Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 臺灣農地法拍價格之決定因素
The Determinants of the Price of Foreclosed Farmland in Taiwan作者 梁維真 貢獻者 林子欽<br>蔡育新
Lin,Tzu Chin<br>Tsai,Yu Hsin
梁維真關鍵詞 農地價格
法拍市場
影響因素
farmland price
foreclosed market
determining factors日期 2015 上傳時間 4-Jan-2016 16:53:59 (UTC+8) 摘要 農地價格反應市場供需平衡的結果，亦可透過眾多影響農地價格的因素以觀察市場情形。歸納國內過去關於研究臺灣農地價格的文獻，較少探討法拍市場農地價格，而研究時間點大多位在民國89年農地市場開放前，且鮮少使用政策面的變數。因此本研究探討影響農地法拍價格的因素，並納入農業用地興建農舍最小基地面積限制作為研究變數，以觀察政策管制對於農地法拍價格的影響。進而將樣本分為都市型與農業型鄉鎮，比較影響農地價格各因素在不同型態鄉鎮間之差異。本研究以法拍市場中民國89至99年間全臺灣已拍定之非都市農地作為研究樣本，透過線性迴歸模型，探討各因素對拍定價格的影響，以及檢視最小基地面積的政策因素對拍定價格影響。由迴歸結果可觀察到在法拍市場中，拍賣底價為迴歸式中較重要因素，而農地產值與農地經營環境對農地拍定價格並無影響，面積限制的政策變數產生了邊際價值，且都市型鄉鎮的邊際價值高於農業型鄉鎮，顯示購買農地欲興建農舍者可能對都市型鄉鎮農地有較高的需求，且都市型鄉鎮中的農地價格受非農用的影響較大。基於上述，本研究研究結論有下列三點：一、農業生產條件並非農地價格主要影響因素。二、興建農舍最小基地面積限制對農地價格產生正向影響。三、都市型鄉鎮之農地價格受非農用的影響較大
Farmland price in the market reflects the interaction of supply and demand. We can also observe the market situation through many factors which affect the farmland price. Review of past literature about farmland price in Taiwan suggests that there are few literature addressing the price of foreclosed farmland. Most of the researches were published before the farmland market opened in year 2000 and rarely took account of the policy variables. So this study will discuss the determining factors of farmland price in the foreclosed market, with special attention paid to farmland policy-related variables. The sample is further divided into two groups of urban and agricultural towns in order to compare the differences of the factors affecting farmland price between two groups of towns.In this study, we use the foreclosed farmland of non-urban area from 2000 to 2009 as research sample. Effects of potential price-affecting variables are examined using a linear regression model. The regression results indicate that the auction reserve price is the more important factor, and farming production value and management environment do not affect the price. Minimum lot size for farmhouse construction has a marginal value effect, and its magnitude is larger in urban towns. Additionally, the farmland prices in urban towns are greatly influenced by non-agricultural use.Three research findings are thus arrived based upon our empirical evidence: 1. Agricultural-related variables do not significantly affect farmland price. 2. The minimum lot size of farmhouse has raised the farmland price. 3. The farmland prices in urban towns are greatly influenced by non-agricultural use.參考文獻 中文部分1.吳功顯，2007，「農地價格之組成及其影響因素之探討」，『華岡農科學報』，20:1-30。2.林子欽，2007，「農地移轉價格對農地所有權流通與農地利用影響之研究」，行政院農業委員會科技計畫研究報告。3.林國慶、趙蕙萍，1994a，「臺灣農地價格時間序列資料之編製與分析」，『臺灣土地金融季刊』，31（1）：75-97。4.林國慶、趙蕙萍，1994b，「臺灣三大都會區農地價格之動態分析」，『臺灣土地金融季刊』，31（2）：1-495.林國慶、趙蕙萍，1994c，「農地區位地價之研究-雲林縣崙背鄉」，『土地經濟年刊』，5：73-104。6.侯佩君、杜素豪、廖培珊、洪永泰、章英華，2008，「臺灣鄉鎮市區類型之研究:臺灣社會變遷基本調查第五期計畫之抽樣分層效果分析」，『調查研究』，23:7-32。7.張志銘，2003，耕地分割與農地興建農舍0.25公頃面積限制之探討，『農政與農情』，11:58-618.陳明燦，1997，「純農業型農業區農地價格之實證研究-以雲林縣大埤鄉為例」，『中興大法商學院法商學報』，33:259-290。9.陳明燦，1998，「農地價格、選擇價值與農地政策不同類型農業區之實證研究」，『中興大法商學院法商學報』，34: 209-234。10.黃炳文，2005，農地興建農舍的課題與調整方向，『農業世界』，278：93-97。11.黃美娟，2007，「土地面積與價格關係之研究」，國立政治大學地政系碩士論文。12.廖仲仁、張金鶚（2009），「景氣期間購屋市場機制選擇及拍賣市場折價效果之再檢視」，『住宅學報』，18（1）：1-2113.廖孟凡，2007，「所有權狀態對法拍土地價格之影響-以臺中市屯區之風景區和農業區為例」，雲林科技大學財務金融系碩士論文。14.趙蕙萍，1992，「臺灣農地價格之研究」，臺灣大學農業經濟系碩士論文。15.劉健哲、黃炳文，2005，農地管理政策與農地興建農舍問題之研究，『經社法治叢論』，34：305-33616.韓墘，2007，『土地資源經濟學』，臺中：滄海書局。英文部分1.Alston, J. M., 1986, “An Analysis of Growth of U.S. Farmland Prices”, 1963–82, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68（1）:1-9.2.Elad, R. L., Clifton, I. D., and Epperson, J. E., 1994, “Hedonic Estimation Applied to the Farmland Market in Georgia”, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 26（2）:351-366.3.Grieson, R., and J. White, 1981, “The Effects of Zoning on Structure and Land Markets”, Journal of Urban Economics, 10（3）:271-285.4.Gujarati, D. N, 2003, Basic Econometrics.4th Edition, India: McGraw-Hill International Edition.5.Huang, H, Miller, G. Y., Sherrick, B. J., and Gomez, M. I., 2006, “Factors Influencing Illinois Farmland Values”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88（2）:458-470.6.Isakson, H., 2004, “Analysis of the Effects of Large Lot Zoning”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 26（4）:397-415.7.Isgin, T., and Forster, D. L., 2006, “A Hedonic Price Analysis of Farmland Option Premiums Under Urban Influences”, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d`agroeconomie,54（3）:327-340.8.Jetzinger, S., Hüttel, S., and Odening, M., 2013, “Forced Sales and Farmland Prices”, Land Economics, 90（3）: 395-410.9.Lin, T. C., & Evans, A. W., 2000, “The Relationship between the Price of Land and Size of Plot When Plots Are Small”, Land Economics.76（3）:386-394.10.Moss, C. B. ,1997, “Returns, Interest Rates, and Inflation: How They Explain Changes in Agricultural land Values”, American Agricultural Economics, 79（5）:1311-1318.11.Murray, S and Munson M., 2007, Land Use Planning Implementation Manual, Vermont Planning Information Center.12.Quan, D. C., 1994, “Real Estate Auctions: A Survey of Theory and Practice”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 9:23-49.13.Rosen, S,1974,Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition, The Journal of Political Economy, 82（1）, 34-5514.Schoenbrod, D. S, 1969, “Large Lot Zoning”, The Yale Law Journal, 78（8）:1418-1441.15.Sinclair. R., 1967, “Von Thunen and Urban Sprawl”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 57:72-87.16.Sirmans, S. G., Macpherson, D. A, & Zietz, E. N.,2005,. The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models, Journal of Real Estate Literature,13（1）, 1-44. 17.Stewart, P. A. and Libby, L. w. ,1998, “Determinants of Farm Land Value: The Case of DeKalb County, Illinois”, Review of Agricultural Economics,20（1）: 80-95.18.Sunderman, M., Birch, J., Cannaday, R., and Hamilton, T., 1990, “Testing for Vertical Inequity in Property Tax Systems”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 5（3）:319-334.19.White, J., 1988, “Large Lot Zoning and Subdivision Costs: A Test”, Journal of Urban Economics, 23（3）:370-384.20.Zabel, J., & Dalton, M., 2011, “The Impact of Minimum Lot Size Regulations on House Prices in Eastern Massachusetts”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41（6）:571-583. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系
102257028資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1022570281 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 林子欽<br>蔡育新 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Lin,Tzu Chin<br>Tsai,Yu Hsin en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 梁維真 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 梁維真 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2015 en_US dc.date.accessioned 4-Jan-2016 16:53:59 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 4-Jan-2016 16:53:59 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Jan-2016 16:53:59 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1022570281 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/80296 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 地政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 102257028 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 農地價格反應市場供需平衡的結果，亦可透過眾多影響農地價格的因素以觀察市場情形。歸納國內過去關於研究臺灣農地價格的文獻，較少探討法拍市場農地價格，而研究時間點大多位在民國89年農地市場開放前，且鮮少使用政策面的變數。因此本研究探討影響農地法拍價格的因素，並納入農業用地興建農舍最小基地面積限制作為研究變數，以觀察政策管制對於農地法拍價格的影響。進而將樣本分為都市型與農業型鄉鎮，比較影響農地價格各因素在不同型態鄉鎮間之差異。本研究以法拍市場中民國89至99年間全臺灣已拍定之非都市農地作為研究樣本，透過線性迴歸模型，探討各因素對拍定價格的影響，以及檢視最小基地面積的政策因素對拍定價格影響。由迴歸結果可觀察到在法拍市場中，拍賣底價為迴歸式中較重要因素，而農地產值與農地經營環境對農地拍定價格並無影響，面積限制的政策變數產生了邊際價值，且都市型鄉鎮的邊際價值高於農業型鄉鎮，顯示購買農地欲興建農舍者可能對都市型鄉鎮農地有較高的需求，且都市型鄉鎮中的農地價格受非農用的影響較大。基於上述，本研究研究結論有下列三點：一、農業生產條件並非農地價格主要影響因素。二、興建農舍最小基地面積限制對農地價格產生正向影響。三、都市型鄉鎮之農地價格受非農用的影響較大 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Farmland price in the market reflects the interaction of supply and demand. We can also observe the market situation through many factors which affect the farmland price. Review of past literature about farmland price in Taiwan suggests that there are few literature addressing the price of foreclosed farmland. Most of the researches were published before the farmland market opened in year 2000 and rarely took account of the policy variables. So this study will discuss the determining factors of farmland price in the foreclosed market, with special attention paid to farmland policy-related variables. The sample is further divided into two groups of urban and agricultural towns in order to compare the differences of the factors affecting farmland price between two groups of towns.In this study, we use the foreclosed farmland of non-urban area from 2000 to 2009 as research sample. Effects of potential price-affecting variables are examined using a linear regression model. The regression results indicate that the auction reserve price is the more important factor, and farming production value and management environment do not affect the price. Minimum lot size for farmhouse construction has a marginal value effect, and its magnitude is larger in urban towns. Additionally, the farmland prices in urban towns are greatly influenced by non-agricultural use.Three research findings are thus arrived based upon our empirical evidence: 1. Agricultural-related variables do not significantly affect farmland price. 2. The minimum lot size of farmhouse has raised the farmland price. 3. The farmland prices in urban towns are greatly influenced by non-agricultural use. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機與目的 1第二節 研究架構與流程 4第二章 農地價格決定因素 7第一節 農地生產條件及市場因素 7第二節 農地使用管制及政策 12第三章 研究設計 17第一節 研究範圍與方法 17第二節 資料說明與處理 20第三節 模型建立與變數選取 24第四章 實證結果與分析 33第一節 影響法拍價格因素實證結果 33第二節 小結 49第五章 結論與建議 51第一節 研究結論 51第二節 後續研究建議 53參考文獻 55附錄 59 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1663160 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1022570281 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 農地價格 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 法拍市場 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 影響因素 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) farmland price en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) foreclosed market en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) determining factors en_US dc.title (題名) 臺灣農地法拍價格之決定因素 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Determinants of the Price of Foreclosed Farmland in Taiwan en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分1.吳功顯，2007，「農地價格之組成及其影響因素之探討」，『華岡農科學報』，20:1-30。2.林子欽，2007，「農地移轉價格對農地所有權流通與農地利用影響之研究」，行政院農業委員會科技計畫研究報告。3.林國慶、趙蕙萍，1994a，「臺灣農地價格時間序列資料之編製與分析」，『臺灣土地金融季刊』，31（1）：75-97。4.林國慶、趙蕙萍，1994b，「臺灣三大都會區農地價格之動態分析」，『臺灣土地金融季刊』，31（2）：1-495.