1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Liberal Arts
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 具知識建構工具支援之數位圖書館 在網路學習社群經營之研究
The study of building web-based learning community based on digital library with support of knowledge construction tool
作者 林憶珊
Lin, Yi Shan
貢獻者 陳志銘
Chen, Chih Ming
林憶珊
Lin, Yi Shan
關鍵詞 數位圖書館
網路學習社群
知識建構
digital library (DL)
web-based learning community
knowledge construction
日期 2009
上傳時間 4-Sep-2013 16:40:39 (UTC+8)
摘要 網路環境的轉變與網路社群網站的盛行，不但改變網路使用者的使用習慣，亦是發揮學習社群力量的時機。數位圖書館自發展以來，累積優質而豐富的典藏內容，強調多元讀者服務，並精進個人化服務與檢索功能，但針對讀者學習社群的經營則顯得不足且忽略發展可以輔助學習社群經營的機制，致使數位圖書館無法成為讀者長期駐足，甚至留下學習心得、交互分享學習成果及良性互動討論數位圖書館典藏內容的園地。
本研究以「提升使用者駐足於學習社群平台之意願」與「促進數位圖書館資源之利用」為目標，促成一個基於數位圖書館典藏內容為經營基礎之學習社群。發展有效的社群經營機制，營造學習者願意參與、交互分享學習成果及良性互動討論的優質學習環境，並支援數位圖書館資源的有效利用。
利用知識論壇(Knoewledge Forum)作為社群學習的討論平台，本研究透過準實驗研究法，從數位圖書館資源與學習社群之結合所促成的學習活動中，探討學習社群的互動歷程與知識建構情況。透過統計分析歸結出適合於發展有效輔助數位圖書館資源應用之學習社群經營工具與機制，提高學習社群的參與以及數位圖書館資源支援學習的機會與價值。
研究結果顯示：1. 研究活動歷程中，相較各階段互動機制，推薦機制與激勵機制對於學習社群參與具有較明顯的助益；2. 數位圖書館資源融入學習社群，有助主題資源與概念多面向的知識討論與擴張；3. 數位圖書館資源融入學習社群過程中，領域專家引導有助於資源的利用。
As the rapid changes of on-line environment and prevalence of social networking websites, not only has the on-line users’ behavior changed, but also it implies the perfect time to develop better learning community with the advantages of technology innovation. Taking the Digital library (DL) as example, it has been developed into the perfect portal with accumulation of high quality information with and reader-centered services, including personalized information services and searching functions. However, comparing with other social networking sites, DL has been considered less value on building on readers’ learning communities, or not suitable sites to share information or communicate with other readers.

The purpose of the study is to promote people cohesiveness at the web-based learning community platform and to improve the usage of digital library resources. Based on the advantage of web-based learning communities, the study analyzes the possible models and outcomes for learning communities on DL. In addition, the study attempts to survey ways to make better environment for readers actively interacting with others more; moreover, utilizing the digital libraries to construct knowledge.

Taking the “Knowledge Forum” as web-based learning community platform, the study adopted the quasi-experimental methodology to investigate the social networks and knowledge construction behavior of the learning community on DL. The statistics analysis scheme was employed to evaluate the specific model of community building for web-based learning, and its effectiveness for promoting DL as learning support.

The results of this study are concluded as following. First, compared with other methods for community building, the recommendation and motivation system are more beneficial for participation on web-based learning community. Second, integrating the resources of DL with web-based learning community is helpful for the diversity of subject topics and concepts in on-line discussion. Third, academic field experts for subject matter discussion are helpful for better DL resources utilization during the process of web-based learning.
參考文獻 一、英文文獻
Abram,Stephen (2008).Social Libraries: The Librarian 2.0 Phenomenon. Library Resources & Technical Services, 52(2),19-22
Ackland, Robert (2009). Social Network Services as Data Sources and platforms for e-researching social networks. Social Science Computer Review, 27(4), 481-492
Adler, P. A. & Adler, Peter (1988).Intense Loyalty in Organizations: A Case Study of College Athletics. Administrative Science Quarterly,33(3), 401-417.
Anderson ,W.T.(1999).Communities in a World of Open System.Futures, 31(5) ,457-463
Balas, Janet I.(2008).Social Networks and the Library Community. Computers in Libraries,28(4) , 40-45
Bejune, M., & Ronan, J. (2008). Social Software in Libraries, SPEC Kit 304. Retrieved December 9,2009, from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/spec304web.pdf
Bordeaux, Abigail & Boyd, Morag(2007).Blogs, Wikis and Podcasts: Social Software in the Library. Serials Librarian,52,3/4,263-269.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.
Casey, Michael E. & Savastinuk, Laura C(2007).Library 2.0: A Guide to Participatory Library Service . NJ: Information Today.
Casey, Michael E. & Savastinuk, Laura C.(2006) .Library2.0: service for the next-generation. Library Journal, 131(14). Retrieved December 22,2009, from http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6365200.html
Christopher Lovelock & Lauren Wright(2002).Principles of service marketing and management(2nd ed) .Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall.
Chad, K.& Miller,P.(2005). Do libraries matter? : the rise of Library 2.0. Retrieved December 11,2009, from http://www.talis.com/applications/downloads/white_papers/DoLibrariesMatter.pdf
Cleveland, Gary. (1998). Digital libraries: Definitions, issues and challenges. IFLANET. Retrieved December 9,2009, from http://www.ifla.org/VI/5/op/udtop8/udtop8.htm
Chen Xu, Fenfei Ouyang, & Heting Chu(2009).The Academic Library Meets Web 2.0: Applications and Implications. The Journal of Academic Librarianship ,35(4),324-331
Chiu, C.M., Hsu, M.H., Sun, S.Y., Lin, T.C., & Sun, P.C.(2005). Usability, Quality ,Value and E-Learning Continuance Decisions.Computers & Education,45(4), 399-416
Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
Chase, Darren (2008).Using Online Social Networks, Podcasting, and a Blog to Enhance Access to Stony Brook University Health Sciences Library Resources and Services. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 5(2),123-132
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R.(1989).User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models.Management Science, 35(8),982-1003
Davis, F.D. (1989).Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly,13(3), 319–340.
Fuchs, M., Muscogiuri, C., Niederée, C.& Hemmje, M.(2004). Digital libraries in knowledge management: An e-learning case study. International Journal Libraries,4(1),31-35
Garrison, D. R. (1991). Critical thinking and adult education: A conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 10 (4), 287-303
Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431.
Goncalves,M.A., Fox,E.A., Watson,L.T. & Kipp,N.A.(2004). Streams,Structures,Spaces,Scenarios,Scocieties(5S):A Formal Model for Digital
Hanna, D. E., Glowacki-Dudka, M., & Conceicao-Runlee, S. (2000). 147 practical tips for teaching online groups: essentials of web-based education. Madison. isconsin: Atwood.
Hewitt, J. & M. Scardamalia.（1998）. Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10（1）, 75-96.
Hou, H.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Sung, Y.-T. (2008). Analysis of Problem-Solving-Based Online Asynchronous Discussion Pattern. Educational Technology & Society,11(1), 17-28.
Jeong, H. & Chi, M. T. H.(2000). Does collaborative learning lead to the construction of common knowledge?.In Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Conferenceof the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,
Jones T. O. & W. E. Sasser, Jr. (1995).Why Satisfied Customers Defect.Harvard Business Review, 73(6),88-100,.
Jacob J. and R. W. Chestnut (1978).Brand loyalty : measurement and management .New York : Wiley
Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology - A constructivist perspective. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kochtanek, T. R.& Hein, K. K. (2000). Creating and nurturing distributed asynchronous learning environments.Online Information Review, 24(4), 280-293.
Lave,J.&Wenger,E.(1991).Situated Learning：Legitimate peripheral participation. New York：Cambridge University Press.
Law, N. (2005). Assessing Learning Outcomes in CSCL Settings. Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005, Taipei, Taiwan,373 – 377.
Luppicini ,Rocci(2003).Categories of virtual learning communities for educational design.The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(4), 409-419.
Landis, Cliff(2007). Social networking sites: Getting friendly with our users (Internet Resources). C&RL News.68(11). Retrieved November 19,2009, from http:http://www.lita.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crlnews/2007/dec/socialnetwrkg.cfm
Maness, Jack M. (2006) .Library 2.0 theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries .Webology, 3(2) Retrieved November 9,2009, from http://www.webology.ir/2006/v3n2/a25.html
Marchionini, G. & Fox, E. A. (1999).Progress toward digital libraries: augmentation through integration. Information Processing & Management, 35 (3), 1-8.
Miller, Paul. (2005).Web 2.0: building the new library. Ariadne, 45. Retrieved November 16,2009, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/miller/
Mathews, Brian S.(2007).Libraries’ Place in Virtual Social Networks. Journal of Web Librarianship,1(2),71-74
Miller, Paul.(2005).Web 2.0: building the new library.Ariadne, 45. Retrieved November 27,2009, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/miller/
Mole, C., Mulcahy, M., O’Donnell K. & Gupta A. (1999).Making Real Sense of Virtual Communities. Retrieved November 11,2009, from http://www.pricewaterhousecoopers.com/
Oliver, R. L. (1999).Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63, 33-44.
O`Reilly, Tim.(2005) .What is web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved December 22,2009, from http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6228
O`Reilly,Tim & Battelle, John (2009). Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five Years On. Special Report. Retrieved December 13,2009, from http://www.web2summit.com/web2009/public/schedule/detail/10194
Peltier, J. W. & J. E. Westfall (2000). Dissecting the HMO-benefits managers relationship: what to measure and why. Marketing Health Services,20(2),4-13.
Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Quentin, J.(1997).Vitual community, virtual settlements & cyber-archaeology: a theoretical outline,Journal of computer mediated communication,3(3), 8-90.
