學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 Re-examining the relationship between PIN and timely loss recognition
作者 詹凌菁
Chan, L.-C.;Lee, E.;J. Petaibanlue;Zeng, C.
貢獻者 會計系
關鍵詞 timely loss recognition;information asymmetry;lender–shareholder conflict;M41
日期 2014.06
上傳時間 15-Oct-2014 14:43:49 (UTC+8)
摘要 We re-examine the positive relationship between the probability of information-based trading (PIN) measure and timely loss recognition, documented by LaFond and Watts (2008). This relationship has been interpreted as evidence that timely loss recognition plays an information role for equity investors in addition to the debt-contracting role widely suggested by the accounting literature. However, we show that this relationship diminishes after we control for lender–shareholder conflict, for which we use as a proxy the price-change asymmetry (PCA) measure suggested by Easton et al. (2011). This finding implies that timely loss recognition still caters mainly to the demands of lenders rather than equity investors. Our study contributes new evidence to the ongoing debate on the underlying cause of timely loss recognition, which is a fundamental issue in accounting literature.
關聯 Applied Financial Economics, 24(3), 1479-1489
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2014.925072
dc.contributor 會計系en_US
dc.creator (作者) 詹凌菁zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chan, L.-C.;Lee, E.;J. Petaibanlue;Zeng, C.en_US
dc.date (日期) 2014.06en_US
dc.date.accessioned 15-Oct-2014 14:43:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 15-Oct-2014 14:43:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 15-Oct-2014 14:43:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70599-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) We re-examine the positive relationship between the probability of information-based trading (PIN) measure and timely loss recognition, documented by LaFond and Watts (2008). This relationship has been interpreted as evidence that timely loss recognition plays an information role for equity investors in addition to the debt-contracting role widely suggested by the accounting literature. However, we show that this relationship diminishes after we control for lender–shareholder conflict, for which we use as a proxy the price-change asymmetry (PCA) measure suggested by Easton et al. (2011). This finding implies that timely loss recognition still caters mainly to the demands of lenders rather than equity investors. Our study contributes new evidence to the ongoing debate on the underlying cause of timely loss recognition, which is a fundamental issue in accounting literature.en_US
dc.format.extent 226153 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) Applied Financial Economics, 24(3), 1479-1489en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) timely loss recognition;information asymmetry;lender–shareholder conflict;M41en_US
dc.title (題名) Re-examining the relationship between PIN and timely loss recognitionen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1080/09603107.2014.925072en_US
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2014.925072en_US