1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Communication
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 跨國做家庭：傳播科技的性別政治
Doing family in a transnational context: the gender politics of communication technologies
作者 許峯源
Hsu, Feng Yuan
貢獻者 康庭瑜
Kang, Ting Yu
許峯源
Hsu, Feng Yuan
關鍵詞 跨國家庭
跨國溝通
傳播科技
性別政治
Transnational family
Transnational communication
Communication technologies
Gender politics
日期 2014
上傳時間 1-May-2015 11:30:18 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究藉由深度訪問18位前往澳洲打工旅遊的女兒，討論跨國家庭中的移民決策、跨國傳播與傳播科技分配的性別政治。本文理論視角強調跨國家庭的異質性。基於各成員如何理解赴澳打工旅遊的移民決策，以及跨國後的溝通責任、傳播科技資源的分配。分析中指出三點。第一，家庭策略與個人動機的協商過程中，赴澳打工旅遊者動用不同的溝通策略：選擇隱瞞或受保護論述，進而說服家庭。兩種策略建立於性別離／返的差異。第二，跨國溝通基於不同的移民決策過程，分為兩種詮釋，一為維繫親密關係，二為管教與監控。跨國溝通中，基於家庭的性別分工，依然是以母親作為主要的聯繫者。資料顯示受訪者對於父母的不同詮釋，形成不可欲的母職，以及工具性的父職，而父親由於缺席於跨國溝通中，被詮釋成「理性」的角色。第三，由於家庭成員的離家，導致傳播科技資源的重新分配。多數家庭中，母親較不會使用傳播科技，教導母親學習傳播科技時，母親則被描述為學不會，若教父親，則是不想學。基於以上三點，本文強調「跨國做家庭」時，性別不平等在跨國家庭中的重組，以及對於傳播科技資源分配之影響。
By conducting 18 in-depth interviews with female working holiday makers, this thesis examines the gender politics of the decision-making process, transnational communication and communication technologies. In the fourth chapter, data shows the female working holiday makers use different communication strategies to negotiate with parents, especially when the personal agenda and family strategies are in conflict. The communication strategies are based on the gendered expectations in Taiwanese families. The informants utilize these expectations to convince their parents that working holiday benefits them.
In the fifth chapter, I analyze the continuing negotiation between parents and daughters. It affects the quality of transnational communication. It shows 2 different communication patterns. First of them is intimacy-maintaining and the other one is discipline/surveillance. Due to the gender division of domestic labor, in most of the Taiwanese families, the mothers make the transnational phone call, try to maintain intimacy with daughters in Australia. On one hand, the informants construe the intensive long-distance mothering as unwanted and emotional. On the other hand, the fathers are mostly absent in transnational communication. Compared with the mothers being too emotional, the informants interpret this absence as “rational.”
I examine the politics of communication technologies in the sixth chapter. When the family is ‘transnationalizing,’ the family members have the opportunity to gain more access to ICTs. This study identifies the different gendered processes of digital empowerment. Firstly, mothers are less expected to be tech-savvy in the process of bridging digital divide. When the family is transnationalizing, the ICTs are indispensable to parents for maintaining intimacy. Therefore, the less tech-savvy parents are taught how to use the ICTs to communicate with transnational daughters. However, mothers are always described as “clumsy” and “can not learn it well” while fathers are expected to be more interested in ICTs, especially in computers. Secondly, fathers are still considered more tech-savvy regardless of their actual capability. A few informants find their fathers do not use ICTs as well as their mothers do, they construe their fathers as “not wanting to learn” rather than “not able to learn it well.” In the process of bridging digital divide in transnational families, the ICTs are still part of the masculine culture that discourages mothers from further digital empowerment. Except for the discouragement in the gendered process, few of my informants’ mothers are more structurally limited. I use the term “gendered mobility” to describe the structural limitation on mothers’ access to ICTs. Gendered mobility refers to how mothers’ geographical mobility is limited to family space and depends on other family members, such as husbands or children. Therefore, the ICTs, especially mobile devices, are not necessary for mothers, because of their limited mobility. Most of the mothers need social support to access ICTs for transnational communication.
