學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 When Does Being Creative Lead to Being Rated as Creative? The Moderating Role of Perceived Probability of Successfully Bringing Ideas to a Supervisor`s Attention
作者 Amy E. Randel;Kimberly S. Jaussi;吳安妮
Randel, Amy E. ; Jaussi, Kimberly S. ; Wu, Anne
貢獻者 會計系
日期 2011.01
上傳時間 18-Feb-2014 14:21:16 (UTC+8)
摘要 This study examined 2 variables often assumed to be positively related in research examining creativity in the workplace: an employee`s objective creativity (independent of supervisor perceptions) and a supervisor`s rating of that employee`s creativity at work. This direct relationship was examined not only to explore if the common assumption of correlation was indeed well-founded, but also to consider a relational aspect of supervisor perceptions of creativity at work. Specifically, perceived probability of successfully bringing ideas to a supervisor`s attention was tested as a moderator of the relationship between employee creativity and supervisor perceptions of employee creativity at work. This study found that employee creativity, measured objectively and independently of a supervisor`s perception, was not significantly related to supervisor ratings of creativity. However, when employees perceived a high probability of successfully bringing ideas to a supervisor`s attention, that relationship was strongly positive. This study points to the importance of research distinguishing between objectively generating ideas and being evaluated as creative. Also, this research highlights how supervisor perceptions of an employee`s creativity at work more closely approximates employee creativity when the employee perceives success in gaining a supervisor`s attention for ideas.
關聯 Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 1-8
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.545699
dc.contributor 會計系en_US
dc.creator (作者) Amy E. Randel;Kimberly S. Jaussi;吳安妮en_US
dc.creator (作者) Randel, Amy E. ; Jaussi, Kimberly S. ; Wu, Anne-
dc.date (日期) 2011.01en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Feb-2014 14:21:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Feb-2014 14:21:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Feb-2014 14:21:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/63933-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study examined 2 variables often assumed to be positively related in research examining creativity in the workplace: an employee`s objective creativity (independent of supervisor perceptions) and a supervisor`s rating of that employee`s creativity at work. This direct relationship was examined not only to explore if the common assumption of correlation was indeed well-founded, but also to consider a relational aspect of supervisor perceptions of creativity at work. Specifically, perceived probability of successfully bringing ideas to a supervisor`s attention was tested as a moderator of the relationship between employee creativity and supervisor perceptions of employee creativity at work. This study found that employee creativity, measured objectively and independently of a supervisor`s perception, was not significantly related to supervisor ratings of creativity. However, when employees perceived a high probability of successfully bringing ideas to a supervisor`s attention, that relationship was strongly positive. This study points to the importance of research distinguishing between objectively generating ideas and being evaluated as creative. Also, this research highlights how supervisor perceptions of an employee`s creativity at work more closely approximates employee creativity when the employee perceives success in gaining a supervisor`s attention for ideas.-
dc.format.extent 182058 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 1-8en_US
dc.title (題名) When Does Being Creative Lead to Being Rated as Creative? The Moderating Role of Perceived Probability of Successfully Bringing Ideas to a Supervisor`s Attentionen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1080/10400419.2011.545699-
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.545699-