Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 關係專屬投資是一種負債?臺灣代工廠商的個案研究
其他題名 Is Relation-specific Investment a Liability? Case Studies of Taiwanese OEM Suppliers
作者 康敏平;司徒達賢
Kang, Min-Ping ; Seetoo, Dah-Hsian
貢獻者 企管系
關鍵詞 關係專屬投資 ; 抵押模式 ; 統理機制
relation-specific investment ; hostage theory ; governance
日期 2007-12
上傳時間 12-Mar-2014 17:50:48 (UTC+8)
摘要 關係專屬投資可增加交易的效率,但礙於資源移轉的困難,也使得交易成本增加。台灣的代工廠商處於相對弱勢的地位,不容易在交易初期就要求品牌客戶對其所承諾的關係專屬投資,給予對等的保護或抵押。在資源有限的情況下,代工廠商傾向以單邊關係專屬投資作為抵押,以爭取合作機會,並在合作過程中累積能力來降低套牢的威脅。根據文獻和五個台灣代工廠商的個案資料,本研究發現關係專屬投資應區分成兩個次構面,分別是「關係投資幅度」與「資產專屬程度」。據此整合抵押模式與能力觀點,提出關係專屬投資與統理機制選擇的原則。
Relation-specific investment creates an inherent dilemma as, although it increases transaction value, it also increases transaction costs for the investing party. Due to their low bargaining position, Taiwanese suppliers cannot demand any formal protection or legal assurance from international brand vendors for their relation-specific investments. Given their resource constraints, we find that Taiwanese suppliers tend to use unilateral relation-specific investments as a hostage to gain opportunities to cooperate with clients. Through this cooperation they may upgrade their capability and decrease the threat of meeting holdups. We argue that relation-specific investment is a multidimensional construct which includes relational investment and asset specificity. We also use two theoretical perspectives, the hostage theory and the capability-based view, to model the governance adopted by smaller suppliers in protecting relation-specific investment.
關聯 臺大管理論叢, 18(1), 21-53
資料來源 http://dx.doi.org/10.6226%2fNTURM2007.18.1.21
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 企管系en_US
dc.creator (作者) 康敏平;司徒達賢zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Kang, Min-Ping ; Seetoo, Dah-Hsianen_US
dc.date (日期) 2007-12en_US
dc.date.accessioned 12-Mar-2014 17:50:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-Mar-2014 17:50:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-Mar-2014 17:50:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/64628-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 關係專屬投資可增加交易的效率,但礙於資源移轉的困難,也使得交易成本增加。台灣的代工廠商處於相對弱勢的地位,不容易在交易初期就要求品牌客戶對其所承諾的關係專屬投資,給予對等的保護或抵押。在資源有限的情況下,代工廠商傾向以單邊關係專屬投資作為抵押,以爭取合作機會,並在合作過程中累積能力來降低套牢的威脅。根據文獻和五個台灣代工廠商的個案資料,本研究發現關係專屬投資應區分成兩個次構面,分別是「關係投資幅度」與「資產專屬程度」。據此整合抵押模式與能力觀點,提出關係專屬投資與統理機制選擇的原則。en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Relation-specific investment creates an inherent dilemma as, although it increases transaction value, it also increases transaction costs for the investing party. Due to their low bargaining position, Taiwanese suppliers cannot demand any formal protection or legal assurance from international brand vendors for their relation-specific investments. Given their resource constraints, we find that Taiwanese suppliers tend to use unilateral relation-specific investments as a hostage to gain opportunities to cooperate with clients. Through this cooperation they may upgrade their capability and decrease the threat of meeting holdups. We argue that relation-specific investment is a multidimensional construct which includes relational investment and asset specificity. We also use two theoretical perspectives, the hostage theory and the capability-based view, to model the governance adopted by smaller suppliers in protecting relation-specific investment.en_US
dc.format.extent 1617627 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 臺大管理論叢, 18(1), 21-53en_US
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://dx.doi.org/10.6226%2fNTURM2007.18.1.21en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 關係專屬投資 ; 抵押模式 ; 統理機制en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) relation-specific investment ; hostage theory ; governanceen_US
dc.title (題名) 關係專屬投資是一種負債?臺灣代工廠商的個案研究zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) Is Relation-specific Investment a Liability? Case Studies of Taiwanese OEM Suppliersen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen