| dc.contributor | 政治系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 翁燕菁 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Weng, Vivianne Yen-Ching | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2015-12 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2-Feb-2016 10:01:05 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 2-Feb-2016 10:01:05 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 2-Feb-2016 10:01:05 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81043 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 歐洲人權公約第3條係絕對保障。然於界定系爭事實是否達其「最低嚴重性」時，仍適用比例原則。歐洲人權法院運用動態解釋，延展公約第3條保障範疇，透過國家積極義務發展間接水平效力。公約原欠缺譴責有規模系統性歧視之條款，惟歐洲人權法院借重國際或歐洲之共識適用第3條，比照強制失蹤之國家義務認定，追究國家特殊弱勢保障機制之系統性失靈，督促消弭超越公私領域之重大歧視。嚴重系統性歧視構成以公約第3條取代第8條之背景。惟就相關判決手法，尚存第3條是否直接禁止歧視，或涉及第14條參照第3條之待決議題。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is an absolute protection. Nevertheless, while assessing whether an alleged fact reaches ＂a minimum level of severity＂ to invoke Article 3, there must be a proportionality review. Through its dynamic interpretation, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) steadily extends the protection of Article 3 beyond the classical definition of torture, reaching the level of indirect horizontal effect through the development of positive obligations. Due to the absence of a clause condemning massive and systematic discriminations in the ECHR, the ECtHR has replied to observations from international and European institutions, and even credible NGOs, to apply Article 3 in cases involving serious human rights violations. The Court is concerned about State accountability in disputed enforced disappearance cases. With Article 3, it questions the failures of State protection system vis-à-vis particularly vulnerable individuals and therefore urges States to eliminate systematic discrimination both in private and public spheres. The failure of mechanisms protecting fundamental human dignity results in serious systematic discrimination. This might have been the core concern of the ECtHR`s application of Article 3 in ＂ratione materiae＂ traditionally within the ambit of Article 8. However, concerning the question of which way would best illustrate the Court`s determination to condemn such discrimination, Article 3 alone, or Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 3, it seems the Court still needs to clarify its approach. | |
| dc.format.extent | 2202889 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 歐美研究, 45(4), 691-765 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 非人道或侮辱處遇;歐洲人權公約;人性尊嚴;間接水平效力;禁止歧視 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | inhuman or degrading treatments or punishments;European Convention on Human Rights;horizontal effect;prohibition of discrimination | |
| dc.title (題名) | 歐洲人權公約第三條與嚴重系統性歧視——私人 關係中的非人道或侮辱待遇 | zh_TW |
| dc.title.alternative (其他題名) | Article 3 of European Convention on Human Rights and Serious Systematic Discrimination-Inhuman or Degrading Treatments in Private Relations | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
