學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 The Association Between Corporate Governance and Audit Quality: Evidence from Taiwan
作者 戚務君
Chang, Yu-Shan; Chi,Wuchun; Hwang,Long-Jainn; Shiue, Min-Jeng
貢獻者 會計系
關鍵詞 Corporate governance; audit quality; publicly held companies; privately held companies
日期 2011.12
上傳時間 12-May-2014 15:51:03 (UTC+8)
摘要 Purpose – Audit quality is traditionally defined as the joint probability that an existing problem is discovered and reported by the auditor. This study examines whether and how audit quality is associated with related-party transactions and CEO duality. The first part (i.e., the ability to discover) is related to professional judgment, and the second part (i.e., report truthfully) is related to independence.</p><p>Methodology/Approach – Regression methods was used on archival data.</p><p>Findings – Our results reveal that for publicly held companies in environments with stronger capital market discipline, which causes greater reputation concerns and litigation risks, a CEO who is also the board chair does not hinder auditor independence. For privately held companies, however, such a CEO hinders auditor independence due to a lack of capital market discipline. The findings on related-party financing, on the other hand, are reversed. That is, in terms of information for an auditor, since the conflicts of interests are more severe in publicly held companies than in privately held companies, the relevance of related-party financing to a decision whether to issue a going-concern opinion is greater in publicly held companies.</p><p>Social implications – The empirical results of publicly held companies are useful for countries with better corporate governance, while those of privately held companies are helpful for countries with relatively weak corporate governance.</p><p>Originality/Value of paper – Because auditors performing audit services face different litigation risks and reputation concerns, the differences in our results between the two types of clients can have implications about the suitability of these types of companies in emerging markets
關聯 Research in Accounting in Emerging Economics, 11(4), 129-153
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 會計系en_US
dc.creator (作者) 戚務君zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chang, Yu-Shan; Chi,Wuchun; Hwang,Long-Jainn; Shiue, Min-Jengen_US
dc.date (日期) 2011.12en_US
dc.date.accessioned 12-May-2014 15:51:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-May-2014 15:51:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-May-2014 15:51:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65958-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Purpose – Audit quality is traditionally defined as the joint probability that an existing problem is discovered and reported by the auditor. This study examines whether and how audit quality is associated with related-party transactions and CEO duality. The first part (i.e., the ability to discover) is related to professional judgment, and the second part (i.e., report truthfully) is related to independence.</p><p>Methodology/Approach – Regression methods was used on archival data.</p><p>Findings – Our results reveal that for publicly held companies in environments with stronger capital market discipline, which causes greater reputation concerns and litigation risks, a CEO who is also the board chair does not hinder auditor independence. For privately held companies, however, such a CEO hinders auditor independence due to a lack of capital market discipline. The findings on related-party financing, on the other hand, are reversed. That is, in terms of information for an auditor, since the conflicts of interests are more severe in publicly held companies than in privately held companies, the relevance of related-party financing to a decision whether to issue a going-concern opinion is greater in publicly held companies.</p><p>Social implications – The empirical results of publicly held companies are useful for countries with better corporate governance, while those of privately held companies are helpful for countries with relatively weak corporate governance.</p><p>Originality/Value of paper – Because auditors performing audit services face different litigation risks and reputation concerns, the differences in our results between the two types of clients can have implications about the suitability of these types of companies in emerging marketsen_US
dc.format.extent 388853 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) Research in Accounting in Emerging Economics, 11(4), 129-153en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Corporate governance; audit quality; publicly held companies; privately held companiesen_US
dc.title (題名) The Association Between Corporate Governance and Audit Quality: Evidence from Taiwanen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen