學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 檔案典藏機構館藏維護政策之研究
A Study of the Preservation Policies of Archive Repositories作者 李佩珊
Li, Pei Shan貢獻者 林巧敏
Lin, Chiao Min
李佩珊
Li, Pei Shan關鍵詞 館藏維護政策
檔案典藏機構
政策
維護
保存
Preservation Policy
Archives Repository
Policy
Preservation
Conservation日期 2015 上傳時間 3-Aug-2015 13:27:46 (UTC+8) 摘要 在臺灣如國史館、國史館臺灣文獻館、中央研究院臺灣史研究所檔案館等機構收藏了非常多珍貴的歷史檔案。這些機構不一定名為檔案館，但典藏許多有價值的檔案，具檔案館之實，因此皆屬於「檔案典藏機構」，且有相當的重要性。為讓文獻傳遞正確真實的資訊、方便使用者查閱、使用，需提供適當的典藏環境與合適的保存、維護措施。正如檔案館的徵集、編排需制定政策、規範、流程作為行政指引，檔案館藏的保存維護也需要館藏維護政策（Preservation Policy）輔助實行。本研究透過文獻探討、內容分析了解國內外重要檔案典藏機構的館藏維護政策，提出建議的館藏維護政策綱要，再訪談國內檔案典藏機構人員目前保存維護措施執行的困難、對館藏維護政策功能、是否需要制定等問題的看法。研究結果顯示臺灣目前尚無機構訂有此政策，相關規範散布於細項法規，但受訪者普遍認可館藏維護政策的正面效益與功能，以及現在機構存在例如專業人力不足、相關規範面向偏狹等問題。本研究建議機構由自我評估著手，了解機構需求，嘗試制定長期保存維護計畫，再逐漸往制定政策的目標邁進，並對內、外推廣保存維護概念，提升人員對此議題的重視與瞭解。
There are many institutions in Taiwan like Academia Historica, Taiwan Historica, National Palace Museum, and they reposit many valuable historical archives. Though their name may not called “the Archive”, but they actually have lots of precious archives. Therefore, they all belong to “Archives Repository” and quite important. For the correction of information in archives, and the convenience of search and use, archives repositories have to provide applicable storage environment, preservation and conservation measures for archives. As the acquisition and arrangement of the Archive need to establish policy, standard or procedures as administrative guides, the preservation measures for the historical archives also need a “Preservation Policy” to assist with it.By document analysis and content analysis, this study attempted to comprehend the preservation policies’ content of archives repositories in Taiwan and overseas and then adressed an advised preservation policy schema. Lastly, interviewed with employees in archives repositories discussing the difficulties of implementing preservation measures, the effects and demand of preservation policy, and so forth. The search result shows that there are no archives repositories having this kind of policy in Taiwan. The related directions disperse in diverse legislations and standards. But interviewees generally approved the positive benefits of preservation policy. And they also acknowledged management problems existing in organization such as insufficient professional manpower and related legislations. Based on the findings, this study proposes some suggestions that advices these institutions start from self-survey to assessing preservation needs. In addition, archives repositories can promote the significance of preservation issue, as to raise the conscious about it. Keywords: Preservation Policy, Archives Repository, Policy, Preservation, Conservation參考文獻 一、 中文于沛（2012）。第三章 文獻保存環境和控制。在林明、周旖、張靖等編，文獻保護與修復（頁70-118）。廣州市：中山大學出版社。林巧敏、洪碧苓（2011）檔案保存維護資源與作業現況分析。檔案季刊，10(4)，56-74。林巧敏、洪碧苓（2012）。紙質文件與檔案修裱人員現況調查。大學圖書館，16(1)，53-72。林明（2012）。第一章 緒論。在林明、周旖、張靖等編，文獻保護與修復（頁1-31）。廣州市：中山大學出版社。林明、周旖、張靖、于沛、邱蔚晴、蔣嘯南（2012）。文獻保護與修復。廣州市中山大學出版社。陳秋瑾（2012）檔案管理人員繼續教育滿意度與需求之研究。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，臺北市。陳國寧、何傳坤、廖紫均、張世賢、余敦平、岩素芬等（2002）。文物保護手冊。臺北市：行政院文化建設委員會。張元鳳（2008）。檔案修護技術及制度之研究：以紙質媒體為例。台北市：檔案管理局。張世賢（2000）。如何作好預防性文物保存。臺北市 : 行政院文化建設委員會。張美芳、唐躍進（2013）。檔案保護概論。北京：中國人民大學出版社。張靖（2012）。第八章 文獻保護計畫。在林明、周旖、張靖等編，文獻保護與修復（頁266-308）。廣州市：中山大學出版社。喬昭華、岩素芬、余敦平、蔡明哲、何兆華、黃廷嫥、高輔霖（1999）。臺灣地區文物保存現況調查暨國內外相關資料收集。國立文化資產保存研究中心籌備處。黃翠梅主編（1997）。文物典藏維護現況調查報告—中華民國博物館學會所屬會員館。臺北市：中華民國博物館學會。雅詩敏‧涵（2005）。全面性的保存修護：國會圖書館的修護流程描述。在蔡斐文編，織品與紙質保存修護國際交流研討會論文集（頁117-127）。