參考文獻 王宏仁、郭佩宜（主編）（2009）。《流轉跨界：跨國的台灣．台灣的跨國》。台北：中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心亞太區域研究專題中心。
王俐容、王維菁、朱淑娟（2008）。〈跨國性社群電視媒體初探-以「台灣媳婦」為例〉，《中華傳播學刊》，14：267-314。
成令方、吳嘉苓（2004）。〈科技的性別政治：理論和研究的回顧〉，《科技、醫療與社會》，3：51-112。
林宇玲（2002）。《網路與性別》。台北：華之鳳科技出版。
林如萍（2012）。〈台灣家庭的代間關係與代間互動類型之變遷趨勢〉，伊慶春、章英華（編），《台灣的社會變遷1985-2005：家庭與婚姻，台灣社會變遷基本調查系列三之1》， 頁75-124。台北：中研院社研所 。
林宗弘、洪敬舒、李建泓、王兆慶、張烽益（2011）。《崩世代：財團化、貧窮化與少子女化的危機》。台灣勞工陣線。
林宗弘（2012）。〈非關上網？台灣的社會落差與網路使用的社會後果 〉，《台灣社會學 》，24：55-97。
林群穎（2013）。《跨國分偶家庭之親子關係：以台商台幹家庭為例》。清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
曾嬿芬（2008）。〈移住／居台灣－移民社會學〉，謝國雄（編），《群學爭鳴：台灣社會學發展史，1945-2005》， 頁524-551。台北：群學。
夏曉鵑（2002）。《流離尋岸：資本國際化下的「外籍新娘」現象》。台北：台灣社會研究社。
蔡綿綿（2010）。《遠距母職：旅台菲籍勞工使用網路溝通履行母職的分析》。政治大學國際傳播英語碩士學位學程。
藍佩嘉（2002）。〈跨越國界的生命地圖：菲籍家務移工的流動與認同〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，48：169-218。
藍佩嘉（2008）。《跨國灰姑娘：當東南亞幫傭遇上台灣新富家庭》。台北：行人文化實驗室。
藍佩嘉，2009，〈當大學生菲傭遇見台灣新富雇主：跨國語言資本中介的階級畫界〉。收錄於《流轉跨界：跨國的台灣，台灣的跨國》，王宏仁、郭佩宜編，頁35-71，台北：中研院。
Australia Department of Immigration and Border Protection (2014) Australia’s Migration Trends 2012-13. Retrieved from http://www.immi.gov.au/pub-res/Documents/statistics/migration-trends-2012-13.pdf
Australia Department of Immigration and Border Protection (2013) Australia’s Migration Trends 2011-12. Retrieved from http://www.immi.gov.au/media/publications/statistics/immigration-update/australian-migration-trends-2011-12.pdf
Australia Department of Immigration and Border Protection (2012) Trends in Migration: Australia 2010-11. Retrieved from http://www.immi.gov.au/media/publications/statistics/trends-in-migration/trends-in-migration-2010-11.pdf
Asis, Maruja M.B. (2002). From the life stories of Filipino women: personal and family agendas in migration. Asian and pacific migration journal, 11(1), 67-94.
Baldassar, Loretta. (2007). Transnational families and aged care: the mobility of care and the migrancy of ageing. Journal of Ethnic and Migration studies, 33(2), 275-297.
Baldassar, Loretta. (2008). Missing kin and longing to be together: emotions and the construction of co-presence in transnational relationships. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29(3), 247-266.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). ‘The forms of capital’ in J. G. Richardson (ed.) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, NY: Greenwood Press, 241-58.
Chee, Maria W. L (2005). Taiwanese American transnational families : women and kin work. Routledge, New York
Chib, Arul, Malik, Shelly, Aricat, Rajiv George, & Kadir, Siti Zubeidah. (2014). Migrant mothering and mobile phones: Negotiations of transnational identity. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(1), 73-93.
Clarke, Nick. (2004a). Free independent travellers? British working holiday makers in Australia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4), 499-509.
Clarke, Nick. (2004b). Mobility, fixity, agency: Australia`s working holiday programme. Population, Space and Place, 10(5), 411-420.
Clarke, Nick. (2005). Detailing transnational lives of the middle: British working holiday makers in Australia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration studies, 31(2), 307-322.
Emerson, Robert M, Fretz, Rachel I, & Shaw, Linda L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes: University of Chicago Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: self, and society in the late modern age. Polity.
Hannaford, Dinah. (2014). Technologies of the spouse: intimate surveillance in Senegalese transnational marriages. Global networks, n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/glob.12045
Ho, C. (2006). Migration as feminisation? Chinese women`s experiences of work and family in Australia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(3), 497-514.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette, & Avila, Ernestine. (1997). “I`m Here, but I`m There” The Meanings of Latina Transnational Motherhood. Gender & Society, 11(5), 548-571.
Horst, Heather A. (2006). The blessings and burdens of communication: cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global networks, 6(2), 143-159.
Huang, Shirlena, & Yeoh, Brenda SA. (2005). Transnational families and their children`s education: China`s ‘study mothers’ in Singapore. Global networks, 5(4), 379-400.
Hugo, Graeme. (2006). Temporary migration and the labour market in Australia. Australian Geographer, 37(2), 211-231.
Hugo, Graeme, & Young, Soogil. (2008). Labour Mobility in the Asia-Pacific Region: Dynamics, Issues and a New APEC Agenda: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Ichimoto, Takae. (2004). Ambivalent ‘selves’ in transition: A case study of Japanese women studying in Australian universities. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 25(3), 247-269.
Kang, Tingyu. (2012). Gendered media, changing intimacy: internet-mediated transnational communication in the family sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 34(2), 146-161.
Kawashima, Kumiko. (2010). Japanese Working Holiday Makers in Australia and their Relationship to the Japanese Labour Market: Before and After. Asian Studies Review, 34(3), 267-286.
Kim, Youna. (2010). Female individualization?: Transnational mobility and media consumption of Asian women. Media, Culture & Society, 32(1), 25-43. doi: 10.1177/0163443709350096
Lan, Pei-Chia. (2002). Subcontracting filial piety elder care in ethnic Chinese immigrant families in California. Journal of Family Issues, 23(7), 812-835.
Lan, Pei-Chia. (2006). Global Cinderellas: Migrant domestics and newly rich employers in Taiwan: Duke University Press.
Le Espiritu, Yen. (2002). Filipino Navy stewards and Filipina health care professionals: Immigration, work and family relations. Asian and pacific migration journal, 11(1), 47-66.
Madianou, Mirca. (2012). Migration and the accentuated ambivalence of motherhood: the role of ICTs in Filipino transnational families. Global networks, 12(3), 277-295.
Madianou, Mirca, & Miller, Daniel. (2011). Mobile phone parenting: Reconfiguring relationships between Filipina migrant mothers and their left-behind children. new media & society, 13(3), 457-470.
Madianou, Mirca, & Miller, Daniel. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. Routledge.
Madianou, Mirca, & Miller, Daniel. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies,16(2), 169-187.
Manalansan, Martin F. (2006). Queer intersections: Sexuality and gender in migration studies. International Migration Review, 40(1), 224-249.
McKay, Deirdre. (2007). ‘Sending Dollars Shows Feeling’–Emotions and Economies in Filipino Migration. Mobilities, 2(2), 175-194.
Oke, Nicole. (2012). Temporary Migration, Transnational Politics? The Politics of Temporary Migration in Australia. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(1), 85-101. doi: 10.1080/07256868.2012.633318
Panagakos, Anastasia N, & Horst, Heather A. (2006). Return to Cyberia: technology and the social worlds of transnational migrants. Global networks, 6(2), 109-124.
Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families. Feminist studies, 361-390.
Parreñas, Rhacel. (2005). Long distance intimacy: class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. Global networks, 5(4), 317-336.
Pessar, P. and Mahler, S. (2003) ‘Transnational migration: bringing gender in’, International Migration Review, 37(3): 812-46.
Portes, Alejandro, Guarnizo, Luis E, & Landolt, Patricia. (1999). The study of transnationalism: pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 217-237.
Pribilsky, Jason. (2004). ‘Aprendemos A Convivir’: Conjugal Relations, Co‐parenting, and Family Life Among Ecuadorian Transnational Migrants in New York and The Ecuadorian Andes. Global networks, 4(3), 313-334.
Rice, Kathleen. (2010). `Working on Holiday`: Relationships between Tourism and Work among Young Canadians in Edinburgh. Anthropology in Action, 17(1).
