Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 立體顯像對使用者心流經驗之探究－以環形互動空間的數位遊戲為例
A Research of User`s Flow Experience for Stereoscopics: A Case Study on Interactive Digital Game Using Circular Projection.作者 任偉強
Jen, Wei Chiang貢獻者 黃心健<br>張寶芳
Huang, Hsin Chien<br>Chang, Pao Fang
任偉強
Jen, Wei Chiang關鍵詞 心流經驗
立體顯像
遊戲心流
數位遊戲
主動式快門立體眼鏡ㄑ
flow experience
stereoscopic
gameflow
digital game
active shutter 3D glasses日期 2015 上傳時間 27-Jul-2015 11:37:27 (UTC+8) 摘要 隨著數位內容的發展，電腦視覺與圖學這兩大領域正進行技術上的整合。遊戲不斷追求畫質與效能突破的同時，顯像設備擔任的角色更顯為重要，以輔助使用者的角度出發，營造數位遊戲中的深度感，探討立體顯像技術如何對使用者的心流經驗中的心流特徵三項構面，樂趣感、控制感與投入感產生影響。此外，設計符合遊戲心流的數位遊戲，並於環形互動空間中，讓使用者穿戴主動式快門立體眼鏡來體驗遊戲。 本研究包含五個階段，依序為分析規劃、設計開發、前測評估、遊戲評估、歸納結論。在分析規劃階段中，透過文獻探討歸納出立體顯像的視覺原理與心流經驗的研究方法，並在設計開發階段中，以Unity 3D引擎作為遊戲開發環境，以Kinect體感感測器作為使用者的操作介面，立體顯像設備則以主動式快門立體眼鏡與三台短焦型立體投影機做環形投影融接，期望達到更好的評估結果。於前測評估階段中，請10位受測者做遊戲立體顯像的影像錯位設定，以及使用者與環形螢幕距離的評估與測試，得到結果後再進行相關遊戲數據的修改。遊戲評估階段，以參與活動調查法並使用問券與訪談，對12位受測者進行研究。最後在歸納結論階段，根據遊戲評估階段所得到的結果做分析，整理並歸納結論。 本研究結果發現，立體顯像能帶給使用者更多的樂趣感與投入感，但在控制感方面研究結果並不顯著。另外在立體顯像的遊戲建構設計，遊戲物件透過明確的位置設計安排，可以讓使用者能感受到更明確的層次感。以及藉由環形互動空間能夠給予使用者包覆感、遊戲的臨場感，以及舞台感。最後，期望本研究的遊戲設計過程與環形互動空間實作經驗，能提供建議給未來研究做參考。
With the development of digital content, computer vision and computer graphics are going through the technical integration. While people keep working on improving picture quality and efficiency of video games, it shows the importance of display device. From user’s perspective, it creates a sense of depth in digital game and find out how stereoscopic influences user’s flow experience of enjoyment, control and engagement. In addition, I designed the digital game in accordance with gameflow model and let users wear active shutter 3D glasses to experience the game in immersive projection wall. This research includes 5 phases: Planning and Analyzing, Designing and Developing, Pretesting, Assess game and Conclusion. During planning and analyzing phase, I discover the visual principle of designing the stereo images of the game and the research method of flow experience by literature review. Furthermore, during designing and developing phase, I use Unity 3D engine as games developing environment and Kinect sensor as user operation interface. Also, I use NVIDIA 3D Vision active shutter 3D glasses and 3 short throw stereo projectors as a stereo display equipment to do the circular projection blend / warp so that it could reach a better result. During pretesting, I invited 10 users to execute 5 levels of stereoscopic and determine the distance between the user and the screen. Finally, I obtained user feedback to improve the digital game. During assess game phase, I use participatory active survey, questionnaires and interviews to research on 12 users. Lastly, during conclusion phase, I analyze it according to the result from assess game phase, organizing it and make the conclusion. This study found that stereoscopic can bring more enjoyment and engagement to users but it’s not that distinctive when it comes to control. Moreover, the concept about the stereoscopic of the spatial construction, the direct design and the suitable arrangement of the game objects may make the users feel the different space hierarchy. By using circular projection, users could immerse themselves in the game, experience more scene feeling and the sense of being on the stage. Finally, I hope my study of the process of game design and practical experience of circular projection could provide an important reference for future research.