臺南市：國立文化資產保存研究中心籌備處。溫台祥、楊時榮（2010）。圖書館紙質文獻典藏環境基準。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，6(4)，30-38。楊時榮（1991）。圖書維護學。台北市：南天書局。楊時榮（2008）。圖書文獻保存性修復。台北市：南天書局。趙彥昌（2011）。中國古代檔案管理制度研究。北京市：人民出版社。蔡斐文（1999）。紙質文物保護工作簡介─認識紙質文物及其劣化的因素。在臺灣地區文物保存現況調查暨國內外相關資料蒐集（頁294-316）。台南：國立文化資產保存研究中心。蔡斐文（2003）。紙質文物保護管理。在王玉豐主編，紙於至善：紙質科技文物保存維護手冊（頁10-15）。高雄市：國立科學工藝博物館。蔡斐文、岩素芬、鄭世強（2011）。紙質類國家檔案修護策略之研究。檔案管理局委託之專題研究成果報告（編號：RDEC-NAA-典-100-001）。臺北市：檔案管理局。劉藍玉（譯）（2001）。藏品維護手冊：博物館研究典藏人員與收藏家必備（Conservation concerns: A guide for collectors and curators）（原作者Bachmann, K. and Cooper-Hewitt Museum）。臺北市：五觀藝術。（原作出版年：1992）。盧美延（2001）。台灣地區圖書館數位化資料保存政策之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，臺北市。藝術與建築索引典（日期不詳）。維護(功能) preservation(function)(編號300105444)。上網日期：2014年11月16日，檢自：http://aat.teldap.tw/AATFullD isplay/300105444二、 外文Balloffet, N., Hille, J., & Reed, J. A. (2005). Preservation and conservation for libraries and archives. Chicago: American Library Association.Banks, P. N., & Pilette, R. (2000). Preservation: Issues and planning. Chicago: American Library Association.Brown, K. E. K. (2005). Use of General Preservation Assessments: Process. Library Resources & Technical Services, 49(2), 90-106.Dawson, A. (Ed.). (2011). Benchmarks in collection care for museums, archives, and libraries: A self-assessment checklist. London: Museums, Libraries and Archives Council. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://www.collectionstrust.org.uk/b enchmarks-in-collections-care/benchmarks-in-collection-care-for-museums-archi ves-and-librariesEzra, S. G., & Zakari, M. (2013). Digital preservation policy in National Information Centres in Nigeria. The Electronic Library, 31(4), 483-492.Feather, J. (1996). Preservation and Management of Library Collections, 2nd ed., Library Association Publishing, London.Feather, J., & Eden, P. (1997). Preservation policies and strategies in british archives and record offices: A survey. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 18(1), 59-70. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/57412384?accountid =10067Feather, J. (2004). Managing preservation for libraries and archives: Current practice and future developments. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate.Fenn, K., & Muir, A. (2003). Preservation management in private subscription libraries in the United Kingdom. Library Management, 24, 204-215.Foot, M. M. (2013). Building a preservation policy. London: British Library. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://www.bl.uk/aboutus/stratpolprog/collectioncare/p ublications/booklets/building_a_preservation_policy.pdfForde, H. & Rhys-Lewis, J. (2013). Preserving Archives. London: Facet Publishing.Gkinni, Z. & Pavlogeorgatos, G. (2013). Preservation performance assessment in Greek libraries and archives; a practical tool to enable excellence. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 2(1), 27-36.Keene, S. (2002). Managing conservation in museums. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.National Archives and Records Administration. (2015). Preservation. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved January 10, 2015, from http://www.archives.gov/preservation/National Archives of Canada. (2001). Preservation policy. Ottawa, Ont: National Archives of Canada. Retrieved October 4, 2014, from http://www.collectionscana da.gc.ca/13/1304/docs/preservationpolicy_e.pdfNortheast Document Conservation Center. (2006). Preservation 101. Retrieved October 4, 2014, from http://unfacilitated.preservation101.org/loggedin.aspNational Archives of Australia. (2012). Operational Policy: Conservation. Canberra: National Archives of Australia. Retrieved December 30, 2014, from http://www.n aa.gov.au/about-us/organisation/accountability/operations-and-preservation/conservation.aspxNational Library of Australia. (2012). Preservation needs assessments. Canberra: National Library of Australia. Retrieved November 16, 2014, from http://www.nla. gov.au/chg/preservation-needs-assessmentsOgden, Sherelyn. (1998). Preservation Planning: Guidelines for Writing a Long-Range Plan. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Museums.Patkus, B., & Northeast Document Conservation Center. (2003). Assessing preservation needs: A self-survey guide. Andover, Mass: Northeast Document Conservation Center. Retrieved May 31, 2015, from https://www.nedcc.org/assets/media/docume nts/apnssg.pdfPearce-Moses, R. (2005). A glossary of archival and records terminology. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.Reed-Scott, J. (2000). Planning for Preservation in Libraries. In Banks, P. N., & Pilette, R. (Eds.), Preservation: Issues and planning (pp. 82-113). Chicago: American Library Association.Reyden, D. V. D. (1995). Preservation Responsibilities: Material Care and Materials Science for Paper-Based Research Collections. Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology IV, 352, 63-71.Sawant, S. (2014). A study on preservation and conservation practices in academic libraries in Mumbai. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 61, 2, 153-159.The American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works（2014）。Definitions of conservation terminology. Retrieved November 22, 2014, from http://www.conser vation-us.org/about-conservation/definitions#.VHBRPskhfCsThe National Archives. (2009). Preservation policy. Kew: The National Archives. Retrieved October 4, 2014, from http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/t na-corporate-preservation-policy-2009-website-version.pdfUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.（2014）. Memory of the world. Retrieved November 22, 2014, from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/co mmunication-and-information/flagship-project-activities/memory-of-the-world/h omepage/財團法人元興寺文化財研究所（2002）。紙国立公文書館所蔵資料保存対策マニュアル。國立公文書館委託之調查研究報告書。東京都：國立公文書館。上網日期：2014年11月22日，檢自： http://www.archives.go.jp/about/report/pdf/h ourei3_09.pdf 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
102155006資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1021550061 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 林巧敏 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Lin, Chiao Min en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 李佩珊 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Li, Pei Shan en_US dc.creator (作者) 李佩珊 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Li, Pei Shan en_US dc.date (日期) 2015 en_US dc.date.accessioned 3-Aug-2015 13:27:46 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 3-Aug-2015 13:27:46 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Aug-2015 13:27:46 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1021550061 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77228 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 102155006 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在臺灣如國史館、國史館臺灣文獻館、中央研究院臺灣史研究所檔案館等機構收藏了非常多珍貴的歷史檔案。這些機構不一定名為檔案館，但典藏許多有價值的檔案，具檔案館之實，因此皆屬於「檔案典藏機構」，且有相當的重要性。