學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 兩岸經貿更加緊密對僑外來台投資子公司運籌中心地位之影響因素
The Determinants of the Role of Subsidiary Logistics Center in Taiwan as Cross-strait Ties Becomes Closer
作者 張英姬
貢獻者 翁永和
張英姬
關鍵詞 兩岸經貿
全球運籌管理
區域營運總部
僑外商子公司
Cross-strait trade
Global Logistics Management
Regional Operating Headquarters
Overseas Foreign Subsidiaries
日期 2013
上傳時間 29-Jul-2014 16:14:50 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究係利用經濟部投資審議委員會2007年「華僑及外國人投資事業營運狀況調查表(非服務業)」問卷資料,以1,013家僑外資在台非服務業廠商為分析對象,運用Probit Model進行實證分析,由廠商規模、行業分類、廠商成立年數、國際化程度、技術來源、在台設立區域營運總部、業務種類多樣化、兩岸經貿政策進一步鬆綁及降低關稅,儘速與他國簽署FTA等各個面向,探討兩岸經貿關係更加緊密後,影響僑外商在台子公司運籌中心地位之決定因素為何。經實證結果發現,國際化程度、技術來源、在台設立區域營運總部、業務種類多樣化及兩岸經貿政策進一步鬆綁等變數為影響僑外商在台子公司運籌中心地位之決定因素,除技術來源為在台自行研發之變數呈負向關係,傾向於採行降低及不變之營運策略外,其他變數皆與僑外商在台子公司運籌中心地位呈正向關係,傾向採提升之營運策略。
This research made use of the 2007 Ministry of Economic Affairs Investment Commission survey entitled "Chinese and Foreign Investment Enterprises Operating Conditions Survey (non-service)" and targeted 1,013 non-service industry overseas foreign manufacturers in Taiwan as research subjects. The Probit model was used to carry out an empirical analysis based on the firm size, industry classification, the year the manufacturer was established, the degree of internationalization, technology source, established regional operational headquarters in Taiwan, business type diversity, steps taken to relax and lower tariffs and promptness in signing FTA and other oriented documents, with other countries. This study discusses why there were influencing factors in the decisions of overseas foreign investment subsidiaries in Taiwan logistics center positions after cross-strait economic and trade relations became closer. The empirical results show that the degree of internationalization, sources of technology, the establishment of the regional operational headquarters in Taiwan, business type diversity and further relaxation of cross-strait trade policy variables are the impacts of overseas subsidiary of foreign logistics center’s factors in determining status. In addition to the fact that the variables of technology sources developing on their own in Taiwan showed a negative relationship and tend to adopt reduced and unchanged operation strategies, other variables are compatible with overseas business subsidiaries in Taiwan logistics center position and showed a positive relationship and tend to enhance the operational strategies adopted.
參考文獻 中文部份
     1.王聖文(2012),「我國廠商對外投資時間與廠商營運之關係探討」,國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
     2.行政院經濟建設委員會(2000),委託中華民國企業管理學會「建構全球運籌中心之政策與法制研究」結案報告。
     3.朱文儀、陳克名、陳建男(2007),「跨國企業子公司自主權影響因素之研究:以外商在台子公司為例」,《台灣管理學刋》,7(2),167-186。
     4.李櫻穗(2011),「區域經濟整合的風潮與面臨的挑戰:以歐盟為例」,《臺灣經濟金融月刋》,47(11),29-31。
     5.李誠、周慧如(2006),《趨勢科技:企業國際化的典範》(第一版)。台北:天下文化。
     6.林立千、張卓寰(2005),「加工出口區發展全球運籌管理之研究」,《運籌管理評論》,1(1),33-48。
     7.林妙雀(2004),「產業全球化驅動力與企業資源/能力對全球策略運作影響之研究-外商來台投資及台商赴海外投資企業之實證分析」,《管理學報》,21(4),411-432。
     8.林彩梅(2005),《多國籍企業論》,台北:五南圖書出版社。
     9.吳萬益、吳雅蓉、劉界富(2002),「國際企業之策略性角色、組織結構、人力資源策略與組織績效之關係:在台子公司之實證」,《輔仁管理評論》,9(1),151-196。
     10.吳濟華、柯志昌(2013),「高雄市發展成為區域產業營運總部策略研究」。《城市學學刊刋》,4(1),1-43。
     11.高孔廉(2013),「馬總統執政五週年兩岸經貿關係發展成果」。《海基會兩岸經貿月刋》,258,6-8。
     12.陳龍黱(2011),「台海兩岸簽訂ECFA後對台利幣之初探」。《台灣經濟金融月刋》,47(8),53-55。
     13.經濟部投資審議委員會(2007),《華僑及外國人投資事業營運狀況調查(非服務業)》,台北:經濟部投資審議委員會四組。
     14.劉孟俊、劉柏定、方嘉伶(2007),《2007年僑外投資事業營運狀況調查及對我國經濟發展貢獻分析報告》,經濟部投審會委託中華經濟研究院研究報告。
     15.劉柏定、劉孟俊、温芳宜(2010),《2010年僑外投資事業營運狀況調查及對我國經濟發展貢獻分析報告》,經濟部投審會委託中華經濟研究院研究報告。
     16.劉孟俊、劉柏定、温芳宜、黃光昇、吳以農(2012),《2012年僑外投資事業營運狀況調查分析報告》,經濟部投審會委託中華經濟研究院研究報告。
     17.劉碧珍、陳添枝、翁永和(2012),《國際貿易導論》(三版),台北市:雙葉書廊。
     18.劉錦龍、劉錦添、鄒孟文、楊志海、陳依依、吳怡穎、陳玉鈴、彭暐崴、劉恩助(2007),「上市公司海外投資對我國經濟的影響與對策」,行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究計畫報告。
     
     英文部份
     1.Ansoff, H. I. (1957), “Strategies for Diversification,” Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.
     2.Balassa, Bela (1961), The Theory of Economic Integration, Homewood, Ill: Rich-ard D. Irwin.
     3.Bartlett, C. A. and S. Ghoshal (1989), Managing Across Borders:The Transna-tional Solution, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
     4.Birkinshaw, J. M. and A. J. Morrison (1995), “Configurations of Strategies and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations,”Journal of Inter-national Business Studies, 26(3), 729-753.
     5.Birkinshaw, J. M., A. J. Morrison and J. Hulland (1995), “Structural and Com-petitive Determinants of a Global Integration Strategy,”Strategic Manage-ment Journal, 16, 637-655.
     6.Birkinshaw, J. M. (1996), “How Multinational Subsidiary Mandates are Gained and Lost,”Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3), 467-95.
     7.Birkinshaw, J. and N. Hood (2000),“Characteristics of Foreign Subsidiaries in Industry Cluster,”Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1), 141-154.
     8.Boyacigiller, N. (1990),“The Role of Expatriates in the Management of Interde-pendence, Complexity and Risk in Multinational Corporations,”Journal of International Business Studies, 21, 357-381.
     9.Cooper, J. C. (1993),“Logistics Strategies for Global Business,”International Journal of Physical distribution & logistics management, 23(4), 12-23.
     10.Daft, R. L. (2001), Organization Theory and Design, South Western College Pub-lishing.
     11.Delios, A. and S. Makino (2003), “Timing of Entry and Foreign Subsidiary Per-formance of Japanese Firms,” Journal of International Marketing, 11(3), 83-105.
     12.Deresky, H. (2002), Global Management: Strategic and Interpersonal, New Jer-sey, Pearson Education Press.
     13.Dunning, J. H. (1981), International Production and the Multinational Enter-prise, London, New York: Allen & Unwin.
     14.Garnier, G. H. (1982),“Context and Decision Making Autonomy in the Foreign Affiliates of U.S. Multinational Corporations,”Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 893-908.
     15.Gates, S. R. and W. G. Egelhoff (1986),“Centralization in Headquar-ters-Subsidiary Relationships,”Journal of International Business Studies, 17(2), 71-92.
     16.Ghoshal, S. and N. Nohria (1989),“Internal Differentiation within Multinational Corporations,”Strategic Management Journal, 10(4), 323-337.
     17.Hamel, G. and C. K. Prahalad (1996), Competing for the Future, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
     18.Hitt, Michael A., Robert E. Hoskisson and Hicheon Kim (1997),“International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Prod-uct-Diversified Firms,” Academy of Management Journal, 40 (4), 767-798.
     19.Hitt, M. A., L. Tihanyi, Miller and B. Connelly (2006),“International Diversifi-cation: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators,”Journal of Management, 32(6), 831-867.
     20.Kotabe, M. (1990), “The Relationship between Offshore Sourcing and Innova-tiveness of U.S. Multinational Firms: An Empirical Investigation,”Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4), 623-638.
     21.Lambert, D. M. and J. R. Stock (1993), Strategic Logistics Management, Home-wood, IL: Irwin.
     22.Lowe, J. and P. Taylor (1998),“R&D and Technology Purchase through License Agreement Complementary Strategy and Complementary Assets.”R&D Management, 28(14), 263-278.
     23.Negandhi, A. R. (1987), International Management, Newton, MA: Allyn and Ba-con.
     24.Nohria, N. and S. Ghoshal (1994),“Differentiated Fit and Shared Values: Alter-natives for Managing Headquarters-subsidiary Relations,”Strategic Man-agement Journal, 15(6), 491-502.
     25.Ohmae, K. (1990), The Borderless World, Harper, New York.
     26.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1997), “ Market Access Issues in the Automobile Sector,”Paris: OECD.
     27.Pinder, J. (1968), “Positive Integration and Negative Integration: Some Problems of Economic Union in the EEC,” The World Today, 88-110.
     28.Robson, P. (1987), The Economics of International Integration, London: George Allen & Unwin.
     29.Sullivan, D. (1994),“Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a Firm,” Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (2), 325-342.
     30.Taggart, J. H. and N. Hood (1999),“Determinants of Autonomy in Multinational Corporation Subsidiaries,”European Management Journal, 17(2), 226-236.
     31.Van der Hoop, J. H. (1992),“Global Logistics: What`s so Specific?”Council of Logistics Management: Annual Meeting Proceeding.
     32.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2013),“Global Value Chains: Investment and Trade for Development,”UNCTAD World Invest-ment Report 2013, United Nations: New York.
     33.Yeoh, P. L. (2004),“International Learning: Antecedents and Performance Im-plications among Newly Internationalizing Companies in an Exporting Con-text,”International Marketing Review, 21(4/5), 511-535.
     34.Zahra, S. A., R. D. Ireland and M. A. Hitt (2000),“International Expansion by New Venture Firms: International Diversity, Mode of Market Entry, Techno-logical Learning and Performance,”Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925-950.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
101921109
102
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101921109
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 翁永和zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張英姬zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 張英姬zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2013en_US
dc.date.accessioned 29-Jul-2014 16:14:50 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 29-Jul-2014 16:14:50 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Jul-2014 16:14:50 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0101921109en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67918-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 行政管理碩士學程zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101921109zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 102zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究係利用經濟部投資審議委員會2007年「華僑及外國人投資事業營運狀況調查表(非服務業)」問卷資料,以1,013家僑外資在台非服務業廠商為分析對象,運用Probit Model進行實證分析,由廠商規模、行業分類、廠商成立年數、國際化程度、技術來源、在台設立區域營運總部、業務種類多樣化、兩岸經貿政策進一步鬆綁及降低關稅,儘速與他國簽署FTA等各個面向,探討兩岸經貿關係更加緊密後,影響僑外商在台子公司運籌中心地位之決定因素為何。經實證結果發現,國際化程度、技術來源、在台設立區域營運總部、業務種類多樣化及兩岸經貿政策進一步鬆綁等變數為影響僑外商在台子公司運籌中心地位之決定因素,除技術來源為在台自行研發之變數呈負向關係,傾向於採行降低及不變之營運策略外,其他變數皆與僑外商在台子公司運籌中心地位呈正向關係,傾向採提升之營運策略。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This research made use of the 2007 Ministry of Economic Affairs Investment Commission survey entitled "Chinese and Foreign Investment Enterprises Operating Conditions Survey (non-service)" and targeted 1,013 non-service industry overseas foreign manufacturers in Taiwan as research subjects. The Probit model was used to carry out an empirical analysis based on the firm size, industry classification, the year the manufacturer was established, the degree of internationalization, technology source, established regional operational headquarters in Taiwan, business type diversity, steps taken to relax and lower tariffs and promptness in signing FTA and other oriented documents, with other countries. This study discusses why there were influencing factors in the decisions of overseas foreign investment subsidiaries in Taiwan logistics center positions after cross-strait economic and trade relations became closer. The empirical results show that the degree of internationalization, sources of technology, the establishment of the regional operational headquarters in Taiwan, business type diversity and further relaxation of cross-strait trade policy variables are the impacts of overseas subsidiary of foreign logistics center’s factors in determining status. In addition to the fact that the variables of technology sources developing on their own in Taiwan showed a negative relationship and tend to adopt reduced and unchanged operation strategies, other variables are compatible with overseas business subsidiaries in Taiwan logistics center position and showed a positive relationship and tend to enhance the operational strategies adopted.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
     第一節 前言 1
     第二節 研究動機與目的 2
     第三節 研究範圍與架構 3
     第二章 文獻探討 5
     第一節 經濟整合之意涵與類型 5
     第二節 全球運籌管理及營運總部之概念 8
     第三節 跨國企業子公司之策略性角色 10
     第四節 實證文獻探討 11
     第三章 廠商在台投資之現況分析 18
     第一節 資料來源與特性 18
     第二節 資料分析 19
     第四章 實證模型設定 27
     第一節 變數說明及預期影響方向 27
     第二節 估計方法與實證模型 33
     第五章 實證結果分析 35
     第一節 實證變數基本統計量 35
     第二節 各計量變項相關性分析 36
     第三節 實證結果分析 37
     第四節 實證模型之邊際效果 44
     第六章 結論與建議 47
     第一節 結論 47
     第二節 研究限制與建議 49
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101921109en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 兩岸經貿zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 全球運籌管理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 區域營運總部zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 僑外商子公司zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cross-strait tradeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Global Logistics Managementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Regional Operating Headquartersen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Overseas Foreign Subsidiariesen_US
dc.title (題名) 兩岸經貿更加緊密對僑外來台投資子公司運籌中心地位之影響因素zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Determinants of the Role of Subsidiary Logistics Center in Taiwan as Cross-strait Ties Becomes Closeren_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部份
     1.王聖文(2012),「我國廠商對外投資時間與廠商營運之關係探討」,國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
     2.行政院經濟建設委員會(2000),委託中華民國企業管理學會「建構全球運籌中心之政策與法制研究」結案報告。
     3.朱文儀、陳克名、陳建男(2007),「跨國企業子公司自主權影響因素之研究:以外商在台子公司為例」,《台灣管理學刋》,7(2),167-186。
     4.李櫻穗(2011),「區域經濟整合的風潮與面臨的挑戰:以歐盟為例」,《臺灣經濟金融月刋》,47(11),29-31。
     5.李誠、周慧如(2006),《趨勢科技:企業國際化的典範》(第一版)。台北:天下文化。
     6.林立千、張卓寰(2005),「加工出口區發展全球運籌管理之研究」,《運籌管理評論》,1(1),33-48。
     7.林妙雀(2004),「產業全球化驅動力與企業資源/能力對全球策略運作影響之研究-外商來台投資及台商赴海外投資企業之實證分析」,《管理學報》,21(4),411-432。
     8.林彩梅(2005),《多國籍企業論》,台北:五南圖書出版社。
     9.吳萬益、吳雅蓉、劉界富(2002),「國際企業之策略性角色、組織結構、人力資源策略與組織績效之關係:在台子公司之實證」,《輔仁管理評論》,9(1),151-196。
     10.吳濟華、柯志昌(2013),「高雄市發展成為區域產業營運總部策略研究」。《城市學學刊刋》,4(1),1-43。
     11.高孔廉(2013),「馬總統執政五週年兩岸經貿關係發展成果」。《海基會兩岸經貿月刋》,258,6-8。
     12.陳龍黱(2011),「台海兩岸簽訂ECFA後對台利幣之初探」。《台灣經濟金融月刋》,47(8),53-55。
     13.經濟部投資審議委員會(2007),《華僑及外國人投資事業營運狀況調查(非服務業)》,台北:經濟部投資審議委員會四組。
     14.劉孟俊、劉柏定、方嘉伶(2007),《2007年僑外投資事業營運狀況調查及對我國經濟發展貢獻分析報告》,經濟部投審會委託中華經濟研究院研究報告。
     15.劉柏定、劉孟俊、温芳宜(2010),《2010年僑外投資事業營運狀況調查及對我國經濟發展貢獻分析報告》,經濟部投審會委託中華經濟研究院研究報告。
     16.劉孟俊、劉柏定、温芳宜、黃光昇、吳以農(2012),《2012年僑外投資事業營運狀況調查分析報告》,經濟部投審會委託中華經濟研究院研究報告。
     17.劉碧珍、陳添枝、翁永和(2012),《國際貿易導論》(三版),台北市:雙葉書廊。
     18.劉錦龍、劉錦添、鄒孟文、楊志海、陳依依、吳怡穎、陳玉鈴、彭暐崴、劉恩助(2007),「上市公司海外投資對我國經濟的影響與對策」,行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究計畫報告。
     
     英文部份
     1.Ansoff, H. I. (1957), “Strategies for Diversification,” Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.
     2.Balassa, Bela (1961), The Theory of Economic Integration, Homewood, Ill: Rich-ard D. Irwin.
     3.Bartlett, C. A. and S. Ghoshal (1989), Managing Across Borders:The Transna-tional Solution, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
     4.Birkinshaw, J. M. and A. J. Morrison (1995), “Configurations of Strategies and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations,”Journal of Inter-national Business Studies, 26(3), 729-753.
     5.Birkinshaw, J. M., A. J. Morrison and J. Hulland (1995), “Structural and Com-petitive Determinants of a Global Integration Strategy,”Strategic Manage-ment Journal, 16, 637-655.
     6.Birkinshaw, J. M. (1996), “How Multinational Subsidiary Mandates are Gained and Lost,”Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3), 467-95.
     7.Birkinshaw, J. and N. Hood (2000),“Characteristics of Foreign Subsidiaries in Industry Cluster,”Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1), 141-154.
     8.Boyacigiller, N. (1990),“The Role of Expatriates in the Management of Interde-pendence, Complexity and Risk in Multinational Corporations,”Journal of International Business Studies, 21, 357-381.
     9.Cooper, J. C. (1993),“Logistics Strategies for Global Business,”International Journal of Physical distribution & logistics management, 23(4), 12-23.
     10.Daft, R. L. (2001), Organization Theory and Design, South Western College Pub-lishing.
     11.Delios, A. and S. Makino (2003), “Timing of Entry and Foreign Subsidiary Per-formance of Japanese Firms,” Journal of International Marketing, 11(3), 83-105.
     12.Deresky, H. (2002), Global Management: Strategic and Interpersonal, New Jer-sey, Pearson Education Press.
     13.Dunning, J. H. (1981), International Production and the Multinational Enter-prise, London, New York: Allen & Unwin.
     14.Garnier, G. H. (1982),“Context and Decision Making Autonomy in the Foreign Affiliates of U.S. Multinational Corporations,”Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 893-908.
     15.Gates, S. R. and W. G. Egelhoff (1986),“Centralization in Headquar-ters-Subsidiary Relationships,”Journal of International Business Studies, 17(2), 71-92.
     16.Ghoshal, S. and N. Nohria (1989),“Internal Differentiation within Multinational Corporations,”Strategic Management Journal, 10(4), 323-337.
     17.Hamel, G. and C. K. Prahalad (1996), Competing for the Future, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
     18.Hitt, Michael A., Robert E. Hoskisson and Hicheon Kim (1997),“International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Prod-uct-Diversified Firms,” Academy of Management Journal, 40 (4), 767-798.
     19.Hitt, M. A., L. Tihanyi, Miller and B. Connelly (2006),“International Diversifi-cation: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators,”Journal of Management, 32(6), 831-867.
     20.Kotabe, M. (1990), “The Relationship between Offshore Sourcing and Innova-tiveness of U.S. Multinational Firms: An Empirical Investigation,”Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4), 623-638.
     21.Lambert, D. M. and J. R. Stock (1993), Strategic Logistics Management, Home-wood, IL: Irwin.
     22.Lowe, J. and P. Taylor (1998),“R&D and Technology Purchase through License Agreement Complementary Strategy and Complementary Assets.”R&D Management, 28(14), 263-278.
     23.Negandhi, A. R. (1987), International Management, Newton, MA: Allyn and Ba-con.
     24.Nohria, N. and S. Ghoshal (1994),“Differentiated Fit and Shared Values: Alter-natives for Managing Headquarters-subsidiary Relations,”Strategic Man-agement Journal, 15(6), 491-502.
     25.Ohmae, K. (1990), The Borderless World, Harper, New York.
     26.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1997), “ Market Access Issues in the Automobile Sector,”Paris: OECD.
     27.Pinder, J. (1968), “Positive Integration and Negative Integration: Some Problems of Economic Union in the EEC,” The World Today, 88-110.
     28.Robson, P. (1987), The Economics of International Integration, London: George Allen & Unwin.
     29.Sullivan, D. (1994),“Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a Firm,” Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (2), 325-342.
     30.Taggart, J. H. and N. Hood (1999),“Determinants of Autonomy in Multinational Corporation Subsidiaries,”European Management Journal, 17(2), 226-236.
     31.Van der Hoop, J. H. (1992),“Global Logistics: What`s so Specific?”Council of Logistics Management: Annual Meeting Proceeding.
     32.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2013),“Global Value Chains: Investment and Trade for Development,”UNCTAD World Invest-ment Report 2013, United Nations: New York.
     33.Yeoh, P. L. (2004),“International Learning: Antecedents and Performance Im-plications among Newly Internationalizing Companies in an Exporting Con-text,”International Marketing Review, 21(4/5), 511-535.
     34.Zahra, S. A., R. D. Ireland and M. A. Hitt (2000),“International Expansion by New Venture Firms: International Diversity, Mode of Market Entry, Techno-logical Learning and Performance,”Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925-950.
zh_TW