Publications-Conference papers
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 The Effect of Focused and Unfocused Direct Written Corrective Feedback on a New Piece of Writing 作者 Frear, David 貢獻者 外文中心 日期 2009-04-11 上傳時間 29-Dec-2015 10:59:20 (UTC+8) 摘要 The value of written corrective feedback (CF) has been an issue of considerable debate in the literature (e.g. Truscott, 1996; Ferris, 1999), and this polemic has lead to a trend in recent studies to draw on second language acquisition (SLA) research as a way to further comprehend the intricacies of this complex issue. Indeed, Ellis, Sheen Murakami and Takashima (2008) delineate between focused CF and unfocused CF. For direct CF, they found that both types of focuses were effective in new pieces of writing, and that this effect was durable. As only this one study has examined these focuses for the target form of articles, arguably further research is needed with different target forms. With this in mind, the study presented here contrasted the effectiveness of focused direct CF for past tense forms, unfocused direct CF and a control group (no CF) on the accuracy of student writing. Using mixed between-within ANOVAs, it was revealed that all three conditions improved in accuracy between two writing tasks; however, both the focused direct CF and unfocused direct CF groups significantly outperformed the control group in the second piece of writing. 關聯 第三屆「大學英文」學術研討會精選論文集, 大學英文學術研討會精選論文集
主辦單位:國立政治大學外文中心
舉辦日期:2009.04.11資料類型 conference dc.contributor 外文中心 dc.creator (作者) Frear, David dc.date (日期) 2009-04-11 dc.date.accessioned 29-Dec-2015 10:59:20 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 29-Dec-2015 10:59:20 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Dec-2015 10:59:20 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/79949 - dc.description.abstract (摘要) The value of written corrective feedback (CF) has been an issue of considerable debate in the literature (e.g. Truscott, 1996; Ferris, 1999), and this polemic has lead to a trend in recent studies to draw on second language acquisition (SLA) research as a way to further comprehend the intricacies of this complex issue. Indeed, Ellis, Sheen Murakami and Takashima (2008) delineate between focused CF and unfocused CF. For direct CF, they found that both types of focuses were effective in new pieces of writing, and that this effect was durable. As only this one study has examined these focuses for the target form of articles, arguably further research is needed with different target forms. With this in mind, the study presented here contrasted the effectiveness of focused direct CF for past tense forms, unfocused direct CF and a control group (no CF) on the accuracy of student writing. Using mixed between-within ANOVAs, it was revealed that all three conditions improved in accuracy between two writing tasks; however, both the focused direct CF and unfocused direct CF groups significantly outperformed the control group in the second piece of writing. dc.format.extent 121365 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.relation (關聯) 第三屆「大學英文」學術研討會精選論文集, 大學英文學術研討會精選論文集 dc.relation (關聯) 主辦單位:國立政治大學外文中心 dc.relation (關聯) 舉辦日期:2009.04.11 dc.title (題名) The Effect of Focused and Unfocused Direct Written Corrective Feedback on a New Piece of Writing dc.type (資料類型) conference
