期 2012
上傳時間 2-九月-2013 15:33:35 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究目的為探討B2B廠商選擇產品創新策略的影響因素，運用迴歸模型進行實證分析，第一階段先探討會進行產品創新的B2B廠商具有何種特性，以及產業特性、廠商特性與產品創新之關係；第二階段則探討廠商進行快速跟隨者(Fast Second)、聚焦利基(Focus)與低破式(Disruptive)三種產品創新策略之影響因素，包括產業特性、廠商特性與廠商創新策略，希望透過兩階段的比較，釐清外在環境與內在條件如何分別影響廠商選擇產品創新決策因素。本研究利用國科會企劃處2007年「台灣地區第二次產業創新活動調查研究」資料庫，選擇台灣地區B2B製造業廠商為研究對象，第一階段採用Logit迴歸模型進行實證分析，第二階段則以Logit模型以及Heckman模型進行實證，希望透過Heckman二階段模型修正「樣本自我選擇偏誤」(self-selection bias)發生之可能性，而對於B2B製造業廠商，實證結果發現：

一、廠商規模、市場廣度對廠商進行產品創新有正向影響，而產品加值鏈區段、廠齡與高科技產業廠商對於廠商進行產品創新則無顯著影響。
二、在有進行產品創新的廠商中，產品加值鏈區段、廠商規模以及擁有自有品牌，對廠商進行三種產品創新策略皆有正向影響。
三、採行快速追隨者策略的廠商，較會追求先行者優勢，而採行聚焦利基與低破式策略的廠商則較不會追求先行者優勢。
四、拓展產品線對廠商的重要性與採行聚焦利基、低破式策略有正向影響。
五、有內部自主研發活動、新產品行銷活動的廠商，與採用低破式策略具有正向影響；而與顧客協同合作、追求既有市場佔有率與利用智財權作為獲利方式的廠商，對於低破式策略則有負向影響。
The main purpose of this research is to discussion factors affecting B2B firms’ product innovation strategy choices by applying regression for practical case analysis. The first section illustrates the characteristics of a B2B firms that performs production innovation as well as the relationship between the industry characteristics, firm characteristics and production innovation. The second section will discuss the factors affecting product innovation strategies such as fast second, focus and disruption in relations to industry characteristics, firm characteristics and innovation strategy of the firm. By applying such two-step comparison, this research aims to find out how external and internal factors affect a firm’s production innovation choices.

This research uses National Science Council Planning Division’s database from 2007, “Taiwan Technological Innovation Survey” with focuses on Taiwan’s B2B firm as research targets. Logit regression is used for case analysis followed by Heckman regression in hopes to correct self-selection bias. The following conclusion is made:

1. The position of value added chain, firm size, market scope have positive correlation with product innovation. B2C firms has negative correlation with product innovation. Firm age and Hi-tech industry firms don’t have significant correlation with product innovation.
2. The position of value added chain, firm sized and independently owned brand have positive correlation with disruptive innovation.
3. Firms that choose to follow the second fast strategy are more likely to pursuit first mover advantage, while firms that choose focus and disruption would not.

4. Extension of product line is important and has a positive impact on firms that perform focus and disruption
5. Firms that perform Internal RD Activities, marketing activity of the innovative product will be positively impacted by choosing disruption while firms that thrive on Collaborative with customers, market share of existing product, and Intellectual Property Rights will be negatively impacted by choosing disruption
參考文獻 小島敏彥（2002），新產品開發管理：企業革新的生存之道（蔣永明 譯），台北：中衛發展中心。
王濟川、郭志剛（2003），Logistic迴歸模型－方法及應用，五南圖書出版。
甘華鳴編著(2003)，新產品開發，北京市：中國國際廣播出版社。
司徒達賢、李仁芳及吳思華（1985），企業概論，教育部空中大學教學委員會。
李仁芳 (2000)，策略九說，三版一刷，臉譜出版。
朱春陽（2005），現代傳媒產品創新理論與策略，中國濟南：山東人民出版社。
何弘凱 (2012)，廠商進行突破性產品創新之影響因素─台灣製造業的實證分析，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
巫維元 (2004)，台灣中小型IC設計公司成長策略之研究，國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
林靈宏（1993），消費品類型、創新類型與新產品行銷策略關係硏究，政治大學企業管理硏究所博士論文。
施培公（1995），企業規模與技術創新，科學與科學技術管理，16(5)：33-41。
陳介玄，1998，台灣產業的社會學研究：中小企業的轉型，台北：聯經出版事業公司。
許士軍(1986)，管理學，台北：東華書局
許明德(2006)，創新及創造性破壞──經濟學大師熊彼得。「科學發展」，403期：70-75。
楊國彬(2004)，台灣國際新創事業市場進入策略、市場成長策略與績效關係之研究，第六屆全球化經營策略論壇，國立政治大學企業管理學系。
劉恆逸譯（2010），現代策略管理，台北：華泰文化。（原書Grant,R.M. (2007),Contemporary strategy analysis concepts, techniques, applications (6th ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons.）
劉常勇（1997），新產品開發程序，「劉常勇管理學習知識庫」，http://cm.nsysu.edu.tw/~cyliu/files/edu36.doc
葉比凡 (2007)，「長尾理論在中小企業的實證研究─閥類製造業之利基市場的個案研究」台南科技大學商學與管理研究所論文。
鍾志明（1999），新產品發展過程之資源配置與績效之關係：以國內製造業為例，政治大學企業管理硏究所博士論文。
鐘憲瑞，2008，產業分析精論-多元觀點與策略思維，前程文化出版。
Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of Industrial Innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40-47.
Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 521-543.
Ansoff, I.H. (1990), Implanting Strategic Management, Prentice Hall International, Ltd. London
Ansoff, H., & Stewart, J. (1967). Strategies for a technology-based business. Harvard Business Review, 45(6), 71-83.
Arrow, K.J. (1962). “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions”,in Nelson, R.R. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton University Press. Princeton
Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation, growth and survival. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 441-457.
Betz, F. (1993). Strategic technology management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bhattacharya, M., & Bloch, H. (2004). Determinants of innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 155-162.
Bonaccorsi, A., & Piccaluga, A. (1994). A Theoretical Framework for the Evaluation of University-Industry Relationships. R & D Management, 24(3), 229-247.
Booz, Allen and Hamilton (1982), New Product Management for the 1980`s. NY: Booz, Allen and Hamilton Inc.
Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive Technologies – Catching the Wave. [Article]. Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 43-53.
Brouwer, E., & Kleinknecht, A. (1999). Innovative output, and a firm`s propensity to patent. An exploration of CIS micro data. Research Policy, 28(6), 615-624.
Buisson&Silberzahn(2010). Blue Ocean or Fast-Second Innovation?A Four Breakthrough Model to Explain Sucessful Market Domination. International Journal of Innovation Management,Vol. 14, No. 3 (June 2010) pp. 359–378
Burgelman, R. A. (1991). Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research. Organization Science, 2(3), 239-262. doi: Doi 10.1287/Orsc.2.3.239
Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent`s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1-17.
Chang, Pao-Long a & Tsai ,Chien-Tzu b (2002). Finding the Niche Position-Competition Strategy of Taiwan’s IC Design Industry. a:Institute of Business and Management, National ChiaoTung University, 4F, 114 Chung-Hsiao W. Road, Sec.1 Taipei, Taiwan,b:Institute of Business and Management, National ChiaoTung University, and Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, MingHsin. . Technovation 22 (2002) 101–111 Republic of China
Institute of Technology, 1 Hsin-Hsing Road, Hsin-Fong, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator`s dilemma : when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. [Article]. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197-218. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199603)17:3<197::aid-smj804>3.0.co;2-u
Christensen, C. M., & Overdorf, M. (2000). Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 66-+.
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator`s solution : creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-+.
Christensen, C. M., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (1995). EXPLAINING THE ATTACKERS ADVANTAGE - TECHNOLOGICAL PARADIGMS, ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, AND THE VALUE NETWORK. [Article]. Research Policy, 24(2), 233-257. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00764-k
Clifford, D. K., Jr., & Cavanagh, R. E. (1985). The entrepreneurial corporation. The McKinsey Quarterly (Autumn, 1985). Retrieved online, May 15, 2007, from Business Source , Premier database.
Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996a). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 232-243.
Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996b). A reprise of size and R&D. Economic Journal, 106(437), 925-951.
Cohen, W. M., Levin, R. C., & Mowery, D. C. (1987). Firm Size and Research-and-Development Intensity - a Reexamination. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 543-565.
Cooper, R. G.(1998). Product leadership: Creating and launching superior new -products. New York : Perseus Books）
Copulsky, W. (1976). Cannibalism in Marketplace. Journal of Marketing, 40(4), 103-105.
Danneels, E. (2002). The Dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095-1121. doi: Doi 10.1002/Smj.275
Danneels, E. (2004). Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A critique and Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(4), 246-258.
Denning, S. (2005). Why the best and brightest approaches don’t solve the innovation -dilemma. Strategy & Leadership, 33(1), 4–11.
Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations - an Empirical-Analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422-1433.
Dimmick, J., & Rothenbuhler, E.(1984b). The theory of the niche: Quantifying competition among media industries. Journal of Communication, 34 , 103-119.
Dobson, Wendy,( 1997), “Crossing Borders: Multinationals in East Asia.” Pp. 223-247, in Multinationals and East Asian Integration, edited by Wendy Dobson and Chia Siow Yue. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
Drejer, A. (2002). Integrating product and technology development. International Journal of Technology Management, 24(2-3), 124-142.
Drucker, Peter F., 1985, Innovation and entrepreneurship： Practice and Principles, New York: Harper and Row
Eisenmann, T. R. (2002). The effects of CEO equity ownership and firm diversification on risk taking. Strategic Management Journal, 23(6), 513-534. doi: Doi 10.1002/Smj.236
Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & Okeefe, R. D. (1984). Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682-695.
Foster, R. N. (1986). Innovation : the attacker`s advantage. New York: Summit Books.
Fritsch, M., & Meschede, M. (2001). Product innovation, process innovation, and size. Review of Industrial Organization, 19(3), 335-350.
Gilbert, J. T. (1994). Choosing an Innovation Strategy: Theory and Practice. Business Horizons, 37(6), 16-22.
Gomes, L., & Ramaswamy, K. (1999). An Empirical Examination of the Form of The- Relationship between Multinationality and Performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 173-187.
Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006a). Disruptiveness of innovations: Measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 189-199. doi: Doi 10.1002/Smj.511
Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006b). The usefulness of measuring disruptiveness of innovations ex post in making ex ante predictions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 12-18.
Govindarajan, V., Kopalle, P. K., & Danneels, E. (2011). The Effects of Mainstream and Emerging Customer Orientations on Radical and Disruptive Innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 121-132. doi: DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00865.x
Grabowski, H. G. (1968). Determinants of Industrial Research and Development Study of Chemical, Drug, and Petroleum Industries. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 292-306.
Grinnel, J., (1904), “The origin and distribution of the chestnut-backed chickadee.” Auk, 21:364–82.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 122-128.
Hannan, M. T., Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press.
Hansen, G. S., & Hill, C. W. L. (1991). Are Institutional Investors Myopic - a Time-Series Study of 4 Technology-Driven Industries. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 1-16.
Hax, A. C. & Majluf, N. S. (1991). The strategy concept and process: A pragmatic approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural Innovation - the Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9-30.
Hewitt-Dundas, N. & S. Roper. (2000) “Strategic Re-engineering – Small Firms’ Tactics in a Mature Industry” Working Paper No. 45, Northern Ireland Economic Research Centre, Belfast.
Hill, C. W. L., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257-274.
Hippel, E. v. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hisrich, R. D., & Peters, M. P. (1978). Marketing a new product : its planning, development, and control. Menlo Park, Calif.: Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co.
Hofer, C. W. & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. Minnesota: St. Paul West Publishing.
Hoffman, K., Parejo, M., Bessant, J., & Perren, L. (1998). Small firms, R & D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review. Technovation, 18(1), 39-55.
Hung, Shiu-Wan(2006). Competitive strategies for Taiwan’s thin film transistor-liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) industry. Department of Business Administration, National Central University, Tao-Yuan 320, Taiwan.. Technology in Society 28 (2006) 349–361
Hutchinson, G.E., (1957) Concluding Remarks.Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22, pp.415–427.
Kerin, R. A., Harvey, M. G., & Rothe, J. T. (1978). Cannibalism and New Product Development. Business Horizons, 21(5), 25-31.
Kim, WC& R Mauborgne (2004). Blue Ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82 (10), 76–85.
Koberg, C., Detienne, D. and Heppard, K. (2003) An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, 21–45.
Kotler, P., 1999. Kotler on marketing: how to create, win and dominate markets. London: The Free Press.
Kotler, P. (2002). Marketing Management, 9th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kotler, P. & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing management (12th ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Leonardbarton, D. (1992). Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities - a Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125.
Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial-Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity(3), 783-831.
Levitt, T. (1966). Innovative Imitation. Harvard Business Review, 44(5), 63-70.
Lieberman, M. B. and D. B. Montgomery (1988).First-mover advantages’, Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 9, pp. 41–58
Luecke, R. (2003) Managing Change and Transition,Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Marquis, D. G. 1972. The anatomy of successful innovation. Managing Advancing Technology, 1:35-48.
Marquish, D.G. 1982. The anatomy of successful innovation. Winthrop Publisher, Cambridge.
Marsh, D. and Oxley, L. (2005) Modelling innovation activity in the New Zealand biotechnology sector. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 69: 103-112.
Miles, R., Snow, C., Meyer, A., & Coleman, J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546-562.
Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in Strategy Formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934-948.
Moriarty, R. T., & Kosnik, T. J. (1989). High-Tech Marketing - Concepts, Continuity, and Change. Sloan Management Review, 30(4), 7-17.
Myers, D. R., Sumpter, C. W., Walsh, S. T., & Kirchhoff, B. A. (2002). A practitioner`s view: Evolutionary stages of disruptive technologies. Ieee Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(4), 322-329. doi: Doi 10.1109/Tem.2002.807295
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Oerlemans, L. A. G., Meeus, M. T. H., & Boekema, F. W. M. (1998). Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 89(3), 298-309.
Peeters, C., & Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. v. (2006). Economic and management perspectives on intellectual property rights. Basingstoke England New York: Palgrave Macmillan..
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York:The Free Press.
Porter, M.E. 1998a. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance,with a new introduction. New York: Free Press.
Roberts, E.B. & C.A. Berry, Entering New Business: Selecting Strategies for Success, Sloan Management Review, 3-17, 1985
Rochford and Linda. (1991)“Generating and Screening New Product Ideas”, Industrial Marketing Management, 20, pp. 67-84.
Rosenberg, J. B. (1976). Research and Market Share - Reappraisal of Schumpeter Hypothesis. Journal of Industrial Economics, 25(2), 101-112.
Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firm Size, Market-Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions. American Economic Review, 55(5), 1097-1125.
Scherer, F. M. (1970). Industrial market structure and economic performance. Chicago,: Rand McNally.
Scherer, F. M. (1980). Industrial market structure and economic performance (2d ed.). Chicago: Rand McNally College Pub. Co.
Scherer, F. M. (1982). Inter-Industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth. Review of Economics and Statistics, 64(4), 627-634.
Schmidt, G. M., & Druehl, C. T. (2008). When is a disruptive innovation disruptive? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(4), 347-369.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles; a theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process (1st ed.). New York, London,: McGraw-Hill Book Company, inc.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York, London,: Harper & Brothers.
Schumpeter, J. A., & Opie, R. (1934). The theory of economic development; an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, Mass.,: Harvard University Press.
Shankar V, Rangaswamy A, Pusateri M. Customer price sensitivity and the online medium. Working paper, 1999.
Shanklin, W. L., & Ryans, J. K. (1984). Organizing for High-Tech Marketing. Harvard Business Review, 62(6), 164-171.
Siddharthan, N. S. (1988). In-House R-and-D, Imported Technology, and Firm Size - Lessons from Indian Experience. Developing Economies, 26(3), 212-221.
Soete, L. L. G. (1979). Firm Size and Inventive Activity - Evidence Reconsidered. European Economic Review, 12(4), 319-340.
Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2002). Technological opportunism and radical technology adoption: An application to e-business. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 47-60.
Thomas, R. J. (1995). New product development: Managing and forecasting for strategic success.
Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1147-1161.
Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2005). Does R&D performance decline with firm size? - A re-examination in terms of elasticity. Research Policy, 34(6), 966-976. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.017.
Trott, P. (2005). Innovation management and new product development (3rd ed.). Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439-465.
Tushman, M. L., & Rosenkopf, L. (1992). Organizational Determinants of Technological-Change - toward a Sociology of Technological Evolution. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 311-347.
Tushman, M. & Nadler, D. (1986). Organizing for Innovation. California Management Review, 28(3), 74-92.
Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 3(6), 639-656.
Wallin, C. C., & Gilman, J. J. (1986). Determining the Optimum Level for Research-and-Development Spending. Research Management, 29(5), 19-24.
Wernefelt, B., (1984), ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180
Worley, J. S. (1961). Industrial-Research and the New Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 69(2), 183-186.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理研究所
100359001
101
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100359001
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 許牧彥zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 王威林zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 王威林zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2012en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-九月-2013 15:33:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-九月-2013 15:33:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-九月-2013 15:33:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0100359001en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59269-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 科技管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100359001zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究目的為探討B2B廠商選擇產品創新策略的影響因素，運用迴歸模型進行實證分析，第一階段先探討會進行產品創新的B2B廠商具有何種特性，以及產業特性、廠商特性與產品創新之關係；第二階段則探討廠商進行快速跟隨者(Fast Second)、聚焦利基(Focus)與低破式(Disruptive)三種產品創新策略之影響因素，包括產業特性、廠商特性與廠商創新策略，希望透過兩階段的比較，釐清外在環境與內在條件如何分別影響廠商選擇產品創新決策因素。本研究利用國科會企劃處2007年「台灣地區第二次產業創新活動調查研究」資料庫，選擇台灣地區B2B製造業廠商為研究對象，第一階段採用Logit迴歸模型進行實證分析，第二階段則以Logit模型以及Heckman模型進行實證，希望透過Heckman二階段模型修正「樣本自我選擇偏誤」(self-selection bias)發生之可能性，而對於B2B製造業廠商，實證結果發現：

一、廠商規模、市場廣度對廠商進行產品創新有正向影響，而產品加值鏈區段、廠齡與高科技產業廠商對於廠商進行產品創新則無顯著影響。
二、在有進行產品創新的廠商中，產品加值鏈區段、廠商規模以及擁有自有品牌，對廠商進行三種產品創新策略皆有正向影響。
三、採行快速追隨者策略的廠商，較會追求先行者優勢，而採行聚焦利基與低破式策略的廠商則較不會追求先行者優勢。
四、拓展產品線對廠商的重要性與採行聚焦利基、低破式策略有正向影響。
五、有內部自主研發活動、新產品行銷活動的廠商，與採用低破式策略具有正向影響；而與顧客協同合作、追求既有市場佔有率與利用智財權作為獲利方式的廠商，對於低破式策略則有負向影響。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The main purpose of this research is to discussion factors affecting B2B firms’ product innovation strategy choices by applying regression for practical case analysis. The first section illustrates the characteristics of a B2B firms that performs production innovation as well as the relationship between the industry characteristics, firm characteristics and production innovation. The second section will discuss the factors affecting product innovation strategies such as fast second, focus and disruption in relations to industry characteristics, firm characteristics and innovation strategy of the firm. By applying such two-step comparison, this research aims to find out how external and internal factors affect a firm’s production innovation choices.

