學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 Opposition to the Libyan intervention among the American public
作者 Lorenzo, David J.
如大維
貢獻者 外交系
關鍵詞 American Foreign Policy;Policy Arguments;Military Interventions;Democratic Peace Theory;Discursive Institutionalism
日期 2014-01
上傳時間 16-Jun-2015 17:07:25 (UTC+8)
摘要 Using submissions to internet fora as data, this essay explores arguments members of the American public used to oppose the US intervention in Libya. Beyond revealing the various types of oppositional arguments that were employed, examination of these arguments suggests reasons, in addition to institutional obstacles, why the opposition may have had little effect on the federal government`s decisions to engage in this and similar interventions. Those additional explanatory factors are the fragmentary nature of the opposition and the deployment of non-mainstream arguments that allow political figures to ignore the opposition as politically marginal.
關聯 Tamkang Journal of International Affairs, 17(3), 1-39
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 外交系
dc.creator (作者) Lorenzo, David J.
dc.creator (作者) 如大維zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2014-01
dc.date.accessioned 16-Jun-2015 17:07:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 16-Jun-2015 17:07:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 16-Jun-2015 17:07:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/75855-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Using submissions to internet fora as data, this essay explores arguments members of the American public used to oppose the US intervention in Libya. Beyond revealing the various types of oppositional arguments that were employed, examination of these arguments suggests reasons, in addition to institutional obstacles, why the opposition may have had little effect on the federal government`s decisions to engage in this and similar interventions. Those additional explanatory factors are the fragmentary nature of the opposition and the deployment of non-mainstream arguments that allow political figures to ignore the opposition as politically marginal.
dc.format.extent 438143 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) Tamkang Journal of International Affairs, 17(3), 1-39
dc.subject (關鍵詞) American Foreign Policy;Policy Arguments;Military Interventions;Democratic Peace Theory;Discursive Institutionalism
dc.title (題名) Opposition to the Libyan intervention among the American public
dc.type (資料類型) articleen