Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 China’s Sui Generis plus Oxymoron - its Justification
作者 湯紹成
Tang, Shao-Cheng
貢獻者 美歐研究所
關鍵詞 China;Sui Generis;Oxymoron;Value;Leadership;Socialism à la Chine
日期 2011.08
上傳時間 12-Aug-2014 14:35:49 (UTC+8)
摘要 In recent years, China’s overall performance stood out extraordinarily. Although the PRC is not only a socialist but also a developing country, it still has offered financial relief to European countries. None of Beijing’s leaders has been directly elected by the people, but most of them have been proven to be competent. Does this mean that the “Beijing Consensus” has taken over “Washington Consensus”? Given China’s vast population and its unique geographical environment and historical development, compared to European countries, China is sui generis. In the traditional Confucianism, benevolence (仁) is a virtue which human beings are born with, while the Western world is rooted deeply in the Christian culture of “original sin”. As a result the rule of virtue in China contrasts the rule of law in the West, harmony vs. contradiction. China’s “socialist market economy” and “Three Represents” are typical oxymorons but with great success. Since the implementation of a “socialist market economy” in 1992 there has been much more market economy than socialism. Currently, political, social and cultural sectors are lagging behind. Therefore, the gap between the rich and the poor must be reduced efficiently. Nonetheless, the corruption problem remains as another serious and important issue for the CCP. Without independent anti-corruption authorities, it would be extremely difficult for them to tackle this problem. For the time being the Mainland has to count on the leadership to set examples for others.
關聯 Open Journal of Political Science (OJPS), 1(1), 1-9
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 美歐研究所en_US
dc.creator (作者) 湯紹成zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Tang, Shao-Chengen_US
dc.date (日期) 2011.08en_US
dc.date.accessioned 12-Aug-2014 14:35:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-Aug-2014 14:35:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-Aug-2014 14:35:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68584-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In recent years, China’s overall performance stood out extraordinarily. Although the PRC is not only a socialist but also a developing country, it still has offered financial relief to European countries. None of Beijing’s leaders has been directly elected by the people, but most of them have been proven to be competent. Does this mean that the “Beijing Consensus” has taken over “Washington Consensus”? Given China’s vast population and its unique geographical environment and historical development, compared to European countries, China is sui generis. In the traditional Confucianism, benevolence (仁) is a virtue which human beings are born with, while the Western world is rooted deeply in the Christian culture of “original sin”. As a result the rule of virtue in China contrasts the rule of law in the West, harmony vs. contradiction. China’s “socialist market economy” and “Three Represents” are typical oxymorons but with great success. Since the implementation of a “socialist market economy” in 1992 there has been much more market economy than socialism. Currently, political, social and cultural sectors are lagging behind. Therefore, the gap between the rich and the poor must be reduced efficiently. Nonetheless, the corruption problem remains as another serious and important issue for the CCP. Without independent anti-corruption authorities, it would be extremely difficult for them to tackle this problem. For the time being the Mainland has to count on the leadership to set examples for others.en_US
dc.format.extent 299671 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) Open Journal of Political Science (OJPS), 1(1), 1-9en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) China;Sui Generis;Oxymoron;Value;Leadership;Socialism à la Chineen_US
dc.title (題名) China’s Sui Generis plus Oxymoron - its Justificationen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen