Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 Daptomycin versus linezolid for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococ- cal bacteremia: systematic review and meta-analysis
作者 林馨怡
Chuang, Yu-Chung;Wang, Jann-Tay;Lin, Hsin-Yi;Chang, Shan-Chwen
貢獻者 經濟系
關鍵詞 Daptomycin;Linezolid;Meta-analysis;Vancomycin-resistant enterococci
日期 2014
上傳時間 27-Apr-2015 16:19:10 (UTC+8)
摘要 Background Linezolid, which has bacteriostatic activity, is approved for the treatment of vancomycinresistant enterococci (VRE) infections. Meanwhile, daptomycin exerts bactericidal activity against VRE, but is not approved for the treatment of VRE bacteremia. Only a few studies with small sample sizes have compared the effectiveness of these drugs for treatment of VRE bacteremia. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies of VRE bacteremia treatment published before January 1, 2014. All studies reporting daptomycin and linezolid treatment outcomes simultaneously were included. The endpoints were mortality and microbiological cure. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of mortality in daptomycin- and linezolid-treated patients were extracted if available. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for all outcomes using a random-effects model. Results Thirteen studies (532 patients receiving daptomycin, 656 patients receiving linezolid) met the selection criteria. All studies had retrospective cohort designs and relatively small sample sizes. Eight studies compared the aORs of mortality in daptomycin- and linezolid-treated patients. Four studies were published as conference papers and there was significant heterogeneity among these studies (I² = 63%, p = 0.04). Daptomycin use was not associated with better microbiological cure (daptomycin vs. linezolid, OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.42-1.06, p = 0.09). However, mortality was higher in patients receiving daptomycin (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.09-1.86, p = 0.009). Subgroup analysis of studies that reported aORs indicated that daptomycin was associated with higher mortality (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.02-2.50, p = 0.04). There was no evidence of publication bias, but all enrolled studies were retrospective, had small sample sizes, and had substantial limitations. Conclusions Although limited data is available, the current meta-analysis shows that linezolid treatment for VRE bacteremia was associated with a lower mortality than daptomycin treatment. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously because of limitations inherent to retrospective studies and the high heterogeneity among studies. A large randomized trial is needed to confirm the present results.
關聯 BMC Infectious Diseases, 14(1), 650-669
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0687-9
dc.contributor 經濟系
dc.creator (作者) 林馨怡zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chuang, Yu-Chung;Wang, Jann-Tay;Lin, Hsin-Yi;Chang, Shan-Chwen
dc.date (日期) 2014
dc.date.accessioned 27-Apr-2015 16:19:10 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 27-Apr-2015 16:19:10 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 27-Apr-2015 16:19:10 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/74864-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Background Linezolid, which has bacteriostatic activity, is approved for the treatment of vancomycinresistant enterococci (VRE) infections. Meanwhile, daptomycin exerts bactericidal activity against VRE, but is not approved for the treatment of VRE bacteremia. Only a few studies with small sample sizes have compared the effectiveness of these drugs for treatment of VRE bacteremia. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies of VRE bacteremia treatment published before January 1, 2014. All studies reporting daptomycin and linezolid treatment outcomes simultaneously were included. The endpoints were mortality and microbiological cure. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of mortality in daptomycin- and linezolid-treated patients were extracted if available. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for all outcomes using a random-effects model. Results Thirteen studies (532 patients receiving daptomycin, 656 patients receiving linezolid) met the selection criteria. All studies had retrospective cohort designs and relatively small sample sizes. Eight studies compared the aORs of mortality in daptomycin- and linezolid-treated patients. Four studies were published as conference papers and there was significant heterogeneity among these studies (I² = 63%, p = 0.04). Daptomycin use was not associated with better microbiological cure (daptomycin vs. linezolid, OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.42-1.06, p = 0.09). However, mortality was higher in patients receiving daptomycin (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.09-1.86, p = 0.009). Subgroup analysis of studies that reported aORs indicated that daptomycin was associated with higher mortality (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.02-2.50, p = 0.04). There was no evidence of publication bias, but all enrolled studies were retrospective, had small sample sizes, and had substantial limitations. Conclusions Although limited data is available, the current meta-analysis shows that linezolid treatment for VRE bacteremia was associated with a lower mortality than daptomycin treatment. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously because of limitations inherent to retrospective studies and the high heterogeneity among studies. A large randomized trial is needed to confirm the present results.
dc.format.extent 1840209 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) BMC Infectious Diseases, 14(1), 650-669
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Daptomycin;Linezolid;Meta-analysis;Vancomycin-resistant enterococci
dc.title (題名) Daptomycin versus linezolid for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococ- cal bacteremia: systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.type (資料類型) articleen
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1186/s12879-014-0687-9
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0687-9