Publications-NSC Projects

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 技術創造力特性與開發研究---各類創意領域之間比較---子計畫IV:科技創造的本質與脈絡
其他題名 The Nature and Context of Creativity in Science & Technology
作者 詹志禹
貢獻者 教育學系
關鍵詞 科學發現;知識成長;科技創造;科學哲學;科學思考;批判思考;創造思考
Scientific discovery;Knowledge growth;Technology creation;Philosophy of science;Scientific thinking;Critical thinking;Creative thinking
日期 1999
上傳時間 27-Aug-2014 17:36:30 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文順著科學哲學發展的歷史脈落,以各派科學哲學的觀點分析科學思考中的創意來源與創造性歷程;到目前為止,分析的結果發現:第一,傳統所謂的歸納法其實是一種「假設-驗證」的歷程,但對於如何創造假設,卻沒有任何說明;第二,邏輯實證論對「發現之脈落」存而不論,造成許多人將科學創造的歷程視為神祕、非理性的歷程;第三,批判思考與創造思考之間,可能具有互相抑制、也可能具有互相助發的關係,總之兩者之間具有密切而難以分割的互動關係,任何有價值的創造都同時需要這兩者;第四,典範既會束縛創造,也會幫助創造,其創造性可能表現在應用、詮釋和預測,但典範之更新則需要危機的刺激;第五,科學發現與科學創造是兩個難以區分的歷程,新事實的發現通常借助於新理論的發明;第六,科學理論與科學方法的多元化,有助於科學創造與科學革命;第七,領域發展與創新是一個拔靴自助的歷程,科學發現雖無邏輯可尋,卻有理由可尋。
This article analyze the possible process and context of creativity in scientific thinking according to the viewpoints from historical development of philosophy of science. It was found that: (1) The so called "inductive reasoning" is actually a "hypothesis-testing" process; (2) Logical positivism leave the "context of discovery" in black box and therefore leave a mysticism about scientific discovery; (3) Creative and critical thinking can facilitate and inhibit each other, resulting an intimate relationship and essential tension between the two; (4) Paradigms can constrain as well as facilitate creativity with possible facilitating effects from helping novel prediction, interpretation, and application; (5) Since the discovery of new facts is usually through the invention of new theory, the distinction between so called "scientific discovery" and "scientific creativity" is blurred; (6) Theoretical and methodological pluralism in science can promote the probability of scientific discovery and revolution; (7) The growth and innovation of a knowledge domain is a bootstrapping process, in which there can be no logic but there should be some good reasons.
關聯 行政院國家科學委員會
計畫編號NSC88-2519-S004-004-C
資料類型 report
dc.contributor 教育學系en_US
dc.creator (作者) 詹志禹zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 1999en_US
dc.date.accessioned 27-Aug-2014 17:36:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 27-Aug-2014 17:36:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 27-Aug-2014 17:36:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69365-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文順著科學哲學發展的歷史脈落,以各派科學哲學的觀點分析科學思考中的創意來源與創造性歷程;到目前為止,分析的結果發現:第一,傳統所謂的歸納法其實是一種「假設-驗證」的歷程,但對於如何創造假設,卻沒有任何說明;第二,邏輯實證論對「發現之脈落」存而不論,造成許多人將科學創造的歷程視為神祕、非理性的歷程;第三,批判思考與創造思考之間,可能具有互相抑制、也可能具有互相助發的關係,總之兩者之間具有密切而難以分割的互動關係,任何有價值的創造都同時需要這兩者;第四,典範既會束縛創造,也會幫助創造,其創造性可能表現在應用、詮釋和預測,但典範之更新則需要危機的刺激;第五,科學發現與科學創造是兩個難以區分的歷程,新事實的發現通常借助於新理論的發明;第六,科學理論與科學方法的多元化,有助於科學創造與科學革命;第七,領域發展與創新是一個拔靴自助的歷程,科學發現雖無邏輯可尋,卻有理由可尋。en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This article analyze the possible process and context of creativity in scientific thinking according to the viewpoints from historical development of philosophy of science. It was found that: (1) The so called "inductive reasoning" is actually a "hypothesis-testing" process; (2) Logical positivism leave the "context of discovery" in black box and therefore leave a mysticism about scientific discovery; (3) Creative and critical thinking can facilitate and inhibit each other, resulting an intimate relationship and essential tension between the two; (4) Paradigms can constrain as well as facilitate creativity with possible facilitating effects from helping novel prediction, interpretation, and application; (5) Since the discovery of new facts is usually through the invention of new theory, the distinction between so called "scientific discovery" and "scientific creativity" is blurred; (6) Theoretical and methodological pluralism in science can promote the probability of scientific discovery and revolution; (7) The growth and innovation of a knowledge domain is a bootstrapping process, in which there can be no logic but there should be some good reasons.en_US
dc.format.extent 135 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 行政院國家科學委員會en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 計畫編號NSC88-2519-S004-004-Cen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 科學發現;知識成長;科技創造;科學哲學;科學思考;批判思考;創造思考en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Scientific discovery;Knowledge growth;Technology creation;Philosophy of science;Scientific thinking;Critical thinking;Creative thinkingen_US
dc.title (題名) 技術創造力特性與開發研究---各類創意領域之間比較---子計畫IV:科技創造的本質與脈絡zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) The Nature and Context of Creativity in Science & Technologyen_US
dc.type (資料類型) reporten