1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 文化背景對移民子女科系特性選擇影響
作者 彭剴意
Peng, Kai Yi
貢獻者 王信實、李浩仲
彭剴意
Peng, Kai Yi
關鍵詞 文化背景
科系選擇
移民原生國
日期 2014
上傳時間 1-Apr-2015 10:08:06 (UTC+8)
摘要 在美國，繁複多元的移民文化為美國帶來不同國家的色彩。雖都身處同一塊土地，\n但各國移民家庭對於子女表現有著不同的期待。如中國和印度移民家庭對於子女學術\n表現期待甚高。伊朗裔移民對於薪資報酬高以及聲望高的科系特別注重。因此本文想\n要探討這些移民原生國的文化如何影響科系特性選擇的傾向。\n本研究採用 2009 年到2013 年間美國American Community Survey (ACS)大學學歷\n以上的樣本。針對樣本選擇之科系具有的特性，探討移民子女選擇科系是否會受到原\n生國文化影響。本研究參考科系對應Occupational Information Network (O*net)的方式\n(Freeman,2008)，輔以National Survey of College Graduates (NSCG)之資料計算各年份\n各科系出路職業的比例，算出各年份各科系預期報酬。就選擇科系方面，考慮科系對\n於職業薪資預期報酬、科系對於職業聲望預期報酬、科系對於職業所需人才預期報酬。\n並藉以Hofstede 國家文化指標衡量對科系預期報酬的影響，捕捉各原生國文化如何影\n響移民子女科系特性選擇的傾向。\n本研究發現台灣裔、中國裔以及印度裔移民子女較當地人傾向選擇預期薪資較\n高或是預期職業聲望較高的科系。再者，進一步探討各國文化差異對科系選擇的影響。\n發現當國家文化的個人主義指標越高，越不傾向選擇預期薪資報酬較高的科系；而剛\n性氣質指標越高，即文化越競爭、越追求實質金錢報酬，則傾向選擇預期薪資報酬較\n高的科系。至於性別差異方面，男性較不害怕風險，較會協商敢於競爭，所以不確定\n性風險趨避指標對預期薪資報酬不顯著；而女性相對於男性較討厭風險，則此指標為\n顯著負向影響。
參考文獻 蔡美兒、傑德•魯本菲爾德（2014）。『虎媽的戰甲』。台北市；三采。\n鍾韶庭(2008)。「台灣、德國品牌個性、廣告訴求與消費者價值信念之跨文化比較」。\n國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\n林元吉 (2000). 「角色壓力源, 焦崩對組織承諾的影響-兩岸資訊從業人員之比較研\n究.」。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。\nAstin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco:\nJossey-Bass. p. 482\nBandana Purkayastha (2005) , Negotiating Ethnicity: Second – Generation South Asian\nAmericans Traverse a Transnational World, Rutgers University Press, p.p 91\nBerger, M. C. (1988). Predicted future earnings and choice of college major. Industrial and\nLabor Relations Review, 418-429.\nChen, M., Asian Management Systems: Chinese, Japanese and Korean Styles of Business,\nRoutledge, Ch. 1, 1995, pp. 11-24.\nCroson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic\nliterature, 448-474.\nDaha Success(ion): Second-Generation Iranian Americans, Iranian Studies 44, no.1, pp.5,7\nDickson, L. (2010). Race and gender differences in college major choice. The Annals of the\nAmerican Academy of Political and Social Science, 627(1), 108-124.\nFreeman, J. A., & Hirsch, B. T. (2008). College majors and the knowledge content of jobs.\nEconomics of Education Review, 27(5), 517-535.\n31\nHersch, J. (1991). `Education Match and Job Match`, Review of Economics and Statistics,\n73, 140-4.\nHofstede, G. (1980b), “Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American\nTheories Apply Abroad?” Organizational Dynamics, 8(2), Summer, pp. 42-63.\nHofstede, G. (1993), “Cultural Constraints in Management Theories,” Academy of\nManagement Executive, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 81-94.\nHofstede, G. (1997) , Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind, McGraw-Hill\nPress.\nJames A. Freeman, Barry T. Hirsch (2008),“College majors and the knowledge content of\njobs,” Economics of Education Review, 27, 517–535\nJin Li (2012) Cultural Foundations of Learning : East and west . New York: Cambridge\nUniversity Press 2012.\nKinsler, J., & Pavan, R. (2012). The Specificity of General Human Capital: Evidence from\nCollege Major Choice. working paper.\nLackland, A. C., & De Lisi, R. (2001). Students` choices of college majors that are gender\ntraditional and nontraditional. Journal of College Student Development.\nRuth K, Chao(1996), Chinese and European Mother`s Beliefs About the Role of Parenting\nin Children’s School Success, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 27, no. 4 ,pp. 403,\n412\nSicherman, N. (1991). `"Overeducation" in the Labour Market`, Journal of Labour\nEconomics, 9, 101-22\nSmith, T. W., & Son, J. (2014). Measuring Occupational Prestige on the 2012 General\nSocial Survey.\n32\nSong, C., & Glick, J. E. (2004). College Attendance and Choice of College Majors Among\nAsian‐American Students*. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1401-1421.