1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 以維興公司為例探討美國新創公司的技術仲介服務
作者 王維漢
Wang, Timothy
貢獻者 吳豐祥
王維漢
Wang, Timothy
關鍵詞 技術仲介
開放式創新
新創公司
技術與市場的不確定性
Technology Broker
Open Innovation
Startup
Technology Uncertainty
日期 2010
上傳時間 1-Apr-2015 10:08:38 (UTC+8)
摘要 絕大多數在台灣的企業屬於年輕的中小企業，他們所熟知的商業模式是生產代工，並無技術與市場的不確定性問題。如何從生產代工的商業模式跳躍到美國新創公司的知識經濟模式實在是一個對雙方都是很大的挑戰。由於雙方的不對稱性太大有必要讓其它人界入並彌補中間落差。開放式創新中需要技術仲介聯結買方與賣方。而技術仲介則是辦識(破壞式)創新機會的來源之一。在維興國際公司目前所專注的四個不同技術中，同時包括B2B及B2C的產品領域。但無論是B2B及B2C，市場拉力與技術推力在技術仲介的領域中均同樣必須受到重視。
本研究由相關文獻探討，推展出以(買方)目標工業的選擇與管理、(賣方)管理並降低市場的不確定性、技術仲介的需求缺口三構面的研究架構來探討技術仲介業在美國新創公司的技術仲介服務活動的關鍵因素與管理項目。本研究採用個案研究法深入訪談個案公司的高階主管以了解其新創過程的實務作為。由個案分析與研究發現得出研究結論如下：
結論一：成功的技術仲介業對技術賣方的選擇與管理應考慮(1)新創公司生態(2)新創公司的動態管理(3)新創公司的選擇(4)新創公司的管理。
結論二：成功的技術仲介業對技術買方的管理應考慮到(1)社會氛圍與使用者的認知(2)使用者的吸收能力(3)創新與使用(4)降低技術與市場的不確定性。
結論三：技術仲介的成功因素包括(1)技術仲介的加值能耐(2)技術仲介的承諾(3)專利/技術加值增加原供應商的仰賴(4)經營策略的創新與新事業開發。
結論四：技術仲介屬於知識管理的一環，在開放式創新中需要技術仲介聯結買方與賣方。而技術仲介則是辦識(破壞式)創新機會的來源之一。
結論五：台灣目前的技術服務業的主導者是以工研院技轉中心為主要的供需中心，輔以少數私人的智財買賣。
結論六：全世界都在鼓勵創新，國家的競爭力表現於創新與創業教育的養成。
Most companies in Taiwan are belong to young SMEs, their business model is known for everybody and mainly the foundry model, there is no technology and market uncertainties. It is indeed a great challenge from the production foundry jumping into the knowledge based US startups. Since the dissymmetry from both sides are huge there exist a need for others to bridge the gap. Technology broker links buyer and seller in the area of open innovation. It is also one of the sources of innovation opportunities. WH International currently focused on four different technologies, including both B2B and B2C products. But whether it is B2B and B2C, market pull and technology push in the field of technology brokers are also to be taken seriously.

From the related literatures survey, based on a technology transfer company, this study is to promote the technology sales (the seller) and management of technology uncertainty, to help (the seller) to manage and reduce market uncertainty, to meet market demands of the technology broker, and compose the three dimensions of framework: the seller, the buyer and the broker. This research adopts case study method to analyze the practice of the case company. The research results are as below.

1. The selection factors of a successful technology broker facing technology vendor should consider (1) ecosystem of start ups (2) the dynamic management of start ups (3) the choice of start ups (4) the management of start ups.

2. The management of technology buyers from a successful broker should take into consideration of(1) the user`s cognitive and social atmosphere (2) the absorptive capacity of users (3) innovation and the diffusion (4) reduce uncertainty of market.

3. The successful factors for technology broker include (1) the value-added capability (2) the commitment to technology (3) patents / technology development to increase value-added services to suppliers (4) innovation of business strategy and new business development.

4. Technical brokering is a part of knowledge management. Technology broker links buyers and sellers in open innovation while it is also one of the sources of innovation opportunities.

5. Technology Transfer Center of the ITRI is the clear leader of technology services industry in Taiwan. There also existed some small private firms that handled intellectual property transactions.

6. Innovation is encouraged worldwide and national competition is reflected in the cultivation of innovation and entrepreneurship education.
參考文獻 一、中文部份

1. 王維漢(2008)，「美國新創公司的商業模式」，工業材料，
　 八月號
2. 王維漢(2008)，「塑膠工業的新契機」，工業材料，九月號
3. 王維漢(2008)，「美國新創公司的技術商品化服務業」，工業
材料，十一月號
4. 王維漢(2009)，「整廠輸出」，科技與人文課程，期中報告
5. 王維漢(2009)，「Ziegler-Natta催化劑世界授權案」，化工資訊
與商情，七月號
6. 王維漢(2009)，「有機電子產業的回顧與展望」，化工資訊與商
情，十月號
7. 王維漢(2010)，「談軟性電子業的商機」，投稿中，
8. 印刷電子展www.printedelectronics.com
9. 技術移轉實物指南，2.1版，AUTM
10. 周延鵬(2010)，智慧財產獲利聖經，天下出版
11. 吳翰中與吳琍璇譯(2010)，美學CEO，謬思出版
12. 袁建中編(2006)，科技管理，雙葉書廊
13. 劉仁傑(1997)，重建台灣產業競爭力，遠流出版，
14. 維興國際公司網頁，www.whinternational.com.tw
15. 台灣立體電路公司網頁，www.3dcircuit.com.tw
16. 艾恩托普公司網頁，www.iontop.com.tw
17. 政大智財所網頁，www. nccu.edu.tw/iip
18. 台灣技術經理人協會網頁，www.twtm.org.tw


