1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Liberal Arts
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 運用自律學習機制提升閱讀標註學習成效研究
A study on applying self-regulated learning mechanism for promoting learning performance of reading annotation
作者 陳炎漳
貢獻者 陳志銘
陳炎漳
關鍵詞 自律學習
數位閱讀
閱讀標註
閱讀學習成效
self-regulated learning
digital reading
reading annotation
learning effects of reading
日期 2010
上傳時間 4-Sep-2013 16:44:03 (UTC+8)
摘要 有鑑於數位閱讀已逐漸成為閱讀發展的新趨勢，許多研究著手於發展相關的閱讀系統或設備來輔助學習者進行閱讀學習。此外，如何幫助學生在進行英文閱讀學習時，增加對於文章的理解，已經成為很重要的研究課題。而基於網路學習環境進行數位閱讀學習時，學習者常常需要進行自主學習，因此學習者個人的自律學習能力成為影響數位閱讀學習成效的關鍵因素。本研究旨在探討運用具自律學習機制的閱讀標註系統是否具有提升國中英語閱讀學習成效的效益，研究採用準實驗研究法，以桃園縣某國中七年級二班的學生，分成實驗組與控制組，實驗組與控制組分別以「具自律學習機制的閱讀標註系統學習」及「不具自律學習機制的閱讀標註系統學習」進行英語閱讀學習，經過實驗處理後，接受「閱讀測驗後測」，以比較兩組學生在閱讀學習成效上的差異性，輔之以問卷調查實驗組學生對課程活動的態度看法，並以訪談作質性資料分析。最後，根據研究結果提出具體建議，以提供未來研究與教師在運用具自律學習機制之數位閱讀標註系統融入閱讀教學時之參考。本研究得到的研究結論如下：
一、 實驗組學習者採用具自律學習機制之數位閱讀標註系統，其英語閱讀學習成效顯著優於採用不具自律學習機制之數位閱讀標註系統的控制組學習者。
二、 實驗組學習者採用具自律學習機制之數位閱讀標註系統，其閱讀標註能力顯著優於採用不具自律學習機制之數位閱讀標註系統的控制組學習者。
三、 實驗組學習者中不同自律能力學習者其閱讀學習成效具有顯著差異。
四、 實驗組學習者中不同自律能力學習者其閱讀標註能力具有顯著差異。
五、 實驗組學習者中閱讀學習成效與閱讀標註能力有顯著相關且自律能力與學習成效呈現正相關

關鍵字：自律學習、數位閱讀、閱讀標註、閱讀學習成效
In the consideration of that digital reading has become a new trend of reading development; many studies were conducted to develop related reading systems or equipments to assist learners on learning of reading. Moreover, how to help students improve comprehension while reading English is an important topic for research. Based on the characteristics of digital reading in the e-learning environment, in which learners often need self-regulated learning, the ability of self-regulated learning has become a key factor that affects the learning effects of reading. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the application of reading annotation system with self-regulated learning could increase the learning effects of English reading for junior high school students. The present study adopted quasi-experimental design method and the subjects were two classes of seventh graders in a junior high school in Taoyuan County. There were divided into experimental group and control group to learn English through reading, and were instructed respectively with “reading annotation system learning with self-regulated learning” and “reading annotation system learning without self-regulated learning.” After the experiment, “reading post-test” was conducted to compare the learning effects of reading for these two groups of students. Students in the experimental group were also surveyed by questionnaires and interviewed for qualitative data analysis. Finally, the researcher made suggestions according to the research results as references for future studies and for teachers who want to apply reading annotation system with self-regulated learning to reading instruction. The results of the present study were as the following:
1. The learning effects of English reading for learners in the experimental group with self-regulated reading annotation system were significantly greater than those who were in the control group without self-regulated reading annotation system.
2. The ability of reading annotation of the learners in the experimental group with self-regulated reading annotation system were significantly greater than those who were in the control group without self-regulated reading annotation system.
3. There were significant differences among the learning effects of reading for learners in the experimental group with different ability of self-regulated learning.
4. There were significant differences among the ability of reading annotation for learners in the experimental group with different ability of self-regulated learning.
5. For the learners in the experimental group, the learning effects of reading were significantly related to the ability of reading annotation; the ability of self-regulated learning was positively correlated with learning effects.
Keywords: self-regulated learning, digital reading, reading annotation, learning effects of reading
參考文獻 參考文獻
一、英文部分
AMBIA (1996). Re:mark TM. Markup and review for Adobe Acrobat Software.User’s Guide. http://www.ambia.com/remark.htm.
Armbruster, B.B., Echols, C. H., & Brown, A.L. (1983). The role of metacognition in reading to learn: a developmental perspective. The Volta Review, 84, 45-56.
Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344-370.
Baker, F. B., & Kim, S. H.(1992). Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques. N.Y.: Marcel Dekker.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall.
Boekaerts, M.(1997). Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learningand Instruction, 7, 161-186.
Brown, A.L., Capione, J.C., & Day, J.D. (1981). Learning to learn: on training students to learn from texts. Educational Research,10, 14-20.
Brush, A.J.B. (2002). “Annotating Digital Documents for Asynchronous Collaboration,＂Ph.D.dissertation, University of Washington,
Butler, D. B., & Winne, P. H.(1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis, Review of Education Research, 65(3), 245-281.
C. A. Wolters (1998), “Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation”, Journal of educational psychology, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 224-235.
Chang, M. M.(2005). Applying Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Web-Based Instruction-An Investigation of Motivation Perception, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 217-230.
Chen, C. M.(2009). Personalized E-learning system with self-regulated learning assisted mechanisms for promoting learning performance. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, issue 5, 8816-8829.
Chen. C. M., & Chen, C. C. (2010). Problem-based learning supported by digital archives: Case study of Taiwan Libraries` History Digital Library. The Electronic Library, 28(1), 5-28.
Cheng, T.-y. (1993). The syntactical problems Chinese college students meet in reading English technical textbooks. Indiana: ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 364094.
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chui, M.H., & La Vancher, C.(1999). Eliciting self-explanation improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.
Danchev, A. (1983). The controversy over translation in foreign languageteaching (f. l. t. translation, Trans.), Translation in the system of foreign languages training (pp. 35-43). Paris: Round Table FIT-UNESCO.
Hannafin, M. J.,& Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167–202.
Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing writing summaries: task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction.Review of educational research, 56(4), 473-493.
Jacobson, M., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 149–199.
Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J.(2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in web-base instruction, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(2), 5-17.
Kahan, J., Koivunen, M., Prud`Hommeaux, E. and Swick, R.R. (2001). “Annotea: An Open RDF Infrastructure for Shared Web Annotations,＂Tenth World Wide Web Conference, HongKong, pp.623-632.
Lamberg, W.J. & Lamb, C.E. (1980). Reading instruction in the content areas. Chicago: Rand McNally College Pub. Co.
Lerner, J.W. (2000). Learning disabilities: theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies(8th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Ley, K., & Young, D.(2001). Instructional principles for self-regulated learning, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49(2), 93-102.
Liao, P. (2002). Taiwanese students` beliefs about translation and their use of translation as a strategy to learn English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
Marshall, C. C. (1997). Annotation: from paper books to the digital library. In Proceedings of the second ACM international conference on Digital libraries (pp. 131-140). ACM New York, NY, USA.
Mcmanus, T. F.(2000). Individualizing Instruction in a Web-Based Hypermedia Learning Environment: Nonlinearity, Advance Organizers, and Self-Regulated Learners, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(3), 219-251.
Microsoft (1998). Microsoft Word.http://www.miscrosoft.com/office/word/default.htm
Mory, E. H.(2003). Feedback research revisited. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: a project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed.), 745-783. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nelson F. Du Bois, & Richard, K.(1997). Staley A Self-Regulated Learning Approach to Teaching Educational Psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 9, 171-197.
Niemi, H., Nevgi, A., & Virtanen, P.(2003). Towards self-regulation in Web-based learning, Journal of Educational Media, 28, 49-71.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. New York: Academic Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies:What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
Ovsiannikov, I. A., Arbib, M. A.,& Mcneill, T. H. (1999) Annotation Technology. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 50, 329-362.
Patrick Rau, P. L., Chen, S. H., & Chin, Y. T. (2004). Developing web annotation tools for learners and instructors. Interacting with Computers,16, 163–181.
P. Nokelainen, J. Kurhila, M. Miettinen, P. Floreen, H. Tirri: "Evaluating the Role of a Shared Document-based Annotation Tool in Learner-centered Collaborative Learning". In Proc. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2003), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 200-203.
Pearson, P.D., & Johnson, D.D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
P. R. Pintrich and E. V. DeGroot (1990), “Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 33-40.
Phelps, T.A. and Wilensky, R. (2000). “Robust Intra-document Locations,＂Ninth World WideWeb Conference, Amsterdam.
Pintrich, P. R.(2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, 451-502. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Quade,A. M. (1996). An assessment of retention and depth of processing associated with notetaking using traditional paper and pencil and on- line notepad during computer-delivered instruction.(Eric Document Reproduction Service, No. ED383 330)
Robinson, D. H., & Schraw, G. (1994). Computational efficiency through visual argument: Do graphic organizers communicate relations in text too effectively? Contemporary Educational Psychology 19, 399-415.
Roscheisen, M., Mogensen, C., Winograd, T. (1995). Shared web annotations as a platform for third-party value-added information providers: architecture, protocols, and usage examples. Technical Report CSDTR/DLTR.
Robinson, D. H., & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology 87, 455-467.
Shih, K. P., Chang, C. Y., Chen, H. C., & Wang, S. S.(2005). A Self-Regulated Learning System with Scaffolding Support for Self-Regulated e/m-Learning, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Information Technology: Research and Education.
Swaby, B.E.R. (1989). Diagnosis and correction of reading difficulties. Boston,MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of note taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 323-338.
Wenden, A. (1986).What do second-language learners know about their language learning? A second look at retrospective accounts. Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 186-201.
Winne, P.H., & Hadwin, A.F.(1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds), Matecognition in educational theory and practice, 277-304, Hillsadale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Yee, K.P. (2002). “CritLink: Advanced Hyperlinks Enable Public Annotation on the Web,＂Proceedings of Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), , New Orleans, Louisiana.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing selfregulated learner : Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington,DC: American Psychological Association.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H.(2001). Reflections on theories, identities, and actions of self-regulated learners. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives, 289-307. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

二、中文部分
王宗斌（1999）。訓練方式、電腦自我效能及學習型態對學習績效的影響-網頁設計實地研究。中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，中壢市。
王順興(2001)。網路上目標設定環境的建置以閱讀網站為例。國立中央大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文，未出版，中壢市。
李錦興（2006）。探討網頁註記標記語言與註記回顧對於數學學習之影響。未出版碩士，國立中央大學資訊工程學系碩士在職專班未出版，中壢市。
林桑瑜(2002)。高中生自我調整學習策略之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
林建平(1994)。整合學習策略與動機的訓練方案對國小閱讀理解困難兒童的輔導效果。國立台灣師範大學教育心裡與輔導研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
林政斌(2001)。線上學習代理人之分析與設計。國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
洪月女(1998)。談閱讀。台北：心理出版。
高台茜(2003)。非同步網路教學中自律學習的鷹架輔助研究。國立東華大學教育研究所，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫(編號：NSC91-2520-S-259-001)。
秦韻婷(2002)。開發線上註記分享平台輔助鷹架教學之研究。中原大學資訊管理學系碩士學位論文，未出版，中壢市。
葉修文(2005)。電子文件之線上註記系統發展與閱讀教學應用。中原學報第三十三卷第二期，頁193-214。
陳守賢(2001)。建構易用線上註記平台。中原大學資訊管理學系碩士學位論文，未出版，中壢市。
陳志銘(2010)。"認知型態與標註品質對閱讀成效之影響與關聯研究：以數位閱讀標註系統為例" ，圖書與資訊學刊。
陳玟伶(2000)。國小高年級兒童自我調整歷程之個案研究。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係：自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報：教育類，46(1)，67-92。
廖聖傑, (Ed.). (2003)。從學習歷程檔案建構決策樹以支援網路教學。國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
蔡忠潔(2007)。具自律學習輔助機制的網路探究學習系統之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文。未出版，台北市。
謝政成(2010)。發展自律學習監控及偵測機制提升網路學習之學習成效研究。國立臺灣師範大學應用電子科技研究所碩士文。未出版，台北市。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
98913018
99
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098913018
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳志銘zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳炎漳zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 陳炎漳zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 4-Sep-2013 16:44:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 4-Sep-2013 16:44:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Sep-2013 16:44:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0098913018en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60192-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98913018zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 有鑑於數位閱讀已逐漸成為閱讀發展的新趨勢，許多研究著手於發展相關的閱讀系統或設備來輔助學習者進行閱讀學習。此外，如何幫助學生在進行英文閱讀學習時，增加對於文章的理解，已經成為很重要的研究課題。而基於網路學習環境進行數位閱讀學習時，學習者常常需要進行自主學習，因此學習者個人的自律學習能力成為影響數位閱讀學習成效的關鍵因素。本研究旨在探討運用具自律學習機制的閱讀標註系統是否具有提升國中英語閱讀學習成效的效益，研究採用準實驗研究法，以桃園縣某國中七年級二班的學生，分成實驗組與控制組，實驗組與控制組分別以「具自律學習機制的閱讀標註系統學習」及「不具自律學習機制的閱讀標註系統學習」進行英語閱讀學習，經過實驗處理後，接受「閱讀測驗後測」，以比較兩組學生在閱讀學習成效上的差異性，輔之以問卷調查實驗組學生對課程活動的態度看法，並以訪談作質性資料分析。最後，根據研究結果提出具體建議，以提供未來研究與教師在運用具自律學習機制之數位閱讀標註系統融入閱讀教學時之參考。本研究得到的研究結論如下：
一、 實驗組學習者採用具自律學習機制之數位閱讀標註系統，其英語閱讀學習成效顯著優於採用不具自律學習機制之數位閱讀標註系統的控制組學習者。
二、 實驗組學習者採用具自律學習機制之數位閱讀標註系統，其閱讀標註能力顯著優於採用不具自律學習機制之數位閱讀標註系統的控制組學習者。
三、 實驗組學習者中不同自律能力學習者其閱讀學習成效具有顯著差異。
四、 實驗組學習者中不同自律能力學習者其閱讀標註能力具有顯著差異。
五、 實驗組學習者中閱讀學習成效與閱讀標註能力有顯著相關且自律能力與學習成效呈現正相關

關鍵字：自律學習、數位閱讀、閱讀標註、閱讀學習成效		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In the consideration of that digital reading has become a new trend of reading development; many studies were conducted to develop related reading systems or equipments to assist learners on learning of reading. Moreover, how to help students improve comprehension while reading English is an important topic for research. Based on the characteristics of digital reading in the e-learning environment, in which learners often need self-regulated learning, the ability of self-regulated learning has become a key factor that affects the learning effects of reading. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the application of reading annotation system with self-regulated learning could increase the learning effects of English reading for junior high school students. The present study adopted quasi-experimental design method and the subjects were two classes of seventh graders in a junior high school in Taoyuan County. There were divided into experimental group and control group to learn English through reading, and were instructed respectively with “reading annotation system learning with self-regulated learning” and “reading annotation system learning without self-regulated learning.” After the experiment, “reading post-test” was conducted to compare the learning effects of reading for these two groups of students. Students in the experimental group were also surveyed by questionnaires and interviewed for qualitative data analysis. Finally, the researcher made suggestions according to the research results as references for future studies and for teachers who want to apply reading annotation system with self-regulated learning to reading instruction. The results of the present study were as the following:
1. The learning effects of English reading for learners in the experimental group with self-regulated reading annotation system were significantly greater than those who were in the control group without self-regulated reading annotation system.
2. The ability of reading annotation of the learners in the experimental group with self-regulated reading annotation system were significantly greater than those who were in the control group without self-regulated reading annotation system.
3. There were significant differences among the learning effects of reading for learners in the experimental group with different ability of self-regulated learning.
4. There were significant differences among the ability of reading annotation for learners in the experimental group with different ability of self-regulated learning.
5. For the learners in the experimental group, the learning effects of reading were significantly related to the ability of reading annotation; the ability of self-regulated learning was positively correlated with learning effects.
Keywords: self-regulated learning, digital reading, reading annotation, learning effects of reading		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目 錄
摘 要 I
ABSTRACT I
目 錄 II
表目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究動機與背景 1
1.2研究目的 3
1.3研究問題 3
1.4研究範圍與研究限制 4
1.5重要名詞釋義 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
2.1閱讀學習 7
2.2 標註系統 12
2.3自律學習 18
第三章 研究方法 25
3.1研究設計 25
3.2 研究變項 27
3.3 研究對象 28
3.4 研究工具 28
3.5 資料分析方法 39
第四章 實驗結果與分析 44
4.1 初始英語能力分析 44
4.2 數位閱讀標註實驗結果分析 45
4.3實驗組學習滿意度回饋問卷分析 58
4.4 數位閱讀標註系統開放式問題回饋分析 62
4.5綜合討論 70
第五章 結論與建議 73
5.1 結論 73
5.2 建議 76
參考文獻 80
附錄一 閱讀標註系統回饋問卷 85
附錄二 訪談內容大綱 86		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 3232727 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098913018en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自律學習zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 數位閱讀zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 閱讀標註zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 閱讀學習成效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) self-regulated learningen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) digital readingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) reading annotationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) learning effects of readingen_US
dc.title (題名) 運用自律學習機制提升閱讀標註學習成效研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A study on applying self-regulated learning mechanism for promoting learning performance of reading annotationen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 參考文獻
一、英文部分
AMBIA (1996). Re:mark TM. Markup and review for Adobe Acrobat Software.User’s Guide. http://www.ambia.com/remark.htm.
