1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Liberal Arts
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程對於學習專注力、情緒、認知負荷與學習成效之影響研究
Assessing the Effects of Different Video Lecture Types of OpenCourseWare on Learning Attention, Emotion, Cognitive Load and Performance
作者 吳中信
Wu, Chung Hsin
貢獻者 陳志銘
Chen, Chih Ming
吳中信
Wu, Chung Hsin
關鍵詞 多媒體影音開放式課程
資訊呈現方式
學習專注力
學習情緒
認知負荷
學習成效
Multimedia OpenCourseWare
Information Presentation
Learning Attention
Learning Emotion
Cognitive Load
Learning Performance
日期 2013
上傳時間 1-Oct-2013 11:53:44 (UTC+8)
摘要 　　隨著網路科技與數位媒體的日益發展，多媒體影音教材已成為開放式課程製作的主要趨勢，目前常用的多媒體影音開放式課程包括現場教學式、視窗教學式與媒體豐富式三種，這三種教材製作方式與成本具有不小差異，並且採用不同資訊呈現方式錄製，但國內外卻鮮少有相關研究從學習者的角度，探討多媒體影音開放式課程資訊呈現方式對於學習成效的影響，因此為了提升開放式課程的品質與成效，有必要進行深入的探究。
　　本研究透過Neurosky腦波偵測、emWave情緒感測儀器、認知負荷量表與學習成效測驗卷為研究工具，探討現場教學式、視窗教學式與媒體豐富式三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程，對於學習者的學習專注力、學習情緒、認知負荷與學習成效影響差異；也進一步探討上述三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程所引發學習者的學習專注力、學習情緒、認知負荷與學習成效彼此之間是否具有顯著關連，並針對彼此顯著中度相關之變項進行迴歸分析，以確認變項彼此之間是否具有可預測之因果關係。此外，也針對文字型和圖像型不同認知風格學習者，採用上述三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程進行學習時的學習專注力、學習情緒、認知負荷與學習成效是否具有顯著差異進行探討。
　　研究結果發現：1.學習者採用三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程，均可以有效增進學習者之學習成效，但是現場教學式與媒體豐富式之學習成效均顯著高於視窗教學式；2.視窗教學式所引發之學習專注力顯著高於媒體豐富式，其原因可能為心智負荷導致學習專注力的提升；3.三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程所引發之學習者正負面學習情緒均無顯著差異；4.三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程中，視窗教學式所引發之認知負荷顯著高於現場教學式與媒體豐富式，並且認知負荷高低會影響學習者之學習成效；5.文字型認知風格學習者採用視窗教學式之學習專注力顯著高於媒體豐富式，圖像型認知風格學習者採用視窗教學式之認知負荷顯著高於現場教學式與媒體豐富式；6.無論是文字型與圖像型認知風格學習者，採用現場教學式與媒體豐富式之學習成效均顯著高於視窗教學式；7.現場教學式之學習專注力與負面情緒具顯著正相關，學習專注力與正面情緒具顯著負相關，並發現兩者關係均具有可預測性。最後，本研究再依據成本、技術、媒體豐富度、學習專注力、學習情緒、認知負荷及學習成效面向進行三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程之優缺點整體歸納，結果顯示目前尚無絕對的低成本與高成效的多媒體影音教材製作型式被發展出來。期望本研究之成果有助於未來多媒體影音教材設計，以及選擇開放式課程製作模式時之參考。
　　Multimedia materials have become a trend in the production of OpenCourseWare because of the development of network technology and digital media. The common multimedia OpenCourseWare contain empirical teaching, window teaching, and media richness, which present various material production and costs as well as distinct information presentation recording. Nevertheless, little domestic and international research has discussed the effects of the information presentation in multimedia OpenCourseWare on learning performance from the aspect of learners. To enhance the quality and effectiveness of OpenCourseWare, a deep exploration is therefore necessary.
