1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 交融記憶系統、資訊精緻化與團隊創新－任務衝突、賦權領導及情感氛圍的調節效果
Transactive Memory Systems, Information Elaboration and Team Innovation: The Moderating Effects of Task Conflict, Empowerment Leadership and Affective Tone
作者 林昭宏
貢獻者 黃家齊
林昭宏
關鍵詞 交融記憶系統
資訊精緻化
團隊創新
任務衝突
賦權領導
情感氛圍
日期 2013
上傳時間 21-Jul-2014 15:33:57 (UTC+8)
摘要 　　時下企業使用團隊以促進創新的方式非常普遍，藉由成員背景的多元性發展出更多可行的新創方案，然而在團隊的專業分工模式下，團隊成員如何快速地瞭解其他成員的專長，並相互配合、協調，高效率地完成任務要求，成為重要的探討議題。團隊成員熟悉團隊內各種技能與知識的分布，並且信任其他成員的專業，彼此溝通協調，此現象稱為交融記憶系統，本研究以真實企業中的團隊為研究對象，且以從事研發或行銷等創意發想工作的團隊為主，探討交融記憶系統與團隊創新之間的關聯。另外，團隊成員對於任務資訊的交流與整合稱為資訊精緻化，本研究也探討資訊精緻化行為是否在兩變項之間擔任中介效果的角色。在交融記憶系統、資訊精緻化與團隊創新的主效果之外，本研究也好奇任務衝突、賦權領導及正、負向情感氛圍是否於其間具有調節效果。\n\n　　本研究共蒐集到70組研發團隊共334位團隊成員作為研究樣本，經過信、效度分析、配適度檢定、趨同性分析、相關分析及層級迴歸分析之後，得出之研究結果顯示交融記憶系統與資訊精緻化之間存在顯著正向關係。任務衝突、賦權領導與正向情感氛圍各自與資訊精緻化之間具有顯著正向關係，而賦權領導對於交融記憶系統與資訊精緻化之間之正向關係具有顯著正向調節效果。另外，任務衝突對於交融記憶系統與資訊精緻化之間之正向關係具有顯著負向調節效果，而賦權領導對於交融記憶系統與團隊創新之間之正向關係具有顯著負向調節效果，此兩者與原假設之調節方向相反。
參考文獻 Agrell, A., & Gustafson, R. (1996). Innovation and creativity in work groups.Handbook of Work group \nPsychology, 317-343.\n\nAhearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An \nempirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction \nand performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945.\n\nAkgün, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G. S., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2005). Knowledge networks in \nnew product development projects: a transactive memory perspective. Information & \nManagement, 42(8), 1105-1120.\n\nAmabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal \nof Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357.\n\nAmabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work\n environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.\n\nAnderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development \nand validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235-258.\n\nArnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership \nquestionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal \nof Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249-269.\n\nBaron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social \npsychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and \nSocial Psychology, 51(6), 1173.\n\nBartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2000). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative \nScience Quarterly, 45(2), 197-231.\n\nBass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations.\n\nBrief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual review of \npsychology, 53(1), 279-307.\n\nBrowne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit.Sociological Methods & \nResearch, 21(2), 230-258.\n\nCaldwell, D. F., & O`Reilly, C. A. (2003). The Determinants of Team-Based Innovation in \nOrganizations The Role of Social Influence. Small Group Research,34(4), 497-517.\n\nCarnevale, P. J., & Probst, T. M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving \nand categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1300.\n\nClore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social \ninformation processing. Handbook of Social Cognition,1, 323-417.\n\nCohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and \ninnovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152.\n\nCohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and \ninnovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152.\n\nCole, M. S., Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: a moderated mediation study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 945.\n\nCollins, A. L., Lawrence, S. A., Troth, A. C., & Jordan, P. J. (2013). Group affective tone: A review and future research directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), S43-S62.\n\nCronin, M. A., Bezrukova, K., Weingart, L. R., & Tinsley, C. H. (2011). Subgroups within a team: The \nrole of cognitive and affective integration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(6), 831-849.\n\nDavenport, T. H. (1997). Ten principles of knowledge management and four case studies. Knowledge \nand Process Management, 4(3), 187-208.\n\nDavis, M. S. (1973). Intimate relations. Free Press.\n\nDe Dreu, C. K. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship\n between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83-107.\n\nDe Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and \nteam member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741.\n\nDe Dreu, C. K., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of \nparticipation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191.\n\nDelery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: \nTests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of \nManagement Journal, 39(4), 802-835.\n\nde Wit, F. R., Jehn, K. A., & Scheepers, D. (2013). Task conflict, information processing, and \ndecision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict.Organizational Behavior and Human \nDecision Processes, 122(2), 177-189.\n\nDrach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes \nand structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(2), 111.\n\nEdmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative \nScience Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.\n\nFangcheng Tang (2014). When communication quality is trustworthy? Transactive memory systems \nand the mediating role of trust in software development teams\n\nFord, R. C., & Fottler, M. D. (1995). Empowerment: A matter of degree. The Academy of Management \nExecutive, 9(3), 21-29.\n\nGeorge, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, \n107–116.\n\nGeorge, J. M. (1995). Leader positive mood and group performance: The case of customer \nservice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(9), 778-794.\n\nGeorge, J. M. (1996). Group affective tone. In M. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology \n(pp. 77–93). New York: Wiley.\n\nGeorge, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at \nwork-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310.\n\nGibson, C. B., & Earley, P. C. (2007). Collective Cognition in Action: Accumulation, Interaction, \nExamination, and Accommodation in the Development and Operation of Group Efficacy Beliefs in the \nWorkplace. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 438-458.\n\n\nGigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group \njudgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,65(5), 959.\n\nGilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ \nengagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30(4), 453-470.\n\nGino, F., Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E., & Todorova, G. (2010). First, get your feet wet: The effects of \nlearning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human \nDecision Processes, 111(2), 102-115.\n\nGlick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls \nin multilevel research. Academy of Management review, 10(3), 601-616.\n\nHair, J. F., Tathom, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis: with \nreadings.\n\nHair Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Intl. \ned.).\n\nHirt, E. R., Melton, R. J., McDonald, H. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Processing goals, task \ninterest, and the mood–performance relationship: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and \nSocial Psychology, 71(2), 245.\n\nHollenbeck, J. R., Colquitt, J. A., Ilgen, D. R., LePine, J. A., & Hedlund, J. (1998). Accuracy \ndecomposition and team decision making: Testing theoretical boundary conditions. Journal of Applied \nPsychology, 83(3), 494.\n\nHollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D. J., Hedlund, J., Major, D. A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Mutlilevel \ntheory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed \nexpertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 292.\n\nHollingshead, A. B. (1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality \nand Social Psychology, 74(3), 659.\n\nHu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: \nConventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary \nJournal, 6(1), 1-55.\n\nHülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a \ncomprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, \n94(5), 1128.\n\nIsen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem \nsolving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122.\n\nIsen, A. M., Johnson, M. M., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The influence of positive affect on \nthe unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1413.\n\nIves, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984). User involvement and MIS success: a review of \nresearch. Management science, 30(5), 586-603.\n\nJackson, M., & Moreland, R. L. (2009). Transactive memory in the classroom.Small Group \nResearch, 40(5), 508-534.\n\nJackson, S. E. (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In M. A. West \n(Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology (pp. 53-75). London: Wiley.\n\nJames, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied \nPsychology, 67(2), 219.\n\nJames, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with \nand without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85.\n\nJanssen, O., Van De Vliert, E., & Veenstra, C. (1999). How task and person conflict shape the role of \npositive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Management, 25(2), 117-141.\n\nJehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup \nconflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 256-282.\n\nJehn, K. A. (1997). Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through \nvalue-based intragroup conflict. Using Conflict in Organizations, 87-100.\n\nJung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing \norganizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership \nQuarterly, 14(4), 525-544.\n\nKanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team \nperformance over time. Mis Quarterly, 783-808.\n\nKanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology.\n\nKanter, R. M. (2000). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for \ninnovation in organization. Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View, 167-210.\n\nKearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: the \nimportance of team members` need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 581-598.\n\nKelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., ... & Peterson, \nD. R. Close relationships. 1983.\n\nKelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work \nteams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 99-130.\n\nKirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1997). A model of work team empowerment. Research in organizational \nchange and development, 10, 131-167.\n\nKirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team \nempowerment. Academy of Management Journal,42(1), 58-74.\n\nKnippenberg, D. V., & Wilke, H. (1992). Prototypicality of arguments and conformity to ingroup \nnorms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 141-155.\n\nKooij-de Bode, H. J., van Knippenberg, D., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2008). Ethnic diversity and \ndistributed information in group decision making: The importance of information elaboration. Group \nDynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice,12(4), 307.\n\nKozlowski, S. W., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. Handbook of \nPsychology.\n\nKozlowski, S. W., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: \nContextual, temporal, and emergent processes.\n\n\n\nLee, C. S., Lee, W., & Kim, J. (2007). Effects of Transformational Leadership and Self-leadership on \nInnovative Behaviors: Mediating Roles of Empowerment. International Area Studies Review, 10(2), \n163-176.