Armbruster, B.B., Echols, C. H., & Brown, A.L. (1983). The role of metacognition in reading to learn: a developmental perspective. The Volta Review, 84, 45-56.
Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344-370.
Baker, F. B., & Kim, S. H.(1992). Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques. N.Y.: Marcel Dekker.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall.
Boekaerts, M.(1997). Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learningand Instruction, 7, 161-186.
Brown, A.L., Capione, J.C., & Day, J.D. (1981). Learning to learn: on training students to learn from texts. Educational Research,10, 14-20.
Brush, A.J.B. (2002). “Annotating Digital Documents for Asynchronous Collaboration,＂Ph.D.dissertation, University of Washington,
Butler, D. B., & Winne, P. H.(1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis, Review of Education Research, 65(3), 245-281.
C. A. Wolters (1998), “Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation”, Journal of educational psychology, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 224-235.
Chang, M. M.(2005). Applying Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Web-Based Instruction-An Investigation of Motivation Perception, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 217-230.
Chen, C. M.(2009). Personalized E-learning system with self-regulated learning assisted mechanisms for promoting learning performance. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, issue 5, 8816-8829.
Chen. C. M., & Chen, C. C. (2010). Problem-based learning supported by digital archives: Case study of Taiwan Libraries` History Digital Library. The Electronic Library, 28(1), 5-28.
Cheng, T.-y. (1993). The syntactical problems Chinese college students meet in reading English technical textbooks. Indiana: ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 364094.
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chui, M.H., & La Vancher, C.(1999). Eliciting self-explanation improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.
Danchev, A. (1983). The controversy over translation in foreign languageteaching (f. l. t. translation, Trans.), Translation in the system of foreign languages training (pp. 35-43). Paris: Round Table FIT-UNESCO.
Hannafin, M. J.,& Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167–202.
Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing writing summaries: task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction.Review of educational research, 56(4), 473-493.
Jacobson, M., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 149–199.
Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J.(2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in web-base instruction, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(2), 5-17.
Kahan, J., Koivunen, M., Prud`Hommeaux, E. and Swick, R.R. (2001). “Annotea: An Open RDF Infrastructure for Shared Web Annotations,＂Tenth World Wide Web Conference, HongKong, pp.623-632.
Lamberg, W.J. & Lamb, C.E. (1980). Reading instruction in the content areas. Chicago: Rand McNally College Pub. Co.
Lerner, J.W. (2000). Learning disabilities: theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies(8th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Ley, K., & Young, D.(2001). Instructional principles for self-regulated learning, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49(2), 93-102.
Liao, P. (2002). Taiwanese students` beliefs about translation and their use of translation as a strategy to learn English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
Marshall, C. C. (1997). Annotation: from paper books to the digital library. In Proceedings of the second ACM international conference on Digital libraries (pp. 131-140). ACM New York, NY, USA.
Mcmanus, T. F.(2000). Individualizing Instruction in a Web-Based Hypermedia Learning Environment: Nonlinearity, Advance Organizers, and Self-Regulated Learners, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(3), 219-251.
Microsoft (1998). Microsoft Word.http://www.miscrosoft.com/office/word/default.htm
Mory, E. H.(2003). Feedback research revisited. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: a project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed.), 745-783. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nelson F. Du Bois, & Richard, K.(1997). Staley A Self-Regulated Learning Approach to Teaching Educational Psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 9, 171-197.
Niemi, H., Nevgi, A., & Virtanen, P.(2003). Towards self-regulation in Web-based learning, Journal of Educational Media, 28, 49-71.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. New York: Academic Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies:What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
Ovsiannikov, I. A., Arbib, M. A.,& Mcneill, T. H. (1999) Annotation Technology. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 50, 329-362.