　　This study tends to explore the effects of the information presentation of empirical teaching, window teaching, and media richness in multimedia OpenCourseWare on learners’ attention to learning, learning emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance with Neurosky, the brainwave detection, emWave, the emotion sensing equipment, the cognitive load scale, and the learning performance test. Furthermore, the correlations among learners’ attention to learning, learning emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance induced by the three information presentations in multimedia OpenCourseWare are also discussed. The variables with significantly moderate correlations are proceeded Regression Analysis to ensure the predictable causation. Moreover, the attention to learning, learning emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance of learners with character and image cognitive styles are also explored the differences in the three information presentations in multimedia OpenCourseWare.
　　The research findings are summarized as below. 1. The learning performance of the learners applying the three information presentations in multimedia OpenCourseWare is enhanced, but the learning performance with empirical teaching and media richness is higher than it with window teaching. 2. The attention to learning induced by window teaching is remarkably higher than it with media richness, possibly because the mental workload enhances the attention to learning. 3. The learners’ positive/negative learning emotion induced by the three information presentations in multimedia OpenCourseWare do not appear notable differences. 4. The cognitive load induced by window teaching, within the three information presentations in multimedia OpenCourseWare, is significantly higher than it induced by empirical teaching and media richness, and the cognitive load would affect the learners’ learning performance. 5. The learners with character cognitive style reveal notably higher attention on the application of window teaching than it of media richness, while the learners with image cognitive style appear higher cognitive load on the application of window teaching than it of empirical teaching and media richness. 6. The learners with both character and image cognitive styles present higher learning performance on the application of empirical teaching and media richness than it of window teaching. 7. The attention to learning with empirical teaching shows remarkably positive correlations with negative emotion, but significantly negative correlations with positive emotion; and, the relationship is predictable. Finally, the advantages and shortcomings of the three information presentations in multimedia OpenCourseWare are further concluded based on the dimensions of costs, skills, media richness, learning attention, learning emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. The results show that there has not been an absolutely low-cost and high-effectiveness multimedia material production model developed. It is expected that the research results could assist in future multimedia material design and be the reference of selecting the open course production model.
參考文獻 中文部份
NeuroSky, Inc.（2012）。NeuroSky – 人人可用的腦波感測器。檢自：http://www.neurosky.com/zh-Hant/。
王乙婷、何美慧（2003）。自我教導策略增進ADHD兒童持續性注意力效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系特殊教育學報，18， 21-54。
台灣開放式課程聯盟（2012）。檢自：http://www.tocwc.org.tw。
林玉雯、黃台珠、劉嘉茹（2010）。課室學習專注力之研究－量表發展與分析應用。科學教育學刊，18（2），107-129。
林育如（2012）。行動閱讀之資訊呈現方式對於學習者專注力、閱讀理解與認知負荷之影響研究。圖書資訊與檔案學研究所碩士論文。台北市：國立政治大學。
胡婉琪（2012）。基於學習情緒及成效探討技能型學習遊戲之設計要素。圖書資訊與檔案學研究所碩士論文。台北市：國立政治大學。
馬郁凝、柯皓仁（2012）。以關注本位採用模式探討大學教師參與開放式課程之研究。圖書資訊學刊，10（1），117-153。
陳志銘、陳勇汀、林筱芳（2010）。通識教育開放式課程數位典藏建置之研究。大學圖書館，14（2），83-112。
鄭昭明（1993）。認知心理學：理論與實踐。桂冠圖書公司。
劉博烝（2012）。數位學習注意力與心跳率偵測系統之發展與應用。工程科學系所碩士論文。台南市：國立成功大學。
謝惠雯、陳昭珍（2011）。開放式課程教材之著作權問題研究。教育資料與圖書館學，48（3），381-406。

英文部份
Aylward, G. P., Verhulst, S. J., & Bell, S. (1990). Individual and combined effects of attention deficits and combined effects of attention deficits and learning disabilities on computerized ADHD assessment. Journal of Psycho Educational Assessment, 8(4), 497-508.
Baraniuk, R. G. (2008). Challenges and opportunities for the open education movement: A connexions case study. In Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M. S. V., (eds.), Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Berger, H. (1929).First human EEG paper: Ueber das Elektroenkephalogramm des Menschen. Archiv fur Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 87, 527-570.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford University Press.