This research uses National Science Council Planning Division’s database from 2007, “Taiwan Technological Innovation Survey” with focuses on Taiwan’s B2B firm as research targets. Logit regression is used for case analysis followed by Heckman regression in hopes to correct self-selection bias. The following conclusion is made:

1. The position of value added chain, firm size, market scope have positive correlation with product innovation. B2C firms has negative correlation with product innovation. Firm age and Hi-tech industry firms don’t have significant correlation with product innovation.
2. The position of value added chain, firm sized and independently owned brand have positive correlation with disruptive innovation.
3. Firms that choose to follow the second fast strategy are more likely to pursuit first mover advantage, while firms that choose focus and disruption would not.

4. Extension of product line is important and has a positive impact on firms that perform focus and disruption
5. Firms that perform Internal RD Activities, marketing activity of the innovative product will be positively impacted by choosing disruption while firms that thrive on Collaborative with customers, market share of existing product, and Intellectual Property Rights will be negatively impacted by choosing disruption		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 4
第三節 研究定位與流程 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 產品創新 7
壹、 產品創新定義 8
貳、 產品創新類型 9
第二節 產品創新的策略 15
壹、 產品創新策略的定義 15
貳、 快速追隨者策略 17
參、 聚焦利基策略 19
肆、 低破式創新策略 21
伍、 三種產品創新策略的比較 24
第三節 產品創新類型與廠商特質的關係 25
壹、 廠商規模與產品創新 25
貳、 市場特性與產品創新 26
參、 組織特性與產品創新 28
肆、 協同合作與產品創新 29
第三章 研究方法 30
第一節 研究架構 31
第二節 假設命題 33
壹、 廠商進行產品創新之影響因素 33
貳、 廠商進行三種產品創新模式之影響因素 35
第三節 資料來源與樣本結構 43
壹、 台灣地區第二次產業創新活動調查 43
貳、 本研究樣本來源 44
參、 樣本結構分析 46
第四節 資料分析方法 52
第五節 研究變數定義 54
壹、 第一階段實證模型 54
貳、 第二階段實證模型 56
第六節 研究限制 62
壹、 問卷問題之單調性 62
貳、 受訪者回答問題之精準度 62
參、 變數與模型選擇之限制 62
肆、 資料之同時性 62
第四章 實證結果與分析 63
第一節 第一階段模型變數之敘述統計 63
第二節 產品創新影響因素之迴歸分析 65
壹、 迴歸分析結果 65
貳、 實證結果討論 66
第三節 廠商獲利方式分析 68
壹、 KMO與Bartlett球型檢定 68
貳、 因素分析結果 69
第四節 第二階段模型變數之敘述統計 71
第五節 產品創新策略影響因素之迴歸分析 74
壹、 迴歸分析結果 74
貳、 實證結果討論 82
第五章 結論與建議 91
第一節 研究結論 91
壹、 B2B製造業廠商與產品創新之關係 91
貳、 B2B製造業廠商與三種產品創新策略之關係 93
第二節 研究建議 96
壹、 實務上之建議 96
貳、 後續研究之建議 97
參考文獻 98
附錄 106
附錄一、問卷內容 106		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 4081421 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100359001en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 產品創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 快速追隨者zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 聚焦利基zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 低破式創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 創新策略zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Product Innovationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Fast Seconden_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Focusen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Disruptive Innovationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Innovation Strategyen_US
dc.title (題名) 廠商選擇產品創新策略之影響因素 —以台灣B2B製造業為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Determinants of Making Product Innovation Strategies - An Empirical Study of Taiwan B2B Manufacturing Industryen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 小島敏彥（2002），新產品開發管理：企業革新的生存之道（蔣永明 譯），台北：中衛發展中心。
王濟川、郭志剛（2003），Logistic迴歸模型－方法及應用，五南圖書出版。
甘華鳴編著(2003)，新產品開發，北京市：中國國際廣播出版社。
司徒達賢、李仁芳及吳思華（1985），企業概論，教育部空中大學教學委員會。
李仁芳 (2000)，策略九說，三版一刷，臉譜出版。
朱春陽（2005），現代傳媒產品創新理論與策略，中國濟南：山東人民出版社。
何弘凱 (2012)，廠商進行突破性產品創新之影響因素─台灣製造業的實證分析，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
巫維元 (2004)，台灣中小型IC設計公司成長策略之研究，國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
