| dc.contributor | 中文系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | Benesova, J. | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 裴海燕 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2010 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 21-May-2015 15:10:37 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 21-May-2015 15:10:37 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 21-May-2015 15:10:37 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/75206 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The commonly encountered account of the postmodern (including postmodernist cultural practices) is the one based on (or very similar to) Fredric Jameson`s view of postmodernism as representing the logic of late capitalism and being defined by the issues of surface, pastiche and paranoia. This also includes Jameson`s criticism of postmodernism`s supposed ahistoricity (or belief that when it uses history, it does so in a naïve and sentimentally nostalgic way). Such is also the prevalent definition of the postmodern in Taiwan, most recently adopted, for example, in Liu Liangya`s new publication, Postmodernism and Postcolonialism: Taiwanese Fiction since 1987. Offering an alternative view, this article deploys Linda Hutcheon`s project of "problematics" of postmodernism to argue that as opposed to the more or less dualistic view of postmodern vs. postcolonial tendencies in contemporary Taiwanese fiction (especially as regards postmodernism`s relation to history) it is also possible to describe the constant revisiting of the past in numerous novels by different authors in post-martial-law Taiwan in terms of Hutcheon`s "postmodern historiographic metafiction." This thesis is further demonstrated by means of an analysis of a short story by Lai Xiangyin. | |
| dc.format.extent | 176 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | Archiv Orientalni, Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages 303-319 | |
| dc.title (題名) | Whosestory is it? - Postmodernism, history and "historiographic metafiction" in the context of Taiwanese literature | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | en |