Carson, S. (2009). The unwalled garden: growth of the OpenCourseWare Consortium, 2001-2008. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24(1), 23-29.
Chandler, P., Cooper, G., Pollock, E., & Tindall-Ford, S. (1998). Applying cognitive psychology principles to education and training. AARE98 Annual Conference.
Chen, C. M., & Lee T. H. (2011). Emotion Recognition and Communication for Reducing Second-language Speaking Anxiety in a Web-based One-to-One Synchronous Learning Environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 417-440.
Chen, C. M., & Sun, Y. C. (2012). Assessing the effects of different multimedia materials on emotions and learning performance for visual and verbal style learners. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1273-1285.
Chen, C. M., & Wang, H. P. (2011). Using emotion recognition technology to assess the effects of different multimedia materials on learning emotion and performance. Library & Information Science Research, 33, 244-255.
Childers, Terry L., Houston, Michael J., Susan E., & Heckler, S. E. (1985). Measurement of individual differences in visual versus verbal information processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 125-134.
Clark, Leonard H., Starr, Irvi. (1986). Secondary and Middle School Teaching Methods. Macmillan.
Clark, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-learning and the science of instruction (2nd ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22, 14-22.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design, in Research in organizational behavior. Edited by Cummings, L. L., and B. M. Staw, Homewood, IL: JAI Press, 191-233.
Darwin, C. (1965). The expression of Ihe emolions in man and animals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Dunn, R., Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching Secondary Students Through Their Individualized Learning Styles. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Co.
Effken, J. A., & Doyle, M. (2001). Interface design and cognitive style in learning an instructional computer simulation. Comput Nurs, 19(4), 164-171.
Ekman, P., & Davidson, R. J. (1994). The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Feinberg, S., & Murphy, M. (2000). Applying cognitive load theory to the design of Web-based instruction (pp. 353–360). Presented at the Professional Communication Conference. Proceedings of 2000 Joint IEEE International and 18th Annual Conference on Computer Documentation (IPCC/SIGDOC 2000), IEEE.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
Gopher, D., & Braune, R. (1984). On the Psychophysics of workload: Why bother with subjective measures? Human Factors, 26, 519-532.
Graf, S., Lan, C. H., Liu, T. C., & Kinshuk, K. (2009). Investigations about the Effects and Effectiveness of Adaptivity for Students with Different Learning　Styles. ICALT, 415-419.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hochschild, A. R. (1975). The sociology of feeling and emotion: Selected possibilities. In M. Millman., & R. M. Kantor (Eds.), Another voice: Feminist perspectives on social life and social science. New York: Anchor Books. 208-307
Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. The American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551-575.
Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M. S. V. (2008). Opening up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education Through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
James, W. (1983). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: the science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Jonassen, D. H., Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences. learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computer in the class-room. Multimedia and Hypermedia: Creativity Through Construction. Prentice Hall, 185-188.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Eaglewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Keefe, J. W. (1987). Learning Style: Theory and Practice. Reston. Virginia: National association of secondary school principals.
Kemper, T. D. (1978). A social interactional theory of emotions. New York: Wiley.
Kemper, T. D. (1991). Predicting emotions from social relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 330-342.
Kleinginna, P., Jr., & Kleinginna A. (1981b). A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion, 5, 345-379.
Kort, B., Reilly, R., & Picard, R.W. (2001). An Affective Model of Interplay Between Emotions and Learning: Reengineering Educational Pedagogy- Building a Learning Companion. In Proceedings of ICALT.
Kuchinskas, G. (1979). Whose cognitive style makes the difference? Education Leadership, 36(4), 269-271.
Kuhlen, R. G. (1968). Studies in Educational Psychology. Blaisdell Pub., Mass, Waltham.
Lai, S. L. (1998). The effects of visual display on analogies using computer-based learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(2), 151-160.
Lane, A. (2008). Widening participation in education through open educational resources. In T. Iiyoshi, Kumar, M. S. V.(ed.), Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
LeDoux, J. (1994). Emotion, memory, and the brain. Scientific American, 270, 50-57.