Reid, E. (1998). The self and the Internet: Variations on the illusion of one self. San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
Rovai, Alfred P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance :A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development Journal, 49(4), 33-48
Rovai, Alfred P. (2000).Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks.The Internet and Higher Education, 3(4), 285-297.
Rovai, Alfred P. (2002).Sense of community,perceived cognitive learning ,and persistence in asynchronous learning networks.Internet and Higher Education,5,319-312.
Scardamalia,M.&Bereiter,C.(1999).Schools as Knowledge Building Organizations ,Today`s Children,Tomorrow`s Society:the developmental health and wealth of nations,New York:Guiford,274-289
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of
knowledge. Liberal education in a knowledge society,Chicago: Open Court, 67-98
Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (ed.).Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University
Schafer, J. Ben, Konstan, Joseph, & Riedl, John (1999), Recommender System in E-Commerce, Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Electronic Commerce, USA:ACM, 158-166
Sing, C. C. & Khine,M. S. (2006).An Analysis of Interaction and Participation Patterns in Online Community.Educational Technology & Society,9(1), 250-261.
Smeaton, Alan F. &Callan, Jamie (2005) Personalisation and recommender systems in digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries,57(4), 99-308.
Soller, A. L. (2001). Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 40-62.
Stahl, G. (2000). A Model of Collaborative Knowledge-Building, Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences.Mahwah,NJ: Erlbaum,70-77.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Williams, R. & Cothrel, J. (2000).Four smart ways to run online community.Sloan Management Review, 41(4), 81-91.
Wellman, Barry（1999）.The Network Community: An Introduction. Networks in the Global Village: Westview Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W.(2002).Cultivating Communities of Practice, A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston Mass: Harvard Business School Press,.
Witten, .H. and Bainbridgc. D. (2002) How to build a digital library. Morgan Kauftnann. San Francisco.
Witten, Ian H. & David Bainbridge (2003).How to Build A Digital Library. San Francisco, Calif : Morgan Kaufmann.
Xiao-Ling Jin , Christy M.K. Cheung , Matthew K.O. Lee & Hua-Ping Chen (2009).How to keep members using the information in a computer-supported social network. Computers in Human Behavior,25,1172–1181
Yu, P. S.(1999).Data Mining and Personalization Technologies. In Arbee L. P. Chen, Frederick H. Lochovsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications(pp.6-13). Taiwan：IEEE Computer Society.
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L. and Parasuraman,A. (1996).The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality.Journal of Marketing,60, 31-46.
comScore: Mobile Internet Becoming A Daily Activity For Many.comcore. Retrieved October22,2009,from http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/3/Daily_Mobile_Internet_Usage_Grows/%28language%29/eng-US
JSTOR SEARCHAccess. Retrieved December 23 , 2009 , from http://apps.facebook.com/jstorsearch/.。
Facebook .Librarian. Retrieved December 11 , 2009 , from http://apps.facebook.com/fblibrarian/.

二、中文文獻
王保堤（2005）。國中生活科技教師如何利用網路學習社群進行 e-learning。生活科技教育月刊，38(3)，50-61。
王熙哲、丁耀民(2008)。人際關係網路對虛擬社群使用意願的影響。資訊管理學報，15(1)，53-72
毛慶禎(2007)。從Web 2.0到Library 2.0—圖書館2.0系列報導。全國新書資訊月刊，2，4-7。
江旻峻(2007)。Web2.0時代網路發展策略─從整合性關係建立網站之觀點出發。未出版之碩士論文，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，台北。
朱國明(2007)。網路社群社會資本與成員間助人行為之相關研究。資訊管理學報，14(2)，169-202
谷玲玲(2002)。為什麼要研究網路社群？ 中華傳播學會年會。上網日期：2009年11月22日，檢自：http://ccs.nccu.edu.tw/UPLOAD_FILES/HISTORY_PAPER_FILES/392_1.pdf
宋述強 ，曾小牧(2005) 。“目的性學習”與“知識建構社群”─加拿大多倫多大學“CSI LE／Knowledge Building”專案述評。中國電化教育。環球瞭望，222，88-90
林泰宏（2006）。2.0時代的圖書館－Web 2.0、Library 2.0介紹。中華民國圖書館學會電子報，2006(2)。上網日期：2009年12月11日，檢自：http://163.27.95.252/school/data/files/200810211002420.pdf
林信成、陳瑩潔、游忠諺(2006)，”Wiki協作系統應用於數位典藏之內容加值與知識匯集"，教育資料與圖書館學，43(3)，285-307。
侯惠澤(2008)。線上合作解題討論教學之知識建構行為模式探究。2008電腦與網路科技在教育上的應用研討會(CNTE 2008)。新竹：新竹教育大學資訊科技研究所
高碧玉(2005)。網路學習社群互動策略之實證研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立中山大學傳播管理研究所，高雄。
許全佑(2004)。以社會網路分析方法探討線上學習社群之形成與發展特徵。未出版之碩士論文，私立淡江大學資訊管理研究所，台北縣。
陳細鈿、邱鈺娟(2008)。探討不同人格特質之網路購物消費者在信任、滿意度及忠誠度間之關聯性研究，國立虎尾科技大學學報，27(3)，107-124
張基成(2003)。網路學習社群之經營與管理。T&D 飛訊第八期。上網日期：2009年11月11日，檢自：http://www.ncsi.gov.tw/NcsiWebFileDocuments/df6e3a0c1d9dd0e6be666b3b2ef1c4ce.pdf
曾繁絹、李宗翰(2008)。圖書館電子資源整合查詢系統評估之研究。圖書資訊學刊，6(1/2)，111-142
葉乃菁(2002)。從群體動力學探討個人對虛擬社群之接受度-以cityfamily為例。未出版之碩士論文，台灣科技大學碩士論文，台北市。
黃剛銘（2003）。虛擬社群激勵機制之研究。南華大學管理研究所碩士論文，. 未出版之碩士論文，嘉義縣。
彭蘭(2009)。從社區到社會網絡——一種網際網路研究視野與方法的拓展。2009年中國新媒體傳播學年會。上網日期：2009年12月22日，檢自：http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/newmedia/2009-11/24/content_12531878.htm
游佳萍(2007)虛擬社群知識分享與知識建立之過程。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫。上網日期：2009年11月11日，檢自：http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/bitstream/987654321/6454/2/962416H032008.pdf
溫達茂、鄭麗敏﹙2006﹚。從圖書館與資訊服務的角度看Web 2.0的應用。Web 2.0與圖書館學術研討會。臺北市：淡江大學圖書館。上網日期：2009年12月13日，檢自：http://www.lib.tku.edu.tw/libintro/pub/web20&lib_semina/infoservice_ft.pdf
褚麗絹、黃剛銘、蔡坤哲（2004）。網路虛擬社群激勵機制之研究。出版與管理研究，1(1)，61~78。上網日期：2009年10月17日，檢自：http://203.72.2.115/EJournal/3032010103.pdf
管怡婷(2004)。以學習風格為基礎之學習資源推薦機制研究。未出版之碩士論文，中原大學資訊管理研究所碩士學位論文，桃園。
蔡昌智(2004)。不同激勵機制對網路學習活動參與程度之影響。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺南大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文，台南。
劉鼎昱(2007)。Library 2.0時代的圖書資訊服務。嘉南學報，33，447-458。
劉軍(2009)。社會網路分析講義：UCINET軟體實用指南。上海：格致出版社。
鄭琮生、陳立祥(2008)。在學習社群中使用紙娃娃機制減低潛水現象。第十二屆全球華人電腦教育應用大會(GCCCE2008)。美國：密西根大學。上網日期：2009年9月12日，檢自：http://set.bnu.edu.cn/ltt/lunwen/files/Papers/papergccce/126.pdf
謝達昌(2005)。網路學習社群之社會網路中心度、角色特徵與人格特質A/B，對個人學習績效之影響。未出版之碩士論文，淡江大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，台北縣。
戴孟宗、莊傑、賴品卉、陳必涵(2009)。國立臺灣藝術大學圖書館網站使用者之滿意度調查，國立臺灣藝術大學 2009圖文傳播藝術學報。
蘇桂枝(2008)，了解與參與：世界數位圖書館（World Digital Library）。國家圖書館館訊，97〈1〉。上網日期：2009年12月17日，檢自：http://www.ncl.edu.tw/upload/P0970715001/cats/04.pdf。
龐惠潔(2008)。美麗人生？網路相簿社群內階級與權力關係研究。資訊社會研究，14，197-227
Marlene Scardamalia、張建偉、孫燕青(2005)。知識建構共同體及其支撐環境。現代教育技術，15(3)，5-13
Wenger. E., McDermott. R., & Snyder. W. M.（2002）。實踐社群：推動學習型組織之輪（Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge）〈黃維譯，2003〉。台北：天下文化。〈原著2002年出版〉
John Hagel & Arthur G. Armstrong(2000)。網路商機(Net gain: Expanding Markets Through Virtual Communities)(朱道凱譯)。麥田出版社。（原著1998年出版）
人大經濟論壇。Retrieved Date: 2009/9/25。URL ：http://www.pinggu.org/bbs/index.asp
『2008年各類別網站排名』。創市際ARO市場研究顧問公司。上網日期：2009年12月15日，檢自：http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_04_09_09.html
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
97155010
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097155010
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳志銘zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Chih Mingen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林憶珊zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lin, Yi Shanen_US
dc.creator (作者) 林憶珊zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Yi Shanen_US
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 4-Sep-2013 16:40:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 4-Sep-2013 16:40:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Sep-2013 16:40:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097155010en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60174-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97155010zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 網路環境的轉變與網路社群網站的盛行，不但改變網路使用者的使用習慣，亦是發揮學習社群力量的時機。數位圖書館自發展以來，累積優質而豐富的典藏內容，強調多元讀者服務，並精進個人化服務與檢索功能，但針對讀者學習社群的經營則顯得不足且忽略發展可以輔助學習社群經營的機制，致使數位圖書館無法成為讀者長期駐足，甚至留下學習心得、交互分享學習成果及良性互動討論數位圖書館典藏內容的園地。
本研究以「提升使用者駐足於學習社群平台之意願」與「促進數位圖書館資源之利用」為目標，促成一個基於數位圖書館典藏內容為經營基礎之學習社群。發展有效的社群經營機制，營造學習者願意參與、交互分享學習成果及良性互動討論的優質學習環境，並支援數位圖書館資源的有效利用。
利用知識論壇(Knoewledge Forum)作為社群學習的討論平台，本研究透過準實驗研究法，從數位圖書館資源與學習社群之結合所促成的學習活動中，探討學習社群的互動歷程與知識建構情況。透過統計分析歸結出適合於發展有效輔助數位圖書館資源應用之學習社群經營工具與機制，提高學習社群的參與以及數位圖書館資源支援學習的機會與價值。
