1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 校長真誠領導與教師組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究
A study on relationship among authentic leadership, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior
作者 徐宗盛
Hsu, Tsung Sheng
貢獻者 吳政達
Wu, Cheng Ta
徐宗盛
Hsu, Tsung Sheng
關鍵詞 真誠領導
組織承諾
組織公民行為
Authentic Leadership
Organizational Commitment
Organizational Citizenship Behavior
日期 2009
上傳時間 3-Sep-2013 11:44:13 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究旨在探討校長真誠領導與教師組織承諾、組織公民行為之關係，並探究組織承諾在真誠領導與組織公民行為之間是否具有中介變項的效果。

本研究採用問卷調查法，以非完全中學之北部地區，共有110所高中職學校教師為樣本母群體，採分層隨機抽樣，抽出800位受試者，回收有效問卷586份，所得資料分別以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析及迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料的分析與處理，以瞭解高中職教師知覺校長真誠領導與教師組織承諾、組織公民行為之現況、差異情形及其預測力。研究結論如下：

一、高中職教師對校長真誠領導之知覺現況中等，以「內化道德觀」最高。
二、高中職教師組織承諾之表現程度屬中等，以「情感性承諾」最高。
三、當前高中職教師組織公民行為之表現屬中等程度，以「對學生之公民行為」最佳。
四、性別、年齡、職務、公私立等四個背景變項在真誠領導、組織承諾、組織公民行為上有顯著差異，以「男性」、「41歲以上」、「兼任主任職務者」、與「私立學校」教師較高。
五、服務總年資及本校服務年資等二個背景變項在組織承諾與組織公民行為上有顯著差異，以服務11年以上之教師比10年以下的教師對學校產生了更高的認同感，表現相對較佳的公民行為。
六、教育背景、學歷、高中職類型等三個背景變項在真誠領導、組織承諾、組織公民行為上無顯著差異。
七、真誠領導與組織承諾對組織公民行為具顯著正相關及預測力
八、組織承諾在真誠領導與組織公民行為間具有部份中介效果

最後依據研究結果與結論，提出具體建議，以作為教育行政機關、高中職校長、以及未來研究的參考。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship among principal’s Authentic Leadership(AL) and teacher’s Organizational Commitment(OC) and Organizational citizenship behavior(OCB). Furthermore, the mediating effect of AL and OC on OCB was examined.
A survey research was conducted using a sample of high school and vocational school teachers in 7 counties/cities in Northern Taiwan, excluding the complete schools. 800 teachers from 110 schools were selected by stratified random sampling. 586 valid sample data collected was analyzed and processed with the methods of descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, multiple-regression analysis. The major findings of this study are as follows:
1.Principal’s AL is above average, “internalized moral perspective” ranks the top.
2.Teacher’s OC is above average, “affective commitment” ranks the top.
3.Teacher’s OCB is above average, “OCB-defending the individual students” ranks the top.
4.Four demographic variables, including gender, age, position, school type, show significant differences in AL, OC, OCB. Teachers who are male, older than 41, work as the chief of department, or work in private schools show higher perception of AL and higher performance of OC and OCB.
5.Two demographic variables, total serving years and serving years in present school, show significant differences in OC, OCB. Teachers with more than 11 serving years show much sense of identification and better performance of OCB.
6.Three demographic variables, including university, education, school category, show no significant differences in AL, OC, OCB.
7.AL is positively related to OC and OCB. In addition, AL has positive direct effect on OCB, OC has positive direct effect on OCB. AL has positive direct effect on OC.
8.OC does have mediating effect on AL and OCB.

Based on the results of the research, suggestions for educational administration authorities, principals and future related study are proposed.