Lerman, S. R., Miyagawa, S., & Marguleis, A. H. (2008). OpenCourseWare: Building a culture of sharing. In T. Iiyoshi, Kumar, M. S. V.(ED.), Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Leutner, D., & Plass, J. L. (1998). Measuring learning styles with questionnaires versus direct observation of preferential choice behavior in authentic learning situations: the visualizer/verbalizer behavior observation scale (VV-BOS). Computers in Human Behavior, 14(4), 543-557.
Mark, S. S., & Ernest, J.M. (1992). Human Factors in Engineering and Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mayer, R. E. (1993). Comprehension of graphics in texts: An overview. Learning and Instruction, 3, 239-245.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The Instructive Animation: Helping Students Build Connections Between Words and Pictures in Multimedia Learning. Journal of Educatinal Psychology, 84, 444-452.
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth a thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 715-726.
Mayer, R. E., & Sims, K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2012). About OCW. From http://ocw.mit.edu/about/.
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19(1), 59-74.
Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing Cognitive Load by Mixing Auditory and Visual Presentation Modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319-334.
Najjar, L. J. (1996). Multimedia information and Information Learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Vol. 5, 129-150.
Nideffer, R. M. (1976). Test of attentional and interpersonal style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 394-404.
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skill: A Cognitive-Load Approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122-133.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Parsons, T. (1955). Family socialization and interaction processes. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Parsons, T. (1964). Social structure and personality. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Pedro P., Pilar R. (2006). The application of learning styles in both individual and collaborative learning. Advanced Learning Technologies.
Phillips, R. A. (1997). A developer’s handbook to interactive multimedia: A practical guide for educational applications. London: Kogan Page.
Piaget, J. (1989). Les relations entre l’intelligence et l’affectivité dans le　developpement de l’enfant. Rimé, B., Scherer, K. (Eds.) Les Émotions. Textes　de base en psychologie. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé. 75-95.
Richardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1(1), 109-126.
Shen, L., Wang, M., & Shen, R. (2009). Affective e-Learning: Using “Emotional” Data to Improve Learning in Pervasive Learning Environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 176–189.
Sissel G. S., & Helmut K. (2000). Using new learning technologies with multimedia. IEEE MultMedia, 7(3), 40-51.
Smith, S.M., Woody, P.C. (2000). Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles. Teaching of Psychology, 27(3), 220-223.
Sturm W. (1996). Evaluation in therapeutical contexts: attentional and neglect disorders. Eur Rev ApplPsychol, 46, 207-14.
Solso, R. L. (1995). Cognitive Psychology (4th ed).
Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251–296.
Tennant, M. (1988). Psychology and adult learning. London: Routledge.
Tomkins, S. S. (1982). Affect theory. In P. Ekman (ed) Emotion in the human face. New York: CUP.
UNESCO (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries. Paris, France: UNESCO.
Vaughan, T. (1993). Multimedia: Making it Work, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wickens, C. D. (1987). "Attention". Pursue Aviation Research Laboratory. University of Illinois, 61874.
Wierwille, W. W., & Eggmeier, F. L. (1993). Recommendations for mental workload measurement in a test and evaluation environment. Human Factors, 35, 263-281.
Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Education Psychologist, 11, 87-95.
Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Education Psychologist, 24, 345-376.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
100155002
102
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100155002
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳志銘zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Chih Mingen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 吳中信zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wu, Chung Hsinen_US
dc.creator (作者) 吳中信zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wu, Chung Hsinen_US
dc.date (日期) 2013en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Oct-2013 11:53:44 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Oct-2013 11:53:44 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Oct-2013 11:53:44 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0100155002en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/61173-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100155002zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 102zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 　　隨著網路科技與數位媒體的日益發展，多媒體影音教材已成為開放式課程製作的主要趨勢，目前常用的多媒體影音開放式課程包括現場教學式、視窗教學式與媒體豐富式三種，這三種教材製作方式與成本具有不小差異，並且採用不同資訊呈現方式錄製，但國內外卻鮮少有相關研究從學習者的角度，探討多媒體影音開放式課程資訊呈現方式對於學習成效的影響，因此為了提升開放式課程的品質與成效，有必要進行深入的探究。
　　本研究透過Neurosky腦波偵測、emWave情緒感測儀器、認知負荷量表與學習成效測驗卷為研究工具，探討現場教學式、視窗教學式與媒體豐富式三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程，對於學習者的學習專注力、學習情緒、認知負荷與學習成效影響差異；也進一步探討上述三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程所引發學習者的學習專注力、學習情緒、認知負荷與學習成效彼此之間是否具有顯著關連，並針對彼此顯著中度相關之變項進行迴歸分析，以確認變項彼此之間是否具有可預測之因果關係。此外，也針對文字型和圖像型不同認知風格學習者，採用上述三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程進行學習時的學習專注力、學習情緒、認知負荷與學習成效是否具有顯著差異進行探討。
　　研究結果發現：1.學習者採用三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程，均可以有效增進學習者之學習成效，但是現場教學式與媒體豐富式之學習成效均顯著高於視窗教學式；2.視窗教學式所引發之學習專注力顯著高於媒體豐富式，其原因可能為心智負荷導致學習專注力的提升；3.三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程所引發之學習者正負面學習情緒均無顯著差異；4.三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程中，視窗教學式所引發之認知負荷顯著高於現場教學式與媒體豐富式，並且認知負荷高低會影響學習者之學習成效；5.文字型認知風格學習者採用視窗教學式之學習專注力顯著高於媒體豐富式，圖像型認知風格學習者採用視窗教學式之認知負荷顯著高於現場教學式與媒體豐富式；6.無論是文字型與圖像型認知風格學習者，採用現場教學式與媒體豐富式之學習成效均顯著高於視窗教學式；7.現場教學式之學習專注力與負面情緒具顯著正相關，學習專注力與正面情緒具顯著負相關，並發現兩者關係均具有可預測性。最後，本研究再依據成本、技術、媒體豐富度、學習專注力、學習情緒、認知負荷及學習成效面向進行三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程之優缺點整體歸納，結果顯示目前尚無絕對的低成本與高成效的多媒體影音教材製作型式被發展出來。期望本研究之成果有助於未來多媒體影音教材設計，以及選擇開放式課程製作模式時之參考。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 　　Multimedia materials have become a trend in the production of OpenCourseWare because of the development of network technology and digital media. The common multimedia OpenCourseWare contain empirical teaching, window teaching, and media richness, which present various material production and costs as well as distinct information presentation recording. Nevertheless, little domestic and international research has discussed the effects of the information presentation in multimedia OpenCourseWare on learning performance from the aspect of learners. To enhance the quality and effectiveness of OpenCourseWare, a deep exploration is therefore necessary.
　　This study tends to explore the effects of the information presentation of empirical teaching, window teaching, and media richness in multimedia OpenCourseWare on learners’ attention to learning, learning emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance with Neurosky, the brainwave detection, emWave, the emotion sensing equipment, the cognitive load scale, and the learning performance test. Furthermore, the correlations among learners’ attention to learning, learning emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance induced by the three information presentations in multimedia OpenCourseWare are also discussed. The variables with significantly moderate correlations are proceeded Regression Analysis to ensure the predictable causation. Moreover, the attention to learning, learning emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance of learners with character and image cognitive styles are also explored the differences in the three information presentations in multimedia OpenCourseWare.
　　The research findings are summarized as below. 1. The learning performance of the learners applying the three information presentations in multimedia OpenCourseWare is enhanced, but the learning performance with empirical teaching and media richness is higher than it with window teaching. 2. The attention to learning induced by window teaching is remarkably higher than it with media richness, possibly because the mental workload enhances the attention to learning. 3. The learners’ positive/negative learning emotion induced by the three information presentations in multimedia OpenCourseWare do not appear notable differences. 4. The cognitive load induced by window teaching, within the three information presentations in multimedia OpenCourseWare, is significantly higher than it induced by empirical teaching and media richness, and the cognitive load would affect the learners’ learning performance. 5. The learners with character cognitive style reveal notably higher attention on the application of window teaching than it of media richness, while the learners with image cognitive style appear higher cognitive load on the application of window teaching than it of empirical teaching and media richness. 6. The learners with both character and image cognitive styles present higher learning performance on the application of empirical teaching and media richness than it of window teaching. 7. The attention to learning with empirical teaching shows remarkably positive correlations with negative emotion, but significantly negative correlations with positive emotion; and, the relationship is predictable. Finally, the advantages and shortcomings of the three information presentations in multimedia OpenCourseWare are further concluded based on the dimensions of costs, skills, media richness, learning attention, learning emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. The results show that there has not been an absolutely low-cost and high-effectiveness multimedia material production model developed. It is expected that the research results could assist in future multimedia material design and be the reference of selecting the open course production model.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目錄
摘要 i
Abstract iii
目錄 vi
圖目錄 viii
表目錄 ix
第一章 緒論 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究目的與問題 3
第三節、研究範圍與限制 4
第四節、名詞解釋 4
第五節、論文架構 7
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節、多媒體學習理論 9
第二節、認知負荷 13
第三節、學習專注力 16
第四節、學習情緒 18
第五節、認知風格 19
第六節、開放式課程 20
第三章 研究方法 23
第一節、研究架構 23
第二節、研究方法 24
第三節、選擇之三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程比較 25
第四節、研究工具 28
第五節、實驗設計 33
第六節、資料分析 35
第四章 實驗結果分析 37
第一節、實驗對象背景說明與設計之三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程難易度及學習成效分析 37
第二節、學習者使用三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程之學習專注力、學習情緒、認知負荷與學習成效差異分析 38
第三節、圖文不同認知風格學習者使用三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程學習專注力、學習情緒、認知負荷與學習成效之差異分析 40
第四節、不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程對於學習專注力、學習情緒、認知負荷與學習成效之相關性分析 51
第五節、不同程度學習專注力、學習情緒、認知負荷與學習成效學習者採用三種不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程之學習專注力、學習情緒、認知負荷與學習成效之相關性分析 53
第六節、訪談資料整理 54
第七節、討論 60
第五章 結論 68
第一節、研究結論 68
第二節、未來研究方向 70
參考文獻 72
附錄一、學習成效測驗試題 80
附錄二、認知風格量表 83
附錄三、認知負荷量表 85		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2129572 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100155002en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 多媒體影音開放式課程zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資訊呈現方式zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學習專注力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學習情緒zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 認知負荷zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學習成效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Multimedia OpenCourseWareen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Information Presentationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Learning Attentionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Learning Emotionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cognitive Loaden_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Learning Performanceen_US
dc.title (題名) 不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程對於學習專注力、情緒、認知負荷與學習成效之影響研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Assessing the Effects of Different Video Lecture Types of OpenCourseWare on Learning Attention, Emotion, Cognitive Load and Performanceen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部份
NeuroSky, Inc.（2012）。NeuroSky – 人人可用的腦波感測器。檢自：http://www.neurosky.com/zh-Hant/。
王乙婷、何美慧（2003）。自我教導策略增進ADHD兒童持續性注意力效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系特殊教育學報，18， 21-54。
台灣開放式課程聯盟（2012）。檢自：http://www.tocwc.org.tw。
林玉雯、黃台珠、劉嘉茹（2010）。課室學習專注力之研究－量表發展與分析應用。科學教育學刊，18（2），107-129。
林育如（2012）。行動閱讀之資訊呈現方式對於學習者專注力、閱讀理解與認知負荷之影響研究。圖書資訊與檔案學研究所碩士論文。台北市：國立政治大學。
胡婉琪（2012）。基於學習情緒及成效探討技能型學習遊戲之設計要素。圖書資訊與檔案學研究所碩士論文。台北市：國立政治大學。
馬郁凝、柯皓仁（2012）。以關注本位採用模式探討大學教師參與開放式課程之研究。圖書資訊學刊，10（1），117-153。
陳志銘、陳勇汀、林筱芳（2010）。通識教育開放式課程數位典藏建置之研究。大學圖書館，14（2），83-112。
鄭昭明（1993）。認知心理學：理論與實踐。桂冠圖書公司。
劉博烝（2012）。數位學習注意力與心跳率偵測系統之發展與應用。工程科學系所碩士論文。台南市：國立成功大學。
謝惠雯、陳昭珍（2011）。開放式課程教材之著作權問題研究。教育資料與圖書館學，48（3），381-406。

英文部份
Aylward, G. P., Verhulst, S. J., & Bell, S. (1990). Individual and combined effects of attention deficits and combined effects of attention deficits and learning disabilities on computerized ADHD assessment. Journal of Psycho Educational Assessment, 8(4), 497-508.
