學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 德國罷工法秩序:1950至1980年的法官造法及其形成背景分析
其他題名 German Legal Order to Strike--Analysis of the Background of Judge-Made Law 1950-1980
作者 Lin, Chia-Ho
貢獻者 法律系
關鍵詞 德國勞動法;罷工;勞動法院;工會運動
German Labor Law;Strike;Labor Court;Trade Union Movement
日期 2014-12
上傳時間 15-Sep-2015 11:54:25 (UTC+8)
摘要 在沒有任何制定法存在的情形下,德國罷工法秩序完全來自法官法,但並非由法院任意依自己的法政策想像形塑,毋寧是相關的社會行動者,包括工會運動與對抗的資本力量,在社會變遷之過程中,扮演一定的共同形成力量,由法院逐步發展與建立。從戰後1955、1971、1980的三則聯邦勞動法院判決,可看到今日作為德國罷工法秩序的主要內容,也當然可以觀察到不同社會行動者留下的軌跡。在當代經濟全球化發展下,面對不同的衝擊,新的罷工法秩序是否將誕生?基於過往經驗,社會行動者之影響與交互作用,顯然扮演重要的角色。
In the absence of any statute, the legal framework governing the legality of striking in West Germany was determined entirely from judge-made law, known of prejudication. The question was not settled through the usual give and take of social actors-including trade unions-that typically shapes legislation subsequently interpreted by the courts. Instead, the court, not the legislature, established the legal order governing the right to strike in Germany. Three important decisions by the German Federal Labor Court, in 1955, 1971, 1980, can be seen, today, as major contributors to German law on strikes, though the influences of different social actors can also be observed. As social actors, labor and capital, are likely to play an important role in shaping industrial affairs, as is the growing importance of economic globalization. Should the old legal order governing industrial action be maintained, new judge-made law be accepted, or should a new legal order be adopted through the legislature?
關聯 歐美研究, 44(4), 467-535
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 法律系
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Chia-Ho
dc.date (日期) 2014-12
dc.date.accessioned 15-Sep-2015 11:54:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 15-Sep-2015 11:54:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 15-Sep-2015 11:54:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78476-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在沒有任何制定法存在的情形下,德國罷工法秩序完全來自法官法,但並非由法院任意依自己的法政策想像形塑,毋寧是相關的社會行動者,包括工會運動與對抗的資本力量,在社會變遷之過程中,扮演一定的共同形成力量,由法院逐步發展與建立。從戰後1955、1971、1980的三則聯邦勞動法院判決,可看到今日作為德國罷工法秩序的主要內容,也當然可以觀察到不同社會行動者留下的軌跡。在當代經濟全球化發展下,面對不同的衝擊,新的罷工法秩序是否將誕生?基於過往經驗,社會行動者之影響與交互作用,顯然扮演重要的角色。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In the absence of any statute, the legal framework governing the legality of striking in West Germany was determined entirely from judge-made law, known of prejudication. The question was not settled through the usual give and take of social actors-including trade unions-that typically shapes legislation subsequently interpreted by the courts. Instead, the court, not the legislature, established the legal order governing the right to strike in Germany. Three important decisions by the German Federal Labor Court, in 1955, 1971, 1980, can be seen, today, as major contributors to German law on strikes, though the influences of different social actors can also be observed. As social actors, labor and capital, are likely to play an important role in shaping industrial affairs, as is the growing importance of economic globalization. Should the old legal order governing industrial action be maintained, new judge-made law be accepted, or should a new legal order be adopted through the legislature?
dc.format.extent 1501804 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 歐美研究, 44(4), 467-535
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 德國勞動法;罷工;勞動法院;工會運動
dc.subject (關鍵詞) German Labor Law;Strike;Labor Court;Trade Union Movement
dc.title (題名) 德國罷工法秩序:1950至1980年的法官造法及其形成背景分析zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) German Legal Order to Strike--Analysis of the Background of Judge-Made Law 1950-1980
dc.type (資料類型) articleen