為讓文獻傳遞正確真實的資訊、方便使用者查閱、使用，需提供適當的典藏環境與合適的保存、維護措施。正如檔案館的徵集、編排需制定政策、規範、流程作為行政指引，檔案館藏的保存維護也需要館藏維護政策（Preservation Policy）輔助實行。本研究透過文獻探討、內容分析了解國內外重要檔案典藏機構的館藏維護政策，提出建議的館藏維護政策綱要，再訪談國內檔案典藏機構人員目前保存維護措施執行的困難、對館藏維護政策功能、是否需要制定等問題的看法。研究結果顯示臺灣目前尚無機構訂有此政策，相關規範散布於細項法規，但受訪者普遍認可館藏維護政策的正面效益與功能，以及現在機構存在例如專業人力不足、相關規範面向偏狹等問題。本研究建議機構由自我評估著手，了解機構需求，嘗試制定長期保存維護計畫，再逐漸往制定政策的目標邁進，並對內、外推廣保存維護概念，提升人員對此議題的重視與瞭解。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) There are many institutions in Taiwan like Academia Historica, Taiwan Historica, National Palace Museum, and they reposit many valuable historical archives. Though their name may not called “the Archive”, but they actually have lots of precious archives. Therefore, they all belong to “Archives Repository” and quite important. For the correction of information in archives, and the convenience of search and use, archives repositories have to provide applicable storage environment, preservation and conservation measures for archives. As the acquisition and arrangement of the Archive need to establish policy, standard or procedures as administrative guides, the preservation measures for the historical archives also need a “Preservation Policy” to assist with it.By document analysis and content analysis, this study attempted to comprehend the preservation policies’ content of archives repositories in Taiwan and overseas and then adressed an advised preservation policy schema. Lastly, interviewed with employees in archives repositories discussing the difficulties of implementing preservation measures, the effects and demand of preservation policy, and so forth. The search result shows that there are no archives repositories having this kind of policy in Taiwan. The related directions disperse in diverse legislations and standards. But interviewees generally approved the positive benefits of preservation policy. And they also acknowledged management problems existing in organization such as insufficient professional manpower and related legislations. Based on the findings, this study proposes some suggestions that advices these institutions start from self-survey to assessing preservation needs. In addition, archives repositories can promote the significance of preservation issue, as to raise the conscious about it. Keywords: Preservation Policy, Archives Repository, Policy, Preservation, Conservation en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機 1第二節 研究目的 3第三節 研究問題 3第四節 研究範圍與限制 4第五節 名詞解釋 6第二章 文獻探討 9第一節 檔案保存維護之工作內涵 9第二節 館藏維護政策之規劃 16第三節 館藏維護政策相關研究 30第三章 研究設計與實施 37第一節 研究設計 37第二節 研究方法與研究工具 39第三節 訪談對象的選取 40第四節 研究步驟與流程 42第五節 資料整理與分析 45第四章 國內外館藏維護政策分析 47第一節 國內檔案典藏機構館藏維護政策分析 47第二節 國外檔案典藏機構館藏維護政策分析 58第三節 國內外檔案典藏機構館藏維護政策比較 76第五章 檔案典藏機構人員訪談分析 87第一節 檔案典藏機構人員訪談分析 87第二節 訪談結果綜合分析 125第六章 結論與建議 133第一節 結論 133第二節 建議 136第三節 後續研究建議 138參考文獻 140附錄一 檔案典藏機構訪談大綱 146 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2545627 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1021550061 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 館藏維護政策 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 檔案典藏機構 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政策 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 維護 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 保存 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Preservation Policy en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Archives Repository en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Policy en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Preservation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Conservation en_US dc.title (題名) 檔案典藏機構館藏維護政策之研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) A Study of the Preservation Policies of Archive Repositories en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文于沛（2012）。