二、英文部份

1. Aalbers, R., Dolfsma, W. and Koppius, O. (2004),　“On and Off the Beaten Path: How Individuals Broker Knowledge Through Formal and Informal Networks”, ERIM Report Series in Management, ESR-2004-066 (技術仲介的種類)
2. Astrid, Szogs, Cristina, Chaminade, & Ruzana, Azatyan 　
　　(2008),“Building Absorptive Capacity in Less Developed
　　Countries, The case of Tanzania”, CIRCLE Electronic Working
　　Paper Series paper # 2008/05 (吸收能力)
3. Bellone, F. (2007), “IT adoption, industrial structure and
　　agglomeration economics”, in J. Surinach, R. Moreno and E. Vaya
　　Ed., Knowledge Externalities, Innovation Clusters and Regional
　　Development, Chapter 4, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (IT支援)
4. Biedermann, Almut von (2004), “U.S. Excellence in New Venture
　　Creation: What Technology Transfer Means in the Early 21st
　　Century”
5. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003), A Better Way To Innovate, HBR, July 　　
　　(開放式創新)
6. Chesbrough, H. W. (2007), Open Business Models, Harvard
　　Business School Press, P. 254 (開放式創新模式)
7. Chesbrough, H. W. and Garman, A. R. (2009), How Open
　　Innovation Can Help You Cope in Lean Times, HBR, December
8. 　Christensen, C.M. and Overdorf, M. (2000), Meeting the 　
　　Challenges of Disruptive Change, HBR, Mar. (顛覆危機)
9. 　Christensen, C.M. and Reynold, M. E. (2003), The Innovator’s
　　Solution, Harvard University Press, (創新者的解答)
10. Christensen, C.M. (2007), The Innovator’s Dilemma, Harvard
University Press, (創新的兩難)
11. Coke, P. (2007), “Theorizing regional knowledge capabilities:
economic geography under open innovation” in J. Surinach, R. Moreno and E. Vaya (Ed.), Knowledge Externalities, Innovation Clusters and Regional Development, Chapter 4, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (開放式創新與技術群聚的相關性)
12. Pink, D.H. (2005), A Whole New Mind, Penguin group, (查修
傑譯，”未來在等待的人才”，大塊文化，2006)
13. Murray, D. K. (2009), Borrowing Brilliance: The Six Steps to
Business Innovation by Building on the Ideas of Others, Gotham (林麗冠譯：借用創意你最快出人頭地，大是文化，2010)
14. Day, G. S. (2007)；Is it Real? Can We Win? Is it Worth Doing? Managing Risk and Reward in an Innovation Portfolio? (管理創新風險)
15. Devinney, T. (2004),”the Client-Consultant Interaction in
Professional Business Firms: Outline of the Imperative Model and Implications for Consulting”, U. of New South Wales, Australia (顧問公司：客戶與顧問之間的互動)
16. Dons, H. J. M. and Bino, R. J. (2008), chapter 1,”Innovation and
knowledge transfer in the Dutch horticulture system”, in
Pathways to High tech Valleys and Research Triangles:
Innovative Entrepreneurship, Knowledge Transfer and Cluster formation in Europe and USA, Springer (創新與知識移轉)
17. Hiltzik, M. (1999), Dealers of Lighting, A Harper Business Book
18. von Hippel, E. (2005), Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press
19. Geim and Novoselov (2004), Science 306, 666-669
20. Gilbert, C. G. and Eyring, M. J. (2010), Beating the Odds When
You Launch a New Venture, HBR, May (創業問題)
21. Hansen, M. T. and Birkinshaw, J. (2007), The Innovation Value
Chain, HBR, June (開放式創新價值鏈)
22. Hargadon, A. B. (1998), Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in
Pursuing Continuous Innovation, California Management Review, 40 (3): 209–227 (技術仲介服務業)
23. Hargadon, A. B. (1998), the Best Practices of Technology Brokers,
HBS, August (技術仲介最佳案例)
24. Hulsink, W. and Dons, H. J. M. (2008), chapter 1:”Venturing and
Clustering in Agri-food and High Technology Hot Spots”, in
Pathways to High tech Valleys and Research Triangles: Innovative
Entrepreneurship, Knowledge Transfer and Cluster formation in
Europe and USA, Springer (技術群聚)
25. Huysman, M. and Wulf, V. (2004), IT to Support
Knowledge Sharing in Communities, Toward a Social Capital
Analysis, Journal on Information Technology (IT支援)
26. Jacksom-Bowers, E., Kalucy, L. and McIntyre, E. (2006), Towards
Better Policy and Practice in Primary Healthcare, Primary
Healthcare Research & Information Service, Focus On, Issue 4 (知
識/技術仲介的議題)
27. Jevenaker, B.H. (2002), Strategic Acting as Stage Setting: the
Case of Industrial Design, Norwegian School of Management,
discussion paper ISSN: 0807-3406 (工業設計)
28. Kraaijenbrink, J. (2004), Toward a Conditional Design Theory for
Electronic Knowledge Broker, Ph.D Thesis, U. of Twente,
Netherlands (e-仲介)
29. Krugman (1995), Development, Geography and Economic Theory,
Cambridge, MIT Press (區域技術群聚的動態研發優勢能力)
30. Lehner, M. (2007), in Knowledge Externalities, Innovation Clusters
and Regional Development, Chapter 2, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham,
UK
31. Levina, N. and Emmanuelle, V. (2005), The Emergence of
Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for
Information System’ Implementation and Use
32. Martin, H. (2007), Polymers, Patents, Profits, Wiley-VCH (專
利授權)
33. Me Milford, L. Dutcher, D. and Barker, T. (2008), Climate
Choreography, in Innovation in Finance, Technology, & Policy,
Clean Energy Group,
34. MIT Open Course: Technology Management, Fall 2008
35. Moggridge, B. (2007), Designing Interactions, MIT Press (關鍵設計報告)
36. Nambisan, S. and Sawhney, M. (2007), Global Brain, Wharton
School Publishing, (全球智匯)
37. Nambisan, S. and Sawhney, M. (2007), A Buyer’s Guide to the
Innovation Bazaar, HBR, June (創新購買者指南)
38. Navis, C., Gltnn, M.A. and Hargadon, A. (2003), Chapter 13, Stayed
Tuned: knowledge brokering via inter-firm collaborative in satellite radio (政府政策)
39. Ofek, E. and Sarvary, M. (2002), Knowledge Exchange and
Knowledge Creation: Should the Emphasis Shift in a competitive
Environment ? INSEAD, France (顧問公司的知識管理系統: 知
識交換 vs 知識創造)
40. Ozgur, E. and Leifer, L. (2003), Facilitating Product Development
Knowledge Acquisition: Interaction Between the Expert and the
team, Int. J. Engng. Ed. 19 (1), 142-152 (產品開發團隊)
41. Pisano, G. P. and Smith, W.C. (2009), Restoring American
Competitiveness, HBR, July-August (重建美國產業競爭力)
42. Peter Thiel and Blake Masters (2014), “Zero to one : notes on
startups, or how to build for the future”, The Gernert Company
(破壞式創新&創業)
43. Potter, S. (2007), Technology Broker-a New Profession？
Strategic Management of Intellectual Property, May 31-June 1st (技
術仲介-新職業?)
44. Qualman, Erik (2010), Socialnomics, (洪慧芳譯，社群新經濟時
代，2010)
45. Rerup, Claus (2002), Knowledge gaps, Brokering and Learned
Ignorance: the Novo Way of Management, on 3rd EU Conference
on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, Greece,
5-6, April (組織的效率性) (己學習的忽略)
46. Richard, K. and Lockwood, G. (2010), Superconnection: The
Power of Networks and the Strength of Weak Links, Felicity Bryan
Ltd (張美惠譯，超級關係，時報文化)
47. Rogers, E. M. (1962), Diffusion of Innovations, Glencoe: Free
Press. (創新使用)
48. Schilling, M. A. (2006), Strategic Management of Technological
Innovation, 2nd ed., McGraw Hill (創新策略管理)
49. Sousa, M. (2008), Open innovation models and the role of
knowledge brokers, Inside Knowledge Magazine, retrieved
2008-11-27 (開放式創新與技術仲介)
50. Spenser, P. L. (2006), The Art & Science of Technology Transfer,
Wiley
51. Verona, G., Prandelli, E., Sawhney, M. (2004), Towards Virtual
Knowledge Brokers: An Exploratory Analysis of Customer
Knowledge Absorption for Innovation, presented at 2003 Strategic
Management Society Conference in Baltimore (虛擬仲介與吸收能
力)
52. www.lyttron.com.de
53. www.konarkatechnology.com
54. www.microdisplay.com.uk
55. www.orientechnology.com
56. www.PacificBioscience.com
57. www.powerpaper.com
58. www.ucdavis.edu
59. www.vorbeckmaterials.com
60. www.yet2.com
61. Wise, Emily, Høgenhaven, Casper ed., (2008), User-Driven
Innovation Context and Cases in the Nordic Region,
62. Yang C.H., Li C.H. and Shyu J.Z. (2008), a Modal Analysis of
Public Intermediary in National System of Open Innovation in
Response to Technology Typology, National Chia-Tung U. Taiwan
(國家創新系統)
63. Zook M.A. (2004), The knowledge brokers: venture capitalists,
tacit knowledge and regional development, International Journal of
Urban and Regional Research International Journal of Urban and
Regional Research, 28 (3): 621–641(技術仲介、創投、區域發展)
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
97932072
99
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097932072
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳豐祥zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 王維漢zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wang, Timothyen_US
dc.creator (作者) 王維漢zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wang, Timothyen_US
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Apr-2015 10:08:38 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Apr-2015 10:08:38 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Apr-2015 10:08:38 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097932072en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/74279-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97932072zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 絕大多數在台灣的企業屬於年輕的中小企業，他們所熟知的商業模式是生產代工，並無技術與市場的不確定性問題。如何從生產代工的商業模式跳躍到美國新創公司的知識經濟模式實在是一個對雙方都是很大的挑戰。由於雙方的不對稱性太大有必要讓其它人界入並彌補中間落差。開放式創新中需要技術仲介聯結買方與賣方。而技術仲介則是辦識(破壞式)創新機會的來源之一。在維興國際公司目前所專注的四個不同技術中，同時包括B2B及B2C的產品領域。但無論是B2B及B2C，市場拉力與技術推力在技術仲介的領域中均同樣必須受到重視。
本研究由相關文獻探討，推展出以(買方)目標工業的選擇與管理、(賣方)管理並降低市場的不確定性、技術仲介的需求缺口三構面的研究架構來探討技術仲介業在美國新創公司的技術仲介服務活動的關鍵因素與管理項目。本研究採用個案研究法深入訪談個案公司的高階主管以了解其新創過程的實務作為。由個案分析與研究發現得出研究結論如下：
結論一：成功的技術仲介業對技術賣方的選擇與管理應考慮(1)新創公司生態(2)新創公司的動態管理(3)新創公司的選擇(4)新創公司的管理。
結論二：成功的技術仲介業對技術買方的管理應考慮到(1)社會氛圍與使用者的認知(2)使用者的吸收能力(3)創新與使用(4)降低技術與市場的不確定性。
結論三：技術仲介的成功因素包括(1)技術仲介的加值能耐(2)技術仲介的承諾(3)專利/技術加值增加原供應商的仰賴(4)經營策略的創新與新事業開發。
結論四：技術仲介屬於知識管理的一環，在開放式創新中需要技術仲介聯結買方與賣方。而技術仲介則是辦識(破壞式)創新機會的來源之一。
結論五：台灣目前的技術服務業的主導者是以工研院技轉中心為主要的供需中心，輔以少數私人的智財買賣。
結論六：全世界都在鼓勵創新，國家的競爭力表現於創新與創業教育的養成。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Most companies in Taiwan are belong to young SMEs, their business model is known for everybody and mainly the foundry model, there is no technology and market uncertainties. It is indeed a great challenge from the production foundry jumping into the knowledge based US startups. Since the dissymmetry from both sides are huge there exist a need for others to bridge the gap. Technology broker links buyer and seller in the area of open innovation. It is also one of the sources of innovation opportunities. WH International currently focused on four different technologies, including both B2B and B2C products. But whether it is B2B and B2C, market pull and technology push in the field of technology brokers are also to be taken seriously.

From the related literatures survey, based on a technology transfer company, this study is to promote the technology sales (the seller) and management of technology uncertainty, to help (the seller) to manage and reduce market uncertainty, to meet market demands of the technology broker, and compose the three dimensions of framework: the seller, the buyer and the broker. This research adopts case study method to analyze the practice of the case company. The research results are as below.

1. The selection factors of a successful technology broker facing technology vendor should consider (1) ecosystem of start ups (2) the dynamic management of start ups (3) the choice of start ups (4) the management of start ups.

2. The management of technology buyers from a successful broker should take into consideration of(1) the user`s cognitive and social atmosphere (2) the absorptive capacity of users (3) innovation and the diffusion (4) reduce uncertainty of market.

3. The successful factors for technology broker include (1) the value-added capability (2) the commitment to technology (3) patents / technology development to increase value-added services to suppliers (4) innovation of business strategy and new business development.

4. Technical brokering is a part of knowledge management. Technology broker links buyers and sellers in open innovation while it is also one of the sources of innovation opportunities.

5. Technology Transfer Center of the ITRI is the clear leader of technology services industry in Taiwan. There also existed some small private firms that handled intellectual property transactions.

6. Innovation is encouraged worldwide and national competition is reflected in the cultivation of innovation and entrepreneurship education.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論…………………………………………….. 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
壹、知識經濟與生產經濟....………………………………….1
貳、美國新創公司與跨國企業……………………………….2
參、不同的跨國企業創新策略……………………………….3
肆、以網絡為中心的創新…………………………………….7
第二節 研究目的與問題 10
第三節 研究流程與論文結構......................................................13
第二章 文獻討論…………………………………………………….14
第一節 技術仲介定義、理論、範圍…………………………...14
第二節 技術仲介產業環境分析…..……………………………18
第三節 虛擬仲介與實體仲介…………………………………..20
第四節 知識與技術仲介的議題………………………………..23
第五節 技術的擴散：創新與使用……………………………..25
第六節 使用者的吸收能力……………………………………..29
第七節 國家級別的技術仲介與技術類別……………………..32
第八節 其它因素………………………………………………..35
壹、政府法規………………………………………………...35
貳、產品開發與設計………………………………………...38
參、 IT支援…………………………………………………..42
肆、技術群聚………………………………………………...43
伍、跨國顧問公司…………………………………………...45
第九節 文獻結論………………………………………………..49第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………..52
第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………52第二節 研究變數…………………………………………………53第三節 研究設計與資料收集……………………………………54
第四節 研究限制…………………………………………………55
第四章 個案研究……………………………………………………..57
第一節 以印刷電子學新興產業為例……………………………57
壹、印刷電子產業概述……………………………………..58
貳、印刷電子產業的未來…………………………………..59
第二節 維興國際公司的成立……………………………………62
壹、維興國際公司的背景…………………………………..62
貳、維興國際公司引進的技術領域………………………..63
第三節 目標工業的選擇與管理(賣方)…………………………..69
壹、新創公司生態……………………………………………69
貳、新創公司的動態管理……………………………………70
參、目標工業的選擇…………………………………………73
肆、目標供應商的管理………………………………………76
第四節 管理並降低技術與市場的不確定性(買方)……………..79
壹、使用者的認知與社會氛圍……………………………...79
貳、使用者的吸收能力……………………………………...80
參、創新與使用……………………………………………...84
肆、市場的不確定性降低…………………………………...88
第五節 市場需求缺口(技術仲介)………………………………..91
壹、技術仲介的加值能耐…………………………………...91
貳、技術仲介的承諾………………………………………...94
參、專利/技術加值增加原供應商的仰賴…………………..96
肆、經營策略的創新與新事業開發………………………100
第六節 小結……………………………………………………..105第五章 研究發現與討論……………………………………………105 第一節 目標美國新創公司的選擇與管理……………………. ……107
第二節 買方認知與降低市場的不確定性……………………..106
第三節 技術仲介所面臨的主要問題…………………………..109
第四節 創新與技術仲介的相依性……………………………..111
第五節 台灣目前的技術服務業的主導者以智財法律人為主..116
第六節 台灣的創新與創業養成教育平台……………………..118
第六章 研究結論與建議……………………………………………120
第一節 研究結論………………………………………………..123
第二節 建議……………………………………………………..125
参考文獻………………………………………………………………126		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 4751908 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097932072en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 技術仲介zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 開放式創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新創公司zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 技術與市場的不確定性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Technology Brokeren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Open Innovationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Startupen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Technology Uncertaintyen_US
dc.title (題名) 以維興公司為例探討美國新創公司的技術仲介服務zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部份

1. 王維漢(2008)，「美國新創公司的商業模式」，工業材料，
　 八月號
2. 王維漢(2008)，「塑膠工業的新契機」，工業材料，九月號
3. 王維漢(2008)，「美國新創公司的技術商品化服務業」，工業
材料，十一月號
4. 王維漢(2009)，「整廠輸出」，科技與人文課程，期中報告
5. 王維漢(2009)，「Ziegler-Natta催化劑世界授權案」，化工資訊
與商情，七月號
6. 王維漢(2009)，「有機電子產業的回顧與展望」，化工資訊與商
情，十月號
7. 王維漢(2010)，「談軟性電子業的商機」，投稿中，
8. 印刷電子展www.printedelectronics.com
9. 技術移轉實物指南，2.1版，AUTM
10. 周延鵬(2010)，智慧財產獲利聖經，天下出版
11. 吳翰中與吳琍璇譯(2010)，美學CEO，謬思出版
12. 袁建中編(2006)，科技管理，雙葉書廊
13. 劉仁傑(1997)，重建台灣產業競爭力，遠流出版，
14. 維興國際公司網頁，www.whinternational.com.tw
15. 台灣立體電路公司網頁，www.3dcircuit.com.tw
16. 艾恩托普公司網頁，www.iontop.com.tw
17. 政大智財所網頁，www. nccu.edu.tw/iip
18. 台灣技術經理人協會網頁，www.twtm.org.tw


二、英文部份

1. Aalbers, R., Dolfsma, W. and Koppius, O. (2004),　“On and Off the Beaten Path: How Individuals Broker Knowledge Through Formal and Informal Networks”, ERIM Report Series in Management, ESR-2004-066 (技術仲介的種類)
2. Astrid, Szogs, Cristina, Chaminade, & Ruzana, Azatyan 　
　　(2008),“Building Absorptive Capacity in Less Developed
　　Countries, The case of Tanzania”, CIRCLE Electronic Working
　　Paper Series paper # 2008/05 (吸收能力)
3. Bellone, F. (2007), “IT adoption, industrial structure and
　　agglomeration economics”, in J. Surinach, R. Moreno and E. Vaya
　　Ed., Knowledge Externalities, Innovation Clusters and Regional
　　Development, Chapter 4, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (IT支援)
4. Biedermann, Almut von (2004), “U.S. Excellence in New Venture
　　Creation: What Technology Transfer Means in the Early 21st
　　Century”
5. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003), A Better Way To Innovate, HBR, July 　　
　　(開放式創新)
6. Chesbrough, H. W. (2007), Open Business Models, Harvard
　　Business School Press, P. 254 (開放式創新模式)
7. Chesbrough, H. W. and Garman, A. R. (2009), How Open
　　Innovation Can Help You Cope in Lean Times, HBR, December
8. 　Christensen, C.M. and Overdorf, M. (2000), Meeting the 　
　　Challenges of Disruptive Change, HBR, Mar. (顛覆危機)
9. 　Christensen, C.M. and Reynold, M. E. (2003), The Innovator’s
　　Solution, Harvard University Press, (創新者的解答)
10. Christensen, C.M. (2007), The Innovator’s Dilemma, Harvard
University Press, (創新的兩難)
11. Coke, P. (2007), “Theorizing regional knowledge capabilities:
economic geography under open innovation” in J. Surinach, R. Moreno and E. Vaya (Ed.), Knowledge Externalities, Innovation Clusters and Regional Development, Chapter 4, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (開放式創新與技術群聚的相關性)
12. Pink, D.H. (2005), A Whole New Mind, Penguin group, (查修
傑譯，”未來在等待的人才”，大塊文化，2006)
13. Murray, D. K. (2009), Borrowing Brilliance: The Six Steps to
Business Innovation by Building on the Ideas of Others, Gotham (林麗冠譯：借用創意你最快出人頭地，大是文化，2010)
14. Day, G. S. (2007)；Is it Real? Can We Win? Is it Worth Doing? Managing Risk and Reward in an Innovation Portfolio? (管理創新風險)
15. Devinney, T. (2004),”the Client-Consultant Interaction in
Professional Business Firms: Outline of the Imperative Model and Implications for Consulting”, U. of New South Wales, Australia (顧問公司：客戶與顧問之間的互動)
16. Dons, H. J. M. and Bino, R. J. (2008), chapter 1,”Innovation and
knowledge transfer in the Dutch horticulture system”, in
Pathways to High tech Valleys and Research Triangles:
Innovative Entrepreneurship, Knowledge Transfer and Cluster formation in Europe and USA, Springer (創新與知識移轉)
17. Hiltzik, M. (1999), Dealers of Lighting, A Harper Business Book
18. von Hippel, E. (2005), Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press
19. Geim and Novoselov (2004), Science 306, 666-669
20. Gilbert, C. G. and Eyring, M. J. (2010), Beating the Odds When
You Launch a New Venture, HBR, May (創業問題)
21. Hansen, M. T. and Birkinshaw, J. (2007), The Innovation Value
Chain, HBR, June (開放式創新價值鏈)
22. Hargadon, A. B. (1998), Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in
Pursuing Continuous Innovation, California Management Review, 40 (3): 209–227 (技術仲介服務業)
23. Hargadon, A. B. (1998), the Best Practices of Technology Brokers,
HBS, August (技術仲介最佳案例)
24. Hulsink, W. and Dons, H. J. M. (2008), chapter 1:”Venturing and
Clustering in Agri-food and High Technology Hot Spots”, in
Pathways to High tech Valleys and Research Triangles: Innovative
Entrepreneurship, Knowledge Transfer and Cluster formation in
Europe and USA, Springer (技術群聚)
25. Huysman, M. and Wulf, V. (2004), IT to Support
Knowledge Sharing in Communities, Toward a Social Capital
Analysis, Journal on Information Technology (IT支援)
26. Jacksom-Bowers, E., Kalucy, L. and McIntyre, E. (2006), Towards
Better Policy and Practice in Primary Healthcare, Primary
Healthcare Research & Information Service, Focus On, Issue 4 (知
識/技術仲介的議題)