參考文獻 Buckingham, D. (2006). Studying computer games. In D. Carr, D. Buckingham, A. Burn, & G. Schott(Eds.), Computer games: Text, narrative and play. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Caillois, Roger. (1958). Man, play and games(M. Brarash, Trans.),Urbana, IL : University of Illinois Press.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). BEYOND BOREDOM AND ANXIETY. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Massimini, F. (1985). On the psychological selection of bio-cultural information. New Ideas in Psychology.Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (1988). Optimal experience: psychological.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). flow: the psychology of optimal experience. (Harper and Row, New York)Crawford, C. (1990). Lessons from Computer Game Design. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.Clarke, S. G., & Haworth, J. T. (1994). Flow Experience in the Daily Lives of 6-th-Form College-students. British Journal of Psychology.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life: Basic Books.Elizabeth J. Lyons, Deborah F. Tate, Dianne S. Ward, Kurt M. Ribisl, J. Michael Bowling, Sriram Kalyanaraman. (2014). Engagement, Enjoyment, and Energy Expenditure During Active Video Game Play.Health Psychol. Health Psychology, Vol. 33.Guilford, J.P. & Hoepfner, R. (1971). The Analysis of Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Gary D. Ellis, J. E. V. (1994). Measurement and analysis issues with explanation of variance in daily experience using the flow model. Journal of Leisure Research.Geoff Howland. (1998). Game design: The essence of computer games. Retrieved April, 25, 2006.Gonzalo Frasca. (2001). Videogames of the Oppressed: Videogames as a Means for Critical Thinking and Debate. Unpublished Masters thesis. Atlanta, GA:Georgia Institute of Technology.Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model. Simulation & Gaming.Greg Costikyan. (2002).“I Have No Words & I Must Design,” In Mäyrä, F. Conference Proceedings of Computer Games and Digital Cultures, Tampere University. Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Peralta, M. (1999). Building Consumer Trust Online. Communications of the ACM.Hsiang Chen, R.T. Wigand, M.S. Nilan. (1999). Optimal experience of web activities. Computers in Human Behavior.Hunicke R. & Chapman V. (2004). AI for Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment in Games. Challenges in Game Artificial Intelligence AAAI Workshop. San Jose.Julesz, B. (1971). Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Jane Webster, Linda Klebe Trevino & Lisa Ryan. (1993).“The Dimensionality and Correlates of Flow in Human-Computer Interactions,”Computers in Human Behavior.James E. Cutting and Peter M. Vishton. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances:The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. Perception of space and motion. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Johnson, Daniel M. and Wiles, Janet. (2003) Effective Affective User Interface Design in Games.Kephart, Newell C. (1960). The slow learner in the classroom.Oxford, England: Charles E. Merrill.Katie Salen Tekinbas & Eric Zimmerman. (2003). Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.L. Hill, A. Jacobs. (2006). 3-D Liquid Crystal Displays and Their Applications, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94.Linda Klebe Trevino & Jane Webster. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research.Massimini, F. & Carli, M. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience, in Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds).Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality.Murray J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. Baltimore & London: The MIT Press.Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (1997). Measuring the Flow Experience Among Web Users. Paper presented at the Interval Research Corporation.Novak, P. T., Hoffman, L. D., & Yung, Y. F. (1999). Measuring the flow construct in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Unpublished manuscript.Nick Holliman. (2005). 3D Display Systems.University of Durham,Science Laboratories.Payne, V. G. & Isaacs, L. D. (2002). Human motor development. Boston: McGraw Hill.Pearce, J.M., Ainley, M. & Howard, S. (2004). The Ebb and Flow of Online Learning. Computers in Human Behavior.Ravin Balakrishnan, George W. Fitzmaurice, Gordon Kurtenbach. (2001). User Interfaces for Volumetric Displays,IEEE Computer, March 2001.Stephen K. Reed. (1988). Cognition: Theories and Applications.Cengage Learning.Shaun P. Vecera, Edward K. Vogel, and Geoffrey F. Woodman. (2002). Lower Region: A New Cue for Figure–Ground Assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General ,Vol. 131.Sherman, W. R. & Craig, A. B. (2003). Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, and Design, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Sweetser, P. M, & Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: A Model for Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games.ACM Computers in Entertainment. New York: ACM Press.Thompson, M., Nordin, I., Cairns, P. (2012). Effect of touch-screen size on game immersion. In Proc. of BCS HCI 2012, BCS.熊祥林（1971）。完形論。台北：大光華印務部。游恒山（譯）（1990）。心理學（原作者：Philip G. Zimbardo /著）。台北：五南圖書。鍾聖校（1992）。認知心理學。台北：心理出版社。張定綺（譯）（1993）。快樂，從心開始（原作者：Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi /著 1990）。台北：天下文化。鄭麗玉（1993）。認知心理學－理論與應用－。台北：五南圖書。洪蘭（譯）（1997）。心理學（原作者：Henry Gleitman /著）。台北：遠流出版社。陳秀娟（譯）（1998）。生命的心流。追求忘我專注的圓融生活（原作者：Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi /著1997）。台北：天下遠見。李姍姍（譯）（1998）。完形心理學（原作者：Wolfgang Köhler /著）。台北：桂冠圖書。杜明城（譯）（1999）。創造力（原作者：Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi /著1999）。台北：時報出版。梁寶珍、劉玲珍（譯）（1999）。英漢雙解活用詞典（原作者：Della Summers / 著）。台北：朗文出版。李江山、孫慶文、陳一平、陳建中、黃淑麗、黃榮村、葉素玲、襲充文、櫻井. 正二郎（1999）。視覺與認知–視覺知覺與視覺運動系統。台北：遠流出版。周宣光（2000）。虛擬實境系統的開發模式與應用。技術學刊。黎煒（譯）（2000）。格式塔心理學原理（上）（原作者：Kurt Koffka /著）。台北：昭明出版社。黎煒（譯）（2000）。格式塔心理學原理（下）（原作者：Kurt Koffka /著）。台北：昭明出版社。劉榮政（2001）。平面螢幕之立體影像設計。碩士論文，中央大學。蔣載榮（2002）。觀、念、攝影：影像的視覺心理剖析。台北：雪嶺文化。梁耘瑭（譯）（2003）。視覺藝術認知（原作者：Robert L. Solso /著）。台北：全華科技圖書。陳芸芸（譯）（2003）。視覺文化導論（原作者：Nicholas Mirzoeff /著）。台北：韋伯文化國際。游梓翔、劉文英、廖婉如（譯）（2003）。人際關係與溝通技巧（原作者：Julia T.Wood /著）。台北：雙葉書廊。蔡朝旭、陳政寰（2004）。立體顯示器技術。光電科技資料叢書之三十三。行政院國科會光電小組。林瑋祥（2005）。網站上沉浸理論對顧客忠誠建立之影響－以「無名小站」為例。碩士論文，逢甲大學。吳麗媛、楊淑朱、楊承達、楊曉苓、林妙徽、林玉霞、梁珀華(譯)（2005）。幼兒遊戲與發展理論（原作者：Joe L.Frost, Sue C.Wortham & Stuart Reifel /著）。台北：華騰文化。吳雨青（2008）。多視點立體顯示器之影像合成技術。碩士論文，成功大學。黃軍富（2009）。心流路徑研究方法論－以休閒遊戲玩家為例。碩士論文，交通大學。黃怡菁、黃乙白、謝漢萍（2010）。3D立體顯示技術。科學發展期刊，451期。蘇志昇（2011）。腦．網路．Myself。台北：秀威資訊科技。陳一平（2011）。視覺心理學。台北：雙葉書廊。王偉存（2011）。遊戲回饋機制對玩家自我調節與遊戲經驗的影響─以音樂節奏遊戲為例。碩士論文，交通大學。吳亨英、吳莉君（譯）（2011）。設計的法則（原作者：William Lidwell & Kritina Holden /著）。台北：原點出版。陳永國（譯）（2012）。圖像學：形象‧文本‧意識形態（原作者：Mitchell, W.J.T /著）。吳麗雪（2012）。3D立體電影的四維觀察。朝陽人文社會學刊，第十卷第一期。謝葆如（2012）。淺談3D顯示光學膜材料。工業材料雜誌 306 期。趙慧芬、林潔盈、吳莉君（譯）（2012）。設計的方法（原作者：Bella Martin & Bruce Hanington /著）。台北：原點出版。孫春在（2013）。遊戲式數位學習。台北：高等教育文化。 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
