學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 探討家長網路自我效能、風險意識與媒體使用對於監督孩童網路行為的影響
Examining the Effects of Parents’ Internet Self Efficacy, Risk Perception, and Media Usage on Parental Mediation of Children’s Internet。作者 曾良基
Adrianus, Vittorio貢獻者 鄭怡卉
曾良基
Vittorio Adrianus關鍵詞 網路自我效能
風險意識
媒體使用
網路行為日期 2014 上傳時間 3-Feb-2015 10:27:10 (UTC+8) 摘要 探討家長網路自我效能、風險意識與媒體使用對於監督孩童網路行為的影響
While previous studies on media effects had studied extensively into how parents mediate children’s use of television, the present paper will delve into parent’s mediation of children’s Internet use. Unlike traditional media, parental mediation of children’s Internet use requires Internet – related skills such as blocking websites, or using filters that parents with only basic computer and web skills may not feel comfortable of using them (Turow & Kavanaugh, 2003; Lee, 2013). Therefore, present study derived from Bandura (1977)’s self efficacy theory, to examine Internet self efficacy variable and its effects on parental mediation. It was predicted that parents’ Internet self efficacy would affect how they mediate children’s Internet use. Furthermore, parents’ risk perception and parents’ media usage variables will also be investigated in relation to parental mediation. It was thought increasing media reports on cyber related crime, and parent’s attitudes towards Internet safety were crucial in determining their parental mediation strategies. The present study utilized a survey methodology, which used a sample of parents in Taipei who currently have an elementary school child or children. The results showed that parents’ risk perception towards Internet has a moderate to strong positive correlation with Parental Mediation. Parents’ Internet self efficacy also correlated positively with four different types of parental mediation, albeit with varying degree. The results suggested that what Internet self efficacy might have brought to the parents were not a mere certain technical advantages in parenting, but instead, an overall willingness and motivation to take an active role in mediating children’s Internet.參考文獻 Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.Bandura, A. (1977). Self efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices, 17-32.Byron, T. (2008). Safer children in a digital world: the report of the Byron Review: be safe, be aware, have fun. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families, and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.Cassell, J., & Cramer, M. (2007). High tech or high risk: Moral panics about girls online. Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected, 53-75.Cassidy, W., Brown, K., & Jackson, M. (2012). " Making Kind Cool": Parents` Suggestions for Preventing Cyber Bullying and Fostering Cyber Kindness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(4), 415-436.Clark, L. S. (2009). Digital media and the generation gap: Qualitative research on US teens and their parents. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 388-407.Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 1(4), 323-343.DeHue, F., Bolman, C., & Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters` experiences and parental perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 217-223.Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self‐efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 6(1).Elena, A., Laouris, Y., & Taraszow, T. (2010). Identifying and Ranking Internet Dangers. 2010 Social Applications for Life Long Learning, 68.Henke, L. L. (1999). Children, advertising, and the Internet: An exploratory study. Advertising and the World Wide Web, 73-80.Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 366.Lee, S. J. (2013). Parental restrictive mediation of children’s Internet use: Effective for what and for whom?. New Media & Society, 15(4), 466-481.Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., & Ang, P. H. (2008). Parental awareness and monitoring of adolescent Internet use. Current Psychology, 27(4), 217-233.Lin, C. W. (2007). E-Learning Strategies for Aboriginal Children in Taiwan. International Journal of Learning, 14(6).Livingstone, S., Bober, M., & Helsper, E. (2005). Internet literacy among children and young people: Findings from the UK Children Go Online Project.Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children`s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599.Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2010). Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the Internet: The role of online skills and Internet self efficacy. New Media & Society, 12(2), 309-329.Lou, S. J., Shih, R. C., Liu, H. T., Guo, Y. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2010). The influences of the sixth graders’ parents’ Internet literacy and parenting style. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4).Lwin, M. O., Stanaland, A. J., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2008). Protecting children`s privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 205-217.Masters. J., & Yelland. N .(2010). Changing learning ecologies: Social media for cyber-citizens. In S. Shariff., & A. Churchill. (Eds.), Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety (pp.229-248) . New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.Munro, M. C., Huff, S. L., Marcolin, B. L., & Compeau, D. R. (1997). Understanding and measuring user competence. Information & Management, 33(1), 45-57.Nathanson, A. I. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children`s aggression. Communication Research, 26(2), 124-143.Nathanson, A. I. (2001). Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(2), 201-220.Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6.Rideout, V. (2007). Parents, Children & Media: A Kaiser Family Foundation Survey. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Savolainen, R. (2002). Network competence and information seeking on the Internet: From definitions towards a social cognitive model. Journal of documentation, 58(2), 211-226.Shariff, S., & Churchill, A. (2010). Appreciating complexity: detangling the web of stakeholder influence and responsibility. In S. Shariff., & A. Churchill. (Eds.), Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety (pp.1 – 23) . New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.Shariff, S., & Churchill, A. (Eds.). (2010). Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.Stald, G. (2003). Outlook and insight: Young Danes` uses of the Internet, navigating global seas and local waters. The Wired Homestead, 227-260.Staksrud, E., & Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and online risk: Powerless victims or resourceful participants?. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 364-387.Turow, J., & Kavanaugh, A. L. (Eds.). (2003). The Wired Homestead: An MIT Press Sourcebook on the Internet and the Family. MIT Press.Valcke, M., Bonte, S., De Wever, B., & Rots, I. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education, 55(2), 454-464.Valcke, M., De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., & Schellens, T. (2011). Long-term study of safe Internet use of young children. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1292-1305.Walrave. M., & Heirman. W. (2010). Appreciating Complexity: Detangling the Web of Stakeholder Influence and Responsibility. In S. Shariff., & A. Churchill. (Eds.), Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety (pp.27-47) . New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.Warren, R., & Bluma, A. (2002). Parental mediation of children`s Internet use: The influence of established media. Communication Research Reports, 19(1), 8-17.Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Ybarra, M. L. (2010). Online “predators” and their victims. Psychology of Violence, 1, 13-35.Zinga, D. (2010). Boundaries in Cyber-space. In S.Shariff., & A. Churchill (Ed.), Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety (pp.105-127) . New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
101461016
103資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1014610163 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 鄭怡卉 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 曾良基 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Vittorio Adrianus en_US dc.creator (作者) 曾良基 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Adrianus, Vittorio en_US dc.date (日期) 2014 en_US dc.date.accessioned 3-Feb-2015 10:27:10 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 3-Feb-2015 10:27:10 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Feb-2015 10:27:10 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1014610163 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73300 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 101461016 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 103 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 探討家長網路自我效能、風險意識與媒體使用對於監督孩童網路行為的影響 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) While previous studies on media effects had studied extensively into how parents mediate children’s use of television, the present paper will delve into parent’s mediation of children’s Internet use. Unlike traditional media, parental mediation of children’s Internet use requires Internet – related skills such as blocking websites, or using filters that parents with only basic computer and web skills may not feel comfortable of using them (Turow & Kavanaugh, 2003; Lee, 2013). Therefore, present study derived from Bandura (1977)’s self efficacy theory, to examine Internet self efficacy variable and its effects on parental mediation. It was predicted that parents’ Internet self efficacy would affect how they mediate children’s Internet use. Furthermore, parents’ risk perception and parents’ media usage variables will also be investigated in relation to parental mediation. It was thought increasing media reports on cyber related crime, and parent’s attitudes towards Internet safety were crucial in determining their parental mediation strategies. The present study utilized a survey methodology, which used a sample of parents in Taipei who currently have an elementary school child or children. The results showed that parents’ risk perception towards Internet has a moderate to strong positive correlation with Parental Mediation. Parents’ Internet self efficacy also correlated positively with four different types of parental mediation, albeit with varying degree. The results suggested that what Internet self efficacy might have brought to the parents were not a mere certain technical advantages in parenting, but instead, an overall willingness and motivation to take an active role in mediating children’s Internet. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Abstract.............................................4Chapter 1: Introduction..............................5 1.1. Background of study........................5 1.2. Significance of study......................6 1.3. Purpose of study...........................7Chapter 2: Literature review.........................8 2.1. Parental mediation on children’s Internet..9 2.2. How media shape parents’ perceptions......12 Hypothesis 1, research question 1 .............14 2.3. Parents’ risk perception..................14 Hypothesis 2, research question 2..............18 2.4. Internet literacy, network competence, and Internet self efficacy..............................19 Hypothesis 3, research question 3.............21 Concept map of research questions, hypotheses 22Chapter 3: Methodology..............................23 3.1. Survey samples............................23 3.2. Measurements..............................24Chapter 4: Results..................................27 4.1. Demographics of sample....................27 4.2. General findings..........................28 4.3. Tests of hypothesis.......................30Chapter 5: Discussion...............................34 5.1. Major findings and implicatons............34 5.2. Limitations and future research...........36References..........................................38Appendix A..........................................43Appendix B..........................................45Appendix C..........................................48 zh_TW dc.format.extent 367993 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1014610163 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 網路自我效能 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 風險意識 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 媒體使用 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 網路行為 zh_TW dc.title (題名) 探討家長網路自我效能、風險意識與媒體使用對於監督孩童網路行為的影響 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Examining the Effects of Parents’ Internet Self Efficacy, Risk Perception, and Media Usage on Parental Mediation of Children’s Internet。 