Ryan, L., Sales, R., Tilki, M., & Siara, B. (2009). Family strategies and transnational migration: recent Polish migrants in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(1), 61-77.
Shen, H. H. (2005). ‘The first Taiwanese wives’ and ‘the Chinese mistresses’: the international division of labour in familial and intimate relations across the Taiwan Strait. Global networks, 5(4), 419-437.
Thai, Hung Cam. (2012). The dual roles of transnational daughters and transnational wives: monetary intentions, expectations and dilemmas. Global networks, 12(2), 216-232.
Tse, Justin KH, & Waters, Johanna L. (2013). Transnational youth transitions: becoming adults between Vancouver and Hong Kong. Global networks, 13(4), 535-550.
Uriely, Natan. (2001). ‘Travelling workers’ and ‘working tourists’: variations across the interaction between work and tourism. International Journal of Tourism Research, 3(1), 1-8.
Uy-Tioco, Cecilia. (2007). Overseas Filipino workers and text messaging: Reinventing transnational mothering. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 21(2), 253-265.
Vertovec, S. (2004). Cheap calls: the social glue of migrant transnationalism. Global networks, 4(2), 219-224.
Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. John Wiley & Sons.
Wang, Hong-zen, Chen, Po-wei & Tang, Anna WH. (2014). ‘Tactical resistances in daily politics: How do battered Vietnamese wives negotiate family and state tightropes in Taiwan?’ in Chiu, Kuei-fen, Dafydd, Fell & Lin, Ping (eds.) Migration to and from Taiwan. Routledge.
Waters, Johanna L. (2005). Transnational family strategies and education in the contemporary Chinese diaspora. Global networks, 5(4), 359-377.
Waters, J. L. (2006). Geographies of cultural capital: education, international migration and family strategies between Hong Kong and Canada. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(2), 179-192.
Wilding, Raelene. (2006). ‘Virtual’intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global networks, 6(2), 125-142.
Wimmer, Andreas, & Glick Schiller, Nina. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation–state building, migration and the social sciences. Global networks, 2(4), 301-334.
Yamanaka, K. (2005). Changing family structures of Nepalese transmigrants in Japan: split‐households and dual‐wage earners. Global networks, 5(4), 337-358.
Yang, C. C., Brown, B. B., & Braun, M. T. (2014). From Facebook to cell calls: Layers of electronic intimacy in college students’ interpersonal relationships. New Media & Society, 16(1), 5-23.
Yeoh, Brenda SA, Graham, Elspeth, & Boyle, Paul J. (2002). Migrations and family relations in the Asia Pacific region. Asian and pacific migration journal, 11(1), 1-12.
Yeoh, Brenda SA, Huang, Shirlena, & Lam, Theodora. (2005). Transnationalizing the ‘Asian’family: imaginaries, intimacies and strategic intents. Global networks, 5(4), 307-315.
Zelizer, V. (2007). The purchase of intimacy. Princeton University Press.
Zelizer, V. (2010). ‘Caring everywhere.’ in Boris & Parreñas (eds.) Intimate labors: cultures, technologies, and the politics of care, California: Standford University Press, 267-278.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
新聞研究所
101451002
103
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101451002
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 康庭瑜zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Kang, Ting Yuen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 許峯源zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsu, Feng Yuanen_US
dc.creator (作者) 許峯源zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Feng Yuanen_US
dc.date (日期) 2014en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-May-2015 11:30:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-May-2015 11:30:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-May-2015 11:30:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0101451002en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/74908-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 新聞研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101451002zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 103zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究藉由深度訪問18位前往澳洲打工旅遊的女兒，討論跨國家庭中的移民決策、跨國傳播與傳播科技分配的性別政治。本文理論視角強調跨國家庭的異質性。基於各成員如何理解赴澳打工旅遊的移民決策，以及跨國後的溝通責任、傳播科技資源的分配。分析中指出三點。第一，家庭策略與個人動機的協商過程中，赴澳打工旅遊者動用不同的溝通策略：選擇隱瞞或受保護論述，進而說服家庭。兩種策略建立於性別離／返的差異。第二，跨國溝通基於不同的移民決策過程，分為兩種詮釋，一為維繫親密關係，二為管教與監控。跨國溝通中，基於家庭的性別分工，依然是以母親作為主要的聯繫者。資料顯示受訪者對於父母的不同詮釋，形成不可欲的母職，以及工具性的父職，而父親由於缺席於跨國溝通中，被詮釋成「理性」的角色。第三，由於家庭成員的離家，導致傳播科技資源的重新分配。多數家庭中，母親較不會使用傳播科技，教導母親學習傳播科技時，母親則被描述為學不會，若教父親，則是不想學。基於以上三點，本文強調「跨國做家庭」時，性別不平等在跨國家庭中的重組，以及對於傳播科技資源分配之影響。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) By conducting 18 in-depth interviews with female working holiday makers, this thesis examines the gender politics of the decision-making process, transnational communication and communication technologies. In the fourth chapter, data shows the female working holiday makers use different communication strategies to negotiate with parents, especially when the personal agenda and family strategies are in conflict. The communication strategies are based on the gendered expectations in Taiwanese families. The informants utilize these expectations to convince their parents that working holiday benefits them.
In the fifth chapter, I analyze the continuing negotiation between parents and daughters. It affects the quality of transnational communication. It shows 2 different communication patterns. First of them is intimacy-maintaining and the other one is discipline/surveillance. Due to the gender division of domestic labor, in most of the Taiwanese families, the mothers make the transnational phone call, try to maintain intimacy with daughters in Australia. On one hand, the informants construe the intensive long-distance mothering as unwanted and emotional. On the other hand, the fathers are mostly absent in transnational communication. Compared with the mothers being too emotional, the informants interpret this absence as “rational.”
I examine the politics of communication technologies in the sixth chapter. When the family is ‘transnationalizing,’ the family members have the opportunity to gain more access to ICTs. This study identifies the different gendered processes of digital empowerment. Firstly, mothers are less expected to be tech-savvy in the process of bridging digital divide. When the family is transnationalizing, the ICTs are indispensable to parents for maintaining intimacy. Therefore, the less tech-savvy parents are taught how to use the ICTs to communicate with transnational daughters. However, mothers are always described as “clumsy” and “can not learn it well” while fathers are expected to be more interested in ICTs, especially in computers. Secondly, fathers are still considered more tech-savvy regardless of their actual capability. A few informants find their fathers do not use ICTs as well as their mothers do, they construe their fathers as “not wanting to learn” rather than “not able to learn it well.” In the process of bridging digital divide in transnational families, the ICTs are still part of the masculine culture that discourages mothers from further digital empowerment. Except for the discouragement in the gendered process, few of my informants’ mothers are more structurally limited. I use the term “gendered mobility” to describe the structural limitation on mothers’ access to ICTs. Gendered mobility refers to how mothers’ geographical mobility is limited to family space and depends on other family members, such as husbands or children. Therefore, the ICTs, especially mobile devices, are not necessary for mothers, because of their limited mobility. Most of the mothers need social support to access ICTs for transnational communication.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、緒論 5
一、研究背景 5
二、問題意識 8
三、章節安排 9
貳、文獻回顧 11
一、跨國家庭：家庭策略與個人動機 11
二、跨國家庭的台灣脈絡 14
三、背包裡的家庭：家庭的跨國溝通 15
四、傳播科技與親密關係： 18
五、小結與研究問題 23
參、研究方法 24
一、滾雪球抽樣 24
二、受訪者描述 25
三、深度訪談 26
四、資料過錄與分析 28
五、研究倫理：知情同意與匿名 29
肆、赴澳打工的家庭協商與溝通 30
一、離家協商的背景 30
(一)、家庭策略與個人動機衝突 30
(二)、離／返的性別差異 31
二、女兒的論述策略 33
(一)、隱瞞經濟動機的論述策略 33
(二)、保證受保護的論述策略 36
三、文化資本的代間溝通 38
四、小結 43
伍、跨國做家庭：性別化的跨國溝通 45
一、不可欲母職（unwanted mothering） 46
(一)、不可欲母職與女兒的工作狀態 46
(二)、瑣碎化母職 50
二、跨國做女兒 51
(一)、道德論述與跨國溝通 51
(二)、跨國情緒管理 54
(三)、性別化的跨國溝通：來自女兒的證據 57
三、女兒的技術：傳播科技的選用與避用 60
(一)、迴避的策略 61
(二)、親密的科技（intimate technologies） 66