數位內容碩士學位學程
1004620003資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100462003 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 黃心健<br>張寶芳 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Huang, Hsin Chien<br>Chang, Pao Fang en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 任偉強 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Jen, Wei Chiang en_US dc.creator (作者) 任偉強 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Jen, Wei Chiang en_US dc.date (日期) 2015 en_US dc.date.accessioned 27-Jul-2015 11:37:27 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 27-Jul-2015 11:37:27 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 27-Jul-2015 11:37:27 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0100462003 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76951 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 數位內容碩士學位學程 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 1004620003 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著數位內容的發展，電腦視覺與圖學這兩大領域正進行技術上的整合。遊戲不斷追求畫質與效能突破的同時，顯像設備擔任的角色更顯為重要，以輔助使用者的角度出發，營造數位遊戲中的深度感，探討立體顯像技術如何對使用者的心流經驗中的心流特徵三項構面，樂趣感、控制感與投入感產生影響。此外，設計符合遊戲心流的數位遊戲，並於環形互動空間中，讓使用者穿戴主動式快門立體眼鏡來體驗遊戲。 本研究包含五個階段，依序為分析規劃、設計開發、前測評估、遊戲評估、歸納結論。在分析規劃階段中，透過文獻探討歸納出立體顯像的視覺原理與心流經驗的研究方法，並在設計開發階段中，以Unity 3D引擎作為遊戲開發環境，以Kinect體感感測器作為使用者的操作介面，立體顯像設備則以主動式快門立體眼鏡與三台短焦型立體投影機做環形投影融接，期望達到更好的評估結果。於前測評估階段中，請10位受測者做遊戲立體顯像的影像錯位設定，以及使用者與環形螢幕距離的評估與測試，得到結果後再進行相關遊戲數據的修改。遊戲評估階段，以參與活動調查法並使用問券與訪談，對12位受測者進行研究。最後在歸納結論階段，根據遊戲評估階段所得到的結果做分析，整理並歸納結論。 本研究結果發現，立體顯像能帶給使用者更多的樂趣感與投入感，但在控制感方面研究結果並不顯著。另外在立體顯像的遊戲建構設計，遊戲物件透過明確的位置設計安排，可以讓使用者能感受到更明確的層次感。以及藉由環形互動空間能夠給予使用者包覆感、遊戲的臨場感，以及舞台感。最後，期望本研究的遊戲設計過程與環形互動空間實作經驗，能提供建議給未來研究做參考。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) With the development of digital content, computer vision and computer graphics are going through the technical integration. While people keep working on improving picture quality and efficiency of video games, it shows the importance of display device. From user’s perspective, it creates a sense of depth in digital game and find out how stereoscopic influences user’s flow experience of enjoyment, control and engagement. In addition, I designed the digital game in accordance with gameflow model and let users wear active shutter 3D glasses to experience the game in immersive projection wall. This research includes 5 phases: Planning and Analyzing, Designing and Developing, Pretesting, Assess game and Conclusion. During planning and analyzing phase, I discover the visual principle of designing the stereo images of the game and the research method of flow experience by literature review. Furthermore, during designing and developing phase, I use Unity 3D engine as games developing environment and Kinect sensor as user operation interface. Also, I use NVIDIA 3D Vision active shutter 3D glasses and 3 short throw stereo projectors as a stereo display equipment to do the circular projection blend / warp so that it could reach a better result. During pretesting, I invited 10 users to execute 5 levels of stereoscopic and determine the distance between the user and the screen. Finally, I obtained user feedback to improve the digital game. During assess game phase, I use participatory active survey, questionnaires and interviews to research on 12 users. Lastly, during conclusion phase, I analyze it according to