\n\nLeenders, R. T. A., Van Engelen, J. M., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new \nproduct team creativity: a social network perspective.Journal of Engineering and Technology \nManagement, 20(1), 69-92.\n\nLevine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review \nof Psychology, 44(1), 585-612.\n\nLewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and \nvalidation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587.\n\nLewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of \ntransactive memory systems. Management Science,50(11), 1519-1533.\n\nLewis, K., Belliveau, M., Herndon, B., & Keller, J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and \nperformance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational \nBehavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159-178.\n\nLewis, K., & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research \ndirections. Organization Science, 22(5), 1254-1265.\n\nLewis, K., Lange, D., & Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning \ntransfer. Organization Science, 16(6), 581-598.\n\nLiang, A. Z., & Jin, Y. H. (2010, November). Transactive Memory Systems in Multi-teams Cooperation. In Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII), 2010 \nInternational Conference on (Vol. 4, pp. 3-7). IEEE.\n\nLiang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group \nperformance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology \nBulletin, 21(4), 384-393.\n\nLipman-Blumen, J., & Leavitt, H. J. (1999). Hot groups: Seeding them, feeding them, and using them \nto ignite your organization. New York: Oxford University Press\n\nLoewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. Handbook of Affective \nScience, 619(642), 3.\n\nMacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of \nsample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological methods, 1(2), 130.\n\nMackie, D. M., Worth, L. T., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group \nmessages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,58(5), 812.\n\nMarks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Mathieu, J. E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and \nteam-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied \nPsychology, 85(6), 971.\n\nMartin, L. L., Ward, D. W., Achee, J. W., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret \nthe motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), \n317.\n\nMathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Cannon‐Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2005). Scaling the \nquality of teammates` mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of \nOrganizational Behavior, 26(1), 37-56.\n\nMathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273..\n\nMayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational \ntrust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.\n\nMcLeod, P. L., Lobel, S. A., & Cox, T. H. (1996). Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small \nGroup Research, 27(2), 248-264.\n\nMeyer, B., Shemla, M., & Schermuly, C. C. (2011). Social category salience moderates the effect of \ndiversity faultlines on information elaboration. Small Group Research.\n\nMoreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and \norganizations.\n\nMoreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive \nmemory and group performance.\n\nMulaik, Stanley A., et al. "Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation \nmodels." Psychological bulletin 105.3 (1989): 430.\n\nMumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and \ninnovation. Psychological bulletin, 103(1), 27.\n\nMurray, N., Sujan, H., Hirt, E. R., & Sujan, M. (1990). The influence of mood on categorization: A \ncognitive flexibility interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 411.\n\nNemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological \nreview, 93(1), 23.\n\nNemeth, C. J., & Owens, P. (1996). Making work group more effective: The value of minority dissent. \nIn M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology (pp. 125-141). London: Wiley.\n\nNijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2002). Creativity and group innovation. Applied Psychology, 51(3), \n400-406.\n\nN Nijstad, B. A., Rietzschel, E. F., & Stroebe, W. (2006). Four principles of group creativity. Creativity \nand innovation in organizational teams, 161-79.\n\nNunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). Psychometric theory.\n\nPearsall, M. J., & Ellis, A. P. (2006). The effects of critical team member assertiveness on team \nperformance and satisfaction. Journal of Management,32(4), 575-594.\n\nPodsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in \nbehavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied \nPsychology, 88(5), 879.\n\nPrichard, J. S., & Ashleigh, M. J. (2007). The effects of team-skills training on transactive memory and \nperformance. Small Group Research, 38(6), 696-726.\n\nRau, D. (2005). The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory performance \nrelation in top management teams. Small Group Research, 36(6), 746-771.\n\n\nRen, Y., Carley, K. M., & Argote, L. (2006). The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it \nmore beneficial to know what others know?.Management Science, 52(5), 671-682.\n\nRhee, S. Y. (2007). Group emotions and group outcomes: The role of group-member \ninteractions. Research on Managing groups and teams, 10, 65-95.\n\nRiedl, B. C., Gallenkamp, J. V., Picot, A., & Welpe, I. M. (2012, January). Antecedents of Transactive \nMemory Systems in Virtual Teams--The Role of Communication, Culture, and Team Size. In System \nScience (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 465-474). IEEE.\n\nSchwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective \nstates on analytic reasoning. Emotion and Social Judgments, 55-71.\n\nShalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual\n factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.\n\nSharkie, R. (2005 , July 19-22). Perceptions of trust in an organisation: The factors that influence the \nsharing of tacit knowledge. In Fifth International Conference on Knowledge, Culture and Change in \nOrganisations. Rhodes, Greece: University of the Aegean.\n\nShonk, J. H. (1982). Working in teams: A practical manual for improving work groups. New York: \nAmacom.\n\nSiegel Christian, J., Pearsall, M. J., Christian, M. S., & Ellis, A. P. (2014). Exploring the benefits and \nboundaries of transactive memory systems in adapting to team member loss. Group Dynamics: Theory, \nResearch, and Practice, 18(1), 69.\n\nSkilton, P. F., & Dooley, K. J. (2010). The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion. Academy \nof Management Review, 35(1), 118-134.\n\nStasser, G. (1999). The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. Shared cognition in \norganizations: The management of knowledge, 49-69.\n\nStasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on \nthe dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social \nPsychology, 53(1), 81.\n\n\nSy, T., Côté, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: impact of the leader`s mood on the \nmood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied \nPsychology, 90(2), 295.\n\nThomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” \nmodel of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.\n\nTindale, R. S., Kameda, T., & Hinsz, V. B. (2003). Group decision making. Sage Handbook of Social \nPsychology, 381-403.\n\nTindale, R. S., Smith, C. M., Thomas, L. S., Filkins, J., & Sheffey, S. (1996). Shared representations \nand asymmetric social influence processes in small groups. Understanding group behaviour: \nConsensual action by small groups, 81-103.\n\nTjosvold, D. (1990). Team organization: An enduring competitive advantage. Chichester, England: \nWiley.\n\nTjosvold, D. (1997). Conflict within Interdependence: Its Value for Productivity and \nIndividuality. Using Conflict in Organizations, 23.\n\nVan de Vliert, E., & De Dreu, C. K. (1994). Optimizing performance by conflict \nstimulation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5(3), 211-222.\n\nvan Ginkel, W. P., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Group information elaboration and group decision \nmaking: The role of shared task representations.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision \nProcesses, 105(1), 82-97.\n\nVan Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda.Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008.\n\nVan Offenbeek, M., & Koopman, P. (1996). Interaction and decision making in project \nteams. Handbook of Work Group Psychology, 159, C187.\n\nVesa, P. & Mervi, H. (August, 2011). The impact of transactive memory systems and transformational \nleadership on team innovation. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings\n\nWalter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). The positive group affect spiral: A dynamic model of the emergence of \npositive affective similarity in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 239-261.\n\nWalton, R. E., & Dutton, J. M. (1969). The management of interdepartmental conflict: A model and \nreview. Administrative Science Quarterly, 73-84.\n\nWatson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of \npositive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), \n1063.\n\nWegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. T. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. \nIn Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (pp. 253-276). Springer New York.\n\nWeiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the \nstructure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work.\n\nWest, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups.\n\nWest, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and \ninnovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 355-387.\n\nWest, M. A., & Altink, W. M. (1996). Innovation at work: Individual, group, organizational, and socio-historical perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 3-11.\n\nWest, M. A., & Wallace, M. (1991). Innovation in health care teams. European Journal of Social \nPsychology, 21(4), 303-315.\n\nWinquist, J. R., & Larson Jr, J. R. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision \nmaking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 371.\n\nWittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups.\n\nYuan, Y. C., Carboni, I., & Ehrlich, K. (2010). The impact of awareness and accessibility on expertise \nretrieval: A multilevel network perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science \nand Technology, 61(4), 700-714.\n\n\nZhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The \ninfluence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process \nengagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所
101355003
102
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1013550031
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 黃家齊zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林昭宏zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 林昭宏zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2013en_US
dc.date.accessioned 21-Jul-2014 15:33:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 21-Jul-2014 15:33:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 21-Jul-2014 15:33:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1013550031en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=75915-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 企業管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101355003zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 102zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 　　時下企業使用團隊以促進創新的方式非常普遍，藉由成員背景的多元性發展出更多可行的新創方案，然而在團隊的專業分工模式下，團隊成員如何快速地瞭解其他成員的專長，並相互配合、協調，高效率地完成任務要求，成為重要的探討議題。團隊成員熟悉團隊內各種技能與知識的分布，並且信任其他成員的專業，彼此溝通協調，此現象稱為交融記憶系統，本研究以真實企業中的團隊為研究對象，且以從事研發或行銷等創意發想工作的團隊為主，探討交融記憶系統與團隊創新之間的關聯。另外，團隊成員對於任務資訊的交流與整合稱為資訊精緻化，本研究也探討資訊精緻化行為是否在兩變項之間擔任中介效果的角色。在交融記憶系統、資訊精緻化與團隊創新的主效果之外，本研究也好奇任務衝突、賦權領導及正、負向情感氛圍是否於其間具有調節效果。\n\n　　本研究共蒐集到70組研發團隊共334位團隊成員作為研究樣本，經過信、效度分析、配適度檢定、趨同性分析、相關分析及層級迴歸分析之後，得出之研究結果顯示交融記憶系統與資訊精緻化之間存在顯著正向關係。任務衝突、賦權領導與正向情感氛圍各自與資訊精緻化之間具有顯著正向關係，而賦權領導對於交融記憶系統與資訊精緻化之間之正向關係具有顯著正向調節效果。另外，任務衝突對於交融記憶系統與資訊精緻化之間之正向關係具有顯著負向調節效果，而賦權領導對於交融記憶系統與團隊創新之間之正向關係具有顯著負向調節效果，此兩者與原假設之調節方向相反。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝辭......i\n摘要......ii\nAbstract......iii\n目錄......v\n表目錄......vi\n圖目錄......vii\n第壹章 緒論......1\n第一節 研究背景與動機......1\n第二節 研究目的......4\n第貳章 文獻探討與假設推演......5\n第一節 交融記憶系統......5\n第二節 交融記憶系統與團隊創新......9\n第三節 資訊精緻化的中介效果......11\n第四節 任務衝突、賦權領導與情感氛圍......13\n第五節 研究架構與研究假設整理......19\n第參章 研究方法......21\n第一節 研究設計......21\n第二節 資料分析程序......30\n第三節 研究變項衡量......31\n第四節 團隊資料整合......38\n第肆章 資料分析與結果......40\n第一節 相關分析......40\n第二節 層級迴歸分析......42\n第三節 研究假設驗證......47\n第伍章 研究限制與未來研究建議......48\n第一節 研究結果與討論......48\n第二節 理論與實務意涵......51\n第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議......53\n參考文獻......56\n附錄一　問卷施測辦法與公司基本資料......69\n附錄二　團隊成員調查問卷......71\n附錄三　團隊主管調查問卷......75zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1106888 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1013550031en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 交融記憶系統zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資訊精緻化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 團隊創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 任務衝突zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 賦權領導zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 情感氛圍zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 交融記憶系統、資訊精緻化與團隊創新－任務衝突、賦權領導及情感氛圍的調節效果zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Transactive Memory Systems, Information Elaboration and Team Innovation: The Moderating Effects of Task Conflict, Empowerment Leadership and Affective Toneen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Agrell, A., & Gustafson, R. (1996). Innovation and creativity in work groups.Handbook of Work group \nPsychology, 317-343.\n\nAhearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An \nempirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction \nand performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945.\n\nAkgün, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G. S., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2005). Knowledge networks in \nnew product development projects: a transactive memory perspective. Information & \nManagement, 42(8), 1105-1120.\n\nAmabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal \nof Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357.\n\nAmabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work\n environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.\n\nAnderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development \nand validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235-258.\n\nArnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership \nquestionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal \nof Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249-269.\n\nBaron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social \npsychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and \nSocial Psychology, 51(6), 1173.\n\nBartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2000). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative \nScience Quarterly, 45(2), 197-231.\n\nBass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations.\n\nBrief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual review of \npsychology, 53(1), 279-307.\n\nBrowne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit.Sociological Methods & \nResearch, 21(2), 230-258.\n\nCaldwell, D. F., & O`Reilly, C. A. (2003). The Determinants of Team-Based Innovation in \nOrganizations The Role of Social Influence. Small Group Research,34(4), 497-517.\n\nCarnevale, P. J., & Probst, T. M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving \nand categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1300.\n\nClore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social \ninformation processing. Handbook of Social Cognition,1, 323-417.\n\nCohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and \ninnovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152.\n\nCohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and \ninnovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152.\n\nCole, M. S., Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: a moderated mediation study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 945.\n\nCollins, A. L., Lawrence, S. A., Troth, A. C., & Jordan, P. J. (2013). Group affective tone: A review and future research directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), S43-S62.\n\nCronin, M. A., Bezrukova, K., Weingart, L. R., & Tinsley, C. H. (2011). Subgroups within a team: The \nrole of cognitive and affective integration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(6), 831-849.\n\nDavenport, T. H. (1997). Ten principles of knowledge management and four case studies. Knowledge \nand Process Management, 4(3), 187-208.\n\nDavis, M. S. (1973). Intimate relations. Free Press.\n\nDe Dreu, C. K. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship\n between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83-107.\n\nDe Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and \nteam member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741.\n\nDe Dreu, C. K., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of \nparticipation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191.\n\nDelery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: \nTests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of \nManagement Journal, 39(4), 802-835.\n\nde Wit, F. R., Jehn, K. A., & Scheepers, D. (2013). Task conflict, information processing, and \ndecision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict.Organizational Behavior and Human \nDecision Processes, 122(2), 177-189.