Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 Co-Authorship Networks and Research Impact: A Social Capital Perspective
作者 李有仁
Li,Eldon Y. ; Liao,Chien Hsiang ; Yen,Hsiuju Rebecca
貢獻者 資管系
關鍵詞 Social capital; Research impact; Social network analysis; Research collaboration; Team exploration; Network centrality
日期 2013-11
上傳時間 26-Dec-2013 17:12:19 (UTC+8)
摘要 The impact of research work is related to a scholar`s reputation and future promotions. Greater research impact not only inspires scholars to continue their research, but also increases the possibility of a larger research budget from sponsors. Given the importance of research impact, this study proposes that utilizing social capital embedded in a social structure is an effective way to achieve more research impact. The contribution of this study is to define six indicators of social capital (degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, prolific co-author count, team exploration, and publishing tenure) and investigate how these indicators interact and affect citations for publications. A total of 137 Information Systems scholars from the Social Science Citation Index database were selected to test the hypothesized relationships. The results show that betweenness centrality plays the most important role in taking advantage of non-redundant resources in a co-authorship network, thereby significantly affecting citations for publications. In addition, we found that prolific co-author count, team exploration, and publishing tenure all have indirect effects on citation count. Specifically, co-authoring with prolific scholars helps researchers develop centralities and, in turn, generate higher numbers of citations. Researchers with longer publishing tenure tend to have higher degree centrality. When they collaborate more with different scholars, they achieve more closeness and betweenness centralities, but risk being distrusted by prolific scholars and losing chances to co-author with them. Finally, implications of findings and recommendations for future research are discussed.
關聯 Research Policy, 42(9), 1515-1530
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012
dc.contributor 資管系en_US
dc.creator (作者) 李有仁zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Li,Eldon Y. ; Liao,Chien Hsiang ; Yen,Hsiuju Rebeccaen_US
dc.date (日期) 2013-11en_US
dc.date.accessioned 26-Dec-2013 17:12:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 26-Dec-2013 17:12:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 26-Dec-2013 17:12:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/63009-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The impact of research work is related to a scholar`s reputation and future promotions. Greater research impact not only inspires scholars to continue their research, but also increases the possibility of a larger research budget from sponsors. Given the importance of research impact, this study proposes that utilizing social capital embedded in a social structure is an effective way to achieve more research impact. The contribution of this study is to define six indicators of social capital (degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, prolific co-author count, team exploration, and publishing tenure) and investigate how these indicators interact and affect citations for publications. A total of 137 Information Systems scholars from the Social Science Citation Index database were selected to test the hypothesized relationships. The results show that betweenness centrality plays the most important role in taking advantage of non-redundant resources in a co-authorship network, thereby significantly affecting citations for publications. In addition, we found that prolific co-author count, team exploration, and publishing tenure all have indirect effects on citation count. Specifically, co-authoring with prolific scholars helps researchers develop centralities and, in turn, generate higher numbers of citations. Researchers with longer publishing tenure tend to have higher degree centrality. When they collaborate more with different scholars, they achieve more closeness and betweenness centralities, but risk being distrusted by prolific scholars and losing chances to co-author with them. Finally, implications of findings and recommendations for future research are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent 131 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) Research Policy, 42(9), 1515-1530en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social capital; Research impact; Social network analysis; Research collaboration; Team exploration; Network centralityen_US
dc.title (題名) Co-Authorship Networks and Research Impact: A Social Capital Perspectiveen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012en_US
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012en_US