學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 台灣製造業對外直接投資進入模式之決定因素
The determinants of foreign direct investment entry modes in taiwan manufacturing industry作者 李文煉 貢獻者 翁永和
李文煉關鍵詞 對外直接投資
進入模式
合資對象
台灣製造業日期 2009 上傳時間 3-Sep-2013 16:04:43 (UTC+8) 摘要 廠商在決定對外直接投資後，即必須做進入模式的選擇，本研究主要目的在探討影響進入模式之決定因素，並以台灣地區從事對外直接投資之製造業為研究對象，作實證分析。本研究第一階段先以probit 模型探討獨資及合資的決策，研究結果發現，行業類別、技術密集度、進貨來源比率、廠商規模、投資地區、投資動機、技術來源及對外投資時間等因素是顯著影響台灣製造業進入模式的重要因素。第二階段再以多元羅吉特模型探討與台商、地主國及外商等三種合資對象的選擇，研究結果發現，行業類別、進貨來源比率、投資地區、投資動機、技術來源、勞力密集度及對外投資時間等，是顯著影響台灣製造業選擇合資對象的重要因素。在檢驗不同理論對台灣製造業選擇進入模式的解釋能力方面，實證發現僅策略行為理論較缺乏解釋能力。 參考文獻 李文瑞（2000），「台商赴東南亞投資進入模式決定因素之研究」，《亞太管理評論》，5，221-236。吳青松（1999），《國際企業管理－理論與實務》，台北市，智勝文化事業有限公司。高長、陳威如（1998），「台商赴大陸投資所有權進入模式決定因素的分析」，《管理學報》，15，393-418。陳忠榮、楊志海（1999），「台灣對外直接投資的決定因素－擴張型與防禦型的比較」，《經濟論文叢刊》，27，215-240。曹為忠、詹雪蘭、李文瑞、陳旭銘（2002），「進入模式、產業環境、以及廠商特性對廠商海外市場經營績效之影響」，《企業管理學報》，54，1-32。趙義隆、于卓民、謝文雀（1998），《國際企業管理》，台北縣，空中大學。Beamish, P. W. (1985), “The characteristics of joint ventures in developed and developing countries”. Columbia Journal of World Business, 20, 13-19.Blodgett, L. L. (1991), “Partner Contribution As Predictors of Equity Share in International Joint Ventures,” Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 63-78.Casson, M. (1995), The Organization of International Business, Studies in the Economics of Trust: Volume Two, Aldershot: Elgar.Caves, R. E. (1982), Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Cheng Y. M. (2006), “Determinants of FDI Mode Choice: Acquisition, Brownfield, and Greenfield Entry in Foreign Markets,” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences Revue canadienne des Sciences de l’administrstion, 23, 202-220.Davidson, W. H. (1980), “The Location of Foreign Direct Investment Activity: Country Characteristics and Experience Effect,” Journal of International Business Studies, 11, 9-22.Dubin, M. (1975), Foreign Acquisitions and the Spread of the Multinational firm, D.B.A. thesis, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Dunning, J. H. (1977), “Trade Location of Economic Activity, and the Multinational Firm ”The International Allocation of Economic Activity, London.Fagre, N. and L. T. Wells (1982),“Bargaining Power of Multinationals and Host Governments,” Journal of International Business Studies, 13, 9-23.Gatignon, H. and E. Anderson (1986), “Mode of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Costs Analysis and Propositions,” Journal of International Business Studies, 17, 1-26.Gatignon, H. and E. Anderson (1988), “The multinational Corporation’s Degree of Control Over Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation,” Journal of Low, Economics, and Organization, 4, 305-336.Gatling, R. (1993), Foreign Investment in Eastern Europe:Corporate Strategies and Experience, Research Report written in association with Creditanstslt Bankverein, London: Economist Intelligence Unit.Gomes-Casseres, B. (1989), “Firm Ownership Preferences and Host Government Restrictions: An Integrated Approach,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 11, 1-25.Gomes-Casseres, B. (1990), “Ownership structures of foreign subsidiaries,” Journal of International Business Studies, 21), 1-22.Hennart, J. F. (1988), “A Transaction Cost Theory of Equity Joint Ventures,”Strategic Management Science, 9, 361-374.Hennart, J. F. (1991), “The Transaction Cost Theory of Joint-Ventures: an Empirical Study of Japanese Subsidiaries in the United States,”Management Science, 37, 483-497.Hennart, J. F. and Y. R. Park (1993),“Greenfield vs. Acquisition; The Strategy of Japanese Investors in the United States,”Management Science, 39, 1054-1070.Hill, C. W. L. (1997), International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace, (2nd ed.), New York, IRWIN.Jemis, D. B. and S. B. Stikin (1986), “Corporate Acquisition: A Process Perspective,”Academy of Management Review, 11, 145-163.Kogut, B. and H. Singh (1987), “Entering the Unite States by Joint Venture: Industry Structure and Competitive Rivalry,” in F. Contractor and P. Lorange (eds): Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexington, MA: Lexington Press. Kogut, B. and H. Singh (1988), “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode,” Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 411-432.Kojima, K. (1978), Direct Foreign Investment, New York: Pracger.Lecraw, D. J. (1984), “Bargaining power, ownership, and profitability of transactional corporations in developing countries,” Journal of International Business Studies, 15, 27-43. Meyer K. (1998), “From of Ownership and Mode of Entry,”Direct Investment in Economies in Transition, 213-244, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Nitsch, D., P. Beamish, and S. Makino (1996), “Entry Mode and Performance of Japanese FDI in Western Europe,”Management International Review, 36, 27-43.