學術產出-Conference papers

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 A Study on the Citizen Participatory Trial in Korea
作者 權五杰
Kwon, Oh Geol
貢獻者 法學院
關鍵詞 Jury Trial in Korea; Korean Criminal Procedure; Judge’s exclusion; Appeal by the prosecutor;The advisory effect of the verdict
日期 2012-03-17
上傳時間 31-Dec-2015 10:09:57 (UTC+8)
摘要 In Korea there have been several democratic claims since 1900’s with the remarkable economic growth, one of which is the fairness of judgement through citizens’ participation in criminal procedures.Korean criminal system introduced a new trial system called “Citizens’ Participation in the Trial System” in 2008. From the historical view points, Korean criminal judicial system began through the foundation of “the Supreme Court’s Judicial Reform Committee” in 2003. One of the results, achieved by the Judicial Reforms, was the enactment of “The act on Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials.” According to this new trial system, common people began to participate in some of criminal trials not as an object, but as the subject of the criminal procedures.But the prospects for this jury trial system in korea are not bright. Because the Result of korean jury trial during 2008-2010 has so many problems.Above all most important problems are as follows1. Low rates of application to the jury trial2. Hgh rates of withdrawl of application by the accused3. High rates of exclusion by judge4. The excessive appeals by the prosecutorAfter the testing period (2008-2012), we had to decide whether we should continue this new system or not. Supposing that the new model is not inconsistent with the Korean culture, is the new Korean jury trial system thought to be suitable for us?Thus at this time, I am going to present some methods to solve current problem in korean jury trial system.
關聯 後繼受時代的東亞法文化 : 東亞法哲學研討會. 第八屆
主辦單位:國立政治大學法學院
舉辦日期:2012.03.17-2012.03.18
資料類型 conference
dc.contributor 法學院
dc.creator (作者) 權五杰zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Kwon, Oh Geol
dc.date (日期) 2012-03-17
dc.date.accessioned 31-Dec-2015 10:09:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 31-Dec-2015 10:09:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 31-Dec-2015 10:09:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/80170-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In Korea there have been several democratic claims since 1900’s with the remarkable economic growth, one of which is the fairness of judgement through citizens’ participation in criminal procedures.Korean criminal system introduced a new trial system called “Citizens’ Participation in the Trial System” in 2008. From the historical view points, Korean criminal judicial system began through the foundation of “the Supreme Court’s Judicial Reform Committee” in 2003. One of the results, achieved by the Judicial Reforms, was the enactment of “The act on Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials.” According to this new trial system, common people began to participate in some of criminal trials not as an object, but as the subject of the criminal procedures.But the prospects for this jury trial system in korea are not bright. Because the Result of korean jury trial during 2008-2010 has so many problems.Above all most important problems are as follows1. Low rates of application to the jury trial2. Hgh rates of withdrawl of application by the accused3. High rates of exclusion by judge4. The excessive appeals by the prosecutorAfter the testing period (2008-2012), we had to decide whether we should continue this new system or not. Supposing that the new model is not inconsistent with the Korean culture, is the new Korean jury trial system thought to be suitable for us?Thus at this time, I am going to present some methods to solve current problem in korean jury trial system.
dc.format.extent 100 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) 後繼受時代的東亞法文化 : 東亞法哲學研討會. 第八屆
dc.relation (關聯) 主辦單位:國立政治大學法學院
dc.relation (關聯) 舉辦日期:2012.03.17-2012.03.18
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Jury Trial in Korea; Korean Criminal Procedure; Judge’s exclusion; Appeal by the prosecutor;The advisory effect of the verdict
dc.title (題名) A Study on the Citizen Participatory Trial in Korea
dc.type (資料類型) conference