四、工具性父職 68
五、小結 70
陸、父母的傳播科技：家中傳播科技的性別政治 72
一、家庭中數位落差的性別政治 73
(一)、橋接（bridging）數位落差 73
(二)、數位落差的性別政治：性別化移動力與身體 79
(三)、暫時的數位賦權 83
二、小結 84
柒、結論：跨國做家庭 86
一、跨國做家庭：跨國家庭的代間與性別政治 87
二、虛擬親密的科技面向：性別化的傳播科技 88
三、研究限制與未來研究建議 91
參考文獻 93
附錄一：半結構訪談大綱 98		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1527505 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101451002en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 跨國家庭zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 跨國溝通zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 傳播科技zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 性別政治zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Transnational familyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Transnational communicationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Communication technologiesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Gender politicsen_US
dc.title (題名) 跨國做家庭：傳播科技的性別政治zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Doing family in a transnational context: the gender politics of communication technologiesen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王宏仁、郭佩宜（主編）（2009）。《流轉跨界：跨國的台灣．台灣的跨國》。台北：中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心亞太區域研究專題中心。
王俐容、王維菁、朱淑娟（2008）。〈跨國性社群電視媒體初探-以「台灣媳婦」為例〉，《中華傳播學刊》，14：267-314。
成令方、吳嘉苓（2004）。〈科技的性別政治：理論和研究的回顧〉，《科技、醫療與社會》，3：51-112。
林宇玲（2002）。《網路與性別》。台北：華之鳳科技出版。
林如萍（2012）。〈台灣家庭的代間關係與代間互動類型之變遷趨勢〉，伊慶春、章英華（編），《台灣的社會變遷1985-2005：家庭與婚姻，台灣社會變遷基本調查系列三之1》， 頁75-124。台北：中研院社研所 。
林宗弘、洪敬舒、李建泓、王兆慶、張烽益（2011）。《崩世代：財團化、貧窮化與少子女化的危機》。台灣勞工陣線。
林宗弘（2012）。〈非關上網？台灣的社會落差與網路使用的社會後果 〉，《台灣社會學 》，24：55-97。
林群穎（2013）。《跨國分偶家庭之親子關係：以台商台幹家庭為例》。清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
曾嬿芬（2008）。〈移住／居台灣－移民社會學〉，謝國雄（編），《群學爭鳴：台灣社會學發展史，1945-2005》， 頁524-551。台北：群學。
夏曉鵑（2002）。《流離尋岸：資本國際化下的「外籍新娘」現象》。台北：台灣社會研究社。
蔡綿綿（2010）。《遠距母職：旅台菲籍勞工使用網路溝通履行母職的分析》。政治大學國際傳播英語碩士學位學程。
藍佩嘉（2002）。〈跨越國界的生命地圖：菲籍家務移工的流動與認同〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，48：169-218。
藍佩嘉（2008）。《跨國灰姑娘：當東南亞幫傭遇上台灣新富家庭》。台北：行人文化實驗室。
藍佩嘉，2009，〈當大學生菲傭遇見台灣新富雇主：跨國語言資本中介的階級畫界〉。收錄於《流轉跨界：跨國的台灣，台灣的跨國》，王宏仁、郭佩宜編，頁35-71，台北：中研院。
Australia Department of Immigration and Border Protection (2014) Australia’s Migration Trends 2012-13. Retrieved from http://www.immi.gov.au/pub-res/Documents/statistics/migration-trends-2012-13.pdf
Australia Department of Immigration and Border Protection (2013) Australia’s Migration Trends 2011-12. Retrieved from http://www.immi.gov.au/media/publications/statistics/immigration-update/australian-migration-trends-2011-12.pdf
Australia Department of Immigration and Border Protection (2012) Trends in Migration: Australia 2010-11. Retrieved from http://www.immi.gov.au/media/publications/statistics/trends-in-migration/trends-in-migration-2010-11.pdf
Asis, Maruja M.B. (2002). From the life stories of Filipino women: personal and family agendas in migration. Asian and pacific migration journal, 11(1), 67-94.
Baldassar, Loretta. (2007). Transnational families and aged care: the mobility of care and the migrancy of ageing. Journal of Ethnic and Migration studies, 33(2), 275-297.