\nThomas, S. L. (2000). Deferred costs and economic returns to college major, quality, and\nperformance. Research in Higher Education, 41(3), 281-313.\nThurstone, L. L. (1935). The vectors of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago press.\nVan Smoorenburg, M.S.M. and van der Velden, R.K.W. (2000). `The Training of\nSchool-leavers: Complementarity or Substitution? `, Economics of Education Review, 19,\n207-17\nWare, N. C., & Lee, V. E. (1988). Sex differences in choice of college science majors.\nAmerican Educational Research Journal, 25(4), 593-614.\nXie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes\n(Vol. 26, No. 73.4). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nZafar, B. (2009). College major choice and the gender gap. FRB of New York Staff Report,\n(364).
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
102258016
103
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1022580161
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 王信實、李浩仲zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 彭剴意zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Peng, Kai Yien_US
dc.creator (作者) 彭剴意zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Peng, Kai Yien_US
dc.date (日期) 2014en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Apr-2015 10:08:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Apr-2015 10:08:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Apr-2015 10:08:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1022580161en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=82990-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 經濟學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 102258016zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 103zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在美國，繁複多元的移民文化為美國帶來不同國家的色彩。雖都身處同一塊土地，\n但各國移民家庭對於子女表現有著不同的期待。如中國和印度移民家庭對於子女學術\n表現期待甚高。伊朗裔移民對於薪資報酬高以及聲望高的科系特別注重。因此本文想\n要探討這些移民原生國的文化如何影響科系特性選擇的傾向。\n本研究採用 2009 年到2013 年間美國American Community Survey (ACS)大學學歷\n以上的樣本。針對樣本選擇之科系具有的特性，探討移民子女選擇科系是否會受到原\n生國文化影響。本研究參考科系對應Occupational Information Network (O*net)的方式\n(Freeman,2008)，輔以National Survey of College Graduates (NSCG)之資料計算各年份\n各科系出路職業的比例，算出各年份各科系預期報酬。就選擇科系方面，考慮科系對\n於職業薪資預期報酬、科系對於職業聲望預期報酬、科系對於職業所需人才預期報酬。\n並藉以Hofstede 國家文化指標衡量對科系預期報酬的影響，捕捉各原生國文化如何影\n響移民子女科系特性選擇的傾向。\n本研究發現台灣裔、中國裔以及印度裔移民子女較當地人傾向選擇預期薪資較\n高或是預期職業聲望較高的科系。再者，進一步探討各國文化差異對科系選擇的影響。\n發現當國家文化的個人主義指標越高，越不傾向選擇預期薪資報酬較高的科系；而剛\n性氣質指標越高，即文化越競爭、越追求實質金錢報酬，則傾向選擇預期薪資報酬較\n高的科系。至於性別差異方面，男性較不害怕風險，較會協商敢於競爭，所以不確定\n性風險趨避指標對預期薪資報酬不顯著；而女性相對於男性較討厭風險，則此指標為\n顯著負向影響。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、緒論 ............................................................ 1\n第一節、前言 .......................................................... 1\n第二節、文獻回顧 ...................................................... 3\n第二章、資料處理 ........................................................ 5\n第一節、American Community Survey ...................................... 5\n第二節、National Survey of College － 建立科系未來職業出比例 .............. 5\n第三節、影響科系預期報酬特性之變數 .................................... 7\n第四節、吉爾特‧霍夫斯塔德(Hofstede)文化指標 .......................... 14\n第三章、模型與結果 ..................................................... 18\n第一節、各國移民子女相對美國科系預期報酬表現 ......................... 19\n第二節、不同文化指標影響移民子女科系預期報酬表現 ..................... 22\n第四章、結論與建議 ..................................................... 29\n第一節、研究結論 ..................................................... 29\n第二節、未來方向與建議 ............................................... 29\n參考文獻 ............................................................... 30\n附錄 ................................................................... 33zh_TW
dc.format.extent 844302 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1022580161en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 文化背景zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 科系選擇zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 移民原生國zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 文化背景對移民子女科系特性選擇影響zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡美兒、傑德•魯本菲爾德（2014）。『虎媽的戰甲』。台北市；三采。\n鍾韶庭(2008)。「台灣、德國品牌個性、廣告訴求與消費者價值信念之跨文化比較」。\n國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\n林元吉 (2000). 「角色壓力源, 焦崩對組織承諾的影響-兩岸資訊從業人員之比較研\n究.」。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。\nAstin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco:\nJossey-Bass. p. 482\nBandana Purkayastha (2005) , Negotiating Ethnicity: Second – Generation South Asian\nAmericans Traverse a Transnational World, Rutgers University Press, p.p 91\nBerger, M. C. (1988). Predicted future earnings and choice of college major. Industrial and\nLabor Relations Review, 418-429.\nChen, M., Asian Management Systems: Chinese, Japanese and Korean Styles of Business,\nRoutledge, Ch. 1, 1995, pp. 11-24.\nCroson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic\nliterature, 448-474.\nDaha Success(ion): Second-Generation Iranian Americans, Iranian Studies 44, no.1, pp.5,7\nDickson, L. (2010). Race and gender differences in college major choice. The Annals of the\nAmerican Academy of Political and Social Science, 627(1), 108-124.\nFreeman, J. A., & Hirsch, B. T. (2008). College majors and the knowledge content of jobs.\nEconomics of Education Review, 27(5), 517-535.\n31\nHersch, J. (1991). `Education Match and Job Match`, Review of Economics and Statistics,\n73, 140-4.\nHofstede, G. (1980b), “Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American\nTheories Apply Abroad?” Organizational Dynamics, 8(2), Summer, pp. 42-63.\nHofstede, G. (1993), “Cultural Constraints in Management Theories,” Academy of\nManagement Executive, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 81-94.\nHofstede, G. (1997) , Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind, McGraw-Hill\nPress.\nJames A. Freeman, Barry T. Hirsch (2008),“College majors and the knowledge content of\njobs,” Economics of Education Review, 27, 517–535\nJin Li (2012) Cultural Foundations of Learning : East and west . New York: Cambridge\nUniversity Press 2012.\nKinsler, J., & Pavan, R. (2012). The Specificity of General Human Capital: Evidence from\nCollege Major Choice. working paper.\nLackland, A. C., & De Lisi, R. (2001). Students` choices of college majors that are gender\ntraditional and nontraditional. Journal of College Student Development.\nRuth K, Chao(1996), Chinese and European Mother`s Beliefs About the Role of Parenting\nin Children’s School Success, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 27, no. 4 ,pp. 403,\n412\nSicherman, N. (1991). `"Overeducation" in the Labour Market`, Journal of Labour\nEconomics, 9, 101-22\nSmith, T. W., & Son, J. (2014). Measuring Occupational Prestige on the 2012 General\nSocial Survey.\n32\nSong, C., & Glick, J. E. (2004). College Attendance and Choice of College Majors Among\nAsian‐American Students*. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1401-1421.\nThomas, S. L. (2000). Deferred costs and economic returns to college major, quality, and\nperformance. Research in Higher Education, 41(3), 281-313.\nThurstone, L. L. (1935). The vectors of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago press.\nVan Smoorenburg, M.S.M. and van der Velden, R.K.W. (2000). `The Training of\nSchool-leavers: Complementarity or Substitution? `, Economics of Education Review, 19,\n207-17\nWare, N. C., & Lee, V. E. (1988). Sex differences in choice of college science majors.\nAmerican Educational Research Journal, 25(4), 593-614.\nXie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes\n(Vol. 26, No. 73.4). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nZafar, B. (2009). College major choice and the gender gap. FRB of New York Staff Report,\n(364).zh_TW