學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 臉書引言框架對科學新聞理解之影響
Framing Effect: The Influence of "Facebook Lead" on Science News Comprehension作者 陳姵如
Chen, Pei Ju貢獻者 施琮仁
Shih, Tsung Jen
陳姵如
Chen, Pei Ju關鍵詞 框架
人情趣味
爭議
理解
臉書
framing
human interest
conflict
comprehension
Facebook日期 2014 上傳時間 1-Oct-2014 13:38:36 (UTC+8) 摘要 隨著社群媒體的熱潮持續延燒，許多科學新聞機構也開始透過臉書的粉絲專頁來發佈自己的新聞以增加新聞曝光率。過去有關於媒體粉絲專頁的研究多探討行銷行為，鮮少針對新聞機構的臉書專頁做研究，對於粉絲專頁社群編輯的引言所形成的框架效果研究也付之闕如。本研究包含兩個實驗法，將兩則不同主題的科學新聞（基因改造、奈米科技）各自配上三種不同框架的臉書引言-技術性框架、爭議性框架、和人情趣味框架，來探討臉書的引言對於科學新聞閱聽眾的影響。 結果發現，人情趣味的臉書引言只會增進讀者想要點擊新聞全文的慾望，卻不會對新聞主文的詮釋造成影響。爭議性臉書引言除了增進讀者閱讀新聞全文的慾望之外，也會再強化讀者對新聞全文的認知。然而這兩種框架對於讀者的新聞注意度、理解度和議題相關性沒有影響。
As social media continue to gain popularity, scientific news agencies also adopt the trend to increase online presence and fuel exposure because of the growing need to strengthen the communication between scientists and the general public. This study investigated the potential power of the current most popular social media- Facebook in fostering public understanding of science by employing two one-factor between-subject web-based experimental factorial designs. Experiment 1 used genetic modification news and experiment 2 used nanotechnology news. Each piece of science news had three different Facebook framed leads: technique, conflict and human interest. Research results found human interest frame only served to arouse reader’s situational interest to click on the news feed to access to the full story but didn’t affect how readers interpret the main theme of the science news articles. On the other hand, conflict frame not only enhanced reader’s intention to click on the news feed but also reinforced how they perceive the main theme of the news story. However, the two soft news frames have no effect on reader’s perceived news attention, understanding and relevance. This study aimed to contribute to the literature as one of the first studies on the use of the social media in the realm of the public understanding of science.參考文獻 Bauer, Martin W., Allum, Nick, & Miller, Steve. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79-95.Baum, M. A. 2003. ‘Commentary: Soft News and Political Knowledge: Evidence of Absence or Absence of Evidence?’, Political Communication, 20, 173–90.Baum, M. A. & Jamison, A. S. 2006. ‘The Oprah Effect: How Soft News Helps Inattentive Citizens Vote Consistently’, Journal of Politics, 68, 946–59.Bann, C.M., & Schwerin, M.J. (2004). Public knowledge and attitudes scale construction: development of short forms. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International.Blake, C.A. (2007). Blake C. Andrew. Media-generated Shortcuts: Do Newspaper Headlines Present Another Roadblock for Low-information Rationality? The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics,12(2), 24-43.BusinessNext(2013). 2013 Taiwan top 100 sites revealed, Facebook as number one. Retrived from http://www.bnext.com.tw/Carmines, E., & Stimson, J. . (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74(1), 78-91. Chen, Y. N. (2011). When Scientists Meet Journalists: An Explorative Study on the Differences of the Two Profession`s Perceptions of Science News. Chinese Journal of Communication Research.19, 147-187.Chang, C. (2009). Repetition variation strat- egies for narrative advertising. The Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 51-65.Chang, C.C. (2012). Features of Science Reporting and Their Influences-An Exploration Based on Structures of Scientific Knowledge and Schema Theory. Chinese Journal of Science Communication, 20(3), 193-216.Chen, L., & Zillmann, D. (2002). Effects of lead frames on the selective reading of associated news reports. Paper presented in the scholar-to- scholar session of the Newspaper Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication’s national conference, Miami Beach, FL.Chen, L., Zillmann, D., Knobloch, S., & Callsion, C. (2004). Effects of Lead Framing on Selective Exposure to Internet News Reports. Communication Research, 31(1), 58-81.ComScore Media Metrix (2013). ARO/MMX releases August 2013 Media Metrix Network Flow Report. ARO. Retrived from http://www.insightxplorer.com/ComScore Media Metrix (2014). ARO/MMX releases August 2014 Media Metrix Network Flow Report. ARO. Retrived from http://www.insightxplorer.com/Cheng, Kun Yi. (2011). A study on the management of Internet news community: take the facebook "fan page" as example. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Shih Hsin University, Taiwan.Condit, C. M., Ferguson, A., Kassel, R., Thadhani, C., Gooding, H.C., & Parrott, R. (2001). An Exploratory Study of the Impact of News Headlines on Genetic Determinism. Science Communication, 22(4), 379-395. Dor, Daniel. (2003). On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 695-721.D` Haenens, L. & Bosman, J. (2003). Portrayal of Canada in the Dutch Print Media. Canandian Journal of Communication, 28(2). Dunwoody, S. (1992). Comparative strategies for making the complex clear. In B. V. Lewenstein (Ed.), When science meets the public (pp. 101-102). Washington,DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Entman, R. M. (1993). “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm,” Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.Eperen, L. V., & Marincola, F. M. (2011). How scientists use social media to communicate their research. Journal translational medicine, 9: 199.Facebook Statistics. [http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics].Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-37. Geer, J. G., & Kahn F. K. 1993. “Grabbing Attention: An Experimental Investigation of Headlines during Campaigns.” Political Communication 10(2):175–91.Genova, B. K. L., & Greenberg, B. S. (1979). Interests in news and the knowledge gap. Public OpinionQuarterly, 43, 79-91.Graber, D. A. 2001. Processing Politics: Learning from Television in the Internet Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Bik HM, Goldstein MC (2013) An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists. PLoS Biol 11(4): e1001535. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535Grove, Jennifer Van. (2013). Facebook grabs most attention among social sites. from http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57569523-93/facebook-grabs-most-attention-among-social-sites/Hansen, Anders. (1994). Journalistic practices and science reporting in the British press. Public Understanding of Science, 3(111). Hansen, L.& Bosman, J. (2003). Portrayal of Canada in the Dutch print media. Canadian Journal of communication , 28 (2).Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang Effects in Science Communication : How Motivated Reasoning and Identity Cues Amplify Opinion Polarization About Climate Mitigation Policies. Communication Research, 39(7), 701-723.Huang, C. J., & Jian, M. J. (2006). Science news in Taiwan: A study of news discourse and text structure. Mass Communication Research, 86, 135-170. Hwang, Yoori, & Southwell, Brian G. (2009). Science TV News Exposure Predicts Science Beliefs : Real World Effects Among a National Sample. Communication Research, 36(5),724-742.Iyengar, S. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible: How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Jebril, N., Vreese, C., Dalen, A., & Albæk, E. (2013). The Effects of Human Interest and Conflict News Frames on the Dynamics of Political Knowledge Gains: Evidence from a Cross-national Study. Scandinavian Political Studies, 36(3), 201-226.Olmstead, K., Mitchell. A., & Rosenstiel. T.(2011). Facebook Is Becoming Increasingly Important. Pew Research Center. Retrived from http://www.journalism.org/León, Bienvenido. (2008). Science related information in European television: a study of prime-time news. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 443-460. Li, M. H. (2012). New Media and Science Communication: Media Representations and Content Production of Low Carbon Life Weblog. Public Communication, Collective Action and the Internet. Hsinchu, Taiwan.Lu, L. H. (2008). Reconstruct the image of science news production in technology society--An empirical study for China times, United Daily News and Liberty times (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nanhua University, Taiwan. Lysak, S., Cremedas, M., & Wolf, J. (2012). Facebook and Twitter in the Newsroom : How and Why Local Television News is Getting Social With Viewers? Electronic News, 6(4), 187-207. MacDougall, C. (1982). Intrepretive reporting. New York: Macmillan.McComas, K.A. & Simone, L.M. (2003). Media Coverage of Conflicts of Interest in Science. Science communication, 24(4), 395-419.Miller, J. D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: what we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 273-294. Miller, J. D., Augenbraun, E., Schulhof, J., & Kimmel, L. G. (2006). Adult Science Learning from Local Television Newscasts. Science Communication, 28, 216-242. Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T. & Christian, L. (2013). What Facebook and Twitter Mean for News. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/Myers, J.L., Hansen, R.S., Robson, R.C. and McCann, J. (1983) “The Role of Explanation in Learning Elementary Probability,” Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 374–81.Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: W.H. Freeman.Neuman, W.R., Just, M.R., & Crigler, A.N. (1992). Common Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Kroepsch, A. (2003). Framing science: The stem cell contro- versy in an age of press/politics. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8, 36-70.Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2007). The future of public engagement. The Scientist,21(10), 39-44.Pellechia, Marianne G. (1997). Trends in science coverage: a content analysis of three US newspapers. Public Understanding of Science, 6, 49-68.Price, V. & Tewksbury. D. (1997). News Values and Public Opinion: A Theoretical Account of Media Priming and Framing. In G. Barnett and F.T. Boster (Eds). Progress in the communicaitonal science (p173-212). Greenwich, CT: Albex.Price, V., Tewksbury, D., Powers, E. (1997). Switching Trains of Thought: The Impact of News Frames on Readers` Cognitive Responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481-506.Wilson, R.E., Gosling, S.D. and Gosling and Graham. L.T (2012). A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3) 203–220.Rogers, C. (1999) “The Importance of Understanding Audiences,” in S.M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody and C.L. Rogers (eds) Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science, pp. 179–200. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Sasseen, Jane, Olmstead, Kenny, & Mitchell, Amy. (2013). Digital: As Mobile Grows Rapidly, the Pressures on News Intensify. from http://stateofthemedia.org/2013/digital-as-mobile-grows-rapidly-the-pressures-on-news-intensify/Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a Theory of Media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122.Semetko, H. A. and Valkenburg, P.M. (2006). Framing European Politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109.Smith, S. (1997). Developing New Reflexes in Framing Stories. from http://www.pewcenter.org/doingcj/civiccat/displayCivcat.php?id=97.Snow, C. P. (1980). The Two Cultures and A Second Look: Cambridge University Press.Stewart, C.O., Dickerson, D. L., & Hotchkiss, R. (2009). Beliefs About Science and News Frames in Audience Evaluations of Embryonic and Adult Stem Cell Research. Science Communication, 30, 427. Tannenbaum, Percy H. 1953. “The Effect of Headlines on the Interpretation of News Stories.” Journalism Quarterly 30:189–97.Tewksbury, D, Weaver, A. J., Maddex, B. D. (2001). Accidentallu informed: incidental news exposure on the world wide web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78: 533.Venkataramanan, Madhumita. (2011). I heart Facebook: Scientists turn to social networks to study cardiovascular health. from http://blogs.nature.com/spoonful/2011/12/i_heart_facebook_scientists_tu_1.htmlVan Dijk, T. A. 1988. News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Wang, T.L. (2006). The Impacts of Sensationalism on Audiences’ Receptions of Television News. Mass Communication Research, 86, 91-133.Weaver, D.A., Lively, E., Bimber, B. (2009). Searching for a Frame: News Media Tell the Story of Technological Progress, Risk, and Regulation. Science Communication, 31(2), 139-166.Wilson, Robert E., Gosling, Samuel D., & Graham, Lindsay T. (2012). A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203-220. Woods, Tiffany. (2011). Fish on Facebook: where to go when your friends are finned., from http://oregonprogress.oregonstate.edu/winter-2013/fish-facebook.Xu, Q. (2013). Social Recommendation, Source Credibility, and Recency: Effects of News Cues in a Social Bookmarking Website. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(4), 757-775.Yaros, Ronald A. (2011). Is It the Medium or the Message? Structuring Complex News to Enhance Engagement and Situational Understanding by Nonexperts. Communication Research, 33(4), 285-309. Yaros, Ronald A. (2011). Effects of Text and Hypertext Structures on User Interest and Understanding of Science and Technology. Science Communication, 33(3), 275-308. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
100461012
103資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100461012 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 施琮仁 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Shih, Tsung Jen en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳姵如 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Pei Ju en_US dc.creator (作者) 陳姵如 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chen, Pei Ju en_US dc.date (日期) 2014 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Oct-2014 13:38:36 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Oct-2014 13:38:36 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Oct-2014 13:38:36 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0100461012 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70300 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 100461012 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 103 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著社群媒體的熱潮持續延燒，許多科學新聞機構也開始透過臉書的粉絲專頁來發佈自己的新聞以增加新聞曝光率。過去有關於媒體粉絲專頁的研究多探討行銷行為，鮮少針對新聞機構的臉書專頁做研究，對於粉絲專頁社群編輯的引言所形成的框架效果研究也付之闕如。本研究包含兩個實驗法，將兩則不同主題的科學新聞（基因改造、奈米科技）各自配上三種不同框架的臉書引言-技術性框架、爭議性框架、和人情趣味框架，來探討臉書的引言對於科學新聞閱聽眾的影響。 結果發現，人情趣味的臉書引言只會增進讀者想要點擊新聞全文的慾望，卻不會對新聞主文的詮釋造成影響。爭議性臉書引言除了增進讀者閱讀新聞全文的慾望之外，也會再強化讀者對新聞全文的認知。然而這兩種框架對於讀者的新聞注意度、理解度和議題相關性沒有影響。