en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.Bandura, A. (1977). Self efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices, 17-32.Byron, T. (2008). Safer children in a digital world: the report of the Byron Review: be safe, be aware, have fun. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families, and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.Cassell, J., & Cramer, M. (2007). High tech or high risk: Moral panics about girls online. Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected, 53-75.Cassidy, W., Brown, K., & Jackson, M. (2012). " Making Kind Cool": Parents` Suggestions for Preventing Cyber Bullying and Fostering Cyber Kindness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(4), 415-436.Clark, L. S. (2009). Digital media and the generation gap: Qualitative research on US teens and their parents. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 388-407.Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 1(4), 323-343.DeHue, F., Bolman, C., & Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters` experiences and parental perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 217-223.Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self‐efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 6(1).Elena, A., Laouris, Y., & Taraszow, T. (2010). Identifying and Ranking Internet Dangers. 2010 Social Applications for Life Long Learning, 68.Henke, L. L. (1999). Children, advertising, and the Internet: An exploratory study. Advertising and the World Wide Web, 73-80.Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 366.Lee, S. J. (2013). Parental restrictive mediation of children’s Internet use: Effective for what and for whom?. New Media & Society, 15(4), 466-481.Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., & Ang, P. H. (2008). Parental awareness and monitoring of adolescent Internet use. Current Psychology, 27(4), 217-233.Lin, C. W. (2007). E-Learning Strategies for Aboriginal Children in Taiwan. International Journal of Learning, 14(6).Livingstone, S., Bober, M., & Helsper, E. (2005). Internet literacy among children and young people: Findings from the UK Children Go Online Project.Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children`s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599.Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2010). Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the Internet: The role of online skills and Internet self efficacy. New Media & Society, 12(2), 309-329.Lou, S. J., Shih, R. C., Liu, H. T., Guo, Y. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2010). The influences of the sixth graders’ parents’ Internet literacy and parenting style. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4).Lwin, M. O., Stanaland, A. J., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2008). Protecting children`s privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 205-217.Masters. J., & Yelland. N .(2010). Changing learning ecologies: Social media for cyber-citizens. In S. Shariff., & A. Churchill. (Eds.), Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety (pp.229-248) . New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.Munro, M. C., Huff, S. L., Marcolin, B. L., & Compeau, D. R. (1997). Understanding and measuring user competence. Information & Management, 33(1), 45-57.Nathanson, A. I. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children`s aggression. Communication Research, 26(2), 124-143.Nathanson, A. I. (2001). Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(2), 201-220.Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6.Rideout, V. (2007). Parents, Children & Media: A Kaiser Family Foundation Survey. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Savolainen, R. (2002). Network competence and information seeking on the Internet: From definitions towards a social cognitive model. Journal of documentation, 58(2), 211-226.Shariff, S., & Churchill, A. (2010). Appreciating complexity: detangling the web of stakeholder influence and responsibility. In S. Shariff., & A. Churchill. (Eds.), Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety (pp.1 – 23) . New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.Shariff, S., & Churchill, A. (Eds.). (2010). Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.Stald, G. (2003). Outlook and insight: Young Danes` uses of the Internet, navigating global seas and local waters. The Wired Homestead, 227-260.Staksrud, E., & Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and online risk: Powerless victims or resourceful participants?. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 364-387.Turow, J., & Kavanaugh, A. L. (Eds.). (2003). The Wired Homestead: An MIT Press Sourcebook on the Internet and the Family. MIT Press.Valcke, M., Bonte, S., De Wever, B., & Rots, I. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education, 55(2), 454-464.Valcke, M., De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., & Schellens, T. (2011). Long-term study of safe Internet use of young children. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1292-1305.Walrave. M., & Heirman. W. (2010). Appreciating Complexity: Detangling the Web of Stakeholder Influence and Responsibility. In S. Shariff., & A. Churchill. (Eds.), Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety (pp.27-47) . New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.Warren, R., & Bluma, A. (2002). Parental mediation of children`s Internet use: The influence of established media. Communication Research Reports, 19(1), 8-17.Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Ybarra, M. L. (2010). Online “predators” and their victims. Psychology of Violence, 1, 13-35.Zinga, D. (2010). Boundaries in Cyber-space. In S.Shariff., & A. Churchill (Ed.), Truths and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder Responsibility and Children`s Safety (pp.105-127) . New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. zh_TW