Baldassar, Loretta. (2008). Missing kin and longing to be together: emotions and the construction of co-presence in transnational relationships. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29(3), 247-266.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). ‘The forms of capital’ in J. G. Richardson (ed.) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, NY: Greenwood Press, 241-58.
Chee, Maria W. L (2005). Taiwanese American transnational families : women and kin work. Routledge, New York
Chib, Arul, Malik, Shelly, Aricat, Rajiv George, & Kadir, Siti Zubeidah. (2014). Migrant mothering and mobile phones: Negotiations of transnational identity. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(1), 73-93.
Clarke, Nick. (2004a). Free independent travellers? British working holiday makers in Australia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4), 499-509.
Clarke, Nick. (2004b). Mobility, fixity, agency: Australia`s working holiday programme. Population, Space and Place, 10(5), 411-420.
Clarke, Nick. (2005). Detailing transnational lives of the middle: British working holiday makers in Australia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration studies, 31(2), 307-322.
Emerson, Robert M, Fretz, Rachel I, & Shaw, Linda L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes: University of Chicago Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: self, and society in the late modern age. Polity.
Hannaford, Dinah. (2014). Technologies of the spouse: intimate surveillance in Senegalese transnational marriages. Global networks, n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/glob.12045
Ho, C. (2006). Migration as feminisation? Chinese women`s experiences of work and family in Australia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(3), 497-514.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette, & Avila, Ernestine. (1997). “I`m Here, but I`m There” The Meanings of Latina Transnational Motherhood. Gender & Society, 11(5), 548-571.
Horst, Heather A. (2006). The blessings and burdens of communication: cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global networks, 6(2), 143-159.
Huang, Shirlena, & Yeoh, Brenda SA. (2005). Transnational families and their children`s education: China`s ‘study mothers’ in Singapore. Global networks, 5(4), 379-400.
Hugo, Graeme. (2006). Temporary migration and the labour market in Australia. Australian Geographer, 37(2), 211-231.
Hugo, Graeme, & Young, Soogil. (2008). Labour Mobility in the Asia-Pacific Region: Dynamics, Issues and a New APEC Agenda: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Ichimoto, Takae. (2004). Ambivalent ‘selves’ in transition: A case study of Japanese women studying in Australian universities. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 25(3), 247-269.
Kang, Tingyu. (2012). Gendered media, changing intimacy: internet-mediated transnational communication in the family sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 34(2), 146-161.
Kawashima, Kumiko. (2010). Japanese Working Holiday Makers in Australia and their Relationship to the Japanese Labour Market: Before and After. Asian Studies Review, 34(3), 267-286.
Kim, Youna. (2010). Female individualization?: Transnational mobility and media consumption of Asian women. Media, Culture & Society, 32(1), 25-43. doi: 10.1177/0163443709350096
Lan, Pei-Chia. (2002). Subcontracting filial piety elder care in ethnic Chinese immigrant families in California. Journal of Family Issues, 23(7), 812-835.
Lan, Pei-Chia. (2006). Global Cinderellas: Migrant domestics and newly rich employers in Taiwan: Duke University Press.
Le Espiritu, Yen. (2002). Filipino Navy stewards and Filipina health care professionals: Immigration, work and family relations. Asian and pacific migration journal, 11(1), 47-66.
Madianou, Mirca. (2012). Migration and the accentuated ambivalence of motherhood: the role of ICTs in Filipino transnational families. Global networks, 12(3), 277-295.
Madianou, Mirca, & Miller, Daniel. (2011). Mobile phone parenting: Reconfiguring relationships between Filipina migrant mothers and their left-behind children. new media & society, 13(3), 457-470.
Madianou, Mirca, & Miller, Daniel. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. Routledge.
Madianou, Mirca, & Miller, Daniel. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies,16(2), 169-187.
Manalansan, Martin F. (2006). Queer intersections: Sexuality and gender in migration studies. International Migration Review, 40(1), 224-249.
McKay, Deirdre. (2007). ‘Sending Dollars Shows Feeling’–Emotions and Economies in Filipino Migration. Mobilities, 2(2), 175-194.