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) As social media continue to gain popularity, scientific news agencies also adopt the trend to increase online presence and fuel exposure because of the growing need to strengthen the communication between scientists and the general public. This study investigated the potential power of the current most popular social media- Facebook in fostering public understanding of science by employing two one-factor between-subject web-based experimental factorial designs. Experiment 1 used genetic modification news and experiment 2 used nanotechnology news. Each piece of science news had three different Facebook framed leads: technique, conflict and human interest. Research results found human interest frame only served to arouse reader’s situational interest to click on the news feed to access to the full story but didn’t affect how readers interpret the main theme of the science news articles. On the other hand, conflict frame not only enhanced reader’s intention to click on the news feed but also reinforced how they perceive the main theme of the news story. However, the two soft news frames have no effect on reader’s perceived news attention, understanding and relevance. This study aimed to contribute to the literature as one of the first studies on the use of the social media in the realm of the public understanding of science. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Introduction……………………………………………………………………5Literature Review……………………………………………………………8Research on Facebook………………………………………………………8Functions of headline……………………………………………………9Framing effect of headline and lead………………………………11Science news frames……………………………………………………13Method………………………………………………………………16Study1………………………………………………………………16Participants………………………………………………………………16Design………………………………………………………………16Material………………………………………………………………17Measures………………………………………………………………18Procedure………………………………………………………………21Results………………………………………………………………23Study2…………………………………………………………28Participants…………………………………………………………28Design………………………………………………………………28Material………………………………………………………………28Measures………………………………………………………………29Procedure………………………………………………………………31Results………………………………………………………………32Discussion……………………………………………………………36Limitation and future studies………………………………………41Conclusion……………………………………………………………44References…………………………………………………………46Appendices………………………………………………………52Questionnaire………………………………………………………52Text of Facebook framed leads……………………………………65 zh_TW dc.format.extent 803541 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100461012 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 框架 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 人情趣味 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 爭議 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 理解 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 臉書 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) framing en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) human interest en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) conflict en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) comprehension en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Facebook en_US dc.title (題名) 臉書引言框架對科學新聞理解之影響 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Framing Effect: The Influence of "Facebook Lead" on Science News Comprehension en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bauer, Martin W., Allum, Nick, & Miller, Steve. (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79-95.Baum, M. A. 2003. ‘Commentary: Soft News and Political Knowledge: Evidence of Absence or Absence of Evidence?’, Political Communication, 20, 173–90.Baum, M. A. & Jamison, A. S. 2006. ‘The Oprah Effect: How Soft News Helps Inattentive Citizens Vote Consistently’, Journal of Politics, 68, 946–59.Bann, C.M., & Schwerin, M.J. (2004). Public knowledge and attitudes scale construction: development of short forms. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International.Blake, C.A. (2007). Blake C. Andrew. Media-generated Shortcuts: Do Newspaper Headlines Present Another Roadblock for Low-information Rationality? The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics,12(2), 24-43.BusinessNext(2013). 