dc.contributor | 廣告學系 | |
dc.creator (作者) | Chang, Ching ching | |
dc.creator (作者) | 張卿卿 | zh_TW |
dc.date (日期) | 2015-10 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 15-Dec-2015 17:57:14 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 15-Dec-2015 17:57:14 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 15-Dec-2015 17:57:14 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/79667 | - |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This article examines responses to news stories that cover novel (vs. familiar) or contradictory (vs. one-sided) health research findings. Drawing on motivated reasoning and uncertainty management literature, this article proposes that novel and contradictory health research news stories arouse uncertainty and confusion and thus trigger motivated reasoning. People discount the credibility of the target news and express less willingness to adopt the advocated behaviors. In addition, people devalue health research by strengthening their beliefs that scientific research is uncertain, which lowers their attitudes toward health research. A large telephone survey of the general public and two experiments test these predictions. | |
dc.format.extent | 485495 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.relation (關聯) | Science Communication, vol. 37 no. 5 , 602-634 | |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | contradictory news; novel news; news evaluations; health behaviors; uncertainty; attitudes toward research | |
dc.title (題名) | Motivated Processing: How People Perceive News Covering Novel or Contradictory Health Research Findings | |
dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.1177/1075547015597914 | |
dc.doi.uri (DOI) | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547015597914 | |