Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

TitleVolatility and Liquidity at NYSE Opening Calls: A Closer Look
Creator李志宏
Lee, Jie-Haun;Lin, Ji-Chai
Contributor財管系
Date1995-12
Date Issued8-Jan-2015 17:26:33 (UTC+8)
SummaryThe literature suggests that the bid-ask spread is responsible, at least in part, for greater price volatility and more negative autocorrelation at the open than at the close. In this study, we find that these phenomena are not related to the bid-ask spread, but are related instead to pricing errors by specialists or limit-order traders around the open. We use George, Kaul, and Nimalendran`s (1991) model, which is less biased than Roll`s (1984) model, to estimate the implied spread. The results show that, on average, the implied spread earned by liquidity suppliers is lower at the open than at the close. These results refute the contention that specialists exploit their monopoly position and earn a higher profit at the opening call. The evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that specialists set a lower cost of immediacy to encourage trading and the release of more information at the opening call. This could reduce information asymmetry and make subsequent trades in the continuous market more profitable.
RelationJournal of Financial Research, 18(4), 479-493
Typearticle
dc.contributor 財管系
dc.creator (作者) 李志宏zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lee, Jie-Haun;Lin, Ji-Chai
dc.date (日期) 1995-12
dc.date.accessioned 8-Jan-2015 17:26:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 8-Jan-2015 17:26:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 8-Jan-2015 17:26:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/72674-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The literature suggests that the bid-ask spread is responsible, at least in part, for greater price volatility and more negative autocorrelation at the open than at the close. In this study, we find that these phenomena are not related to the bid-ask spread, but are related instead to pricing errors by specialists or limit-order traders around the open. We use George, Kaul, and Nimalendran`s (1991) model, which is less biased than Roll`s (1984) model, to estimate the implied spread. The results show that, on average, the implied spread earned by liquidity suppliers is lower at the open than at the close. These results refute the contention that specialists exploit their monopoly position and earn a higher profit at the opening call. The evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that specialists set a lower cost of immediacy to encourage trading and the release of more information at the opening call. This could reduce information asymmetry and make subsequent trades in the continuous market more profitable.
dc.format.extent 142 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Journal of Financial Research, 18(4), 479-493
dc.title (題名) Volatility and Liquidity at NYSE Opening Calls: A Closer Look
dc.type (資料類型) articleen