學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 結合本體論與案例推理之合理使用推薦
Ontology-supported case-based reasoning for a fair use recommendation作者 楊協達
Yang, Xie Da貢獻者 胡毓忠
Hu, Yuh Jong
楊協達
Yang, Xie Da關鍵詞 本體論
規則語言
案例式比對
合理使用
Ontology
Rule language
CBR
fair use日期 2011 上傳時間 4-九月-2013 17:11:29 (UTC+8) 摘要 網路的發達使得數位內容的流通更加的便利，數位內容擁有者為了避免資料被任意散播，而採用DRM(Digital Rights Management)系統來保護自身的權利。然而DRM系統是採用限制的方式來控管資料的使用，並沒有考量到合理使用的設計，其中主要的原因在於合理使用的規範難以設計且用電腦落實，時常會有一些情況需視個案而定。 本研究希望透過結合本體論推論與案例式比對的來解決合理使用規範難以制定的問題，利用本體論與規則語言進行推論做合理使用判斷，當本體論與規則語言無法判斷時再進行案例式比對，經由案例庫中的合理使用案例，我們可以明確的給予使用者在對數位內容操作上是否為合理使用的依歸，若沒有相符的案例，依舊可以給予使用者一個迫近預期的合理使用建議。
Thanks to the development of network, it is much more convenient to spread digital contents; nevertheless, digital content owners can only use DRM (Digital Rights Management) system to protect their personal data from unapproved spreading. However, the fair use design is barely taken into consideration in the DRM system since it only uses limit principles to control data-spreading. The main reason is that fair use policy is not only hard to design but also hard to be universally practiced on computers. Furthermore, there are always rooms for fair use cases beyond a general model description.This research aims to combine the advantages of ontology reasoning and case-based reasoning (CBR) to solve the problem of defining and enforcing fair use policy. Applying ontology and the rule language is the first approach to infer fair use decision; following is the CBR. This means that if ontology is not able to infer a fair use through its enforceable policy, then we apply CBR technique by compared with previous fair use cases established in our case base. Therefore, we can always derive a fair use or not fair use decision. Otherwise, we propose a recommendation for how to achieve a fair use or avoid not a fair use.參考文獻 [1] Roberto Garcia and Rosa Gil (2008) . “A Web Ontology for Copyright Contract Management”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol.12, pp.99-114[2] T.K. Armstrong (2006). “Digital Rights Management and the Process of Fair Use” , In Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol.20, pp.49-121.[3] F. S. Grodzinsky and M.C. Bottis (2007) . “Private Use as Fair Use：Is it Fair?” , SIGCAS Computers and Society, Vol.37，No.2.[4] E.W. Felten(2003). “A skeptical view of DRM and fair use” , In communication of the ACM, Vol.46, No.4, pp.34-39.[5] A. Aamodt and E. Plaza(1994). “Case-based reasoning：Foundational issues, methodological variations and sys approaches”, AI Communications, No.1, pp.39-49[6] Janet L.Kolodner(1992). “An Introduction to Case-Based Reasoning” ,Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol.6, pp.3-34.[7] Ralph Bergmann, Martin Schaaf(2003).“Structural Case-Based Reasoning and Ontology-Based Knowledge Management: A Perfect Match”, Journal of Universal Computer Scince, Vol.9, No.7, pp.608-626.[8] Columbia University Libraries/Information Services(2011)http://copyright.columbia.edu/copyright/fair-use/case-summaries/[9] Juan A. Recio-Garcia, Belen Diaz-Agudo, and Pedro Gonzalez-Calero(2008).“jCOLIBRI 2 case-Based Reasoning Framework”, group for artifcial intelligence applications universidad complutense de madrid.[10] Friedman-Hill, E.J.(2000). “Jess, The Java Expert System Shell”, Distributed Computing Systems, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA.[11] Knublauch, H., M. A. Musen, and A. L. Rector(2004). “Editing description logics ontologies with the Protégé OWL plugin”, International Workshop on Description Logics., Vol.104[12] D.Mulligan,A. Burstein(2003). “Implementing Copyright Limitations in Rights Expression”, In Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2696: pp.137-154. [13] J.S.Erickson(2003). “Fair use, DRM, and trusted computing”, In Communication of the ACM,Vol.46, No.4, pp. 34-39[14] Li Shuguang, Jiang Qing and Chris George(2000) .”Combining Case-based and Model-based Reasoning: A formal specification”, UNU/IIST Report No.188[15] Adam Wyner, Rinke Hoekstra(2010). “A Legal Case OWL Ontology with an Instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi” ,The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol.14, pp.1-24.[16] Adam WYNER (2008). “An Ontology in OWL for Legal Case-based Reasoning” , Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vol.16, No.4, pp. 361-387. [17] 林光德(2009)，“實踐具語意的著管理規範來逼近合理使用” , 國立政治大學資訊科學系碩士論文。[18] S. Guth, R. Iannella (2009). “ ODRL V2.0 - Core Model (Poznan Edition)." http://odrl.net/2.0/DS-ODRL-Model-20090306.html[19] Assali, A. A., D. Lenne, et al. (2009). “Case retrieval in ontology-based CBR systems” ,Proceedings of the 32nd annual German conference on Advances in artificial intelligence., Vol.5803, pp.564-571.[20] T.W. Liao*, Z.M. Zhang, C.R. Mount (2000).“A case-based reasoning system for identifying failure mechanisms” , Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence , Vol.13 ,pp.199-213.[21] Ian Horrocks, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Harold Boley, Said Tabet, Benjamin Grosof, Mike Dean(2004). ”SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule LanguageCombining OWL and RuleML”, http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/ 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
資訊科學學系
98753033
100資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0987530331 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 胡毓忠 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Hu, Yuh Jong en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 楊協達 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Yang, Xie Da en_US dc.creator (作者) 楊協達 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Yang, Xie Da en_US dc.date (日期) 2011 en_US dc.date.accessioned 4-九月-2013 17:11:29 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 4-九月-2013 17:11:29 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-九月-2013 17:11:29 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0987530331 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60266 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 資訊科學學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 98753033 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 100 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 網路的發達使得數位內容的流通更加的便利，數位內容擁有者為了避免資料被任意散播，而採用DRM(Digital Rights Management)系統來保護自身的權利。然而DRM系統是採用限制的方式來控管資料的使用，並沒有考量到合理使用的設計，其中主要的原因在於合理使用的規範難以設計且用電腦落實，時常會有一些情況需視個案而定。 本研究希望透過結合本體論推論與案例式比對的來解決合理使用規範難以制定的問題，利用本體論與規則語言進行推論做合理使用判斷，當本體論與規則語言無法判斷時再進行案例式比對，經由案例庫中的合理使用案例，我們可以明確的給予使用者在對數位內容操作上是否為合理使用的依歸，若沒有相符的案例，依舊可以給予使用者一個迫近預期的合理使用建議。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Thanks to the development of network, it is much more convenient to spread digital contents; nevertheless, digital content owners can only use DRM (Digital Rights Management) system to protect their personal data from unapproved spreading. However, the fair use design is barely taken into consideration in the DRM system since it only uses limit principles to control data-spreading. The main reason is that fair use policy is not only hard to design but also hard to be universally practiced on computers. Furthermore, there are always rooms for fair use cases beyond a general model description.This research aims to combine the advantages of ontology reasoning and case-based reasoning (CBR) to solve the problem of defining and enforcing fair use policy. Applying ontology and the rule language is the first approach to infer fair use decision; following is the CBR. This means that if ontology is not able to infer a fair use through its enforceable policy, then we apply CBR technique by compared with previous fair use cases established in our case base. Therefore, we can always derive a fair use or not fair use decision. Otherwise, we propose a recommendation for how to achieve a fair use or avoid not a fair use. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 摘要 1誌謝 3圖目錄 6第一章 81.1 研究動機 81.2 研究目的 91.3 各章節概述 10第二章 112.1 合理使用與數位著作管理 112.2 CBR與KNN演算法 122.3本體論 14第三章 153.1 使用OWL ONTOLOGY來建構法律案件 153.2 實踐具有語意的著作權管理規範來逼近合理使用 16第四章 174.1 研究架構 174.2本體論結合規則語言之合理使用推論 204.3 CBR系統之合理使用案例比對 284.3.1 案例描述 294.3.2 本體論與案例庫的建構 374.3.3基於本體論的相似度計算 384.3.4 實際案例的相似度計算 41第五章 435.1 系統架構 435.2 PROTÉGÉ實作本體論與規則 455.3 JCOLIBRI2實作CBR系統 475.4 CBR系統與SWRL TAB整合 485.5 情境模擬 50第六章 54參考文獻 55 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1367267 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0987530331 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 本體論 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 規則語言 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 案例式比對 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 合理使用 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Ontology en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Rule language en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) CBR en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) fair use en_US dc.title (題名) 結合本體論與案例推理之合理使用推薦 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Ontology-supported case-based reasoning for a fair use recommendation en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [1] Roberto Garcia and Rosa Gil (2008) . “A Web Ontology for Copyright Contract Management”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol.12, pp.99-114[2] T.K. Armstrong (2006). “Digital Rights Management and the Process of Fair Use” , In Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol.20, pp.49-121.[3] F. S. Grodzinsky and M.C. Bottis (2007) . “Private Use as Fair Use：Is it Fair?” , SIGCAS Computers and Society, Vol.37，No.2.[4] E.W. Felten(2003). “A skeptical view of DRM and fair use” , In communication of the ACM, Vol.46, No.4, pp.34-39.[5] A. Aamodt and E. Plaza(1994). “Case-based reasoning：Foundational issues, methodological variations and sys approaches”, AI Communications, No.1, pp.39-49[6] Janet L.Kolodner(1992). “An Introduction to Case-Based Reasoning” ,Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol.6, pp.3-34.[7] Ralph Bergmann, Martin Schaaf(2003).“Structural Case-Based Reasoning and Ontology-Based Knowledge Management: A Perfect Match”, Journal of Universal Computer Scince, Vol.9, No.7, pp.608-626.[8] Columbia University Libraries/Information Services(2011)http://copyright.columbia.edu/copyright/fair-use/case-summaries/[9] Juan A. Recio-Garcia, Belen Diaz-Agudo, and Pedro Gonzalez-Calero(2008).“jCOLIBRI 2 case-Based Reasoning Framework”, group for artifcial intelligence applications universidad complutense de madrid.[10] Friedman-Hill, E.J.(2000). “Jess, The Java Expert System Shell”, Distributed Computing Systems, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA.[11] Knublauch, H., M. A. Musen, and A. L. Rector(2004). “Editing description logics ontologies with the Protégé OWL plugin”, International Workshop on Description Logics., Vol.104[12] D.Mulligan,A. Burstein(2003). “Implementing Copyright Limitations in Rights Expression”, In Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2696: pp.137-154. [13] J.S.Erickson(2003). “Fair use, DRM, and trusted computing”, In Communication of the ACM,Vol.46, No.4, pp. 34-39[14] Li Shuguang, Jiang Qing and Chris George(2000) .”Combining Case-based and Model-based Reasoning: A formal specification”, UNU/IIST Report No.188[15] Adam Wyner, Rinke Hoekstra(2010). “A Legal Case OWL Ontology with an Instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi” ,The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol.14, pp.1-24.[16] Adam WYNER (2008). “An Ontology in OWL for Legal Case-based Reasoning” , Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vol.16, No.4, pp. 361-387. [17] 林光德(2009)，“實踐具語意的著管理規範來逼近合理使用” , 國立政治大學資訊科學系碩士論文。[18] S. Guth, R. Iannella (2009). “ ODRL V2.0 - Core Model (Poznan Edition)." http://odrl.net/2.0/DS-ODRL-Model-20090306.html[19] Assali, A. A., D. Lenne, et al. (2009). “Case retrieval in ontology-based CBR systems” ,Proceedings of the 32nd annual German conference on Advances in artificial intelligence., Vol.5803, pp.564-571.[20] T.W. Liao*, Z.M. Zhang, C.R. Mount (2000).“A case-based reasoning system for identifying failure mechanisms” , Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence , Vol.13 ,pp.199-213.[21] Ian Horrocks, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Harold Boley, Said Tabet, Benjamin Grosof, Mike Dean(2004). ”SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule LanguageCombining OWL and RuleML”, http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/ zh_TW