參考文獻 壹、中文部份
丁 虹（1987）。企業文化與組織承諾之關係(未出版博士論文)。國立政治大學企業管理研究所，台北市。
王文科、王智弘（2007）教育研究法。台北市：五南。
王保進（2002）。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北市：心理。
白崇亮（1986）。組織承諾研究：理論與實證。管理評論，5，30-51。
吳明隆（2003）。SPSS統計應用學習實務。台北市：知城。
吳政達（2009）。學校組織中領導者與部屬交換關係、組織公平、組織自尊與工作滿意度對組織公民行為影響之研究。教育政策論壇，12(1)，141-161。
吳政達、湯家偉、羅清水（2007）。心理契約、組織公平、組織信任與組織公民行為結構關係之驗證：以台北地區國民中學學校組織為例。教育政策論壇，10(1)，133-159。
吳清山、林天祐（2005）。教育名詞：組織承諾。教育研究月刊，136，159。
呂旺澤（2008）。國小校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為之研究—以組織承諾為中介變項(碩士論文)。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。(096THMU4457021)
余民寧（2008）。心理與教育統計學。台北市：三民。
李茂能（2006）。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。台北市：心理。
李雯智（2008）。教師組織公民行為之評析。學校行政雙月刊，56，95-106。
林月盛（2003）。國民中學教改壓力、組織衝突、權力運用與組織承諾關係之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系，高雄市。
林淑姬（1992）。薪酬公平、程式公平與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立政治大學企業管理研究所，台北市。
林淑姬、樊景立、吳靜吉、司徒達賢（1994）。薪酬公平、程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究，管理評論，13(2)，87-108。
林鉦棽（1999）。組織承諾、工作滿意與組織公民行為之研究：各種不同理論模式之比較。中山管理評論，7(4)，1049-1073。
林鉦棽（2003）。以組織承諾及工作滿足為實徵切入分析組織公民行為與員工工作考績之結構模式比較。人力資源管理學報，3(2)，93-113。
林鉦棽、蕭淑月、何慧清（2005）。社會交換理論觀點下組織支持、組織知識分享行為與組織公民行為相關因素之研究：以信任與關係為分析切入點。人力資源管理學報，5（1），77-110。
林曉芳（2008）。統計學-SPSS之應用。台北市：鼎茂。
邱麗蓉（2003）。組織公平與組織公民行為關係之研究--以苗栗縣國民小學為例(碩士論文)。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。(091TKU00631002)
胡雅棠（2008）。教師覺知校長服務領導與教師組織公民行為的關係研究-以台南市國民中學為例(碩士論文)。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。(097NTNT5626001)。
范熾文（2002）。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所，台北市。
范熾文（2007）。教師組織承諾：概念、發展、類別及其啟示。學校行政雙月刊，50，128-144
秦夢群（2005）。教育領導新理論與研究取向之分析。教育研究月刊，136，109。
教育部統計處（2009.12.24）。高級中等學校校別資料(不含進修學校)，(990108取自http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn= 21549)
張新堂（2005）。高級中學知識管理、教師專業成長需求、與組織承諾關係之研究(博士論文)。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。（094NCCU5331006）
張瑞村（1997）。高級工業職業學校校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立政治大學教育學系，台北市。
張瑞村（2003）。職業學校教師組織承諾與教師效能關係研究。朝陽學報，8，37-69。
許文敏（2004）。高職教師之校長領導風格知覺、組織承諾知覺及公民行為知覺相關之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系，彰化縣。
許順興（2006）。臺北市國中校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班，台北市。
許道然（2002）。公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立政治大學公共行政學系，台北市。
陳怡君（2001）。職業學校校長領導行為與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。（089NCUE0037007）
陳瑞惠（2003）。私立高中教師工作價值觀、工作壓力與組織承諾之研究（碩士論文）。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。（091NCUE0331005）
陳啟東（2004）。高級職業學校校長領導型態對教師組織公民行為與學校組織績效影響之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系，彰化市。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)，管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救，管理學報，23(1)，77-98。
曾怡錦（2004）。教師工作壓力、組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究-以台南市高級職業學校為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立成功大學企業管理研究所，台南市。
黃俊傑（2005）。屏東縣國民小學內部行銷、教師組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育學系，高雄市。
黃柏勳（2004）。國民中小學校長轉型領導、學校組織氣候與教師組織公民行為關係之研究（碩士論文）。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。（092NKNU0332002）
黃國隆（1986）。中學教師的組織承諾與專業承諾。國立政治大學學報，53，55-84。
葉佳文（2006）。臺灣地區公立高中校長教學領導、教師組織承諾與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立政治大學教育研究所，台北市。
劉春榮（1993）。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與組織效能關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立政治大學教育研究所，台北市。
蔡炳坤（2006）。高中校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織效能關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立政治大學教育研究所，台北市。
蔡進雄（1993）。國民中學校長領導方式與教師組織承諾關係之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所，台北市。
鄭燿男（2002）。國中小教師的組織公民行為及其影響因素之研究----學校組織公民行為模型初構（未出版博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所，高雄市。

貳、西文部份
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior,49, 252–276.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16: 315-338. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., Walumbwa, F.O., Luthans, F., & May, D. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders’ impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801-823.