林靈宏（1993），消費品類型、創新類型與新產品行銷策略關係硏究，政治大學企業管理硏究所博士論文。
施培公（1995），企業規模與技術創新，科學與科學技術管理，16(5)：33-41。
陳介玄，1998，台灣產業的社會學研究：中小企業的轉型，台北：聯經出版事業公司。
許士軍(1986)，管理學，台北：東華書局
許明德(2006)，創新及創造性破壞──經濟學大師熊彼得。「科學發展」，403期：70-75。
楊國彬(2004)，台灣國際新創事業市場進入策略、市場成長策略與績效關係之研究，第六屆全球化經營策略論壇，國立政治大學企業管理學系。
劉恆逸譯（2010），現代策略管理，台北：華泰文化。（原書Grant,R.M. (2007),Contemporary strategy analysis concepts, techniques, applications (6th ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons.）
劉常勇（1997），新產品開發程序，「劉常勇管理學習知識庫」，http://cm.nsysu.edu.tw/~cyliu/files/edu36.doc
葉比凡 (2007)，「長尾理論在中小企業的實證研究─閥類製造業之利基市場的個案研究」台南科技大學商學與管理研究所論文。
鍾志明（1999），新產品發展過程之資源配置與績效之關係：以國內製造業為例，政治大學企業管理硏究所博士論文。
鐘憲瑞，2008，產業分析精論-多元觀點與策略思維，前程文化出版。
Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of Industrial Innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40-47.
Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 521-543.
Ansoff, I.H. (1990), Implanting Strategic Management, Prentice Hall International, Ltd. London
Ansoff, H., & Stewart, J. (1967). Strategies for a technology-based business. Harvard Business Review, 45(6), 71-83.
Arrow, K.J. (1962). “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions”,in Nelson, R.R. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton University Press. Princeton
Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation, growth and survival. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 441-457.
Betz, F. (1993). Strategic technology management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bhattacharya, M., & Bloch, H. (2004). Determinants of innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 155-162.
Bonaccorsi, A., & Piccaluga, A. (1994). A Theoretical Framework for the Evaluation of University-Industry Relationships. R & D Management, 24(3), 229-247.
Booz, Allen and Hamilton (1982), New Product Management for the 1980`s. NY: Booz, Allen and Hamilton Inc.
Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive Technologies – Catching the Wave. [Article]. Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 43-53.
Brouwer, E., & Kleinknecht, A. (1999). Innovative output, and a firm`s propensity to patent. An exploration of CIS micro data. Research Policy, 28(6), 615-624.
Buisson&Silberzahn(2010). Blue Ocean or Fast-Second Innovation?A Four Breakthrough Model to Explain Sucessful Market Domination. International Journal of Innovation Management,Vol. 14, No. 3 (June 2010) pp. 359–378
Burgelman, R. A. (1991). Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research. Organization Science, 2(3), 239-262. doi: Doi 10.1287/Orsc.2.3.239
Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent`s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1-17.
Chang, Pao-Long a & Tsai ,Chien-Tzu b (2002). Finding the Niche Position-Competition Strategy of Taiwan’s IC Design Industry. a:Institute of Business and Management, National ChiaoTung University, 4F, 114 Chung-Hsiao W. Road, Sec.1 Taipei, Taiwan,b:Institute of Business and Management, National ChiaoTung University, and Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, MingHsin. . Technovation 22 (2002) 101–111 Republic of China
Institute of Technology, 1 Hsin-Hsing Road, Hsin-Fong, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator`s dilemma : when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. [Article]. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197-218. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199603)17:3<197::aid-smj804>3.0.co;2-u
Christensen, C. M., & Overdorf, M. (2000). Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 66-+.
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator`s solution : creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-+.
Christensen, C. M., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (1995). EXPLAINING THE ATTACKERS ADVANTAGE - TECHNOLOGICAL PARADIGMS, ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, AND THE VALUE NETWORK. [Article]. Research Policy, 24(2), 233-257. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00764-k
Clifford, D. K., Jr., & Cavanagh, R. E. (1985). The entrepreneurial corporation. The McKinsey Quarterly (Autumn, 1985). Retrieved online, May 15, 2007, from Business Source , Premier database.
Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996a). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 232-243.
Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996b). A reprise of size and R&D. Economic Journal, 106(437), 925-951.
Cohen, W. M., Levin, R. C., & Mowery, D. C. (1987). Firm Size and Research-and-Development Intensity - a Reexamination. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 543-565.
Cooper, R. G.(1998). Product leadership: Creating and launching superior new -products. New York : Perseus Books）
Copulsky, W. (1976). Cannibalism in Marketplace. Journal of Marketing, 40(4), 103-105.
Danneels, E. (2002). The Dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095-1121. doi: Doi 10.1002/Smj.275
Danneels, E. (2004). Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A critique and Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(4), 246-258.
Denning, S. (2005). Why the best and brightest approaches don’t solve the innovation -dilemma. Strategy & Leadership, 33(1), 4–11.
Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations - an Empirical-Analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422-1433.
Dimmick, J., & Rothenbuhler, E.(1984b). The theory of the niche: Quantifying competition among media industries. Journal of Communication, 34 , 103-119.
Dobson, Wendy,( 1997), “Crossing Borders: Multinationals in East Asia.” Pp. 223-247, in Multinationals and East Asian Integration, edited by Wendy Dobson and Chia Siow Yue. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
Drejer, A. (2002). Integrating product and technology development. International Journal of Technology Management, 24(2-3), 124-142.
Drucker, Peter F., 1985, Innovation and entrepreneurship： Practice and Principles, New York: Harper and Row
Eisenmann, T. R. (2002). The effects of CEO equity ownership and firm diversification on risk taking. Strategic Management Journal, 23(6), 513-534. doi: Doi 10.1002/Smj.236
Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & Okeefe, R. D. (1984). Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682-695.
Foster, R. N. (1986). Innovation : the attacker`s advantage. New York: Summit Books.
Fritsch, M., & Meschede, M. (2001). Product innovation, process innovation, and size. Review of Industrial Organization, 19(3), 335-350.
Gilbert, J. T. (1994). Choosing an Innovation Strategy: Theory and Practice. Business Horizons, 37(6), 16-22.
Gomes, L., & Ramaswamy, K. (1999). An Empirical Examination of the Form of The- Relationship between Multinationality and Performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 173-187.
Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006a). Disruptiveness of innovations: Measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 189-199. doi: Doi 10.1002/Smj.511
Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006b). The usefulness of measuring disruptiveness of innovations ex post in making ex ante predictions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 12-18.
Govindarajan, V., Kopalle, P. K., & Danneels, E. (2011). The Effects of Mainstream and Emerging Customer Orientations on Radical and Disruptive Innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 121-132. doi: DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00865.x
Grabowski, H. G. (1968). Determinants of Industrial Research and Development Study of Chemical, Drug, and Petroleum Industries. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 292-306.
Grinnel, J., (1904), “The origin and distribution of the chestnut-backed chickadee.” Auk, 21:364–82.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 122-128.
Hannan, M. T., Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press.
Hansen, G. S., & Hill, C. W. L. (1991). Are Institutional Investors Myopic - a Time-Series Study of 4 Technology-Driven Industries. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 1-16.
Hax, A. C. & Majluf, N. S. (1991). The strategy concept and process: A pragmatic approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural Innovation - the Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9-30.
Hewitt-Dundas, N. & S. Roper. (2000) “Strategic Re-engineering – Small Firms’ Tactics in a Mature Industry” Working Paper No. 45, Northern Ireland Economic Research Centre, Belfast.
Hill, C. W. L., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257-274.
Hippel, E. v. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hisrich, R. D., & Peters, M. P. (1978). Marketing a new product : its planning, development, and control. Menlo Park, Calif.: Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co.
Hofer, C. W. & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. Minnesota: St. Paul West Publishing.
Hoffman, K., Parejo, M., Bessant, J., & Perren, L. (1998). Small firms, R & D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review. Technovation, 18(1), 39-55.
Hung, Shiu-Wan(2006). Competitive strategies for Taiwan’s thin film transistor-liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) industry. Department of Business Administration, National Central University, Tao-Yuan 320, Taiwan.. Technology in Society 28 (2006) 349–361
Hutchinson, G.E., (1957) Concluding Remarks.Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22, pp.415–427.
Kerin, R. A., Harvey, M. G., & Rothe, J. T. (1978). Cannibalism and New Product Development. Business Horizons, 21(5), 25-31.
Kim, WC& R Mauborgne (2004). Blue Ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82 (10), 76–85.
Koberg, C., Detienne, D. and Heppard, K. (2003) An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, 21–45.
Kotler, P., 1999. Kotler on marketing: how to create, win and dominate markets. London: The Free Press.
Kotler, P. (2002). Marketing Management, 9th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kotler, P. & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing management (12th ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Leonardbarton, D. (1992). Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities - a Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125.
Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial-Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity(3), 783-831.
Levitt, T. (1966). Innovative Imitation. Harvard Business Review, 44(5), 63-70.
Lieberman, M. B. and D. B. Montgomery (1988).First-mover advantages’, Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 9, pp. 41–58
Luecke, R. (2003) Managing Change and Transition,Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Marquis, D. G. 1972. The anatomy of successful innovation. Managing Advancing Technology, 1:35-48.
Marquish, D.G. 1982. The anatomy of successful innovation. Winthrop Publisher, Cambridge.
Marsh, D. and Oxley, L. (2005) Modelling innovation activity in the New Zealand biotechnology sector. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 69: 103-112.
Miles, R., Snow, C., Meyer, A., & Coleman, J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546-562.
Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in Strategy Formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934-948.
Moriarty, R. T., & Kosnik, T. J. (1989). High-Tech Marketing - Concepts, Continuity, and Change. Sloan Management Review, 30(4), 7-17.
Myers, D. R., Sumpter, C. W., Walsh, S. T., & Kirchhoff, B. A. (2002). A practitioner`s view: Evolutionary stages of disruptive technologies. Ieee Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(4), 322-329. doi: Doi 10.1109/Tem.2002.807295
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Oerlemans, L. A. G., Meeus, M. T. H., & Boekema, F. W. M. (1998). Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 89(3), 298-309.
Peeters, C., & Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. v. (2006). Economic and management perspectives on intellectual property rights. Basingstoke England New York: Palgrave Macmillan..
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York:The Free Press.
Porter, M.E. 1998a. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance,with a new introduction. New York: Free Press.
Roberts, E.B. & C.A. Berry, Entering New Business: Selecting Strategies for Success, Sloan Management Review, 3-17, 1985
Rochford and Linda. (1991)“Generating and Screening New Product Ideas”, Industrial Marketing Management, 20, pp. 67-84.
Rosenberg, J. B. (1976). Research and Market Share - Reappraisal of Schumpeter Hypothesis. Journal of Industrial Economics, 25(2), 101-112.
Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firm Size, Market-Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions. American Economic Review, 55(5), 1097-1125.
Scherer, F. M. (1970). Industrial market structure and economic performance. Chicago,: Rand McNally.
Scherer, F. M. (1980). Industrial market structure and economic performance (2d ed.). Chicago: Rand McNally College Pub. Co.
Scherer, F. M. (1982). Inter-Industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth. Review of Economics and Statistics, 64(4), 627-634.
Schmidt, G. M., & Druehl, C. T. (2008). When is a disruptive innovation disruptive? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(4), 347-369.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles; a theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process (1st ed.). New York, London,: McGraw-Hill Book Company, inc.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York, London,: Harper & Brothers.
Schumpeter, J. A., & Opie, R. (1934). The theory of economic development; an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, Mass.,: Harvard University Press.
Shankar V, Rangaswamy A, Pusateri M. Customer price sensitivity and the online medium. Working paper, 1999.
Shanklin, W. L., & Ryans, J. K. (1984). Organizing for High-Tech Marketing. Harvard Business Review, 62(6), 164-171.
Siddharthan, N. S. (1988). In-House R-and-D, Imported Technology, and Firm Size - Lessons from Indian Experience. Developing Economies, 26(3), 212-221.
Soete, L. L. G. (1979). Firm Size and Inventive Activity - Evidence Reconsidered. European Economic Review, 12(4), 319-340.
Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2002). Technological opportunism and radical technology adoption: An application to e-business. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 47-60.
Thomas, R. J. (1995). New product development: Managing and forecasting for strategic success.
Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1147-1161.
Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2005). Does R&D performance decline with firm size? - A re-examination in terms of elasticity. Research Policy, 34(6), 966-976. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.017.
Trott, P. (2005). Innovation management and new product development (3rd ed.). Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439-465.
Tushman, M. L., & Rosenkopf, L. (1992). Organizational Determinants of Technological-Change - toward a Sociology of Technological Evolution. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 311-347.
Tushman, M. & Nadler, D. (1986). Organizing for Innovation. California Management Review, 28(3), 74-92.
Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 3(6), 639-656.
Wallin, C. C., & Gilman, J. J. (1986). Determining the Optimum Level for Research-and-Development Spending. Research Management, 29(5), 19-24.
Wernefelt, B., (1984), ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180
Worley, J. S. (1961). Industrial-Research and the New Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 69(2), 183-186.		zh_TW