Publications-Periodical Articles
Article View/Open
Publication Export
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
| Title | 師範學院教育實習教學能力形成性評量之研究 |
| Creator | 謝文英;胡悅倫 Hu, Yueh-Luen |
| Contributor | 教育系 |
| Key Words | 教學能力評量標準 ; 形成性評量 ; 教育實習 ; Teaching evaluation criteria ; Formative evaluation ; Educational practicum |
| Date | 1995-01 |
| Date Issued | 21-Sep-2015 16:30:14 (UTC+8) |
| Summary | 本研究旨在瞭解(一)師院生教育實習形成性評量所需的教學能力；(二)師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量標準之重要性與鑑別度；(三)師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量之相對重要性。 本研究以自編之「師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量調查問卷」，對師院教授、國小校長、主任、教師及師院學生進行施測，藉此調查問卷瞭解受試者對師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量標準之重要性的看法。形成性評量調查問卷共發出1394份，回收問卷計1101份，回收率為79.0%。本研究採用的統計方法有：信度考驗、描述統計、鑑別度分析、肯氏和諧度係數。 研究結果發現： 1.師院生教育實習形成性評量在教學態度、教學計畫、教學方法、教學技術及教學評量上，所需的教學能力，計有22項教學行為，73項行為指標。 2.師院生教育實習能力形成性評量，各項目之重要性均很好，鑑別度大致良好，為一良好的評量工具。 3.師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量最重要的教學能力依序為：(1)教學態度，(2)教學技術，(3)教學方法，(4)教學計畫，(5)教學評量。 The main purpose of this study was to examine formative teaching evaluation criteria for student teachers. This study employed the self-devised "Formative Teaching Evaluation Criteria for Student Teacher Evaluation Questionnaire" and was administered to educational professors of teachers’ colleges, principals, grade principals, elementary teachers and teachers’ college students. A total of 1,101 of 1,394 questionnaires were returned, for a rate of 79.0%. Descriptive statistics, reliability, item discrimination, and Kendall’s W were employed to analyze the data collected. The findings showed that: 1. There were five areas of teaching performance of formative teaching evaluation criteria for student teachers. The five areas of teaching performance were teaching attitudes, teaching plans, teaching methods, teaching techniques and teaching evaluations. 2. The five areas of teaching performance included twenty-two teaching behaviors which included seventy-three teaching behavior indicators. 3. The most important area of teaching performance was teaching attitudes. The second was teaching techniques. The third was teaching methods. The fourth was teaching plans. The last was teaching evaluations. 4. The items of formative teaching evaluation criteria for students’ teachers were rated as important on a Likert scale. The index of discrimination of those items was generally good. |
| Relation | 新竹師院學報, 8, 235-290. |
| Type | article |
| dc.contributor | 教育系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 謝文英;胡悅倫 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Hu, Yueh-Luen | |
| dc.date (日期) | 1995-01 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 21-Sep-2015 16:30:14 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 21-Sep-2015 16:30:14 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 21-Sep-2015 16:30:14 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78607 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究旨在瞭解(一)師院生教育實習形成性評量所需的教學能力；(二)師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量標準之重要性與鑑別度；(三)師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量之相對重要性。 本研究以自編之「師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量調查問卷」，對師院教授、國小校長、主任、教師及師院學生進行施測，藉此調查問卷瞭解受試者對師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量標準之重要性的看法。形成性評量調查問卷共發出1394份，回收問卷計1101份，回收率為79.0%。本研究採用的統計方法有：信度考驗、描述統計、鑑別度分析、肯氏和諧度係數。 研究結果發現： 1.師院生教育實習形成性評量在教學態度、教學計畫、教學方法、教學技術及教學評量上，所需的教學能力，計有22項教學行為，73項行為指標。 2.師院生教育實習能力形成性評量，各項目之重要性均很好，鑑別度大致良好，為一良好的評量工具。 3.師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量最重要的教學能力依序為：(1)教學態度，(2)教學技術，(3)教學方法，(4)教學計畫，(5)教學評量。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The main purpose of this study was to examine formative teaching evaluation criteria for student teachers. This study employed the self-devised "Formative Teaching Evaluation Criteria for Student Teacher Evaluation Questionnaire" and was administered to educational professors of teachers’ colleges, principals, grade principals, elementary teachers and teachers’ college students. A total of 1,101 of 1,394 questionnaires were returned, for a rate of 79.0%. Descriptive statistics, reliability, item discrimination, and Kendall’s W were employed to analyze the data collected. The findings showed that: 1. There were five areas of teaching performance of formative teaching evaluation criteria for student teachers. The five areas of teaching performance were teaching attitudes, teaching plans, teaching methods, teaching techniques and teaching evaluations. 2. The five areas of teaching performance included twenty-two teaching behaviors which included seventy-three teaching behavior indicators. 3. The most important area of teaching performance was teaching attitudes. The second was teaching techniques. The third was teaching methods. The fourth was teaching plans. The last was teaching evaluations. 4. The items of formative teaching evaluation criteria for students’ teachers were rated as important on a Likert scale. The index of discrimination of those items was generally good. | |
| dc.format.extent | 130 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 新竹師院學報, 8, 235-290. | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 教學能力評量標準 ; 形成性評量 ; 教育實習 ; Teaching evaluation criteria ; Formative evaluation ; Educational practicum | |
| dc.title (題名) | 師範學院教育實習教學能力形成性評量之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | en |