the result from assess game phase, organizing it and make the conclusion. This study found that stereoscopic can bring more enjoyment and engagement to users but it’s not that distinctive when it comes to control. Moreover, the concept about the stereoscopic of the spatial construction, the direct design and the suitable arrangement of the game objects may make the users feel the different space hierarchy. By using circular projection, users could immerse themselves in the game, experience more scene feeling and the sense of being on the stage. Finally, I hope my study of the process of game design and practical experience of circular projection could provide an important reference for future research. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 謝辭 ... i中文摘要 ... ii英文摘要 ... iii目錄 ... vi表目錄 ... vii圖目錄 ... ix第一章 緒論 ... 11.1 研究背景 ... 11.2 研究動機 ... 11.3 研究目的 ... 21.4 研究架構 ... 31.5 研究範圍和限制 ... 41.6 名詞界定與釋義 ... 5第二章 文獻探討 ... 72.1 人類立體視覺原理 ... 72.1.1 立體感的深度線索 ... 72.1.2 立體視覺的形成 ... 152.2 立體顯像技術探討 ... 182.2.1 平面螢幕顯示立體原理 ... 182.2.2 立體顯像發展概況 ... 212.2.3 立體顯像的技術難題 ... 312.3 視覺認知與知覺組織 ... 342.3.1 視覺訊息認知與處理 ... 342.3.2 感覺與知覺 ... 362.3.3 知覺的組織－完形心理學 ... 372.3.4 知覺與動作反應 ... 432.4 心流經驗 ... 452.4.1 心流經驗的定義 ... 452.4.2 心流狀態與心流頻道模型 ... 452.4.3 心流特徵 ... 492.4.4 心流活動下的遊戲 ... 522.4.5 心流經驗的測量 ... 542.5 數位遊戲 ... 552.5.1 數位遊戲的定義 ... 552.5.2 數位遊戲中的心流經驗 ... 582.5.3 數位遊戲的設計－gameflow ... 59第三章 研究方法 ... 643.1 研究流程與步驟 ... 653.1.1 分析規劃階段 ... 663.1.2 設計開發階段 ... 663.1.3 前測評估階段 ... 673.1.4 遊戲評估階段 ... 673.1.5 歸納結論 ... 673.2 研究問題 ... 673.3 研究對象 ... 68第四章 數位遊戲與環形互動空間的建構設計 ... 694.1 設計開發階段 ... 694.1.1 數位遊戲的建構設計 ... 694.1.2 數位遊戲的圖像設計 ... 804.1.3 數位遊戲的立體顯像空間建構 ... 834.1.4 環形互動空間的建構 ... 1004.2 前測評估階段 ... 1104.2.1 前測評估對象 ... 1104.2.2 前測評估流程 ... 1114.2.3 前測評估問卷 ... 1134.2.4 前測評估分析 ... 1144.2.5 前測評估結果 ... 119第五章 研究結果與分析 ... 1225.1 遊戲評估階段 ... 1225.1.1 遊戲評估對象 ... 1225.1.2 遊戲評估流程 ... 1235.1.3 心流經驗評估問卷 ... 1245.1.4 訪談問題 ... 1255.2 評估資料分析 ... 1265.2.1 問券資料整理與分析 ... 1265.2.2 訪談資料整理與分析 ... 1335.3 遊戲評估觀察記錄 ... 136第六章 結論與建議 ... 1386.1 研究發現與討論 ... 1386.2 未來研究建議 ... 140參考文獻 ... 143英文部分 ... 143中文部分 ... 146網路資料部分 ... 148附錄一 環形互動空間的架設 ... 149附錄二 前測評估流程說明頁 ... 151附錄三 心流經驗評估流程說明頁 ... 152附錄四 前測評估問卷 ... 153附錄五 心流經驗A組評估問卷 ... 155附錄六 心流經驗B組評估問卷 ... 158附錄七 遊戲操作教學 ... 161附錄八 環形互動空間的數位遊戲情境 ... 164附錄九 數位遊戲說明海報 ... 166附錄十 遊戲實際影片與製作過程 ... 167附錄十一 使用者站立位置標記 ... 168 zh_TW dc.format.extent 92936548 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100462003 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 心流經驗 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 立體顯像 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 遊戲心流 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 數位遊戲 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 主動式快門立體眼鏡ㄑ zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) flow experience en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) stereoscopic en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) gameflow en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) digital game en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) active shutter 3D glasses en_US dc.title (題名) 立體顯像對使用者心流經驗之探究－以環形互動空間的數位遊戲為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) A Research of User`s Flow Experience for Stereoscopics: A Case Study on Interactive Digital Game Using Circular Projection. en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Buckingham, D. (2006). Studying computer games. In D. Carr, D. Buckingham, A. Burn, & G. Schott(Eds.), Computer games: Text, narrative and play. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Caillois, Roger. (1958). Man, play and games(M. Brarash, Trans.),Urbana, IL : University of Illinois Press.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). BEYOND BOREDOM AND ANXIETY. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Massimini, F. (1985). On the psychological selection of bio-cultural information. New Ideas in Psychology.Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (1988). Optimal experience: psychological.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). flow: the psychology of optimal experience. (Harper and Row, New York)Crawford, C. (1990). Lessons from Computer Game Design. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.Clarke, S. G., & Haworth, J. T. (1994). Flow Experience in the Daily Lives of 6-th-Form College-students. British Journal of Psychology.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life: Basic Books.Elizabeth J. Lyons, Deborah F. Tate, Dianne S. Ward, Kurt M. Ribisl, J. Michael Bowling, Sriram Kalyanaraman. (2014). Engagement, Enjoyment, and Energy Expenditure During Active Video Game Play.Health Psychol. Health Psychology, Vol. 33.Guilford, J.P. & Hoepfner, R. (1971). The Analysis of Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Gary D. Ellis, J. E. V. (1994). Measurement and analysis issues with explanation of variance in daily experience using the flow model. Journal of Leisure Research.Geoff Howland. (1998). Game design: The essence of computer games. Retrieved April, 25, 2006.Gonzalo Frasca. (2001). Videogames of the Oppressed: Videogames as a Means for Critical Thinking and Debate. Unpublished Masters thesis. Atlanta, GA:Georgia Institute of Technology.Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model. Simulation & Gaming.Greg Costikyan. (2002).“I Have No Words & I Must Design,” In Mäyrä, F. Conference Proceedings of Computer Games and Digital Cultures, Tampere University. Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Peralta, M. (1999). Building Consumer Trust Online. Communications of the ACM.Hsiang Chen, R.T. Wigand, M.S. Nilan. (1999). Optimal experience of web activities. Computers in Human Behavior.Hunicke R. & Chapman V. (2004). AI for Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment in Games. Challenges in Game Artificial Intelligence AAAI Workshop. San Jose.Julesz, B. (1971). Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Jane Webster, Linda Klebe Trevino & Lisa Ryan. (1993).“The Dimensionality and Correlates of Flow in Human-Computer Interactions,”Computers in Human Behavior.James E. Cutting and Peter M. Vishton. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances:The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. Perception of space and motion. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Johnson, Daniel M. and Wiles, Janet. (2003) Effective Affective User Interface Design in Games.Kephart, Newell C. (1960). The slow learner in the classroom.Oxford, England: Charles E. Merrill.Katie Salen Tekinbas & Eric Zimmerman. (2003). Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.L. Hill, A. Jacobs. (2006). 3-D Liquid Crystal Displays and Their Applications, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94.Linda Klebe Trevino & Jane Webster. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research.Massimini, F. & Carli, M. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience, in Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds).Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality.Murray J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. Baltimore & London: The MIT Press.Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (1997). Measuring the Flow Experience Among Web Users. Paper presented at the Interval Research Corporation.Novak, P. T., Hoffman, L. D., & Yung, Y. F. (1999). Measuring the flow construct in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Unpublished manuscript.Nick Holliman. (2005). 3D Display Systems.University of Durham,Science Laboratories.Payne, V. G. & Isaacs, L. D. (2002). Human motor development. Boston: McGraw Hill.Pearce, J.M., Ainley, M. & Howard, S. (2004). The Ebb and Flow of Online Learning. Computers in Human Behavior.Ravin Balakrishnan, George W. Fitzmaurice, Gordon Kurtenbach. (2001). User Interfaces for Volumetric Displays,IEEE Computer, March 2001.Stephen K. Reed. (1988). Cognition: Theories and Applications.Cengage Learning.Shaun P. Vecera, Edward K. Vogel, and Geoffrey F. Woodman. (2002). Lower Region: A New Cue for Figure–Ground Assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General ,Vol. 131.Sherman, W. R. & Craig, A. B. (2003). Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, and Design, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Sweetser, P. M, & Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: A Model for Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games.ACM Computers in Entertainment. New York: ACM Press.Thompson, M., Nordin, I., Cairns, P. (2012). Effect of touch-screen size on game immersion. In Proc. of BCS HCI 2012, BCS.熊祥林（1971）。完形論。台北：大光華印務部。游恒山（譯）（1990）。心理學（原作者：Philip G. Zimbardo /著）。台北：五南圖書。鍾聖校（1992）。認知心理學。台北：心理出版社。張定綺（譯）（1993）。快樂，從心開始（原作者：Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi /著 1990）。台北：天下文化。鄭麗玉（1993）。認知心理學－理論與應用－。台北：五南圖書。洪蘭（譯）（1997）。心理學（原作者：Henry Gleitman /著）。台北：遠流出版社。陳秀娟（譯）（1998）。生命的心流。追求忘我專注的圓融生活（原作者：Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi /著1997）。台北：天下遠見。李姍姍（譯）（1998）。完形心理學（原作者：Wolfgang Köhler /著）。台北：桂冠圖書。杜明城（譯）（1999）。創造力（原作者：Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi /著1999）。台北：時報出版。梁寶珍、劉玲珍（譯）（1999）。英漢雙解活用詞典（原作者：Della Summers / 著）。台北：朗文出版。李江山、孫慶文、陳一平、陳建中、黃淑麗、黃榮村、葉素玲、襲充文、櫻井. 正二郎（1999）。視覺與認知–視覺知覺與視覺運動系統。台北：遠流出版。周宣光（2000）。虛擬實境系統的開發模式與應用。技術學刊。黎煒（譯）（2000）。格式塔心理學原理（上）（原作者：Kurt Koffka /著）。台北：昭明出版社。黎煒（譯）（2000）。格式塔心理學原理（下）（原作者：Kurt Koffka /著）。台北：昭明出版社。劉榮政（2001）。平面螢幕之立體影像設計。碩士論文，中央大學。蔣載榮（2002）。觀、念、攝影：影像的視覺心理剖析。台北：雪嶺文化。梁耘瑭（譯）（2003）。視覺藝術認知（原作者：Robert L. Solso /著）。台北：全華科技圖書。陳芸芸（譯）（2003）。視覺文化導論（原作者：Nicholas Mirzoeff /著）。台北：韋伯文化國際。游梓翔、劉文英、廖婉如（譯）（2003）。人際關係與溝通技巧（原作者：Julia T.Wood /著）。台北：雙葉書廊。蔡朝旭、陳政寰（2004）。立體顯示器技術。光電科技資料叢書之三十三。行政院國科會光電小組。林瑋祥（2005）。網站上沉浸理論對顧客忠誠建立之影響－以「無名小站」為例。碩士論文，逢甲大學。吳麗媛、楊淑朱、楊承達、楊曉苓、林妙徽、林玉霞、梁珀華(譯)（2005）。幼兒遊戲與發展理論（原作者：Joe L.Frost, Sue C.Wortham & Stuart Reifel /著）。台北：華騰文化。吳雨青（2008）。多視點立體顯示器之影像合成技術。碩士論文，成功大學。黃軍富（2009）。心流路徑研究方法論－以休閒遊戲玩家為例。碩士論文，交通大學。黃怡菁、黃乙白、謝漢萍（2010）。3D立體顯示技術。科學發展期刊，451期。蘇志昇（2011）。腦．網路．Myself。台北：秀威資訊科技。陳一平（2011）。視覺心理學。台北：雙葉書廊。王偉存（2011）。遊戲回饋機制對玩家自我調節與遊戲經驗的影響─以音樂節奏遊戲為例。碩士論文，交通大學。吳亨英、吳莉君（譯）（2011）。設計的法則（原作者：William Lidwell & Kritina Holden /著）。台北：原點出版。陳永國（譯）（2012）。圖像學：形象‧文本‧意識形態（原作者：Mitchell, W.J.T /著）。吳麗雪（2012）。3D立體電影的四維觀察。朝陽人文社會學刊，第十卷第一期。謝葆如（2012）。淺談3D顯示光學膜材料。工業材料雜誌 306 期。趙慧芬、林潔盈、吳莉君（譯）（2012）。設計的方法（原作者：Bella Martin & Bruce Hanington /著）。台北：原點出版。孫春在（2013）。遊戲式數位學習。台北：高等教育文化。 zh_TW