研究結果顯示：1. 研究活動歷程中，相較各階段互動機制，推薦機制與激勵機制對於學習社群參與具有較明顯的助益；2. 數位圖書館資源融入學習社群，有助主題資源與概念多面向的知識討論與擴張；3. 數位圖書館資源融入學習社群過程中，領域專家引導有助於資源的利用。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) As the rapid changes of on-line environment and prevalence of social networking websites, not only has the on-line users’ behavior changed, but also it implies the perfect time to develop better learning community with the advantages of technology innovation. Taking the Digital library (DL) as example, it has been developed into the perfect portal with accumulation of high quality information with and reader-centered services, including personalized information services and searching functions. However, comparing with other social networking sites, DL has been considered less value on building on readers’ learning communities, or not suitable sites to share information or communicate with other readers.

The purpose of the study is to promote people cohesiveness at the web-based learning community platform and to improve the usage of digital library resources. Based on the advantage of web-based learning communities, the study analyzes the possible models and outcomes for learning communities on DL. In addition, the study attempts to survey ways to make better environment for readers actively interacting with others more; moreover, utilizing the digital libraries to construct knowledge.

Taking the “Knowledge Forum” as web-based learning community platform, the study adopted the quasi-experimental methodology to investigate the social networks and knowledge construction behavior of the learning community on DL. The statistics analysis scheme was employed to evaluate the specific model of community building for web-based learning, and its effectiveness for promoting DL as learning support.

The results of this study are concluded as following. First, compared with other methods for community building, the recommendation and motivation system are more beneficial for participation on web-based learning community. Second, integrating the resources of DL with web-based learning community is helpful for the diversity of subject topics and concepts in on-line discussion. Third, academic field experts for subject matter discussion are helpful for better DL resources utilization during the process of web-based learning.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 3
第三節 研究範圍與限制 3
第四節 名詞解釋 5

第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 網路學習社群 7
第二節 數位圖書館與網路學習社群 13
第三節 網路學習社群的經營 25
第四節 社會網路分析 39
第五節 透過討論的學習社群知識建構 42

第三章 研究方法與設計 50
第一節 研究架構 50
第二節 研究方法與步驟 53
第三節 研究對象 55
第四節 研究設計 56
第五節 資料蒐集與分析 60
第六節 研究工具 62

第四章 實驗結果與分析 69
第一節 學習社群基本資料 69
第二節 互動機制對於網路學習社群互動與學習的影響 75
第三節 學習社群的資源利用效能分析 92
第四節 互動機制對學習社群參與動機和滿意度的影響 98

第五章 結論與建議 108
第一節 結論 108
第二節 建議 110
第三節 未來研究建議 111

參考文獻 113
附錄一 數位學習平台使用經驗調查問卷 120
附錄二 學習調查問卷 122		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2071055 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097155010en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 數位圖書館zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 網路學習社群zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識建構zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) digital library (DL)en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) web-based learning communityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) knowledge constructionen_US
dc.title (題名) 具知識建構工具支援之數位圖書館 在網路學習社群經營之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The study of building web-based learning community based on digital library with support of knowledge construction toolen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、英文文獻
Abram,Stephen (2008).Social Libraries: The Librarian 2.0 Phenomenon. Library Resources & Technical Services, 52(2),19-22
Ackland, Robert (2009). Social Network Services as Data Sources and platforms for e-researching social networks. Social Science Computer Review, 27(4), 481-492
Adler, P. A. & Adler, Peter (1988).Intense Loyalty in Organizations: A Case Study of College Athletics. Administrative Science Quarterly,33(3), 401-417.
Anderson ,W.T.(1999).Communities in a World of Open System.Futures, 31(5) ,457-463
Balas, Janet I.(2008).Social Networks and the Library Community. Computers in Libraries,28(4) , 40-45
Bejune, M., & Ronan, J. (2008). Social Software in Libraries, SPEC Kit 304. Retrieved December 9,2009, from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/spec304web.pdf
Bordeaux, Abigail & Boyd, Morag(2007).Blogs, Wikis and Podcasts: Social Software in the Library. Serials Librarian,52,3/4,263-269.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.
