Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

  • Loading...
    Loading...

Related Publications in TAIR

TitleDisentangling the Effects of Applicant Defensive Impression Management Tactics in Job Interviews
CreatorTsai, Wei-Chi
蔡維奇
Contributor企管系
Date2010
Date Issued10-Mar-2015 16:54:42 (UTC+8)
SummaryThis study explores (1) the effects that three kinds of applicant defensive impression management (IM) tactics (apologies, justifications, and excuses) have on interviewer evaluation and (2) the moderating effects that two types of interviewer negative concerns (competence-related and integrity-related concerns) have on the aforementioned relationship. Two hundred and one managers from Taiwan participated in this study by watching a simulated interview. Compared with the control group, applicants using defensive IM tactics received higher interviewer ratings when negative concerns surfaced. Moreover, the type of interviewer negative concern moderated the effects of defensive IM tactics. All three tactics had similar effects on interviewer evaluation when the concern was competence related. Apology was, however, the most effective tactic when the concern was integrity related.
RelationInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment - INT J SELECTION ASSESSMENT , vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 131-140
Typearticle
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00495.x
dc.contributor 企管系
dc.creator (作者) Tsai, Wei-Chi
dc.creator (作者) 蔡維奇zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2010
dc.date.accessioned 10-Mar-2015 16:54:42 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 10-Mar-2015 16:54:42 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 10-Mar-2015 16:54:42 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73751-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study explores (1) the effects that three kinds of applicant defensive impression management (IM) tactics (apologies, justifications, and excuses) have on interviewer evaluation and (2) the moderating effects that two types of interviewer negative concerns (competence-related and integrity-related concerns) have on the aforementioned relationship. Two hundred and one managers from Taiwan participated in this study by watching a simulated interview. Compared with the control group, applicants using defensive IM tactics received higher interviewer ratings when negative concerns surfaced. Moreover, the type of interviewer negative concern moderated the effects of defensive IM tactics. All three tactics had similar effects on interviewer evaluation when the concern was competence related. Apology was, however, the most effective tactic when the concern was integrity related.
dc.format.extent 103864 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) International Journal of Selection and Assessment - INT J SELECTION ASSESSMENT , vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 131-140
dc.title (題名) Disentangling the Effects of Applicant Defensive Impression Management Tactics in Job Interviews
dc.type (資料類型) articleen
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00495.xen_US
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00495.xen_US