27. Jevenaker, B.H. (2002), Strategic Acting as Stage Setting: the
Case of Industrial Design, Norwegian School of Management,
discussion paper ISSN: 0807-3406 (工業設計)
28. Kraaijenbrink, J. (2004), Toward a Conditional Design Theory for
Electronic Knowledge Broker, Ph.D Thesis, U. of Twente,
Netherlands (e-仲介)
29. Krugman (1995), Development, Geography and Economic Theory,
Cambridge, MIT Press (區域技術群聚的動態研發優勢能力)
30. Lehner, M. (2007), in Knowledge Externalities, Innovation Clusters
and Regional Development, Chapter 2, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham,
UK
31. Levina, N. and Emmanuelle, V. (2005), The Emergence of
Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for
Information System’ Implementation and Use
32. Martin, H. (2007), Polymers, Patents, Profits, Wiley-VCH (專
利授權)
33. Me Milford, L. Dutcher, D. and Barker, T. (2008), Climate
Choreography, in Innovation in Finance, Technology, & Policy,
Clean Energy Group,
34. MIT Open Course: Technology Management, Fall 2008
35. Moggridge, B. (2007), Designing Interactions, MIT Press (關鍵設計報告)
36. Nambisan, S. and Sawhney, M. (2007), Global Brain, Wharton
School Publishing, (全球智匯)
37. Nambisan, S. and Sawhney, M. (2007), A Buyer’s Guide to the
Innovation Bazaar, HBR, June (創新購買者指南)
38. Navis, C., Gltnn, M.A. and Hargadon, A. (2003), Chapter 13, Stayed
Tuned: knowledge brokering via inter-firm collaborative in satellite radio (政府政策)
39. Ofek, E. and Sarvary, M. (2002), Knowledge Exchange and
Knowledge Creation: Should the Emphasis Shift in a competitive
Environment ? INSEAD, France (顧問公司的知識管理系統: 知
識交換 vs 知識創造)
40. Ozgur, E. and Leifer, L. (2003), Facilitating Product Development
Knowledge Acquisition: Interaction Between the Expert and the
team, Int. J. Engng. Ed. 19 (1), 142-152 (產品開發團隊)
41. Pisano, G. P. and Smith, W.C. (2009), Restoring American
Competitiveness, HBR, July-August (重建美國產業競爭力)
42. Peter Thiel and Blake Masters (2014), “Zero to one : notes on
startups, or how to build for the future”, The Gernert Company
(破壞式創新&創業)
43. Potter, S. (2007), Technology Broker-a New Profession？
Strategic Management of Intellectual Property, May 31-June 1st (技
術仲介-新職業?)
44. Qualman, Erik (2010), Socialnomics, (洪慧芳譯，社群新經濟時
代，2010)
45. Rerup, Claus (2002), Knowledge gaps, Brokering and Learned
Ignorance: the Novo Way of Management, on 3rd EU Conference
on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, Greece,
5-6, April (組織的效率性) (己學習的忽略)
46. Richard, K. and Lockwood, G. (2010), Superconnection: The
Power of Networks and the Strength of Weak Links, Felicity Bryan
Ltd (張美惠譯，超級關係，時報文化)
47. Rogers, E. M. (1962), Diffusion of Innovations, Glencoe: Free
Press. (創新使用)
48. Schilling, M. A. (2006), Strategic Management of Technological
Innovation, 2nd ed., McGraw Hill (創新策略管理)
49. Sousa, M. (2008), Open innovation models and the role of
knowledge brokers, Inside Knowledge Magazine, retrieved
2008-11-27 (開放式創新與技術仲介)
50. Spenser, P. L. (2006), The Art & Science of Technology Transfer,
Wiley
51. Verona, G., Prandelli, E., Sawhney, M. (2004), Towards Virtual
Knowledge Brokers: An Exploratory Analysis of Customer
Knowledge Absorption for Innovation, presented at 2003 Strategic
Management Society Conference in Baltimore (虛擬仲介與吸收能
力)
52. www.lyttron.com.de
53. www.konarkatechnology.com
54. www.microdisplay.com.uk
55. www.orientechnology.com
56. www.PacificBioscience.com
57. www.powerpaper.com
58. www.ucdavis.edu
59. www.vorbeckmaterials.com
60. www.yet2.com
61. Wise, Emily, Høgenhaven, Casper ed., (2008), User-Driven
Innovation Context and Cases in the Nordic Region,
62. Yang C.H., Li C.H. and Shyu J.Z. (2008), a Modal Analysis of
Public Intermediary in National System of Open Innovation in
Response to Technology Typology, National Chia-Tung U. Taiwan
(國家創新系統)
63. Zook M.A. (2004), The knowledge brokers: venture capitalists,
tacit knowledge and regional development, International Journal of
Urban and Regional Research International Journal of Urban and
Regional Research, 28 (3): 621–641(技術仲介、創投、區域發展)		zh_TW