1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Informatics
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 結合本體論與案例推理之合理使用推薦
Ontology-supported case-based reasoning for a fair use recommendation
作者 楊協達
Yang, Xie Da
貢獻者 胡毓忠
Hu, Yuh Jong
楊協達
Yang, Xie Da
關鍵詞 本體論
規則語言
案例式比對
合理使用
Ontology
Rule language
CBR
fair use
日期 2011
上傳時間 4-Sep-2013 17:11:29 (UTC+8)
摘要 網路的發達使得數位內容的流通更加的便利，數位內容擁有者為了避免資料被任意散播，而採用DRM(Digital Rights Management)系統來保護自身的權利。然而DRM系統是採用限制的方式來控管資料的使用，並沒有考量到合理使用的設計，其中主要的原因在於合理使用的規範難以設計且用電腦落實，時常會有一些情況需視個案而定。
本研究希望透過結合本體論推論與案例式比對的來解決合理使用規範難以制定的問題，利用本體論與規則語言進行推論做合理使用判斷，當本體論與規則語言無法判斷時再進行案例式比對，經由案例庫中的合理使用案例，我們可以明確的給予使用者在對數位內容操作上是否為合理使用的依歸，若沒有相符的案例，依舊可以給予使用者一個迫近預期的合理使用建議。
Thanks to the development of network, it is much more convenient to spread digital contents; nevertheless, digital content owners can only use DRM (Digital Rights Management) system to protect their personal data from unapproved spreading. However, the fair use design is barely taken into consideration in the DRM system since it only uses limit principles to control data-spreading. The main reason is that fair use policy is not only hard to design but also hard to be universally practiced on computers. Furthermore, there are always rooms for fair use cases beyond a general model description.
This research aims to combine the advantages of ontology reasoning and case-based reasoning (CBR) to solve the problem of defining and enforcing fair use policy. Applying ontology and the rule language is the first approach to infer fair use decision; following is the CBR. This means that if ontology is not able to infer a fair use through its enforceable policy, then we apply CBR technique by compared with previous fair use cases established in our case base. Therefore, we can always derive a fair use or not fair use decision. Otherwise, we propose a recommendation for how to achieve a fair use or avoid not a fair use.
參考文獻 [1] Roberto Garcia and Rosa Gil (2008) . “A Web Ontology for Copyright Contract Management”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol.12, pp.99-114

[2] T.K. Armstrong (2006). “Digital Rights Management and the Process of Fair Use” , In Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol.20, pp.49-121.

[3] F. S. Grodzinsky and M.C. Bottis (2007) . “Private Use as Fair Use：Is it Fair?” , SIGCAS Computers and Society, Vol.37，No.2.

[4] E.W. Felten(2003). “A skeptical view of DRM and fair use” , In communication of the ACM, Vol.46, No.4, pp.34-39.

[5] A. Aamodt and E. Plaza(1994). “Case-based reasoning：Foundational issues, methodological variations and sys approaches”, AI Communications, No.1, pp.39-49

[6] Janet L.Kolodner(1992). “An Introduction to Case-Based Reasoning” ,Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol.6, pp.3-34.

[7] Ralph Bergmann, Martin Schaaf(2003).“Structural Case-Based Reasoning and Ontology-Based Knowledge Management: A Perfect Match”, Journal of Universal Computer Scince, Vol.9, No.7, pp.608-626.

[8] Columbia University Libraries/Information Services(2011)
http://copyright.columbia.edu/copyright/fair-use/case-summaries/

[9] Juan A. Recio-Garcia, Belen Diaz-Agudo, and Pedro Gonzalez-Calero(2008).“jCOLIBRI 2 case-Based Reasoning Framework”, group for artifcial intelligence applications universidad complutense de madrid.

[10] Friedman-Hill, E.J.(2000). “Jess, The Java Expert System Shell”, Distributed Computing Systems, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA.

[11] Knublauch, H., M. A. Musen, and A. L. Rector(2004). “Editing description logics ontologies with the Protégé OWL plugin”, International Workshop on Description Logics., Vol.104

[12] D.Mulligan,A. Burstein(2003). “Implementing Copyright Limitations in Rights Expression”, In Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2696: pp.137-154.

