Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 A CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON OF SELF-MONITORING
作者 Gudykunst, William B.;Nishida, Tsukasa;Leung, Kwok;Gao, Ge;Bond, Michael H.;Wang, Georgette;Barraclough, Robert A.
汪琪
貢獻者 新聞系
日期 1989-06
上傳時間 3-Sep-2015 16:18:22 (UTC+8)
摘要 This study examined the goodness of fit of three alternative models of self-monitoring to data collected in five cultures (two individualistic and three collectivistic cultures) and the influence of individualism-collectivism on self-monitoring. It was predicted that the 18-item unidimensional self-monitoring scale is the best fit among the three and individualistic cultures exhibit higher self-monitoring than collectivistic cultures. Data were collected from respondents in the United States, Australia (individualistic cultures) and Japan, Hong Kong, and Taiwan (collectivistic cultures). Results supported the predictions. The data suggest, however, that it is necessary to develop self-monitoring measures which are sensitive across cultures.
關聯 Communication Research Reports, 6(1), 7-12
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824098909359826
dc.contributor 新聞系-
dc.creator (作者) Gudykunst, William B.;Nishida, Tsukasa;Leung, Kwok;Gao, Ge;Bond, Michael H.;Wang, Georgette;Barraclough, Robert A.-
dc.creator (作者) 汪琪-
dc.date (日期) 1989-06-
dc.date.accessioned 3-Sep-2015 16:18:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-Sep-2015 16:18:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Sep-2015 16:18:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78251-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study examined the goodness of fit of three alternative models of self-monitoring to data collected in five cultures (two individualistic and three collectivistic cultures) and the influence of individualism-collectivism on self-monitoring. It was predicted that the 18-item unidimensional self-monitoring scale is the best fit among the three and individualistic cultures exhibit higher self-monitoring than collectivistic cultures. Data were collected from respondents in the United States, Australia (individualistic cultures) and Japan, Hong Kong, and Taiwan (collectivistic cultures). Results supported the predictions. The data suggest, however, that it is necessary to develop self-monitoring measures which are sensitive across cultures.-
dc.format.extent 476503 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) Communication Research Reports, 6(1), 7-12-
dc.title (題名) A CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON OF SELF-MONITORING-
dc.type (資料類型) articleen
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1080/08824098909359826-
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824098909359826-