Baraniuk, R. G. (2008). Challenges and opportunities for the open education movement: A connexions case study. In Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M. S. V., (eds.), Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Berger, H. (1929).First human EEG paper: Ueber das Elektroenkephalogramm des Menschen. Archiv fur Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 87, 527-570.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford University Press.
Carson, S. (2009). The unwalled garden: growth of the OpenCourseWare Consortium, 2001-2008. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24(1), 23-29.
Chandler, P., Cooper, G., Pollock, E., & Tindall-Ford, S. (1998). Applying cognitive psychology principles to education and training. AARE98 Annual Conference.
Chen, C. M., & Lee T. H. (2011). Emotion Recognition and Communication for Reducing Second-language Speaking Anxiety in a Web-based One-to-One Synchronous Learning Environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 417-440.
Chen, C. M., & Sun, Y. C. (2012). Assessing the effects of different multimedia materials on emotions and learning performance for visual and verbal style learners. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1273-1285.
Chen, C. M., & Wang, H. P. (2011). Using emotion recognition technology to assess the effects of different multimedia materials on learning emotion and performance. Library & Information Science Research, 33, 244-255.
Childers, Terry L., Houston, Michael J., Susan E., & Heckler, S. E. (1985). Measurement of individual differences in visual versus verbal information processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 125-134.
Clark, Leonard H., Starr, Irvi. (1986). Secondary and Middle School Teaching Methods. Macmillan.
Clark, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-learning and the science of instruction (2nd ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22, 14-22.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design, in Research in organizational behavior. Edited by Cummings, L. L., and B. M. Staw, Homewood, IL: JAI Press, 191-233.
Darwin, C. (1965). The expression of Ihe emolions in man and animals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Dunn, R., Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching Secondary Students Through Their Individualized Learning Styles. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Co.
Effken, J. A., & Doyle, M. (2001). Interface design and cognitive style in learning an instructional computer simulation. Comput Nurs, 19(4), 164-171.
Ekman, P., & Davidson, R. J. (1994). The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Feinberg, S., & Murphy, M. (2000). Applying cognitive load theory to the design of Web-based instruction (pp. 353–360). Presented at the Professional Communication Conference. Proceedings of 2000 Joint IEEE International and 18th Annual Conference on Computer Documentation (IPCC/SIGDOC 2000), IEEE.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
Gopher, D., & Braune, R. (1984). On the Psychophysics of workload: Why bother with subjective measures? Human Factors, 26, 519-532.
Graf, S., Lan, C. H., Liu, T. C., & Kinshuk, K. (2009). Investigations about the Effects and Effectiveness of Adaptivity for Students with Different Learning　Styles. ICALT, 415-419.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hochschild, A. R. (1975). The sociology of feeling and emotion: Selected possibilities. In M. Millman., & R. M. Kantor (Eds.), Another voice: Feminist perspectives on social life and social science. New York: Anchor Books. 208-307
Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. The American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551-575.
Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M. S. V. (2008). Opening up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education Through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
James, W. (1983). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: the science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Jonassen, D. H., Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences. learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computer in the class-room. Multimedia and Hypermedia: Creativity Through Construction. Prentice Hall, 185-188.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Eaglewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Keefe, J. W. (1987). Learning Style: Theory and Practice. Reston. Virginia: National association of secondary school principals.
Kemper, T. D. (1978). A social interactional theory of emotions. New York: Wiley.
Kemper, T. D. (1991). Predicting emotions from social relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 330-342.
Kleinginna, P., Jr., & Kleinginna A. (1981b). A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion, 5, 345-379.
Kort, B., Reilly, R., & Picard, R.W. (2001). An Affective Model of Interplay Between Emotions and Learning: Reengineering Educational Pedagogy- Building a Learning Companion. In Proceedings of ICALT.
Kuchinskas, G. (1979). Whose cognitive style makes the difference? Education Leadership, 36(4), 269-271.
Kuhlen, R. G. (1968). Studies in Educational Psychology. Blaisdell Pub., Mass, Waltham.
Lai, S. L. (1998). The effects of visual display on analogies using computer-based learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(2), 151-160.
Lane, A. (2008). Widening participation in education through open educational resources. In T. Iiyoshi, Kumar, M. S. V.(ed.), Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
LeDoux, J. (1994). Emotion, memory, and the brain. Scientific American, 270, 50-57.
Lerman, S. R., Miyagawa, S., & Marguleis, A. H. (2008). OpenCourseWare: Building a culture of sharing. In T. Iiyoshi, Kumar, M. S. V.(ED.), Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Leutner, D., & Plass, J. L. (1998). Measuring learning styles with questionnaires versus direct observation of preferential choice behavior in authentic learning situations: the visualizer/verbalizer behavior observation scale (VV-BOS). Computers in Human Behavior, 14(4), 543-557.
Mark, S. S., & Ernest, J.M. (1992). Human Factors in Engineering and Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mayer, R. E. (1993). Comprehension of graphics in texts: An overview. Learning and Instruction, 3, 239-245.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The Instructive Animation: Helping Students Build Connections Between Words and Pictures in Multimedia Learning. Journal of Educatinal Psychology, 84, 444-452.
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth a thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 715-726.
Mayer, R. E., & Sims, K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2012). About OCW. From http://ocw.mit.edu/about/.
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19(1), 59-74.
Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing Cognitive Load by Mixing Auditory and Visual Presentation Modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319-334.
Najjar, L. J. (1996). Multimedia information and Information Learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Vol. 5, 129-150.
Nideffer, R. M. (1976). Test of attentional and interpersonal style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 394-404.
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skill: A Cognitive-Load Approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122-133.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Parsons, T. (1955). Family socialization and interaction processes. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Parsons, T. (1964). Social structure and personality. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Pedro P., Pilar R. (2006). The application of learning styles in both individual and collaborative learning. Advanced Learning Technologies.
Phillips, R. A. (1997). A developer’s handbook to interactive multimedia: A practical guide for educational applications. London: Kogan Page.
Piaget, J. (1989). Les relations entre l’intelligence et l’affectivité dans le　developpement de l’enfant. Rimé, B., Scherer, K. (Eds.) Les Émotions. Textes　de base en psychologie. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé. 75-95.
Richardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1(1), 109-126.
Shen, L., Wang, M., & Shen, R. (2009). Affective e-Learning: Using “Emotional” Data to Improve Learning in Pervasive Learning Environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 176–189.
Sissel G. S., & Helmut K. (2000). Using new learning technologies with multimedia. IEEE MultMedia, 7(3), 40-51.
Smith, S.M., Woody, P.C. (2000). Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles. Teaching of Psychology, 27(3), 220-223.
Sturm W. (1996). Evaluation in therapeutical contexts: attentional and neglect disorders. Eur Rev ApplPsychol, 46, 207-14.
Solso, R. L. (1995). Cognitive Psychology (4th ed).
Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251–296.
Tennant, M. (1988). Psychology and adult learning. London: Routledge.
Tomkins, S. S. (1982). Affect theory. In P. Ekman (ed) Emotion in the human face. New York: CUP.
UNESCO (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries. Paris, France: UNESCO.
Vaughan, T. (1993). Multimedia: Making it Work, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wickens, C. D. (1987). "Attention". Pursue Aviation Research Laboratory. University of Illinois, 61874.
Wierwille, W. W., & Eggmeier, F. L. (1993). Recommendations for mental workload measurement in a test and evaluation environment. Human Factors, 35, 263-281.
Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Education Psychologist, 11, 87-95.
Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Education Psychologist, 24, 345-376.		zh_TW