[13] J.S.Erickson(2003). “Fair use, DRM, and trusted computing”, In Communication of the ACM,Vol.46, No.4, pp. 34-39

[14] Li Shuguang, Jiang Qing and Chris George(2000) .”Combining Case-based and Model-based Reasoning: A formal specification”, UNU/IIST Report No.188

[15] Adam Wyner, Rinke Hoekstra(2010). “A Legal Case OWL Ontology with an Instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi” ,The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol.14, pp.1-24.

[16] Adam WYNER (2008). “An Ontology in OWL for Legal Case-based Reasoning” , Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vol.16, No.4, pp. 361-387.

[17] 林光德(2009)，“實踐具語意的著管理規範來逼近合理使用” , 國立政治大學資訊科學系碩士論文。

[18] S. Guth, R. Iannella (2009). “ ODRL V2.0 - Core Model (Poznan Edition)."
http://odrl.net/2.0/DS-ODRL-Model-20090306.html

[19] Assali, A. A., D. Lenne, et al. (2009). “Case retrieval in ontology-based CBR systems” ,Proceedings of the 32nd annual German conference on Advances in artificial intelligence., Vol.5803, pp.564-571.

[20] T.W. Liao*, Z.M. Zhang, C.R. Mount (2000).“A case-based reasoning system for
identifying failure mechanisms” , Engineering Applications of Artificial
Intelligence , Vol.13 ,pp.199-213.

[21] Ian Horrocks, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Harold Boley, Said Tabet, Benjamin Grosof, Mike
Dean(2004). ”SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule LanguageCombining OWL and RuleML”, http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
資訊科學學系
98753033
100
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0987530331
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 胡毓忠zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Hu, Yuh Jongen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 楊協達zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Yang, Xie Daen_US
dc.creator (作者) 楊協達zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Yang, Xie Daen_US
dc.date (日期) 2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned 4-Sep-2013 17:11:29 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 4-Sep-2013 17:11:29 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Sep-2013 17:11:29 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0987530331en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60266-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 資訊科學學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98753033zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 網路的發達使得數位內容的流通更加的便利，數位內容擁有者為了避免資料被任意散播，而採用DRM(Digital Rights Management)系統來保護自身的權利。然而DRM系統是採用限制的方式來控管資料的使用，並沒有考量到合理使用的設計，其中主要的原因在於合理使用的規範難以設計且用電腦落實，時常會有一些情況需視個案而定。
本研究希望透過結合本體論推論與案例式比對的來解決合理使用規範難以制定的問題，利用本體論與規則語言進行推論做合理使用判斷，當本體論與規則語言無法判斷時再進行案例式比對，經由案例庫中的合理使用案例，我們可以明確的給予使用者在對數位內容操作上是否為合理使用的依歸，若沒有相符的案例，依舊可以給予使用者一個迫近預期的合理使用建議。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Thanks to the development of network, it is much more convenient to spread digital contents; nevertheless, digital content owners can only use DRM (Digital Rights Management) system to protect their personal data from unapproved spreading. However, the fair use design is barely taken into consideration in the DRM system since it only uses limit principles to control data-spreading. The main reason is that fair use policy is not only hard to design but also hard to be universally practiced on computers. Furthermore, there are always rooms for fair use cases beyond a general model description.
This research aims to combine the advantages of ontology reasoning and case-based reasoning (CBR) to solve the problem of defining and enforcing fair use policy. Applying ontology and the rule language is the first approach to infer fair use decision; following is the CBR. This means that if ontology is not able to infer a fair use through its enforceable policy, then we apply CBR technique by compared with previous fair use cases established in our case base. Therefore, we can always derive a fair use or not fair use decision. Otherwise, we propose a recommendation for how to achieve a fair use or avoid not a fair use.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 摘要 1
誌謝 3
圖目錄 6
第一章 8
1.1 研究動機 8
1.2 研究目的 9
1.3 各章節概述 10
第二章 11
2.1 合理使用與數位著作管理 11
2.2 CBR與KNN演算法 12
2.3本體論 14
第三章 15
3.1 使用OWL ONTOLOGY來建構法律案件 15
3.2 實踐具有語意的著作權管理規範來逼近合理使用 16
第四章 17
4.1 研究架構 17
4.2本體論結合規則語言之合理使用推論 20
4.3 CBR系統之合理使用案例比對 28
4.3.1 案例描述 29
4.3.2 本體論與案例庫的建構 37
4.3.3基於本體論的相似度計算 38
4.3.4 實際案例的相似度計算 41
第五章 43
5.1 系統架構 43
5.2 PROTÉGÉ實作本體論與規則 45
5.3 JCOLIBRI2實作CBR系統 47
5.4 CBR系統與SWRL TAB整合 48
5.5 情境模擬 50
第六章 54
參考文獻 55		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1367267 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0987530331en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 本體論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 規則語言zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 案例式比對zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 合理使用zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Ontologyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Rule languageen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) CBRen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) fair useen_US
dc.title (題名) 結合本體論與案例推理之合理使用推薦zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Ontology-supported case-based reasoning for a fair use recommendationen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [1] Roberto Garcia and Rosa Gil (2008) . “A Web Ontology for Copyright Contract Management”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol.12, pp.99-114

[2] T.K. Armstrong (2006). “Digital Rights Management and the Process of Fair Use” , In Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol.20, pp.49-121.

[3] F. S. Grodzinsky and M.C. Bottis (2007) . “Private Use as Fair Use：Is it Fair?” , SIGCAS Computers and Society, Vol.37，No.2.

[4] E.W. Felten(2003). “A skeptical view of DRM and fair use” , In communication of the ACM, Vol.46, No.4, pp.34-39.

[5] A. Aamodt and E. Plaza(1994). “Case-based reasoning：Foundational issues, methodological variations and sys approaches”, AI Communications, No.1, pp.39-49

[6] Janet L.Kolodner(1992). “An Introduction to Case-Based Reasoning” ,Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol.6, pp.3-34.

[7] Ralph Bergmann, Martin Schaaf(2003).“Structural Case-Based Reasoning and Ontology-Based Knowledge Management: A Perfect Match”, Journal of Universal Computer Scince, Vol.9, No.7, pp.608-626.

[8] Columbia University Libraries/Information Services(2011)
http://copyright.columbia.edu/copyright/fair-use/case-summaries/

[9] Juan A. Recio-Garcia, Belen Diaz-Agudo, and Pedro Gonzalez-Calero(2008).“jCOLIBRI 2 case-Based Reasoning Framework”, group for artifcial intelligence applications universidad complutense de madrid.

[10] Friedman-Hill, E.J.(2000). “Jess, The Java Expert System Shell”, Distributed Computing Systems, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA.

[11] Knublauch, H., M. A. Musen, and A. L. Rector(2004). “Editing description logics ontologies with the Protégé OWL plugin”, International Workshop on Description Logics., Vol.104

[12] D.Mulligan,A. Burstein(2003). “Implementing Copyright Limitations in Rights Expression”, In Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2696: pp.137-154.

[13] J.S.Erickson(2003). “Fair use, DRM, and trusted computing”, In Communication of the ACM,Vol.46, No.4, pp. 34-39

[14] Li Shuguang, Jiang Qing and Chris George(2000) .”Combining Case-based and Model-based Reasoning: A formal specification”, UNU/IIST Report No.188

[15] Adam Wyner, Rinke Hoekstra(2010). “A Legal Case OWL Ontology with an Instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi” ,The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol.14, pp.1-24.

[16] Adam WYNER (2008). “An Ontology in OWL for Legal Case-based Reasoning” , Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vol.16, No.4, pp. 361-387.

[17] 林光德(2009)，“實踐具語意的著管理規範來逼近合理使用” , 國立政治大學資訊科學系碩士論文。

[18] S. Guth, R. Iannella (2009). “ ODRL V2.0 - Core Model (Poznan Edition)."
http://odrl.net/2.0/DS-ODRL-Model-20090306.html

[19] Assali, A. A., D. Lenne, et al. (2009). “Case retrieval in ontology-based CBR systems” ,Proceedings of the 32nd annual German conference on Advances in artificial intelligence., Vol.5803, pp.564-571.

[20] T.W. Liao*, Z.M. Zhang, C.R. Mount (2000).“A case-based reasoning system for
identifying failure mechanisms” , Engineering Applications of Artificial
Intelligence , Vol.13 ,pp.199-213.

[21] Ian Horrocks, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Harold Boley, Said Tabet, Benjamin Grosof, Mike
Dean(2004). ”SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule LanguageCombining OWL and RuleML”, http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/		zh_TW