| dc.contributor.advisor | 林良楓 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Lee, Liang Feng | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 王瀚 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Wang, Han | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 王瀚 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Wang, Han | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2013 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 1-Oct-2014 13:42:06 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 1-Oct-2014 13:42:06 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 1-Oct-2014 13:42:06 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0101353023 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70320 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 會計研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 101353023 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 102 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究以2002至2013年11個球季NBA聯盟的球隊，來探討球隊內薪資不平均化程度，分別與球隊的例行賽及季後賽戰績的關聯性如何?以及球隊總薪資超越豪華稅門檻多寡，分別與例行賽及季後賽戰績的關聯性如何? 實證結果發現在控制球員人數、觀眾人數、總教練因素以及球隊過去的戰績，薪資不平均程度與例行賽勝率、晉級季後賽有著顯著的正相關，但與季後賽的戰績則沒有顯著的關聯，且將球隊以薪資不平均程度(以HHI作為衡量指標)分為高低中三個群組，在最高的群組，付出的豪華稅越多，越能幫助球隊晉級季後賽。同時根據logistic 廻歸研究結果發現HHI指標及GINI係數每增加1%，打進季後賽的機率分別會增加1.152%及1.049%的機率打進季後賽，另外就HHI就最不平均組別而言，球隊總薪資超過豪華稅門檻時，每多支付100萬美元的薪資可增加1.002%機率打入季後賽。本研究認為決定球賽的勝負，薪資策略固然重要，但只運用薪資策略本身來提升球隊例行賽勝率有限，必須考慮球隊本身特質、有效利用相關資源才能增加球隊勝率。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This research uses NBA’s past 11 seasons (2002 to 2013 season) to explore the association with NBA team`s salary structure and its performance. The research also tries to analysis the association between luxury tax and NBA team’s performance. The empirical results show that after control the number of players, audience, coach, and the last season’s winning percentage, the regular season’s performance has positive highly corrected with salary’s HHI and GINI index. However, the playoff’s performance does not associate with salary’s HHI and GINI index. The logistic regression model predicts that when a team increases 1 percent of HHI and GINI index, then the team increases 1.152% and 1.049% opportunity to make in the NBA playoff. The highest HHI group’s logistic model predicts that when a team increases 100 million salaries over luxury tax cap, the team can increase 1.002% opportunity to make in the NBA playoff. We believe that although the strategy of NBA’s salary is important, however, the salary strategy itself is not enough to dramatic increase team’s performance. In order to improve the performance of a team, the characteristic of a team, the coach, audience and the team winning history maybe play the more important role in increasing winning percentage. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第壹章 緒論 3第一節 研究動機 3第二節 研究目的與問題 5第三節 研究架構 6第貳章 文獻探討 7第一節NBA薪資重要規定、條款以及衡量不平均程度之指標說明 7球季 8第二節 產業不平均程度之指標說明 13第二節 薪資策略與組織績效相關文獻 15第參章 研究方法 23第一節 研究期間與資料來源 23第二節 研究假說 24第三節 變數衡量 24第肆章 實證結果與分析 33第一節 資料敘述性統計整理 33第二節 單變量分析-超過及沒超過豪華稅門檻的球隊之表現差異 36第三節 單變量檢定-薪資不平均程度高、中、低球隊的表現差異 40第四節 多元迴歸分析 44第伍章 結論 55第一節 研究結論 55第二節 研究建議與限制 55參考文獻 58 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 1525646 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101353023 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 薪資策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | HHI指數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | GINI指數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Salary strategy | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | HHI index | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | GINI index | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 薪資策略如何影響組織績效-以NBA球隊為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | How The Salary Strategies Affect The Organizational Performance- NBA Teams | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王浚宇，2006，NBA外籍球員薪資與效率衡量之關聯性研究，國立政治大學會計研究所論文，頁5-15陳冠語，2010，薪資結構對組織績效的影響-以NBA及MLB為例，中央大學產業經濟研究所論文。翁景民、許書銘、楊君琦，1999，台灣地區電影映演市場集中度分析，新聞學研究。陳寶惠，2005，中小企業薪資不均程度與經營績效成長之實證研究-以台北縣製造業為例，國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。Berri, D. J., and R. T. Jewell. 2004. Wage inequality and firm performance professional basketball’s natural experiments. Atlantic Economic Journal: 130-139.Bloom, M. 1999. The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Academy Management Journal 42(1): 25-40.Frick, B., J. Prinz, and K. Winkelmann. 2003. Pay inequalities and team performance. International Journal of Manpower 24 (4): 472-491.Gini, C. 1910. Indici ci concentraxione e di dependenza. Atti della III Riunione della societa. Italiana per il Progresso delle Sciencze.Herfindahl, O. C. 1977. Concentration in modern industry. Theory, measurement and the U. K. experience. London: MacmillanHirschman, A. O. 1945. National power and the structure of foreign trade. University of California. Beareau of business & economic research, Berkerly. Kesenne, S. 2000. The impact of salary caps in professional team sports. Scottish Journal of Political economy 47(4): 422-430.Leazer, E. P. 1989. Pay equality and industrial politics. Journal of Political Economy 97: 561-580.Leazer, E. P. and S. Rosen. 1981. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy 89: 841-864.Madden. J. F. 2002. Difference in the success of NFL coaches by race, 1990-2002. University of Pennsylvania.Martinez, J. A. and S. B. Claudill. 2013. Does midseason change of coach improve team performance? Evidence from the NBA. Journal of sport management: 1-7.Mondello, M. and J. Maxcy. 2009. The impact of salary dispersion and performance bonuses in NFL organization. Management Decision 47(1): 110-123.Richards, D. G. and R. C. Guell. 1996. Baseball success and the structure of salaries. Applied Economics Letters 5(May): 291-295.Stiroh, K. J. 2003. Playing for keeps: pay and performance. Federal Reserve Bank: 19-24.Tarlow, J. 2012. Experience and winning in National Basketball Association. MIT Sloan sports analytics conference: 1-11. | zh_TW |