Avolio, B.J., Walumbwa, F.O., & Weber, T.J. (2009). Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions, Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449.
Baron, R. M.,&Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in Social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Becker H.S.(1960) Notes on the Concept of Commitment. The American Journal of Sociology, 66(10), 32-40 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable.
Belogolovsky, E., Somech, A. (2009) Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the boundary between in-role behavior and extra-role behavior from the perspective of teachers, principals and parents, Teaching and Teacher Education (2009), doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.032.
Bogler, R, & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 277-289.
Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 533-546.
Chen Z.X., Francesco A.M. (2003). The relationship between the three components of commitment and employee performance in China. Journal of Vocational Behavior 62, 490–510.
Cheng, Y. and Stockdale, M.S. (2003). The validity of the three-component model of organizational commitment in a Chinese context. Journal of Vocational Behavior 62, 465–489.
Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W.C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 25-44.
Cooper, C., Scandura, T. A., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2005). Looking forward but learning from our past: Potential challenges to developing authentic leadership theory and authentic leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 475-493. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.008
DiPaola, M. F., & Hoy, W. K. (2005). Organizational citizenship of faculty and achievement of high school students. High School Journal, 88(3), 35-44.
Erickson, R. J. (1995). The importance of authenticity for self and society. Symbolic Interaction, 18(2), 121–144.
Gardner, W.L., Avolio, B.J., Luthans, F., May, D.R., & Walumbwa, F.O. (2005). Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 343-372.doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003
Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology , 58, 479-514.
George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Goffee R., Jones G. (2005). Managing authenticity. Harvard Business Review, 83(12), 86-94.
Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(4), 249-270.
Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology: 382-394. London: Oxford University Press.
Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader-follower outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 373-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.002
Jeffries, G. (2009). Authentic leadership within professional services organizations. MBA thesis, University of Portsmouth.
Katz, D.(1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131-133.
Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1-26.
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D.(1994) .Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656-669.
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 26, 695-706.
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive developmental approach. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton,& R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241–261). San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences or organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory,research,and application. London: SAGE publications.
Michie, S. & Gooty, J. (2005) Values, emotions and authenticity: Will the real leader please stand up? Leadership Quarterly, 16, 441-457.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C.A. (1993). Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three-Component Conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology 78(4), 538-551.
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior 61(1), 20-52.
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L.W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee organization linkage. New York: Academic Press.
Morrow, P. C. (1993). The theory and measurement of work commitment. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press Inc.
Oplatka, I. (2006). Going beyond role expectations: Toward an understanding of the determinants and components of teacher organizational citizenship behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 385-423.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good solider syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexing Books.
Organ, D. W. & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48 ,775-802.
Park, S., Henkin, A.B. & Egley, R. (2005). Teacher team commitment, teamwork and trust:exploring association. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(5), 462-79.
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future Research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133-151.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bachrach, D. G.(2000). Organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulion, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of applied psychology, 59, 603-609.
Randall, D. M. (1987). Commitment and the organization: The organizational man revisited. Academy of Management Review, 12, 460-471.
Reyes, P. (1992). Preliminary models of teacher organizational commitment : Implications for restructuring the workplace. Madison, WI : Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 349680).
Robinson, S. L. & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civil virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 289-298.
Salancik, G.R. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B. W. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior .Chicago: St Clair.
Shamir, B., & Eilam, G. (2005). What`s your story? A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 395-417. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.005
Smith, C. A. & Organ, D. W. & Near, P. J. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: It is nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653-663.
Somech, A. (2002). Explicating the complexity of participative management: aninvestigation of multiple dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 341-371.
Somech, A, & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 555-577.
Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: the relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers` extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 649-659.
Somech, A., & Ron, I. (2007). Promoting organizational citizenship behavior in schools: The impact of individual and organizational characteristics. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 38-66.
Sparrowe, R. T. (2005). Authentic leadership and the narrative self. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 419-439.
Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 46-56.
Vey, M. A., & Campbell, J. P. (2004). In-role or extra-role organizational citizenship behavior: which are we measuring? Human Performance, 17(1),119-135.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., Wernsing, T.S., & Peterson, S.J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Oke, A.(2009).Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) doi: 10.1002/job.653.
Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organization: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7, 418-428. Published by: Academy of Management Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/257334 Accessed: 19/12/2009 11:19.
Williams, L. J. & Anderson, S. E.(1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behavior. Journal of Management,17(3), 601-617.
Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Schriesheim, C. A., & Dansereau, F. (2008). Authentic leadership and positive organizational behavior: A meso, multi-level perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 693–707.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
96911019
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096911019
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳政達zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wu, Cheng Taen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 徐宗盛zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsu, Tsung Shengen_US
dc.creator (作者) 徐宗盛zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Tsung Shengen_US
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 3-Sep-2013 11:44:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-Sep-2013 11:44:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Sep-2013 11:44:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0096911019en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59654-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 學校行政碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96911019zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在探討校長真誠領導與教師組織承諾、組織公民行為之關係，並探究組織承諾在真誠領導與組織公民行為之間是否具有中介變項的效果。

本研究採用問卷調查法，以非完全中學之北部地區，共有110所高中職學校教師為樣本母群體，採分層隨機抽樣，抽出800位受試者，回收有效問卷586份，所得資料分別以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析及迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料的分析與處理，以瞭解高中職教師知覺校長真誠領導與教師組織承諾、組織公民行為之現況、差異情形及其預測力。研究結論如下：

一、高中職教師對校長真誠領導之知覺現況中等，以「內化道德觀」最高。
二、高中職教師組織承諾之表現程度屬中等，以「情感性承諾」最高。
三、當前高中職教師組織公民行為之表現屬中等程度，以「對學生之公民行為」最佳。
四、性別、年齡、職務、公私立等四個背景變項在真誠領導、組織承諾、組織公民行為上有顯著差異，以「男性」、「41歲以上」、「兼任主任職務者」、與「私立學校」教師較高。
五、服務總年資及本校服務年資等二個背景變項在組織承諾與組織公民行為上有顯著差異，以服務11年以上之教師比10年以下的教師對學校產生了更高的認同感，表現相對較佳的公民行為。
六、教育背景、學歷、高中職類型等三個背景變項在真誠領導、組織承諾、組織公民行為上無顯著差異。
七、真誠領導與組織承諾對組織公民行為具顯著正相關及預測力
八、組織承諾在真誠領導與組織公民行為間具有部份中介效果

最後依據研究結果與結論，提出具體建議，以作為教育行政機關、高中職校長、以及未來研究的參考。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship among principal’s Authentic Leadership(AL) and teacher’s Organizational Commitment(OC) and Organizational citizenship behavior(OCB). Furthermore, the mediating effect of AL and OC on OCB was examined.
A survey research was conducted using a sample of high school and vocational school teachers in 7 counties/cities in Northern Taiwan, excluding the complete schools. 800 teachers from 110 schools were selected by stratified random sampling. 586 valid sample data collected was analyzed and processed with the methods of descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, multiple-regression analysis. The major findings of this study are as follows:
1.Principal’s AL is above average, “internalized moral perspective” ranks the top.
2.Teacher’s OC is above average, “affective commitment” ranks the top.
3.Teacher’s OCB is above average, “OCB-defending the individual students” ranks the top.