林國慶、趙蕙萍，1994c，「農地區位地價之研究-雲林縣崙背鄉」，『土地經濟年刊』，5：73-104。6.侯佩君、杜素豪、廖培珊、洪永泰、章英華，2008，「臺灣鄉鎮市區類型之研究:臺灣社會變遷基本調查第五期計畫之抽樣分層效果分析」，『調查研究』，23:7-32。7.張志銘，2003，耕地分割與農地興建農舍0.25公頃面積限制之探討，『農政與農情』，11:58-618.陳明燦，1997，「純農業型農業區農地價格之實證研究-以雲林縣大埤鄉為例」，『中興大法商學院法商學報』，33:259-290。9.陳明燦，1998，「農地價格、選擇價值與農地政策不同類型農業區之實證研究」，『中興大法商學院法商學報』，34: 209-234。10.黃炳文，2005，農地興建農舍的課題與調整方向，『農業世界』，278：93-97。11.黃美娟，2007，「土地面積與價格關係之研究」，國立政治大學地政系碩士論文。12.廖仲仁、張金鶚（2009），「景氣期間購屋市場機制選擇及拍賣市場折價效果之再檢視」，『住宅學報』，18（1）：1-2113.廖孟凡，2007，「所有權狀態對法拍土地價格之影響-以臺中市屯區之風景區和農業區為例」，雲林科技大學財務金融系碩士論文。14.趙蕙萍，1992，「臺灣農地價格之研究」，臺灣大學農業經濟系碩士論文。15.劉健哲、黃炳文，2005，農地管理政策與農地興建農舍問題之研究，『經社法治叢論』，34：305-33616.韓墘，2007，『土地資源經濟學』，臺中：滄海書局。英文部分1.Alston, J. M., 1986, “An Analysis of Growth of U.S. Farmland Prices”, 1963–82, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68（1）:1-9.2.Elad, R. L., Clifton, I. D., and Epperson, J. E., 1994, “Hedonic Estimation Applied to the Farmland Market in Georgia”, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 26（2）:351-366.3.Grieson, R., and J. White, 1981, “The Effects of Zoning on Structure and Land Markets”, Journal of Urban Economics, 10（3）:271-285.4.Gujarati, D. N, 2003, Basic Econometrics.4th Edition, India: McGraw-Hill International Edition.5.Huang, H, Miller, G. Y., Sherrick, B. J., and Gomez, M. I., 2006, “Factors Influencing Illinois Farmland Values”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88（2）:458-470.6.Isakson, H., 2004, “Analysis of the Effects of Large Lot Zoning”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 26（4）:397-415.7.Isgin, T., and Forster, D. L., 2006, “A Hedonic Price Analysis of Farmland Option Premiums Under Urban Influences”, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d`agroeconomie,54（3）:327-340.8.Jetzinger, S., Hüttel, S., and Odening, M., 2013, “Forced Sales and Farmland Prices”, Land Economics, 90（3）: 395-410.9.Lin, T. C., & Evans, A. W., 2000, “The Relationship between the Price of Land and Size of Plot When Plots Are Small”, Land Economics.76（3）:386-394.10.Moss, C. B. ,1997, “Returns, Interest Rates, and Inflation: How They Explain Changes in Agricultural land Values”, American Agricultural Economics, 79（5）:1311-1318.11.Murray, S and Munson M., 2007, Land Use Planning Implementation Manual, Vermont Planning Information Center.12.Quan, D. C., 1994, “Real Estate Auctions: A Survey of Theory and Practice”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 9:23-49.13.Rosen, S,1974,Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition, The Journal of Political Economy, 82（1）, 34-5514.Schoenbrod, D. S, 1969, “Large Lot Zoning”, The Yale Law Journal, 78（8）:1418-1441.15.Sinclair. R., 1967, “Von Thunen and Urban Sprawl”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 57:72-87.16.Sirmans, S. G., Macpherson, D. A, & Zietz, E. N.,2005,. The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models, Journal of Real Estate Literature,13（1）, 1-44. 17.Stewart, P. A. and Libby, L. w. ,1998, “Determinants of Farm Land Value: The Case of DeKalb County, Illinois”, Review of Agricultural Economics,20（1）: 80-95.18.Sunderman, M., Birch, J., Cannaday, R., and Hamilton, T., 1990, “Testing for Vertical Inequity in Property Tax Systems”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 5（3）:319-334.19.White, J., 1988, “Large Lot Zoning and Subdivision Costs: A Test”, Journal of Urban Economics, 23（3）:370-384.20.Zabel, J., & Dalton, M., 2011, “The Impact of Minimum Lot Size Regulations on House Prices in Eastern Massachusetts”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41（6）:571-583. zh_TW