2013 Taiwan top 100 sites revealed, Facebook as number one. Retrived from http://www.bnext.com.tw/Carmines, E., & Stimson, J. . (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74(1), 78-91. Chen, Y. N. (2011). When Scientists Meet Journalists: An Explorative Study on the Differences of the Two Profession`s Perceptions of Science News. Chinese Journal of Communication Research.19, 147-187.Chang, C. (2009). Repetition variation strat- egies for narrative advertising. The Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 51-65.Chang, C.C. (2012). Features of Science Reporting and Their Influences-An Exploration Based on Structures of Scientific Knowledge and Schema Theory. Chinese Journal of Science Communication, 20(3), 193-216.Chen, L., & Zillmann, D. (2002). Effects of lead frames on the selective reading of associated news reports. Paper presented in the scholar-to- scholar session of the Newspaper Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication’s national conference, Miami Beach, FL.Chen, L., Zillmann, D., Knobloch, S., & Callsion, C. (2004). Effects of Lead Framing on Selective Exposure to Internet News Reports. Communication Research, 31(1), 58-81.ComScore Media Metrix (2013). ARO/MMX releases August 2013 Media Metrix Network Flow Report. ARO. Retrived from http://www.insightxplorer.com/ComScore Media Metrix (2014). ARO/MMX releases August 2014 Media Metrix Network Flow Report. ARO. Retrived from http://www.insightxplorer.com/Cheng, Kun Yi. (2011). A study on the management of Internet news community: take the facebook "fan page" as example. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Shih Hsin University, Taiwan.Condit, C. M., Ferguson, A., Kassel, R., Thadhani, C., Gooding, H.C., & Parrott, R. (2001). An Exploratory Study of the Impact of News Headlines on Genetic Determinism. Science Communication, 22(4), 379-395. Dor, Daniel. (2003). On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 695-721.D` Haenens, L. & Bosman, J. (2003). Portrayal of Canada in the Dutch Print Media. Canandian Journal of Communication, 28(2). Dunwoody, S. (1992). Comparative strategies for making the complex clear. In B. V. Lewenstein (Ed.), When science meets the public (pp. 101-102). Washington,DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Entman, R. M. (1993). “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm,” Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.Eperen, L. V., & Marincola, F. M. (2011). How scientists use social media to communicate their research. Journal translational medicine, 9: 199.Facebook Statistics. [http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics].Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-37. Geer, J. G., & Kahn F. K. 1993. “Grabbing Attention: An Experimental Investigation of Headlines during Campaigns.” Political Communication 10(2):175–91.Genova, B. K. L., & Greenberg, B. S. (1979). Interests in news and the knowledge gap. Public OpinionQuarterly, 43, 79-91.Graber, D. A. 2001. Processing Politics: Learning from Television in the Internet Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Bik HM, Goldstein MC (2013) An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists. PLoS Biol 11(4): e1001535. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535Grove, Jennifer Van. (2013). Facebook grabs most attention among social sites. from http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57569523-93/facebook-grabs-most-attention-among-social-sites/Hansen, Anders. (1994). Journalistic practices and science reporting in the British press. Public Understanding of Science, 3(111). Hansen, L.& Bosman, J. (2003). Portrayal of Canada in the Dutch print media. Canadian Journal of communication , 28 (2).Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang Effects in Science Communication : How Motivated Reasoning and Identity Cues Amplify Opinion Polarization About Climate Mitigation Policies. Communication Research, 39(7), 701-723.Huang, C. J., & Jian, M. J. (2006). Science news in Taiwan: A study of news discourse and text structure. Mass Communication Research, 86, 135-170. Hwang, Yoori, & Southwell, Brian G. (2009). Science TV News Exposure Predicts Science Beliefs : Real World Effects Among a National Sample. Communication Research, 36(5),724-742.Iyengar, S. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible: How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Jebril, N., Vreese, C., Dalen, A., & Albæk, E. (2013). The Effects of Human Interest and Conflict News Frames on the Dynamics of Political Knowledge Gains: Evidence from a Cross-national Study. Scandinavian Political Studies, 36(3), 201-226.Olmstead, K., Mitchell. A., & Rosenstiel. T.(2011). Facebook Is Becoming Increasingly Important. Pew Research Center. Retrived from http://www.journalism.org/León, Bienvenido. (2008). Science related information in European television: a study of prime-time news. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 443-460. Li, M. H. (2012). New Media and Science Communication: Media Representations and Content Production of Low Carbon Life Weblog. Public Communication, Collective Action and the Internet. Hsinchu, Taiwan.Lu, L. H. (2008). Reconstruct the image of science news production in technology society--An empirical study for China times, United Daily News and Liberty times (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nanhua University, Taiwan. Lysak, S., Cremedas, M., & Wolf, J. (2012). Facebook and Twitter in the Newsroom : How and Why Local Television News is Getting Social With Viewers? Electronic News, 6(4), 187-207. MacDougall, C. (1982). Intrepretive reporting. New York: Macmillan.McComas, K.A. & Simone, L.M. (2003). Media Coverage of Conflicts of Interest in Science. Science communication, 24(4), 395-419.Miller, J. D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: what we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 273-294. Miller, J. D., Augenbraun, E., Schulhof, J., & Kimmel, L. G. (2006). Adult Science Learning from Local Television Newscasts. Science Communication, 28, 216-242. Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T. & Christian, L. (2013). What Facebook and Twitter Mean for News. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/Myers, J.L., Hansen, R.S., Robson, R.C. and McCann, J. (1983) “The Role of Explanation in Learning Elementary Probability,” Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 374–81.Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: W.H. Freeman.Neuman, W.R., Just, M.R., & Crigler, A.N. (1992). Common Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Kroepsch, A. (2003). Framing science: The stem cell contro- versy in an age of press/politics. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8, 36-70.Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2007). The future of public engagement. The Scientist,21(10), 39-44.Pellechia, Marianne G. (1997). Trends in science coverage: a content analysis of three US newspapers. Public Understanding of Science, 6, 49-68.Price, V. & Tewksbury. D. (1997). News Values and Public Opinion: A Theoretical Account of Media Priming and Framing. In G. Barnett and F.T. Boster (Eds). Progress in the communicaitonal science (p173-212). Greenwich, CT: Albex.Price, V., Tewksbury, D., Powers, E. (1997). Switching Trains of Thought: The Impact of News Frames on Readers` Cognitive Responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481-506.Wilson, R.E., Gosling, S.D. and Gosling and Graham. L.T (2012). A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3) 203–220.Rogers, C. (1999) “The Importance of Understanding Audiences,” in S.M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody and C.L. Rogers (eds) Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science, pp. 179–200. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Sasseen, Jane, Olmstead, Kenny, & Mitchell, Amy. (2013). Digital: As Mobile Grows Rapidly, the Pressures on News Intensify. from http://stateofthemedia.org/2013/digital-as-mobile-grows-rapidly-the-pressures-on-news-intensify/Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a Theory of Media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122.Semetko, H. A. and Valkenburg, P.M. (2006). Framing European Politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109.Smith, S. (1997). Developing New Reflexes in Framing Stories. from http://www.pewcenter.org/doingcj/civiccat/displayCivcat.php?id=97.Snow, C. P. (1980). The Two Cultures and A Second Look: Cambridge University Press.Stewart, C.O., Dickerson, D. L., & Hotchkiss, R. (2009). Beliefs About Science and News Frames in Audience Evaluations of Embryonic and Adult Stem Cell Research. Science Communication, 30, 427. Tannenbaum, Percy H. 1953. “The Effect of Headlines on the Interpretation of News Stories.” Journalism Quarterly 30:189–97.Tewksbury, D, Weaver, A. J., Maddex, B. D. (2001). Accidentallu informed: incidental news exposure on the world wide web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78: 533.Venkataramanan, Madhumita. (2011). I heart Facebook: Scientists turn to social networks to study cardiovascular health. from http://blogs.nature.com/spoonful/2011/12/i_heart_facebook_scientists_tu_1.htmlVan Dijk, T. A. 1988. News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Wang, T.L. (2006). The Impacts of Sensationalism on Audiences’ Receptions of Television News. Mass Communication Research, 86, 91-133.Weaver, D.A., Lively, E., Bimber, B. (2009). Searching for a Frame: News Media Tell the Story of Technological Progress, Risk, and Regulation. Science Communication, 31(2), 139-166.Wilson, Robert E., Gosling, Samuel D., & Graham, Lindsay T. (2012). A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203-220. Woods, Tiffany. (2011). Fish on Facebook: where to go when your friends are finned., from http://oregonprogress.oregonstate.edu/winter-2013/fish-facebook.Xu, Q. (2013). Social Recommendation, Source Credibility, and Recency: Effects of News Cues in a Social Bookmarking Website. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(4), 757-775.Yaros, Ronald A. (2011). Is It the Medium or the Message? Structuring Complex News to Enhance Engagement and Situational Understanding by Nonexperts. Communication Research, 33(4), 285-309. Yaros, Ronald A. (2011). Effects of Text and Hypertext Structures on User Interest and Understanding of Science and Technology. Science Communication, 33(3), 275-308. zh_TW