4.Four demographic variables, including gender, age, position, school type, show significant differences in AL, OC, OCB. Teachers who are male, older than 41, work as the chief of department, or work in private schools show higher perception of AL and higher performance of OC and OCB.
5.Two demographic variables, total serving years and serving years in present school, show significant differences in OC, OCB. Teachers with more than 11 serving years show much sense of identification and better performance of OCB.
6.Three demographic variables, including university, education, school category, show no significant differences in AL, OC, OCB.
7.AL is positively related to OC and OCB. In addition, AL has positive direct effect on OCB, OC has positive direct effect on OCB. AL has positive direct effect on OC.
8.OC does have mediating effect on AL and OCB.

Based on the results of the research, suggestions for educational administration authorities, principals and future related study are proposed.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒 論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 待答問題 5
第三節 名詞釋義 6
第四節 研究範圍與限制 7
第二章 文獻探討 11
第一節 真誠領導理論 11
第二節 組織承諾理論與相關研究 23
第三節 教師組織公民行為理論與相關研究 38
第四節 真誠領導與組織承諾、組織公民行為之關係研究 51
第三章 研究設計與實施 55
第一節 研究架構與變項 55
第二節 研究假設 58
第三節 研究對象 59
第四節 研究方法與工具 63
第五節 資料處理與分析 76
第六節 研究程序 77
第四章 研究結果分析與討論 79
第一節 校長真誠領導、教師組織承諾與組織公民行為之現況分析 79
第二節 不同背景變項之校長真誠領導差異分析 81
第三節 不同背景變項之教師組織承諾差異分析 94
第四節 不同背景變項之教師組織公民行為差異分析 106
第五節 真誠領導對組織承諾之預測力分析 120
第六節 真誠領導對組織公民行為之預測力分析 124
第七節 組織承諾對組織公民行為之預測力分析 129
第八節 組織承諾在真誠領導與組織公民行為間之效果驗證 134
第五章 結論與建議 137
第一節 研究發現 137
第二節 結論 137
第三節 建議 150
參考文獻 155
附錄一 問卷授權書 163
附錄二 真誠領導與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係【預試問卷】 164
附錄三 真誠領導與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係【正式問卷】 168		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 4464477 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096911019en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 真誠領導zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 組織承諾zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 組織公民行為zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Authentic Leadershipen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Organizational Commitmenten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Organizational Citizenship Behavioren_US
dc.title (題名) 校長真誠領導與教師組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A study on relationship among authentic leadership, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavioren_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、中文部份
丁 虹（1987）。企業文化與組織承諾之關係(未出版博士論文)。國立政治大學企業管理研究所，台北市。
王文科、王智弘（2007）教育研究法。台北市：五南。
王保進（2002）。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北市：心理。
白崇亮（1986）。組織承諾研究：理論與實證。管理評論，5，30-51。
吳明隆（2003）。SPSS統計應用學習實務。台北市：知城。
吳政達（2009）。學校組織中領導者與部屬交換關係、組織公平、組織自尊與工作滿意度對組織公民行為影響之研究。教育政策論壇，12(1)，141-161。
吳政達、湯家偉、羅清水（2007）。心理契約、組織公平、組織信任與組織公民行為結構關係之驗證：以台北地區國民中學學校組織為例。教育政策論壇，10(1)，133-159。
吳清山、林天祐（2005）。教育名詞：組織承諾。教育研究月刊，136，159。
呂旺澤（2008）。國小校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為之研究—以組織承諾為中介變項(碩士論文)。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。(096THMU4457021)
余民寧（2008）。心理與教育統計學。台北市：三民。
李茂能（2006）。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。台北市：心理。
李雯智（2008）。教師組織公民行為之評析。學校行政雙月刊，56，95-106。
林月盛（2003）。國民中學教改壓力、組織衝突、權力運用與組織承諾關係之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系，高雄市。
林淑姬（1992）。薪酬公平、程式公平與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立政治大學企業管理研究所，台北市。
林淑姬、樊景立、吳靜吉、司徒達賢（1994）。薪酬公平、程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究，管理評論，13(2)，87-108。
林鉦棽（1999）。組織承諾、工作滿意與組織公民行為之研究：各種不同理論模式之比較。中山管理評論，7(4)，1049-1073。
林鉦棽（2003）。以組織承諾及工作滿足為實徵切入分析組織公民行為與員工工作考績之結構模式比較。人力資源管理學報，3(2)，93-113。