第三章 文獻保存環境和控制。在林明、周旖、張靖等編，文獻保護與修復（頁70-118）。廣州市：中山大學出版社。林巧敏、洪碧苓（2011）檔案保存維護資源與作業現況分析。檔案季刊，10(4)，56-74。林巧敏、洪碧苓（2012）。紙質文件與檔案修裱人員現況調查。大學圖書館，16(1)，53-72。林明（2012）。第一章 緒論。在林明、周旖、張靖等編，文獻保護與修復（頁1-31）。廣州市：中山大學出版社。林明、周旖、張靖、于沛、邱蔚晴、蔣嘯南（2012）。文獻保護與修復。廣州市中山大學出版社。陳秋瑾（2012）檔案管理人員繼續教育滿意度與需求之研究。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，臺北市。陳國寧、何傳坤、廖紫均、張世賢、余敦平、岩素芬等（2002）。文物保護手冊。臺北市：行政院文化建設委員會。張元鳳（2008）。檔案修護技術及制度之研究：以紙質媒體為例。台北市：檔案管理局。張世賢（2000）。如何作好預防性文物保存。臺北市 : 行政院文化建設委員會。張美芳、唐躍進（2013）。檔案保護概論。北京：中國人民大學出版社。張靖（2012）。第八章 文獻保護計畫。在林明、周旖、張靖等編，文獻保護與修復（頁266-308）。廣州市：中山大學出版社。喬昭華、岩素芬、余敦平、蔡明哲、何兆華、黃廷嫥、高輔霖（1999）。臺灣地區文物保存現況調查暨國內外相關資料收集。國立文化資產保存研究中心籌備處。黃翠梅主編（1997）。文物典藏維護現況調查報告—中華民國博物館學會所屬會員館。臺北市：中華民國博物館學會。雅詩敏‧涵（2005）。全面性的保存修護：國會圖書館的修護流程描述。在蔡斐文編，織品與紙質保存修護國際交流研討會論文集（頁117-127）。臺南市：國立文化資產保存研究中心籌備處。溫台祥、楊時榮（2010）。圖書館紙質文獻典藏環境基準。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，6(4)，30-38。楊時榮（1991）。圖書維護學。台北市：南天書局。楊時榮（2008）。圖書文獻保存性修復。台北市：南天書局。趙彥昌（2011）。中國古代檔案管理制度研究。北京市：人民出版社。蔡斐文（1999）。紙質文物保護工作簡介─認識紙質文物及其劣化的因素。在臺灣地區文物保存現況調查暨國內外相關資料蒐集（頁294-316）。台南：國立文化資產保存研究中心。蔡斐文（2003）。紙質文物保護管理。在王玉豐主編，紙於至善：紙質科技文物保存維護手冊（頁10-15）。高雄市：國立科學工藝博物館。蔡斐文、岩素芬、鄭世強（2011）。紙質類國家檔案修護策略之研究。檔案管理局委託之專題研究成果報告（編號：RDEC-NAA-典-100-001）。臺北市：檔案管理局。劉藍玉（譯）（2001）。藏品維護手冊：博物館研究典藏人員與收藏家必備（Conservation concerns: A guide for collectors and curators）（原作者Bachmann, K. and Cooper-Hewitt Museum）。臺北市：五觀藝術。（原作出版年：1992）。盧美延（2001）。台灣地區圖書館數位化資料保存政策之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，臺北市。藝術與建築索引典（日期不詳）。維護(功能) preservation(function)(編號300105444)。上網日期：2014年11月16日，檢自：http://aat.teldap.tw/AATFullD isplay/300105444二、 外文Balloffet, N., Hille, J., & Reed, J. A. (2005). Preservation and conservation for libraries and archives. Chicago: American Library Association.Banks, P. N., & Pilette, R. (2000). Preservation: Issues and planning. Chicago: American Library Association.Brown, K. E. K. (2005). Use of General Preservation Assessments: Process. Library Resources & Technical Services, 49(2), 90-106.Dawson, A. (Ed.). (2011). Benchmarks in collection care for museums, archives, and libraries: A self-assessment checklist. London: Museums, Libraries and Archives Council. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://www.collectionstrust.org.uk/b enchmarks-in-collections-care/benchmarks-in-collection-care-for-museums-archi ves-and-librariesEzra, S. G., & Zakari, M. (2013). Digital preservation policy in National Information Centres in Nigeria. The Electronic Library, 31(4), 483-492.Feather, J. (1996). Preservation and Management of Library Collections, 2nd ed., Library Association Publishing, London.Feather, J., & Eden, P. (1997). Preservation policies and strategies in british archives and record offices: A survey. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 18(1), 59-70. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/57412384?accountid =10067Feather, J. (2004). Managing preservation for libraries and archives: Current practice and future developments. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate.Fenn, K., & Muir, A. (2003). Preservation management in private subscription libraries in the United Kingdom. Library Management, 24, 204-215.Foot, M. M. (2013). Building a preservation policy. London: British Library. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://www.bl.uk/aboutus/stratpolprog/collectioncare/p ublications/booklets/building_a_preservation_policy.pdfForde, H. & Rhys-Lewis, J. (2013). Preserving Archives. London: Facet Publishing.Gkinni, Z. & Pavlogeorgatos, G. (2013). Preservation performance assessment in Greek libraries and archives; a practical tool to enable excellence. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 2(1), 27-36.Keene, S. (2002). Managing conservation in museums. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.National Archives and Records Administration. (2015). Preservation. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved January 10, 2015, from http://www.archives.gov/preservation/National Archives of Canada. (2001). Preservation policy. Ottawa, Ont: National Archives of Canada. Retrieved October 4, 2014, from http://www.collectionscana da.gc.ca/13/1304/docs/preservationpolicy_e.pdfNortheast Document Conservation Center. (2006). Preservation 101. Retrieved October 4, 2014, from http://unfacilitated.preservation101.org/loggedin.aspNational Archives of Australia. (2012). Operational Policy: Conservation. Canberra: National Archives of Australia. Retrieved December 30, 2014, from http://www.n aa.gov.au/about-us/organisation/accountability/operations-and-preservation/conservation.aspxNational Library of Australia. (2012). Preservation needs assessments. Canberra: National Library of Australia. Retrieved November 16, 2014, from http://www.nla. gov.au/chg/preservation-needs-assessmentsOgden, Sherelyn. (1998). Preservation Planning: Guidelines for Writing a Long-Range Plan. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Museums.Patkus, B., & Northeast Document Conservation Center. (2003). Assessing preservation needs: A self-survey guide. Andover, Mass: Northeast Document Conservation Center. Retrieved May 31, 2015, from https://www.nedcc.org/assets/media/docume nts/apnssg.pdfPearce-Moses, R. (2005). A glossary of archival and records terminology. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.Reed-Scott, J. (2000). Planning for Preservation in Libraries. In Banks, P. N., & Pilette, R. (Eds.), Preservation: Issues and planning (pp. 82-113). Chicago: American Library Association.Reyden, D. V. D. (1995). Preservation Responsibilities: Material Care and Materials Science for Paper-Based Research Collections. Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology IV, 352, 63-71.Sawant, S. (2014). A study on preservation and conservation practices in academic libraries in Mumbai. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 61, 2, 153-159.The American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works（2014）。Definitions of conservation terminology. Retrieved November 22, 2014, from http://www.conser vation-us.org/about-conservation/definitions#.VHBRPskhfCsThe National Archives. (2009). Preservation policy. Kew: The National Archives. Retrieved October 4, 2014, from http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/t na-corporate-preservation-policy-2009-website-version.pdfUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.（2014）. Memory of the world. Retrieved November 22, 2014, from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/co mmunication-and-information/flagship-project-activities/memory-of-the-world/h omepage/財團法人元興寺文化財研究所（2002）。紙国立公文書館所蔵資料保存対策マニュアル。國立公文書館委託之調查研究報告書。東京都：國立公文書館。上網日期：2014年11月22日，檢自： http://www.archives.go.jp/about/report/pdf/h ourei3_09.pdf zh_TW