Patrick Rau, P. L., Chen, S. H., & Chin, Y. T. (2004). Developing web annotation tools for learners and instructors. Interacting with Computers,16, 163–181.
P. Nokelainen, J. Kurhila, M. Miettinen, P. Floreen, H. Tirri: "Evaluating the Role of a Shared Document-based Annotation Tool in Learner-centered Collaborative Learning". In Proc. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2003), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 200-203.
Pearson, P.D., & Johnson, D.D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
P. R. Pintrich and E. V. DeGroot (1990), “Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 33-40.
Phelps, T.A. and Wilensky, R. (2000). “Robust Intra-document Locations,＂Ninth World WideWeb Conference, Amsterdam.
Pintrich, P. R.(2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, 451-502. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Quade,A. M. (1996). An assessment of retention and depth of processing associated with notetaking using traditional paper and pencil and on- line notepad during computer-delivered instruction.(Eric Document Reproduction Service, No. ED383 330)
Robinson, D. H., & Schraw, G. (1994). Computational efficiency through visual argument: Do graphic organizers communicate relations in text too effectively? Contemporary Educational Psychology 19, 399-415.
Roscheisen, M., Mogensen, C., Winograd, T. (1995). Shared web annotations as a platform for third-party value-added information providers: architecture, protocols, and usage examples. Technical Report CSDTR/DLTR.
Robinson, D. H., & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology 87, 455-467.
Shih, K. P., Chang, C. Y., Chen, H. C., & Wang, S. S.(2005). A Self-Regulated Learning System with Scaffolding Support for Self-Regulated e/m-Learning, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Information Technology: Research and Education.
Swaby, B.E.R. (1989). Diagnosis and correction of reading difficulties. Boston,MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of note taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 323-338.
Wenden, A. (1986).What do second-language learners know about their language learning? A second look at retrospective accounts. Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 186-201.
Winne, P.H., & Hadwin, A.F.(1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds), Matecognition in educational theory and practice, 277-304, Hillsadale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Yee, K.P. (2002). “CritLink: Advanced Hyperlinks Enable Public Annotation on the Web,＂Proceedings of Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), , New Orleans, Louisiana.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing selfregulated learner : Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington,DC: American Psychological Association.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H.(2001). Reflections on theories, identities, and actions of self-regulated learners. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives, 289-307. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

二、中文部分
王宗斌（1999）。訓練方式、電腦自我效能及學習型態對學習績效的影響-網頁設計實地研究。中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，中壢市。
王順興(2001)。網路上目標設定環境的建置以閱讀網站為例。國立中央大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文，未出版，中壢市。
李錦興（2006）。探討網頁註記標記語言與註記回顧對於數學學習之影響。未出版碩士，國立中央大學資訊工程學系碩士在職專班未出版，中壢市。
林桑瑜(2002)。高中生自我調整學習策略之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
林建平(1994)。整合學習策略與動機的訓練方案對國小閱讀理解困難兒童的輔導效果。國立台灣師範大學教育心裡與輔導研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
林政斌(2001)。線上學習代理人之分析與設計。國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
洪月女(1998)。談閱讀。台北：心理出版。
高台茜(2003)。非同步網路教學中自律學習的鷹架輔助研究。國立東華大學教育研究所，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫(編號：NSC91-2520-S-259-001)。
秦韻婷(2002)。開發線上註記分享平台輔助鷹架教學之研究。中原大學資訊管理學系碩士學位論文，未出版，中壢市。
葉修文(2005)。電子文件之線上註記系統發展與閱讀教學應用。中原學報第三十三卷第二期，頁193-214。
陳守賢(2001)。建構易用線上註記平台。中原大學資訊管理學系碩士學位論文，未出版，中壢市。
陳志銘(2010)。"認知型態與標註品質對閱讀成效之影響與關聯研究：以數位閱讀標註系統為例" ，圖書與資訊學刊。
陳玟伶(2000)。國小高年級兒童自我調整歷程之個案研究。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係：自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報：教育類，46(1)，67-92。
廖聖傑, (Ed.). (2003)。從學習歷程檔案建構決策樹以支援網路教學。國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
蔡忠潔(2007)。具自律學習輔助機制的網路探究學習系統之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文。未出版，台北市。
謝政成(2010)。發展自律學習監控及偵測機制提升網路學習之學習成效研究。國立臺灣師範大學應用電子科技研究所碩士文。未出版，台北市。		zh_TW