林鉦棽、蕭淑月、何慧清（2005）。社會交換理論觀點下組織支持、組織知識分享行為與組織公民行為相關因素之研究：以信任與關係為分析切入點。人力資源管理學報，5（1），77-110。
林曉芳（2008）。統計學-SPSS之應用。台北市：鼎茂。
邱麗蓉（2003）。組織公平與組織公民行為關係之研究--以苗栗縣國民小學為例(碩士論文)。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。(091TKU00631002)
胡雅棠（2008）。教師覺知校長服務領導與教師組織公民行為的關係研究-以台南市國民中學為例(碩士論文)。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。(097NTNT5626001)。
范熾文（2002）。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所，台北市。
范熾文（2007）。教師組織承諾：概念、發展、類別及其啟示。學校行政雙月刊，50，128-144
秦夢群（2005）。教育領導新理論與研究取向之分析。教育研究月刊，136，109。
教育部統計處（2009.12.24）。高級中等學校校別資料(不含進修學校)，(990108取自http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn= 21549)
張新堂（2005）。高級中學知識管理、教師專業成長需求、與組織承諾關係之研究(博士論文)。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。（094NCCU5331006）
張瑞村（1997）。高級工業職業學校校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立政治大學教育學系，台北市。
張瑞村（2003）。職業學校教師組織承諾與教師效能關係研究。朝陽學報，8，37-69。
許文敏（2004）。高職教師之校長領導風格知覺、組織承諾知覺及公民行為知覺相關之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系，彰化縣。
許順興（2006）。臺北市國中校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班，台北市。
許道然（2002）。公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立政治大學公共行政學系，台北市。
陳怡君（2001）。職業學校校長領導行為與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。（089NCUE0037007）
陳瑞惠（2003）。私立高中教師工作價值觀、工作壓力與組織承諾之研究（碩士論文）。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。（091NCUE0331005）
陳啟東（2004）。高級職業學校校長領導型態對教師組織公民行為與學校組織績效影響之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系，彰化市。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)，管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救，管理學報，23(1)，77-98。
曾怡錦（2004）。教師工作壓力、組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究-以台南市高級職業學校為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立成功大學企業管理研究所，台南市。
黃俊傑（2005）。屏東縣國民小學內部行銷、教師組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育學系，高雄市。
黃柏勳（2004）。國民中小學校長轉型領導、學校組織氣候與教師組織公民行為關係之研究（碩士論文）。取自全國碩博士論文資訊網。（092NKNU0332002）
黃國隆（1986）。中學教師的組織承諾與專業承諾。國立政治大學學報，53，55-84。
葉佳文（2006）。臺灣地區公立高中校長教學領導、教師組織承諾與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立政治大學教育研究所，台北市。
劉春榮（1993）。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與組織效能關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立政治大學教育研究所，台北市。
蔡炳坤（2006）。高中校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織效能關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立政治大學教育研究所，台北市。
蔡進雄（1993）。國民中學校長領導方式與教師組織承諾關係之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所，台北市。
鄭燿男（2002）。國中小教師的組織公民行為及其影響因素之研究----學校組織公民行為模型初構（未出版博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所，高雄市。

貳、西文部份
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior,49, 252–276.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16: 315-338. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., Walumbwa, F.O., Luthans, F., & May, D. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders’ impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801-823.
Avolio, B.J., Walumbwa, F.O., & Weber, T.J. (2009). Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions, Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449.
Baron, R. M.,&Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in Social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Becker H.S.(1960) Notes on the Concept of Commitment. The American Journal of Sociology, 66(10), 32-40 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable.
Belogolovsky, E., Somech, A. (2009) Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the boundary between in-role behavior and extra-role behavior from the perspective of teachers, principals and parents, Teaching and Teacher Education (2009), doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.032.
Bogler, R, & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 277-289.
Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 533-546.
Chen Z.X., Francesco A.M. (2003). The relationship between the three components of commitment and employee performance in China. Journal of Vocational Behavior 62, 490–510.
Cheng, Y. and Stockdale, M.S. (2003). The validity of the three-component model of organizational commitment in a Chinese context. Journal of Vocational Behavior 62, 465–489.
Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W.C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 25-44.
Cooper, C., Scandura, T. A., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2005). Looking forward but learning from our past: Potential challenges to developing authentic leadership theory and authentic leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 475-493. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.008
DiPaola, M. F., & Hoy, W. K. (2005). Organizational citizenship of faculty and achievement of high school students. High School Journal, 88(3), 35-44.
Erickson, R. J. (1995). The importance of authenticity for self and society. Symbolic Interaction, 18(2), 121–144.
Gardner, W.L., Avolio, B.J., Luthans, F., May, D.R., & Walumbwa, F.O. (2005). Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 343-372.doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003
Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology , 58, 479-514.
George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Goffee R., Jones G. (2005). Managing authenticity. Harvard Business Review, 83(12), 86-94.
Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(4), 249-270.
Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology: 382-394. London: Oxford University Press.
Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader-follower outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 373-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.002
Jeffries, G. (2009). Authentic leadership within professional services organizations. MBA thesis, University of Portsmouth.
Katz, D.(1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131-133.
Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1-26.
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D.(1994) .Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656-669.
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 26, 695-706.
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive developmental approach. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton,& R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241–261). San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences or organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory,research,and application. London: SAGE publications.
Michie, S. & Gooty, J. (2005) Values, emotions and authenticity: Will the real leader please stand up? Leadership Quarterly, 16, 441-457.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C.A. (1993). Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three-Component Conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology 78(4), 538-551.
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior 61(1), 20-52.
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L.W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee organization linkage. New York: Academic Press.
Morrow, P. C. (1993). The theory and measurement of work commitment. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press Inc.
Oplatka, I. (2006). Going beyond role expectations: Toward an understanding of the determinants and components of teacher organizational citizenship behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 385-423.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good solider syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexing Books.
Organ, D. W. & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48 ,775-802.
Park, S., Henkin, A.B. & Egley, R. (2005). Teacher team commitment, teamwork and trust:exploring association. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(5), 462-79.
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future Research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133-151.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bachrach, D. G.(2000). Organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulion, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of applied psychology, 59, 603-609.
Randall, D. M. (1987). Commitment and the organization: The organizational man revisited. Academy of Management Review, 12, 460-471.
Reyes, P. (1992). Preliminary models of teacher organizational commitment : Implications for restructuring the workplace. Madison, WI : Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 349680).
Robinson, S. L. & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civil virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 289-298.
Salancik, G.R. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B. W. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior .Chicago: St Clair.
Shamir, B., & Eilam, G. (2005). What`s your story? A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 395-417. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.005
Smith, C. A. & Organ, D. W. & Near, P. J. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: It is nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653-663.
Somech, A. (2002). Explicating the complexity of participative management: aninvestigation of multiple dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 341-371.
Somech, A, & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 555-577.
Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: the relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers` extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 649-659.
Somech, A., & Ron, I. (2007). Promoting organizational citizenship behavior in schools: The impact of individual and organizational characteristics. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 38-66.
Sparrowe, R. T. (2005). Authentic leadership and the narrative self. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 419-439.
Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 46-56.
Vey, M. A., & Campbell, J. P. (2004). In-role or extra-role organizational citizenship behavior: which are we measuring? Human Performance, 17(1),119-135.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., Wernsing, T.S., & Peterson, S.J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Oke, A.(2009).Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) doi: 10.1002/job.653.
Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organization: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7, 418-428. Published by: Academy of Management Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/257334 Accessed: 19/12/2009 11:19.
Williams, L. J. & Anderson, S. E.(1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behavior. Journal of Management,17(3), 601-617.
Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Schriesheim, C. A., & Dansereau, F. (2008). Authentic leadership and positive organizational behavior: A meso, multi-level perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 693–707.		zh_TW