學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 學術期刊出版之非引文計量稽核與評鑑
其他題名 Non-bibliometric Audit and Evaluation of Scholarly Journal Publishing
作者 邱炯友
Chiu, Jeong-Yeou
貢獻者 圖檔所
關鍵詞 期刊評鑑 ; 期刊出版 ; 評鑑指標 ; 臺灣社會科學引文索引 ; 核心期刊
Journal evaluation ; Journal publishing ; Assessment indicator ; TSSCI ; Core journal
日期 2007.05
上傳時間 22-Dec-2014 10:49:25 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究在「內部稽核」與「外部評鑑」兩項不同程度之工作規範上,分析學術期刊「非引文計量」指標之定義規範,以及其它學術期刊稽核評鑑設計與機制。此外,亦就臺灣和中國大陸期刊出版評鑑發展進行探討,這些指標頗為繁細,常視評鑑者之要求而有不同加權比重之情事。本文試圖辯證和檢討這些指標內容,使其回歸真正具有期刊出版實務意涵與精神旨趣,並建議與討論若干可行之指標。這些指標在於凸顯有別於一般常見引文計量評鑑途徑,補強學術期刊出版評鑑工作之效標。
This study aims at verifying and organizing the role of non-bibliometric indexes respectively in the regulations of the interior audit and of the exterior evaluation in scholarly journal publishing, which would enable the procedure of quality control to operate. In addition, this paper will explain how the technical standards of non-bibliometric indexes can be implemented in use on the basis of varied scales of weighting. To realize the recent development regarding non-bibliometric indexes, a comparison of the different scholarly journal evaluation systems between Taiwan and Mainland China will be brought into discussion. With the help of the explicit indication of non-bibliometric indexes, the application of non-bibliometric standards will become distinguished from the normally conducted bibliometric evaluation. Adoption of the non-bibliometric evaluation system as a result will enhance the evaluative effects of scholarly journal publishing.
關聯 圖書與資訊學刊, 61, 24-41
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 圖檔所en_US
dc.creator (作者) 邱炯友zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chiu, Jeong-Yeouen_US
dc.date (日期) 2007.05en_US
dc.date.accessioned 22-Dec-2014 10:49:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 22-Dec-2014 10:49:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 22-Dec-2014 10:49:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/72174-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究在「內部稽核」與「外部評鑑」兩項不同程度之工作規範上,分析學術期刊「非引文計量」指標之定義規範,以及其它學術期刊稽核評鑑設計與機制。此外,亦就臺灣和中國大陸期刊出版評鑑發展進行探討,這些指標頗為繁細,常視評鑑者之要求而有不同加權比重之情事。本文試圖辯證和檢討這些指標內容,使其回歸真正具有期刊出版實務意涵與精神旨趣,並建議與討論若干可行之指標。這些指標在於凸顯有別於一般常見引文計量評鑑途徑,補強學術期刊出版評鑑工作之效標。en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study aims at verifying and organizing the role of non-bibliometric indexes respectively in the regulations of the interior audit and of the exterior evaluation in scholarly journal publishing, which would enable the procedure of quality control to operate. In addition, this paper will explain how the technical standards of non-bibliometric indexes can be implemented in use on the basis of varied scales of weighting. To realize the recent development regarding non-bibliometric indexes, a comparison of the different scholarly journal evaluation systems between Taiwan and Mainland China will be brought into discussion. With the help of the explicit indication of non-bibliometric indexes, the application of non-bibliometric standards will become distinguished from the normally conducted bibliometric evaluation. Adoption of the non-bibliometric evaluation system as a result will enhance the evaluative effects of scholarly journal publishing.en_US
dc.format.extent 522541 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 圖書與資訊學刊, 61, 24-41en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 期刊評鑑 ; 期刊出版 ; 評鑑指標 ; 臺灣社會科學引文索引 ; 核心期刊en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Journal evaluation ; Journal publishing ; Assessment indicator ; TSSCI ; Core journalen_US
dc.title (題名) 學術期刊出版之非引文計量稽核與評鑑zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) Non-bibliometric Audit and Evaluation of Scholarly Journal Publishingen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen