Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 民法第四八三條之一之研究-以我國實務見解及日本法為素材
作者 徐婉寧
Hsu, Wan-Ning
貢獻者 法律系
日期 2014-09
上傳時間 27-Apr-2015 16:05:02 (UTC+8)
摘要 民法債編於一九九九年時,增訂了民法第四八三條之一,明文規定「受僱人服勞務,其生命、身體、健康有受危害之虞者,僱用人應按其情形為必要之預防。」將僱用人之保護照顧義務予以明文化。然而由於民法第四八三條之一乃係一抽象規定,對於保護照顧義務之具體內容並未詳加論述,因此如何特定保護照顧義務之內容,據以主張僱用人之債務不履行損害賠償責任,對受僱人而言即為一棘手的課題。此外,關於保護照顧義務的性質、僱用人違反民法第四八三條之一時之效果,學說上仍有爭議;且自債編修正以來,縱使實務上已累積了相當的案例,學界對民法第四八三條之一相關的研究仍十分有限,且欠缺對我國近年來的實務見解為進一步分析整理之探討。因此,本文擬以實務見解為中心,先探討保護照顧義務之性質,進一步去探究其具體內容及其與勞工安全衛生法規、性別工作平等法中性騷擾防治義務之關係。隨後分析其與民法第一八四條第二項、第四八七條之一的關係,最後進行日本法之介紹與探討,冀透過比較法的觀察,對於我國民法第四八三條之一之發展及實務上的運作能有所助益。
Civil Code § 483-1 was enacted and promulgated in 1999, and so the employer’s duty to care for employee safety and health becomes a statutory one. However, when the employee pursues the employer’s responsibility for damages in the legal context of an exploration of liability for non-performance of an obligation in a contract relationship under the Civil Code, it is very difficult for the employee to specify the content of the violation of the duty to care for safety because Civil Code § 483-1 is very abstract. In praxis of Jurisdiction in Taiwan it seems unusual to specify the actual content of such duty on the part of the employer; neither do scholarly opinions. From the both theoretical and practical aspects, through the analyses of the relationship between Civil Code § 483-1 and the Labor Safety and Health Act and the Gender Equality in Employment Act, the relationship among Civil Code § 483-1, § 487-1, and § 184, and the cases in Taiwan, this research will construct a framework of the actual content of the employer’s duty to care for safety.
關聯 政大法學評論, 138, 237-304
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 法律系
dc.creator (作者) 徐婉寧zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Wan-Ning
dc.date (日期) 2014-09
dc.date.accessioned 27-Apr-2015 16:05:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 27-Apr-2015 16:05:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 27-Apr-2015 16:05:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/74856-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 民法債編於一九九九年時,增訂了民法第四八三條之一,明文規定「受僱人服勞務,其生命、身體、健康有受危害之虞者,僱用人應按其情形為必要之預防。」將僱用人之保護照顧義務予以明文化。然而由於民法第四八三條之一乃係一抽象規定,對於保護照顧義務之具體內容並未詳加論述,因此如何特定保護照顧義務之內容,據以主張僱用人之債務不履行損害賠償責任,對受僱人而言即為一棘手的課題。此外,關於保護照顧義務的性質、僱用人違反民法第四八三條之一時之效果,學說上仍有爭議;且自債編修正以來,縱使實務上已累積了相當的案例,學界對民法第四八三條之一相關的研究仍十分有限,且欠缺對我國近年來的實務見解為進一步分析整理之探討。因此,本文擬以實務見解為中心,先探討保護照顧義務之性質,進一步去探究其具體內容及其與勞工安全衛生法規、性別工作平等法中性騷擾防治義務之關係。隨後分析其與民法第一八四條第二項、第四八七條之一的關係,最後進行日本法之介紹與探討,冀透過比較法的觀察,對於我國民法第四八三條之一之發展及實務上的運作能有所助益。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Civil Code § 483-1 was enacted and promulgated in 1999, and so the employer’s duty to care for employee safety and health becomes a statutory one. However, when the employee pursues the employer’s responsibility for damages in the legal context of an exploration of liability for non-performance of an obligation in a contract relationship under the Civil Code, it is very difficult for the employee to specify the content of the violation of the duty to care for safety because Civil Code § 483-1 is very abstract. In praxis of Jurisdiction in Taiwan it seems unusual to specify the actual content of such duty on the part of the employer; neither do scholarly opinions. From the both theoretical and practical aspects, through the analyses of the relationship between Civil Code § 483-1 and the Labor Safety and Health Act and the Gender Equality in Employment Act, the relationship among Civil Code § 483-1, § 487-1, and § 184, and the cases in Taiwan, this research will construct a framework of the actual content of the employer’s duty to care for safety.
dc.format.extent 1056937 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 政大法學評論, 138, 237-304
dc.title (題名) 民法第四八三條之一之研究-以我國實務見解及日本法為素材zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) articleen