Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 公共行政研究之本質、標準、議題與知識成長:方法論的觀點
其他題名 The Reality, Criterion, Issue and Knowledge Growth of Public Adminstration Research: From the Perspective of Methodology
作者 江明修 ; 陳玉山 ; 王雯玲
Chiang, Min-Hisu ; Chen, Yu-San ; Wang, Wen-Ling
日期 1996-03
上傳時間 12-Nov-2008 09:36:09 (UTC+8)
摘要 This paper reviewed the major literatures of methodological debate in the study of public administration. It also showed the basic values and assumptions of different methodological stances. In addition, this paper discussed four foci: social constructive reality and science, quality criterion, core issue and knowledge growth. It is expected that this effort can help us not only obtain a broader methodological vision, but also create a better approach to the understanding of knowledge growth in the study of public administration.
本文首先回顧公共行政學方法論爭辯的歷程與其主要論述,介紹各種不同的立論與主張,其次,分析在公共行政學方法論上,實證論與後實證論兩種典範爭辯的四項焦點議題,即科學本質、品質標準、核心議題與知識成長,希望從中獲得更寬廣的方法論視野,並進以開啟公共行政學知識的心窗,以及對公共行政理論的建構及成長有所助益。
關聯 中國行政評論 5(2),89-120
資料類型 article
dc.creator (作者) 江明修 ; 陳玉山 ; 王雯玲zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chiang, Min-Hisu ; Chen, Yu-San ; Wang, Wen-Ling-
dc.date (日期) 1996-03en_US
dc.date.accessioned 12-Nov-2008 09:36:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-Nov-2008 09:36:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-Nov-2008 09:36:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/6654-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This paper reviewed the major literatures of methodological debate in the study of public administration. It also showed the basic values and assumptions of different methodological stances. In addition, this paper discussed four foci: social constructive reality and science, quality criterion, core issue and knowledge growth. It is expected that this effort can help us not only obtain a broader methodological vision, but also create a better approach to the understanding of knowledge growth in the study of public administration.-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文首先回顧公共行政學方法論爭辯的歷程與其主要論述,介紹各種不同的立論與主張,其次,分析在公共行政學方法論上,實證論與後實證論兩種典範爭辯的四項焦點議題,即科學本質、品質標準、核心議題與知識成長,希望從中獲得更寬廣的方法論視野,並進以開啟公共行政學知識的心窗,以及對公共行政理論的建構及成長有所助益。-
dc.format application/en_US
dc.language enen_US
dc.language en-USen_US
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 中國行政評論 5(2),89-120en_US
dc.title (題名) 公共行政研究之本質、標準、議題與知識成長:方法論的觀點zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) The Reality, Criterion, Issue and Knowledge Growth of Public Adminstration Research: From the Perspective of Methodology-
dc.type (資料類型) articleen