學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 大學生合作學習歷程中團隊創意氛圍發展之個案研究
A Case Study of the Cooperative Learning Process of the Team’s Creative Climate Development作者 林曉涵 貢獻者 邱美秀
林曉涵關鍵詞 大學生
合作學習
創意氛圍
college students
cooperative learning
creative climate日期 2011 上傳時間 1-Oct-2013 13:57:15 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究旨在探討與了解透過合作學習歷程中團隊所知覺之創意氛圍情形，研究對象為某國立大學修習「合作學習」課程之大學生(N=36)，其中包含透過課程中合作學習法的理論認識，與教師的課程設計，實際進行團隊合作學習，並實踐合作學習之理論，學生透過每一週的課程，進行充足的團體討論。本研究將以個案研究的方式，並透過量化與質性資料的收集與分析，探究大學生合作學習歷程中團隊創意氛圍之情形。主要研究結果發現包括：一、創意氛圍表現相異的團體，其合作學習歷程也具有歧異性；二、影響團隊創意氛圍之因素具有階段性；三、「合作學習課程」對於團隊合作歷程造成影響。本研究根據研究結果，提出對未來教育和未來研究的建議，以作為未來相關領域的參考。
The purpose of this study was explore the cooperative learning process of the team’s creative climate development. Participants were 36 (N=36) college students who took a national university course about cooperative learning. It is comprised of the schedule of cooperative learning method in the curriculum, teachers’ curriculum design, practical group cooperative learning and practical theory of cooperative learning. Moreover, the students can have a lot of group discussion time in every class. Based on case study, this study explores the situation of group creative climate in the process of college students’ cooperative learning by collecting and analyzing the quantitative and qualitative data. The major research findings include: 1. The groups with different creative climate are also different in their cooperative processes. 2. The factors affecting the group creative climate are different in every stage. 3. The cooperative learning course has influence on the group cooperative process. Based on these research results, this study makes some suggestions on the future education and researches for the reference of related fields in the future.參考文獻 丁惠琪（2000）合作學習應用在國小數學教學之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北師範大學，臺北市。王金國、張新仁（2003）。國小六年級教師實施國語科合作學習之研究。教育學刊，21，53-26。吳芝儀(譯)（2001）。資料分析。(原作者：Robert C. Bogda)。載於黃光雄(主譯)，質性教育研究（Qualitative Research For Education）（220-263頁）。嘉義市：濤石文化吳靜吉、林偉文（2004）。創意氛圍與創造力的培育。瀋陽國際創造力教育會議，瀋陽東北大學，中國。尚榮安(譯)（2001）。個案研究法。(原作者：Robert K. Yin)。台北：弘智文化。張宇慧（2011）。以想法為中心的知識翻新學習對團隊創造力之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。張定綺(譯)（1993）快樂，從心開始。(原作者Csikszentmihalyi, M.)。台北市：天下遠見。（原作出版年：1990）曾敬梅（2002）。研究生玩興、幽默、創意態度，所知覺系所創造氛圍與創造力 的關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。黃政傑、林佩璇（1996）。合作學習。台北：五南。蔡秀鷹（2008）。合作學習應用在融合班國小四年級視覺藝術教學之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。鍾靜、丁惠琪（2006）。合作學習應用在國小數學教學之探究。載於黃政傑、吳俊憲（主編），合作學習：發展與實踐(333-383頁)。臺北：五南。蘇筑筠(2008)。創造思考教學方案對高職生創造思考能力與創意氛圍之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣科技大學，臺北市。簡妙娟 (2003)。合作學習理論與教學應用, 載於張新仁（主編），學習與教學新趨勢(405-463頁)。臺北市：心理出版社。Abdullah Al-Beraidi, Tudor Rickards, (2003) Creative team climate in an international accounting office: an exploratory study in Saudi Arabia, Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(1), 7 -18.Anderson, N.R., &West, M.A., (1998) Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-258.Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5), 1154-1184.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Ekvall, G. (1983). Climate, structure and innovativeness of organizations: A theoretical framework and an experiment. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish Council for Management and Organizational Behavior.Ekvall, G., & Ryhammar, L. (1999). The creative climate: Its determinants and effects at a Swedish university. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 303-310. Ellis, A. K. (2001). Research on educational innovations. New York, NY: Eye on Education, Inc.Farivar, S. (1985). Developing a cooperative learning program in a elementary classroom: Comparative study of innovative and tradition middle teaching and learning strategies. Los Angeles, CA:University of California. Furman, A. (1998). Teacher and pupil characteristics in the perception of the creativity of classroom climate. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(4), 258-277.Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Dimensions of creative climate:A general taxonomy. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 15, 97–116.Isaksen, S. G., & Parnes, S. T. (1985). Curriculum planning for creative thinking andproblem solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 19(1), 1-29.Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., & Ekvall, G., (2010). Managing for Innovation: The TwoFaces of Tension in Creative Climates. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 73-88.Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G., & Britz, A. (2001). Perceptions of best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171-184.Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J. (2002). The climate for creativity and change in teams. Creativity and innovation management, 11(1), 74-86Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition：Theory and Research. Edina, MN : Interaction Book Co.Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.McNeil, J. H., & Payne, P.K. (1996). Cooperative learning groups at the college level:Applicable learning. Paper presented at the Division for Early Childhood, International EarlyChildhood Conference on Children with Special. Needs, Phoenix, AZ.Morin, E. (2002). Seven complex lessons in education for the future. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation[UNESCO].Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development[OECD](1996). The Knowledge-based Economy. Paris, France: OECD.Pan, J. D. P., Pan, H. M. G., Lee, C. Y., & Chang, S. H. S. (2010), University students` perceptions of a holistic care course through cooperative learning: Implications for instructors and researchers, Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2) , 199－209.Peterson, R. E. (2002). Establishing the creative environment in technology education. Technology Teacher, 61(4), 7-10.Rickards, T. & Moger, S. T. (1999). Handbook for creative team leaders, Aldershot, Hants, UK: Gower.Selvi, K. (2006). Learning and creativity. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/t7632nx2708521h0/Sharman, D., & Johnson, A. (1997). Innovation in all things! Developing creativity in the workplace. Industrial and Commercial Training, 29(3), 85-87.Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Swann, Jr., W. B., Milton, L. P. & Polzer, J. T. (2000). Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 238-250. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
99152013
100資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099152013 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 邱美秀 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林曉涵 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 林曉涵 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2011 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Oct-2013 13:57:15 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Oct-2013 13:57:15 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Oct-2013 13:57:15 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0099152013 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/61210 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 教育研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 99152013 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 100 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在探討與了解透過合作學習歷程中團隊所知覺之創意氛圍情形，研究對象為某國立大學修習「合作學習」課程之大學生(N=36)，其中包含透過課程中合作學習法的理論認識，與教師的課程設計，實際進行團隊合作學習，並實踐合作學習之理論，學生透過每一週的課程，進行充足的團體討論。本研究將以個案研究的方式，並透過量化與質性資料的收集與分析，探究大學生合作學習歷程中團隊創意氛圍之情形。主要研究結果發現包括：一、創意氛圍表現相異的團體，其合作學習歷程也具有歧異性；二、影響團隊創意氛圍之因素具有階段性；三、「合作學習課程」對於團隊合作歷程造成影響。本研究根據研究結果，提出對未來教育和未來研究的建議，以作為未來相關領域的參考。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of this study was explore the cooperative learning process of the team’s creative climate development. Participants were 36 (N=36) college students who took a national university course about cooperative learning. It is comprised of the schedule of cooperative learning method in the curriculum, teachers’ curriculum design, practical group cooperative learning and practical theory of cooperative learning. Moreover, the students can have a lot of group discussion time in every class. Based on case study, this study explores the situation of group creative climate in the process of college students’ cooperative learning by collecting and analyzing the quantitative and qualitative data. The major research findings include: 1. The groups with different creative climate are also different in their cooperative processes. 2. The factors affecting the group creative climate are different in every stage. 3. The cooperative learning course has influence on the group cooperative process. Based on these research results, this study makes some suggestions on the future education and researches for the reference of related fields in the future. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 謝誌 i中文摘要 ii英文摘要 iii目次 iv 表次 .......v圖次 vi第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究問題 4 第四節 名詞釋義 5 第五節 研究範圍與限制 6第二章 文獻探討 第一節 合作學習的理論內涵與特徵 7 第二節 團隊創意氛圍的內涵與相關研究 13 第三節 合作學習與創意氛圍關係之研究 19第三章 研究設計與實施 第一節 研究設計 23 第二節 研究場域 25 第三節 實施程序 29 第四節 資料來源與分析 30第四章 研究資料分析與討論 第一節 大學生所知覺團隊創意氛圍之分析 35 第二節影響創意氛圍發展之因素 47 第三節 合作學習法隊團隊合作歷程之影響 57第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論 61 第二節 討論 63 第三節 建議 65參考文獻 68表次表 2-1 合作學習法內涵簡述一覽表 8表 2-2 合作學習小組與一般學習小組之比較 10表 2-3 創意氛圍向度簡述表 15表 2-4 創意氛圍的內涵 16表 2-5 創意氛圍量表簡述 17表 3-1 各組人數分配表 23表 3-2 創意氛圍量表之因素與例題 31表 3-3 課程週記編碼說明 33表 4-1 大學生所知覺團隊創意氛圍之比較 37圖次圖 3-1 研究架構圖 24圖 3-2 課程活動設計 27圖 3-3 研究流程圖 29圖 4-1 團隊創意氛圍發展概念圖 55 zh_TW dc.format.extent 686472 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099152013 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 大學生 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 合作學習 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 創意氛圍 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) college students en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) cooperative learning en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) creative climate en_US dc.title (題名) 大學生合作學習歷程中團隊創意氛圍發展之個案研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) A Case Study of the Cooperative Learning Process of the Team’s Creative Climate Development en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 丁惠琪（2000）合作學習應用在國小數學教學之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北師範大學，臺北市。王金國、張新仁（2003）。國小六年級教師實施國語科合作學習之研究。教育學刊，21，53-26。吳芝儀(譯)（2001）。資料分析。(原作者：Robert C. Bogda)。載於黃光雄(主譯)，質性教育研究（Qualitative Research For Education）（220-263頁）。嘉義市：濤石文化吳靜吉、林偉文（2004）。創意氛圍與創造力的培育。瀋陽國際創造力教育會議，瀋陽東北大學，中國。尚榮安(譯)（2001）。個案研究法。(原作者：Robert K. Yin)。台北：弘智文化。張宇慧（2011）。以想法為中心的知識翻新學習對團隊創造力之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。張定綺(譯)（1993）快樂，從心開始。(原作者Csikszentmihalyi, M.)。台北市：天下遠見。（原作出版年：1990）曾敬梅（2002）。研究生玩興、幽默、創意態度，所知覺系所創造氛圍與創造力 的關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。黃政傑、林佩璇（1996）。合作學習。台北：五南。蔡秀鷹（2008）。合作學習應用在融合班國小四年級視覺藝術教學之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。鍾靜、丁惠琪（2006）。合作學習應用在國小數學教學之探究。載於黃政傑、吳俊憲（主編），合作學習：發展與實踐(333-383頁)。臺北：五南。蘇筑筠(2008)。創造思考教學方案對高職生創造思考能力與創意氛圍之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣科技大學，臺北市。簡妙娟 (2003)。合作學習理論與教學應用, 載於張新仁（主編），學習與教學新趨勢(405-463頁)。臺北市：心理出版社。Abdullah Al-Beraidi, Tudor Rickards, (2003) Creative team climate in an international accounting office: an exploratory study in Saudi Arabia, Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(1), 7 -18.Anderson, N.R., &West, M.A., (1998) Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-258.Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5), 1154-1184.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Ekvall, G. (1983). Climate, structure and innovativeness of organizations: A theoretical framework and an experiment. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish Council for Management and Organizational Behavior.Ekvall, G., & Ryhammar, L. (1999). The creative climate: Its determinants and effects at a Swedish university. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 303-310. Ellis, A. K. (2001). Research on educational innovations. New York, NY: Eye on Education, Inc.Farivar, S. (1985). Developing a cooperative learning program in a elementary classroom: Comparative study of innovative and tradition middle teaching and learning strategies. Los Angeles, CA:University of California. Furman, A. (1998). Teacher and pupil characteristics in the perception of the creativity of classroom climate. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(4), 258-277.Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Dimensions of creative climate:A general taxonomy. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 15, 97–116.Isaksen, S. G., & Parnes, S. T. (1985). Curriculum planning for creative thinking andproblem solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 19(1), 1-29.Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., & Ekvall, G., (2010). Managing for Innovation: The TwoFaces of Tension in Creative Climates. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 73-88.Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G., & Britz, A. (2001). Perceptions of best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171-184.Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J. (2002). The climate for creativity and change in teams. Creativity and innovation management, 11(1), 74-86Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition：Theory and Research. Edina, MN : Interaction Book Co.Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.McNeil, J. H., & Payne, P.K. (1996). Cooperative learning groups at the college level:Applicable learning. Paper presented at the Division for Early Childhood, International EarlyChildhood Conference on Children with Special. Needs, Phoenix, AZ.Morin, E. (2002). Seven complex lessons in education for the future. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation[UNESCO].Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development[OECD](1996). The Knowledge-based Economy. Paris, France: OECD.Pan, J. D. P., Pan, H. M. G., Lee, C. Y., & Chang, S. H. S. (2010), University students` perceptions of a holistic care course through cooperative learning: Implications for instructors and researchers, Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2) , 199－209.Peterson, R. E. (2002). Establishing the creative environment in technology education. Technology Teacher, 61(4), 7-10.Rickards, T. & Moger, S. T. (1999). Handbook for creative team leaders, Aldershot, Hants, UK: Gower.Selvi, K. (2006). Learning and creativity. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/t7632nx2708521h0/Sharman, D., & Johnson, A. (1997). Innovation in all things! Developing creativity in the workplace. Industrial and Commercial Training, 29(3), 85-87.Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Swann, Jr., W. B., Milton, L. P. & Polzer, J. T. (2000). Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 238-250. zh_TW
