Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 臺灣人文學文獻引用類型分析研究
其他題名 Citation Type Analysis on Humanity Literature of Taiwan
作者 蔡明月;邱琦茹
Tsay, Ming-Yueh;Chiu, Chi-Ju
貢獻者 圖檔所
關鍵詞 人文學;引用類型;期刊論文結構;引用位置;引用文獻分析
Humanity;Citation type;Classification of citation;Citation analysis
日期 2014.04
上傳時間 12-Aug-2014 15:46:48 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究利用引用文獻分析法,針對國內人文學各學科頂尖期刊,其2011年所出版的研究性文章為樣本,探討其論文結構與引用文獻出現在文章中的位置。再者,進一步採用Frost模式,分析各學科引用類型以及國內外引用類型的異同。本研究結果發現國內文史哲藝術四門人文學科以論述型文獻為主,語言學以結構型文獻為主。論述型文章的引用文獻以本文部分最多,結論最少;結構型文章之引用文獻則是緒論部分最多,研究方法次之。人文學大多引用作品原著的首次作品,引用類型以支持作者意見或事實描述為主。整體而言國內外引用類型分布大致相似,不同之處各學科略有差異。本研究結果可以了解人文學學者的引用特性與資訊需求,進而提升圖書館相關服務。再者,亦可增進人文學者對引用文獻本質的認識,並期望為未來相關實證研究提供參考。
Using informetrics and citation analysis, the present study explores and compares characteristics and types of citations in the humanity journal articles that published in Taiwan. Research articles published in 2011, from top humanity journals, assessed by the Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Science Council in Taiwan, were collected and analyzed. The analysis was done by structure of journal article and location of citations. In addition to citations appearing in the text, the phenomena of citation type will be compared and discussed in the latter part. The results of this study revealed articles of literature, history, philosophy and arts were mostly argumentative, while linguistic articles tended to comply with IMRAD (Introduction, Methods and Materials, Results, And Discussion) formats. Introducing primary materials from original works, humanity scholars tended to cite for factual descriptions or to support authors` perspectives. Secondary materials, such as later studies on the original works by other scholars, were seen the most in the disciplines of linguistics while the least in that of history. In general, the distribution of citation types is similar between articles in domestic and foreign journals; merely minor differences occurred among disciplines. While citing characteristics and information needs of humanities scholars revealed in this study may contribute to collection development of libraries or refinement of information services to researchers, suggestions based on analysis of research results may also serve as reference for standardization of writing and publication of journal articles in Taiwan. Aiming at further exploration of citations, this study is expected to provide a better understanding of the nature of citations and to serve as a foundation for future empirical studies.
關聯 教育資料與圖書館學, 51(3), 1-37
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.2014.513/0594.RS.AM
dc.contributor 圖檔所en_US
dc.creator (作者) 蔡明月;邱琦茹zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Tsay, Ming-Yueh;Chiu, Chi-Juen_US
dc.date (日期) 2014.04en_US
dc.date.accessioned 12-Aug-2014 15:46:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-Aug-2014 15:46:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-Aug-2014 15:46:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68623-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究利用引用文獻分析法,針對國內人文學各學科頂尖期刊,其2011年所出版的研究性文章為樣本,探討其論文結構與引用文獻出現在文章中的位置。再者,進一步採用Frost模式,分析各學科引用類型以及國內外引用類型的異同。本研究結果發現國內文史哲藝術四門人文學科以論述型文獻為主,語言學以結構型文獻為主。論述型文章的引用文獻以本文部分最多,結論最少;結構型文章之引用文獻則是緒論部分最多,研究方法次之。人文學大多引用作品原著的首次作品,引用類型以支持作者意見或事實描述為主。整體而言國內外引用類型分布大致相似,不同之處各學科略有差異。本研究結果可以了解人文學學者的引用特性與資訊需求,進而提升圖書館相關服務。再者,亦可增進人文學者對引用文獻本質的認識,並期望為未來相關實證研究提供參考。en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Using informetrics and citation analysis, the present study explores and compares characteristics and types of citations in the humanity journal articles that published in Taiwan. Research articles published in 2011, from top humanity journals, assessed by the Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Science Council in Taiwan, were collected and analyzed. The analysis was done by structure of journal article and location of citations. In addition to citations appearing in the text, the phenomena of citation type will be compared and discussed in the latter part. The results of this study revealed articles of literature, history, philosophy and arts were mostly argumentative, while linguistic articles tended to comply with IMRAD (Introduction, Methods and Materials, Results, And Discussion) formats. Introducing primary materials from original works, humanity scholars tended to cite for factual descriptions or to support authors` perspectives. Secondary materials, such as later studies on the original works by other scholars, were seen the most in the disciplines of linguistics while the least in that of history. In general, the distribution of citation types is similar between articles in domestic and foreign journals; merely minor differences occurred among disciplines. While citing characteristics and information needs of humanities scholars revealed in this study may contribute to collection development of libraries or refinement of information services to researchers, suggestions based on analysis of research results may also serve as reference for standardization of writing and publication of journal articles in Taiwan. Aiming at further exploration of citations, this study is expected to provide a better understanding of the nature of citations and to serve as a foundation for future empirical studies.en_US
dc.format.extent 2547337 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 教育資料與圖書館學, 51(3), 1-37en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 人文學;引用類型;期刊論文結構;引用位置;引用文獻分析en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Humanity;Citation type;Classification of citation;Citation analysisen_US
dc.title (題名) 臺灣人文學文獻引用類型分析研究zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) Citation Type Analysis on Humanity Literature of Taiwanen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6120/JoEMLS.2014.513/0594.RS.AM-
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.2014.513/0594.RS.AM en_US