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD (1994): Assessing Investment Opportunities in Economies in Transition, Paris: OECD.Pan, Y., S. Li, and D. K. Tse (1999), “The Impact of Order and Model of Market Entry on Profitability and Market Share,” Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 81-104.Pan, Y. and D. K. Tse (2000),“The Hierarchical Model of Market Entry Modes,”Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 535-544.Parkhe, A. (1993),“Messy Research, Methodological Predispositions, and Theory Development in International Joint Ventures, ”The Academy of Management Review, 18, 227-268.Pholips J. and K. Woolfson (1991), “Franco-German Banking Link-Up Ignore Skeptics,” The European, 12, 20.Siripaisalpipat, P. and Y. Hasui (2000),“Firm-specific advantages, entry mode, and performance of Japanese FDI in Thailand,”Japan and World Economy, 12, 33-48.Stopford, J. and L. Wells (1972), Managing the Multinational Enterprise; Organization of the Firms and Ownership of the Subsidiaries, London: LongmanSvensson, R. (1996), Foreign Activities of Swedish Multinational Corporations, Economic Studies 25, Department of Economics, Uppsala University.Vachani, S. (1995), “Enhancing the Obsolescing Bargain Theory: A Longitudinal Study of Foreign Ownership of U.S. and European Multinationals,” Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 159-180.Wind, Y. and H. Perlmutter (1977),“On the Identification of Frontier Issues in International Marketing,”Columbia Journal of World Business, winter, 131-139. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
97921049
98資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097921049 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 翁永和 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 李文煉 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 李文煉 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2009 en_US dc.date.accessioned 3-Sep-2013 16:04:43 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 3-Sep-2013 16:04:43 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Sep-2013 16:04:43 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097921049 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59845 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 行政管理碩士學程 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 97921049 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 98 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 廠商在決定對外直接投資後，即必須做進入模式的選擇，本研究主要目的在探討影響進入模式之決定因素，並以台灣地區從事對外直接投資之製造業為研究對象，作實證分析。本研究第一階段先以probit 模型探討獨資及合資的決策，研究結果發現，行業類別、技術密集度、進貨來源比率、廠商規模、投資地區、投資動機、技術來源及對外投資時間等因素是顯著影響台灣製造業進入模式的重要因素。第二階段再以多元羅吉特模型探討與台商、地主國及外商等三種合資對象的選擇，研究結果發現，行業類別、進貨來源比率、投資地區、投資動機、技術來源、勞力密集度及對外投資時間等，是顯著影響台灣製造業選擇合資對象的重要因素。在檢驗不同理論對台灣製造業選擇進入模式的解釋能力方面，實證發現僅策略行為理論較缺乏解釋能力。 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………… 1第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………… 1第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………… 2第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………… 3第一節 對外直接投資………………………………………………… 3第二節 進入模式……………………………………………………… 5第三章 台灣廠商對外直接投資進入模式現況分析…………………… 11第四章 實證模型設定…………………………………………………… 17第一節 研究變數定義………………………………………………… 17第二節 估計模型……………………………………………………… 21第五章 實證研究……………………………………………………… 23第一節 第一階段實證分析…………………………………………… 25第二節 第一階段的邊際效果分析…………………………………… 30第三節 第二階段實證分析…………………………………………… 33第四節 第二階段的邊際效果分析…………………………………… 38第六章 結論與建議…………………………………………………… 42第一節 結論…………………………………………………………… 42第二節 建議…………………………………………………………… 44參考文獻…………………………………………………………………… 45附錄………………………………………………………………………… 49 zh_TW dc.format.extent 359286 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097921049 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 對外直接投資 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 進入模式 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 合資對象 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 台灣製造業 zh_TW dc.title (題名) 台灣製造業對外直接投資進入模式之決定因素 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The determinants of foreign direct investment entry modes in taiwan manufacturing industry en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李文瑞（2000），「台商赴東南亞投資進入模式決定因素之研究」，《亞太管理評論》，5，221-236。吳青松（1999），《國際企業管理－理論與實務》，台北市，智勝文化事業有限公司。高長、陳威如（1998），「台商赴大陸投資所有權進入模式決定因素的分析」，《管理學報》，15，393-418。陳忠榮、楊志海（1999），「台灣對外直接投資的決定因素－擴張型與防禦型的比較」，《經濟論文叢刊》，27，215-240。曹為忠、詹雪蘭、李文瑞、陳旭銘（2002），「進入模式、產業環境、以及廠商特性對廠商海外市場經營績效之影響」，《企業管理學報》，54，1-32。趙義隆、于卓民、謝文雀（1998），《國際企業管理》，台北縣，空中大學。Beamish, P. W. (1985), “The characteristics of joint ventures in developed and developing countries”. Columbia Journal of World Business, 20, 13-19.Blodgett, L. L. (1991), “Partner Contribution As Predictors of Equity Share in International Joint Ventures,” Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 63-78.Casson, M. (1995), The Organization of International Business, Studies in the Economics of Trust: Volume Two, Aldershot: Elgar.Caves, R. E. (1982), Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Cheng Y. M. (2006), “Determinants of FDI Mode Choice: Acquisition, Brownfield, and Greenfield Entry in Foreign Markets,” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences Revue canadienne des Sciences de l’administrstion, 23, 202-220.Davidson, W. H. (1980), “The Location of Foreign Direct Investment Activity: Country Characteristics and Experience Effect,” Journal of International Business Studies, 11, 9-22.Dubin, M. (1975), Foreign Acquisitions and the Spread of the Multinational firm, D.B.A. thesis, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Dunning, J. H. (1977), “Trade Location of Economic Activity, and the Multinational Firm ”The International Allocation of Economic Activity, London.Fagre, N. and L. T. Wells (1982),“Bargaining Power of Multinationals and Host Governments,” Journal of International Business Studies, 13, 9-23.Gatignon, H. and E. Anderson (1986), “Mode of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Costs Analysis and Propositions,” Journal of International Business Studies, 17, 1-26.Gatignon, H. and E. Anderson (1988), “The multinational Corporation’s Degree of Control Over Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation,” Journal of Low, Economics, and Organization, 4, 305-336.Gatling, R. (1993), Foreign Investment in Eastern Europe:Corporate Strategies and Experience, Research Report written in association with Creditanstslt Bankverein, London: Economist Intelligence Unit.Gomes-Casseres, B. (1989), “Firm Ownership Preferences and Host Government Restrictions: An Integrated Approach,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 11, 1-25.Gomes-Casseres, B. (1990), “Ownership structures of foreign subsidiaries,” Journal of International Business Studies, 21), 1-22.Hennart, J. F. (1988), “A Transaction Cost Theory of Equity Joint Ventures,”Strategic Management Science, 9, 361-374.Hennart, J. F. (1991), “The Transaction Cost Theory of Joint-Ventures: an Empirical Study of Japanese Subsidiaries in the United States,”Management Science, 37, 483-497.Hennart, J. F. and Y. R. Park (1993),“Greenfield vs. Acquisition; The Strategy of Japanese Investors in the United States,”Management Science, 39, 1054-1070.Hill, C. W. L. (1997), International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace, (2nd ed.), New York, IRWIN.Jemis, D. B. and S. B. Stikin (1986), “Corporate Acquisition: A Process Perspective,”Academy of Management Review, 11, 145-163.Kogut, B. and H. Singh (1987), “Entering the Unite States by Joint Venture: Industry Structure and Competitive Rivalry,” in F. Contractor and P. Lorange (eds): Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexington, MA: Lexington Press. Kogut, B. and H. Singh (1988), “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode,” Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 411-432.Kojima, K. (1978), Direct Foreign Investment, New York: Pracger.Lecraw, D. J. (1984), “Bargaining power, ownership, and profitability of transactional corporations in developing countries,” Journal of International Business Studies, 15, 27-43. Meyer K. (1998), “From of Ownership and Mode of Entry,”Direct Investment in Economies in Transition, 213-244, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Nitsch, D., P. Beamish, and S. Makino (1996), “Entry Mode and Performance of Japanese FDI in Western Europe,”Management International Review, 36, 27-43.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD (1994): Assessing Investment Opportunities in Economies in Transition, Paris: OECD.Pan, Y., S. Li, and D. K. Tse (1999), “The Impact of Order and Model of Market Entry on Profitability and Market Share,” Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 81-104.Pan, Y. and D. K. Tse (2000),“The Hierarchical Model of Market Entry Modes,”Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 535-544.Parkhe, A. (1993),“Messy Research, Methodological Predispositions, and Theory Development in International Joint Ventures, ”The Academy of Management Review, 18, 227-268.Pholips J. and K. Woolfson (1991), “Franco-German Banking Link-Up Ignore Skeptics,” The European, 12, 20.Siripaisalpipat, P. and Y. Hasui (2000),“Firm-specific advantages, entry mode, and performance of Japanese FDI in Thailand,”Japan and World Economy, 12, 33-48.Stopford, J. and L. Wells (1972), Managing the Multinational Enterprise; Organization of the Firms and Ownership of the Subsidiaries, London: LongmanSvensson, R. (1996), Foreign Activities of Swedish Multinational Corporations, Economic Studies 25, Department of Economics, Uppsala University.Vachani, S. (1995), “Enhancing the Obsolescing Bargain Theory: A Longitudinal Study of Foreign Ownership of U.S. and European Multinationals,” Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 159-180.Wind, Y. and H. Perlmutter (1977),“On the Identification of Frontier Issues in International Marketing,”Columbia Journal of World Business, winter, 131-139. zh_TW