Oke, Nicole. (2012). Temporary Migration, Transnational Politics? The Politics of Temporary Migration in Australia. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(1), 85-101. doi: 10.1080/07256868.2012.633318
Panagakos, Anastasia N, & Horst, Heather A. (2006). Return to Cyberia: technology and the social worlds of transnational migrants. Global networks, 6(2), 109-124.
Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families. Feminist studies, 361-390.
Parreñas, Rhacel. (2005). Long distance intimacy: class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. Global networks, 5(4), 317-336.
Pessar, P. and Mahler, S. (2003) ‘Transnational migration: bringing gender in’, International Migration Review, 37(3): 812-46.
Portes, Alejandro, Guarnizo, Luis E, & Landolt, Patricia. (1999). The study of transnationalism: pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 217-237.
Pribilsky, Jason. (2004). ‘Aprendemos A Convivir’: Conjugal Relations, Co‐parenting, and Family Life Among Ecuadorian Transnational Migrants in New York and The Ecuadorian Andes. Global networks, 4(3), 313-334.
Rice, Kathleen. (2010). `Working on Holiday`: Relationships between Tourism and Work among Young Canadians in Edinburgh. Anthropology in Action, 17(1).
Ryan, L., Sales, R., Tilki, M., & Siara, B. (2009). Family strategies and transnational migration: recent Polish migrants in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(1), 61-77.
Shen, H. H. (2005). ‘The first Taiwanese wives’ and ‘the Chinese mistresses’: the international division of labour in familial and intimate relations across the Taiwan Strait. Global networks, 5(4), 419-437.
Thai, Hung Cam. (2012). The dual roles of transnational daughters and transnational wives: monetary intentions, expectations and dilemmas. Global networks, 12(2), 216-232.
Tse, Justin KH, & Waters, Johanna L. (2013). Transnational youth transitions: becoming adults between Vancouver and Hong Kong. Global networks, 13(4), 535-550.
Uriely, Natan. (2001). ‘Travelling workers’ and ‘working tourists’: variations across the interaction between work and tourism. International Journal of Tourism Research, 3(1), 1-8.
Uy-Tioco, Cecilia. (2007). Overseas Filipino workers and text messaging: Reinventing transnational mothering. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 21(2), 253-265.
Vertovec, S. (2004). Cheap calls: the social glue of migrant transnationalism. Global networks, 4(2), 219-224.
Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. John Wiley & Sons.
Wang, Hong-zen, Chen, Po-wei & Tang, Anna WH. (2014). ‘Tactical resistances in daily politics: How do battered Vietnamese wives negotiate family and state tightropes in Taiwan?’ in Chiu, Kuei-fen, Dafydd, Fell & Lin, Ping (eds.) Migration to and from Taiwan. Routledge.
Waters, Johanna L. (2005). Transnational family strategies and education in the contemporary Chinese diaspora. Global networks, 5(4), 359-377.
Waters, J. L. (2006). Geographies of cultural capital: education, international migration and family strategies between Hong Kong and Canada. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(2), 179-192.
Wilding, Raelene. (2006). ‘Virtual’intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global networks, 6(2), 125-142.
Wimmer, Andreas, & Glick Schiller, Nina. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation–state building, migration and the social sciences. Global networks, 2(4), 301-334.
Yamanaka, K. (2005). Changing family structures of Nepalese transmigrants in Japan: split‐households and dual‐wage earners. Global networks, 5(4), 337-358.
Yang, C. C., Brown, B. B., & Braun, M. T. (2014). From Facebook to cell calls: Layers of electronic intimacy in college students’ interpersonal relationships. New Media & Society, 16(1), 5-23.
Yeoh, Brenda SA, Graham, Elspeth, & Boyle, Paul J. (2002). Migrations and family relations in the Asia Pacific region. Asian and pacific migration journal, 11(1), 1-12.
Yeoh, Brenda SA, Huang, Shirlena, & Lam, Theodora. (2005). Transnationalizing the ‘Asian’family: imaginaries, intimacies and strategic intents. Global networks, 5(4), 307-315.
Zelizer, V. (2007). The purchase of intimacy. Princeton University Press.
Zelizer, V. (2010). ‘Caring everywhere.’ in Boris & Parreñas (eds.) Intimate labors: cultures, technologies, and the politics of care, California: Standford University Press, 267-278.		zh_TW