| dc.contributor | 語言所 | en_US |
| dc.coverage.temporal | Her, One-Soon | - |
| dc.creator (作者) | 何萬順 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2012.11 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 11-Nov-2013 15:35:47 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 11-Nov-2013 15:35:47 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 11-Nov-2013 15:35:47 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/61578 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Based on the insight that a measure word (M) in [Num (Adj)-C/M N] is semantically substantive, while a classifier (C) is redundant and does not block modification or quantification to N (Her and Hsieh, 2010), this paper proposes a distinction of C/M from a mathematical perspective. Synthesizing the concepts of parceler (Landman, 2004), divider (Borer, 2005), and multiplicand (Au Yeung, 2005, 2007), I follow Her (2010) and contend that while C/M both function as a multiplicand mathematically, C`s value is necessarily 1 and M`s is not, thus :1. This offers a natural explanation to the semantic tests developed in Her and Hsieh (2010). Implications are discussed for these areas: typology of classifiers and classifier languages, correlations between numeral systems and the employment of C/M, the universal count/mass distinction at the lexical level, and first language acquisition of classifiers and numbers. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 752274 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | Lingua, 122, (14), 1668-1691 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Classifier;Measure word;Multiplication;Multiplicand;1;¬1 | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | en |
| dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012 | - |
| dc.doi.uri (DOI) | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012 | - |