\n\nDrach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes \nand structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(2), 111.\n\nEdmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative \nScience Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.\n\nFangcheng Tang (2014). When communication quality is trustworthy? Transactive memory systems \nand the mediating role of trust in software development teams\n\nFord, R. C., & Fottler, M. D. (1995). Empowerment: A matter of degree. The Academy of Management \nExecutive, 9(3), 21-29.\n\nGeorge, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, \n107–116.\n\nGeorge, J. M. (1995). Leader positive mood and group performance: The case of customer \nservice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(9), 778-794.\n\nGeorge, J. M. (1996). Group affective tone. In M. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology \n(pp. 77–93). New York: Wiley.\n\nGeorge, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at \nwork-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310.\n\nGibson, C. B., & Earley, P. C. (2007). Collective Cognition in Action: Accumulation, Interaction, \nExamination, and Accommodation in the Development and Operation of Group Efficacy Beliefs in the \nWorkplace. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 438-458.\n\n\nGigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group \njudgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,65(5), 959.\n\nGilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ \nengagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30(4), 453-470.\n\nGino, F., Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E., & Todorova, G. (2010). First, get your feet wet: The effects of \nlearning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human \nDecision Processes, 111(2), 102-115.\n\nGlick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls \nin multilevel research. Academy of Management review, 10(3), 601-616.\n\nHair, J. F., Tathom, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis: with \nreadings.\n\nHair Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Intl. \ned.).\n\nHirt, E. R., Melton, R. J., McDonald, H. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Processing goals, task \ninterest, and the mood–performance relationship: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and \nSocial Psychology, 71(2), 245.\n\nHollenbeck, J. R., Colquitt, J. A., Ilgen, D. R., LePine, J. A., & Hedlund, J. (1998). Accuracy \ndecomposition and team decision making: Testing theoretical boundary conditions. Journal of Applied \nPsychology, 83(3), 494.\n\nHollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D. J., Hedlund, J., Major, D. A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Mutlilevel \ntheory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed \nexpertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 292.\n\nHollingshead, A. B. (1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality \nand Social Psychology, 74(3), 659.\n\nHu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: \nConventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary \nJournal, 6(1), 1-55.\n\nHülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a \ncomprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, \n94(5), 1128.\n\nIsen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem \nsolving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122.\n\nIsen, A. M., Johnson, M. M., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The influence of positive affect on \nthe unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1413.\n\nIves, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984). User involvement and MIS success: a review of \nresearch. Management science, 30(5), 586-603.\n\nJackson, M., & Moreland, R. L. (2009). Transactive memory in the classroom.Small Group \nResearch, 40(5), 508-534.\n\nJackson, S. E. (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In M. A. West \n(Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology (pp. 53-75). London: Wiley.\n\nJames, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied \nPsychology, 67(2), 219.\n\nJames, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with \nand without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85.\n\nJanssen, O., Van De Vliert, E., & Veenstra, C. (1999). How task and person conflict shape the role of \npositive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Management, 25(2), 117-141.\n\nJehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup \nconflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 256-282.\n\nJehn, K. A. (1997). Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through \nvalue-based intragroup conflict. Using Conflict in Organizations, 87-100.\n\nJung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing \norganizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership \nQuarterly, 14(4), 525-544.\n\nKanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team \nperformance over time. Mis Quarterly, 783-808.\n\nKanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology.\n\nKanter, R. M. (2000). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for \ninnovation in organization. Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View, 167-210.\n\nKearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: the \nimportance of team members` need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 581-598.\n\nKelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., ... & Peterson, \nD. R. Close relationships. 1983.\n\nKelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work \nteams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 99-130.\n\nKirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1997). A model of work team empowerment. Research in organizational \nchange and development, 10, 131-167.\n\nKirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team \nempowerment. Academy of Management Journal,42(1), 58-74.\n\nKnippenberg, D. V., & Wilke, H. (1992). Prototypicality of arguments and conformity to ingroup \nnorms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 141-155.\n\nKooij-de Bode, H. J., van Knippenberg, D., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2008). Ethnic diversity and \ndistributed information in group decision making: The importance of information elaboration. Group \nDynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice,12(4), 307.\n\nKozlowski, S. W., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. Handbook of \nPsychology.\n\nKozlowski, S. W., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: \nContextual, temporal, and emergent processes.\n\n\n\nLee, C. S., Lee, W., & Kim, J. (2007). Effects of Transformational Leadership and Self-leadership on \nInnovative Behaviors: Mediating Roles of Empowerment. International Area Studies Review, 10(2), \n163-176.\n\nLeenders, R. T. A., Van Engelen, J. M., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new \nproduct team creativity: a social network perspective.Journal of Engineering and Technology \nManagement, 20(1), 69-92.\n\nLevine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review \nof Psychology, 44(1), 585-612.\n\nLewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and \nvalidation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587.\n\nLewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of \ntransactive memory systems. Management Science,50(11), 1519-1533.\n\nLewis, K., Belliveau, M., Herndon, B., & Keller, J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and \nperformance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational \nBehavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159-178.\n\nLewis, K., & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research \ndirections. Organization Science, 22(5), 1254-1265.\n\nLewis, K., Lange, D., & Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning \ntransfer. Organization Science, 16(6), 581-598.\n\nLiang, A. Z., & Jin, Y. H. (2010, November). Transactive Memory Systems in Multi-teams Cooperation. In Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII), 2010 \nInternational Conference on (Vol. 4, pp. 3-7). IEEE.\n\nLiang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group \nperformance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology \nBulletin, 21(4), 384-393.\n\nLipman-Blumen, J., & Leavitt, H. J. (1999). Hot groups: Seeding them, feeding them, and using them \nto ignite your organization. New York: Oxford University Press\n\nLoewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. Handbook of Affective \nScience, 619(642), 3.\n\nMacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of \nsample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological methods, 1(2), 130.\n\nMackie, D. M., Worth, L. T., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group \nmessages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,58(5), 812.\n\nMarks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Mathieu, J. E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and \nteam-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied \nPsychology, 85(6), 971.\n\nMartin, L. L., Ward, D. W., Achee, J. W., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret \nthe motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), \n317.\n\nMathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Cannon‐Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2005). Scaling the \nquality of teammates` mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of \nOrganizational Behavior, 26(1), 37-56.\n\nMathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273..\n\nMayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational \ntrust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.\n\nMcLeod, P. L., Lobel, S. A., & Cox, T. H. (1996). Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small \nGroup Research, 27(2), 248-264.\n\nMeyer, B., Shemla, M., & Schermuly, C. C. (2011). Social category salience moderates the effect of \ndiversity faultlines on information elaboration. Small Group Research.\n\nMoreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and \norganizations.\n\nMoreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive \nmemory and group performance.\n\nMulaik, Stanley A., et al. "Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation \nmodels." Psychological bulletin 105.3 (1989): 430.\n\nMumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and \ninnovation. Psychological bulletin, 103(1), 27.\n\nMurray, N., Sujan, H., Hirt, E. R., & Sujan, M. (1990). The influence of mood on categorization: A \ncognitive flexibility interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 411.\n\nNemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological \nreview, 93(1), 23.\n\nNemeth, C. J., & Owens, P. (1996). Making work group more effective: The value of minority dissent. \nIn M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology (pp. 125-141). London: Wiley.\n\nNijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2002). Creativity and group innovation. Applied Psychology, 51(3), \n400-406.\n\nN Nijstad, B. A., Rietzschel, E. F., & Stroebe, W. (2006). Four principles of group creativity. Creativity \nand innovation in organizational teams, 161-79.\n\nNunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). Psychometric theory.\n\nPearsall, M. J., & Ellis, A. P. (2006). The effects of critical team member assertiveness on team \nperformance and satisfaction. Journal of Management,32(4), 575-594.\n\nPodsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in \nbehavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied \nPsychology, 88(5), 879.\n\nPrichard, J. S., & Ashleigh, M. J. (2007). The effects of team-skills training on transactive memory and \nperformance. Small Group Research, 38(6), 696-726.\n\nRau, D. (2005). The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory performance \nrelation in top management teams. Small Group Research, 36(6), 746-771.\n\n\nRen, Y., Carley, K. M., & Argote, L. (2006). The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it \nmore beneficial to know what others know?.Management Science, 52(5), 671-682.\n\nRhee, S. Y. (2007). Group emotions and group outcomes: The role of group-member \ninteractions. Research on Managing groups and teams, 10, 65-95.\n\nRiedl, B. C., Gallenkamp, J. V., Picot, A., & Welpe, I. M. (2012, January). Antecedents of Transactive \nMemory Systems in Virtual Teams--The Role of Communication, Culture, and Team Size. In System \nScience (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 465-474). IEEE.\n\nSchwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective \nstates on analytic reasoning. Emotion and Social Judgments, 55-71.\n\nShalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual\n factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.\n\nSharkie, R. (2005 , July 19-22). Perceptions of trust in an organisation: The factors that influence the \nsharing of tacit knowledge. In Fifth International Conference on Knowledge, Culture and Change in \nOrganisations. Rhodes, Greece: University of the Aegean.\n\nShonk, J. H. (1982). Working in teams: A practical manual for improving work groups. New York: \nAmacom.\n\nSiegel Christian, J., Pearsall, M. J., Christian, M. S., & Ellis, A. P. (2014). Exploring the benefits and \nboundaries of transactive memory systems in adapting to team member loss. Group Dynamics: Theory, \nResearch, and Practice, 18(1), 69.\n\nSkilton, P. F., & Dooley, K. J. (2010). The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion. Academy \nof Management Review, 35(1), 118-134.\n\nStasser, G. (1999). The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. Shared cognition in \norganizations: The management of knowledge, 49-69.\n\nStasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on \nthe dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social \nPsychology, 53(1), 81.\n\n\nSy, T., Côté, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: impact of the leader`s mood on the \nmood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied \nPsychology, 90(2), 295.\n\nThomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” \nmodel of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.\n\nTindale, R. S., Kameda, T., & Hinsz, V. B. (2003). Group decision making. Sage Handbook of Social \nPsychology, 381-403.\n\nTindale, R. S., Smith, C. M., Thomas, L. S., Filkins, J., & Sheffey, S. (1996). Shared representations \nand asymmetric social influence processes in small groups. Understanding group behaviour: \nConsensual action by small groups, 81-103.\n\nTjosvold, D. (1990). Team organization: An enduring competitive advantage. Chichester, England: \nWiley.\n\nTjosvold, D. (1997). Conflict within Interdependence: Its Value for Productivity and \nIndividuality. Using Conflict in Organizations, 23.\n\nVan de Vliert, E., & De Dreu, C. K. (1994). Optimizing performance by conflict \nstimulation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5(3), 211-222.\n\nvan Ginkel, W. P., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Group information elaboration and group decision \nmaking: The role of shared task representations.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision \nProcesses, 105(1), 82-97.\n\nVan Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda.Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008.\n\nVan Offenbeek, M., & Koopman, P. (1996). Interaction and decision making in project \nteams. Handbook of Work Group Psychology, 159, C187.\n\nVesa, P. & Mervi, H. (August, 2011). The impact of transactive memory systems and transformational \nleadership on team innovation. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings\n\nWalter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). The positive group affect spiral: A dynamic model of the emergence of \npositive affective similarity in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 239-261.\n\nWalton, R. E., & Dutton, J. M. (1969). The management of interdepartmental conflict: A model and \nreview. Administrative Science Quarterly, 73-84.\n\nWatson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of \npositive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), \n1063.\n\nWegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. T. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. \nIn Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (pp. 253-276). Springer New York.\n\nWeiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the \nstructure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work.\n\nWest, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups.\n\nWest, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and \ninnovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 355-387.\n\nWest, M. A., & Altink, W. M. (1996). Innovation at work: Individual, group, organizational, and socio-historical perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 3-11.\n\nWest, M. A., & Wallace, M. (1991). Innovation in health care teams. European Journal of Social \nPsychology, 21(4), 303-315.\n\nWinquist, J. R., & Larson Jr, J. R. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision \nmaking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 371.\n\nWittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups.\n\nYuan, Y. C., Carboni, I., & Ehrlich, K. (2010). The impact of awareness and accessibility on expertise \nretrieval: A multilevel network perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science \nand Technology, 61(4), 700-714.\n\n\nZhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The \ninfluence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process \nengagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.zh_TW