Casey, Michael E. & Savastinuk, Laura C(2007).Library 2.0: A Guide to Participatory Library Service . NJ: Information Today.
Casey, Michael E. & Savastinuk, Laura C.(2006) .Library2.0: service for the next-generation. Library Journal, 131(14). Retrieved December 22,2009, from http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6365200.html
Christopher Lovelock & Lauren Wright(2002).Principles of service marketing and management(2nd ed) .Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall.
Chad, K.& Miller,P.(2005). Do libraries matter? : the rise of Library 2.0. Retrieved December 11,2009, from http://www.talis.com/applications/downloads/white_papers/DoLibrariesMatter.pdf
Cleveland, Gary. (1998). Digital libraries: Definitions, issues and challenges. IFLANET. Retrieved December 9,2009, from http://www.ifla.org/VI/5/op/udtop8/udtop8.htm
Chen Xu, Fenfei Ouyang, & Heting Chu(2009).The Academic Library Meets Web 2.0: Applications and Implications. The Journal of Academic Librarianship ,35(4),324-331
Chiu, C.M., Hsu, M.H., Sun, S.Y., Lin, T.C., & Sun, P.C.(2005). Usability, Quality ,Value and E-Learning Continuance Decisions.Computers & Education,45(4), 399-416
Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
Chase, Darren (2008).Using Online Social Networks, Podcasting, and a Blog to Enhance Access to Stony Brook University Health Sciences Library Resources and Services. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 5(2),123-132
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R.(1989).User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models.Management Science, 35(8),982-1003
Davis, F.D. (1989).Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly,13(3), 319–340.
Fuchs, M., Muscogiuri, C., Niederée, C.& Hemmje, M.(2004). Digital libraries in knowledge management: An e-learning case study. International Journal Libraries,4(1),31-35
Garrison, D. R. (1991). Critical thinking and adult education: A conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 10 (4), 287-303
Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431.
Goncalves,M.A., Fox,E.A., Watson,L.T. & Kipp,N.A.(2004). Streams,Structures,Spaces,Scenarios,Scocieties(5S):A Formal Model for Digital
Hanna, D. E., Glowacki-Dudka, M., & Conceicao-Runlee, S. (2000). 147 practical tips for teaching online groups: essentials of web-based education. Madison. isconsin: Atwood.
Hewitt, J. & M. Scardamalia.（1998）. Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10（1）, 75-96.
Hou, H.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Sung, Y.-T. (2008). Analysis of Problem-Solving-Based Online Asynchronous Discussion Pattern. Educational Technology & Society,11(1), 17-28.
Jeong, H. & Chi, M. T. H.(2000). Does collaborative learning lead to the construction of common knowledge?.In Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Conferenceof the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,
Jones T. O. & W. E. Sasser, Jr. (1995).Why Satisfied Customers Defect.Harvard Business Review, 73(6),88-100,.
Jacob J. and R. W. Chestnut (1978).Brand loyalty : measurement and management .New York : Wiley
Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology - A constructivist perspective. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kochtanek, T. R.& Hein, K. K. (2000). Creating and nurturing distributed asynchronous learning environments.Online Information Review, 24(4), 280-293.
Lave,J.&Wenger,E.(1991).Situated Learning：Legitimate peripheral participation. New York：Cambridge University Press.
Law, N. (2005). Assessing Learning Outcomes in CSCL Settings. Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005, Taipei, Taiwan,373 – 377.
Luppicini ,Rocci(2003).Categories of virtual learning communities for educational design.The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(4), 409-419.
Landis, Cliff(2007). Social networking sites: Getting friendly with our users (Internet Resources). C&RL News.68(11). Retrieved November 19,2009, from http:http://www.lita.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crlnews/2007/dec/socialnetwrkg.cfm
Maness, Jack M. (2006) .Library 2.0 theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries .Webology, 3(2) Retrieved November 9,2009, from http://www.webology.ir/2006/v3n2/a25.html
Marchionini, G. & Fox, E. A. (1999).Progress toward digital libraries: augmentation through integration. Information Processing & Management, 35 (3), 1-8.
Miller, Paul. (2005).Web 2.0: building the new library. Ariadne, 45. Retrieved November 16,2009, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/miller/
Mathews, Brian S.(2007).Libraries’ Place in Virtual Social Networks. Journal of Web Librarianship,1(2),71-74
Miller, Paul.(2005).Web 2.0: building the new library.Ariadne, 45. Retrieved November 27,2009, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/miller/
Mole, C., Mulcahy, M., O’Donnell K. & Gupta A. (1999).Making Real Sense of Virtual Communities. Retrieved November 11,2009, from http://www.pricewaterhousecoopers.com/
Oliver, R. L. (1999).Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63, 33-44.
O`Reilly, Tim.(2005) .What is web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved December 22,2009, from http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6228
O`Reilly,Tim & Battelle, John (2009). Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five Years On. Special Report. Retrieved December 13,2009, from http://www.web2summit.com/web2009/public/schedule/detail/10194
Peltier, J. W. & J. E. Westfall (2000). Dissecting the HMO-benefits managers relationship: what to measure and why. Marketing Health Services,20(2),4-13.
Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Quentin, J.(1997).Vitual community, virtual settlements & cyber-archaeology: a theoretical outline,Journal of computer mediated communication,3(3), 8-90.
Reid, E. (1998). The self and the Internet: Variations on the illusion of one self. San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
Rovai, Alfred P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance :A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development Journal, 49(4), 33-48
Rovai, Alfred P. (2000).Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks.The Internet and Higher Education, 3(4), 285-297.
Rovai, Alfred P. (2002).Sense of community,perceived cognitive learning ,and persistence in asynchronous learning networks.Internet and Higher Education,5,319-312.
Scardamalia,M.&Bereiter,C.(1999).Schools as Knowledge Building Organizations ,Today`s Children,Tomorrow`s Society:the developmental health and wealth of nations,New York:Guiford,274-289
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of
knowledge. Liberal education in a knowledge society,Chicago: Open Court, 67-98
Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (ed.).Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University
Schafer, J. Ben, Konstan, Joseph, & Riedl, John (1999), Recommender System in E-Commerce, Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Electronic Commerce, USA:ACM, 158-166
Sing, C. C. & Khine,M. S. (2006).An Analysis of Interaction and Participation Patterns in Online Community.Educational Technology & Society,9(1), 250-261.
Smeaton, Alan F. &Callan, Jamie (2005) Personalisation and recommender systems in digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries,57(4), 99-308.
Soller, A. L. (2001). Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 40-62.
Stahl, G. (2000). A Model of Collaborative Knowledge-Building, Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences.Mahwah,NJ: Erlbaum,70-77.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Williams, R. & Cothrel, J. (2000).Four smart ways to run online community.Sloan Management Review, 41(4), 81-91.
Wellman, Barry（1999）.The Network Community: An Introduction. Networks in the Global Village: Westview Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W.(2002).Cultivating Communities of Practice, A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston Mass: Harvard Business School Press,.
Witten, .H. and Bainbridgc. D. (2002) How to build a digital library. Morgan Kauftnann. San Francisco.
Witten, Ian H. & David Bainbridge (2003).How to Build A Digital Library. San Francisco, Calif : Morgan Kaufmann.
Xiao-Ling Jin , Christy M.K. Cheung , Matthew K.O. Lee & Hua-Ping Chen (2009).How to keep members using the information in a computer-supported social network. Computers in Human Behavior,25,1172–1181
Yu, P. S.(1999).Data Mining and Personalization Technologies. In Arbee L. P. Chen, Frederick H. Lochovsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications(pp.6-13). Taiwan：IEEE Computer Society.
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L. and Parasuraman,A. (1996).The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality.Journal of Marketing,60, 31-46.
comScore: Mobile Internet Becoming A Daily Activity For Many.comcore. Retrieved October22,2009,from http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/3/Daily_Mobile_Internet_Usage_Grows/%28language%29/eng-US
JSTOR SEARCHAccess. Retrieved December 23 , 2009 , from http://apps.facebook.com/jstorsearch/.。
Facebook .Librarian. Retrieved December 11 , 2009 , from http://apps.facebook.com/fblibrarian/.

二、中文文獻
王保堤（2005）。國中生活科技教師如何利用網路學習社群進行 e-learning。生活科技教育月刊，38(3)，50-61。
王熙哲、丁耀民(2008)。人際關係網路對虛擬社群使用意願的影響。資訊管理學報，15(1)，53-72
毛慶禎(2007)。從Web 2.0到Library 2.0—圖書館2.0系列報導。全國新書資訊月刊，2，4-7。
江旻峻(2007)。Web2.0時代網路發展策略─從整合性關係建立網站之觀點出發。未出版之碩士論文，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，台北。
朱國明(2007)。網路社群社會資本與成員間助人行為之相關研究。資訊管理學報，14(2)，169-202
谷玲玲(2002)。為什麼要研究網路社群？ 中華傳播學會年會。上網日期：2009年11月22日，檢自：http://ccs.nccu.edu.tw/UPLOAD_FILES/HISTORY_PAPER_FILES/392_1.pdf
宋述強 ，曾小牧(2005) 。“目的性學習”與“知識建構社群”─加拿大多倫多大學“CSI LE／Knowledge Building”專案述評。中國電化教育。環球瞭望，222，88-90
林泰宏（2006）。2.0時代的圖書館－Web 2.0、Library 2.0介紹。中華民國圖書館學會電子報，2006(2)。上網日期：2009年12月11日，檢自：http://163.27.95.252/school/data/files/200810211002420.pdf
林信成、陳瑩潔、游忠諺(2006)，”Wiki協作系統應用於數位典藏之內容加值與知識匯集"，教育資料與圖書館學，43(3)，285-307。
侯惠澤(2008)。線上合作解題討論教學之知識建構行為模式探究。2008電腦與網路科技在教育上的應用研討會(CNTE 2008)。新竹：新竹教育大學資訊科技研究所
高碧玉(2005)。網路學習社群互動策略之實證研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立中山大學傳播管理研究所，高雄。
許全佑(2004)。以社會網路分析方法探討線上學習社群之形成與發展特徵。未出版之碩士論文，私立淡江大學資訊管理研究所，台北縣。
陳細鈿、邱鈺娟(2008)。探討不同人格特質之網路購物消費者在信任、滿意度及忠誠度間之關聯性研究，國立虎尾科技大學學報，27(3)，107-124
張基成(2003)。網路學習社群之經營與管理。T&D 飛訊第八期。上網日期：2009年11月11日，檢自：http://www.ncsi.gov.tw/NcsiWebFileDocuments/df6e3a0c1d9dd0e6be666b3b2ef1c4ce.pdf
曾繁絹、李宗翰(2008)。圖書館電子資源整合查詢系統評估之研究。圖書資訊學刊，6(1/2)，111-142
葉乃菁(2002)。從群體動力學探討個人對虛擬社群之接受度-以cityfamily為例。未出版之碩士論文，台灣科技大學碩士論文，台北市。
黃剛銘（2003）。虛擬社群激勵機制之研究。南華大學管理研究所碩士論文，. 未出版之碩士論文，嘉義縣。
彭蘭(2009)。從社區到社會網絡——一種網際網路研究視野與方法的拓展。2009年中國新媒體傳播學年會。上網日期：2009年12月22日，檢自：http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/newmedia/2009-11/24/content_12531878.htm
游佳萍(2007)虛擬社群知識分享與知識建立之過程。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫。上網日期：2009年11月11日，檢自：http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/bitstream/987654321/6454/2/962416H032008.pdf
溫達茂、鄭麗敏﹙2006﹚。從圖書館與資訊服務的角度看Web 2.0的應用。Web 2.0與圖書館學術研討會。臺北市：淡江大學圖書館。上網日期：2009年12月13日，檢自：http://www.lib.tku.edu.tw/libintro/pub/web20&lib_semina/infoservice_ft.pdf
褚麗絹、黃剛銘、蔡坤哲（2004）。網路虛擬社群激勵機制之研究。出版與管理研究，1(1)，61~78。上網日期：2009年10月17日，檢自：http://203.72.2.115/EJournal/3032010103.pdf
管怡婷(2004)。以學習風格為基礎之學習資源推薦機制研究。未出版之碩士論文，中原大學資訊管理研究所碩士學位論文，桃園。
蔡昌智(2004)。不同激勵機制對網路學習活動參與程度之影響。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺南大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文，台南。
劉鼎昱(2007)。Library 2.0時代的圖書資訊服務。嘉南學報，33，447-458。
劉軍(2009)。社會網路分析講義：UCINET軟體實用指南。上海：格致出版社。
鄭琮生、陳立祥(2008)。在學習社群中使用紙娃娃機制減低潛水現象。第十二屆全球華人電腦教育應用大會(GCCCE2008)。美國：密西根大學。上網日期：2009年9月12日，檢自：http://set.bnu.edu.cn/ltt/lunwen/files/Papers/papergccce/126.pdf
謝達昌(2005)。網路學習社群之社會網路中心度、角色特徵與人格特質A/B，對個人學習績效之影響。未出版之碩士論文，淡江大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，台北縣。
戴孟宗、莊傑、賴品卉、陳必涵(2009)。國立臺灣藝術大學圖書館網站使用者之滿意度調查，國立臺灣藝術大學 2009圖文傳播藝術學報。
蘇桂枝(2008)，了解與參與：世界數位圖書館（World Digital Library）。國家圖書館館訊，97〈1〉。上網日期：2009年12月17日，檢自：http://www.ncl.edu.tw/upload/P0970715001/cats/04.pdf。
龐惠潔(2008)。美麗人生？網路相簿社群內階級與權力關係研究。資訊社會研究，14，197-227
Marlene Scardamalia、張建偉、孫燕青(2005)。知識建構共同體及其支撐環境。現代教育技術，15(3)，5-13
Wenger. E., McDermott. R., & Snyder. W. M.（2002）。實踐社群：推動學習型組織之輪（Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge）〈黃維譯，2003〉。台北：天下文化。〈原著2002年出版〉
John Hagel & Arthur G. Armstrong(2000)。網路商機(Net gain: Expanding Markets Through Virtual Communities)(朱道凱譯)。麥田出版社。（原著1998年出版）
人大經濟論壇。Retrieved Date: 2009/9/25。URL ：http://www.pinggu.org/bbs/index.asp
『2008年各類別網站排名』。創市際ARO市場研究顧問公司。上網日期：2009年12月15日，檢自：http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_04_09_09.html		zh_TW