| dc.contributor | 政治系 | - |
| dc.creator (作者) | 陳建綱 | - |
| dc.creator (作者) | Chen, Brian Chien-Kang | - |
| dc.date (日期) | 2015-12 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2-Feb-2016 10:01:47 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 2-Feb-2016 10:01:47 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 2-Feb-2016 10:01:47 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81046 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 晚近以來，越來越多的研究者主張休謨的正義理論立基於社會契約的概念上，這與休謨以批判社會契約論著稱的傳統形象相去甚遠。為評估此研究趨勢是否有助於釐清休謨的正義理論，本文聚焦於高提也的＂David Hume, Contractarian＂。該文的主要涵義為：第一，休謨的效益原則不同於效益主義所捍衛的公共福祉，反而與位居契約論核心的互惠更為相符。其次，高提也強調休謨思想的保守性，否定休謨具備分配正義的關懷。本文指出，休謨眼中的人性並非僅以追求自我之私利為滿足；相反地，人類與生俱來的親社會性在休謨的理論中發揮了關鍵的作用。其次，休謨並非僅關注財產制度之穩定性的資產階級代言人，在其經濟論文中，他表達了對社會不平等問題的重視，尤其是對奴隸制度的譴責。 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | There is a trend that forms lately in the study of David Hume`s political thought, namely an increasing number of scholars now regard Hume`s theory of justice as founded on the idea of social contract. This view deviates from Hume`s conventional image which proposed significant criticism of social contract theory. To evaluate this interpretive perspective, this article focuses on David Gauthier`s ＂David Hume, Contractarian＂. Gauthier`s essay has two implications. First, Gauthier argues that whereas Hume`s theory of justice is founded on a principle of utility, utility for Hume does not reveal the general welfare of society as what utilitarianism defends, but mutual advantage compatible with a contractarian account of morality. Second, Gauthier emphasizes the conservative tendency of Hume`s political thought, and he rejects that there is a concern for distributive justice in it. This article argues that, unlike Gauthier`s view, Hume thinks that human nature may not be reduced to the psychology of selfishness. On the contrary, men`s natural sociability and sympathy are crucial to Hume`s theory of justice. Moreover, if Gauthier took Hume`s economic essays more seriously, he would have found Hume`s criticism of slavery and oppressions. On that account, it seems not fair to depict Hume as a conservative indifferent to social inequality. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 2104449 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 政治與社會哲學評論, 55, 1-49. | - |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 休謨;正義;社會契約;親社會性;效益 | - |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | David Hume;Justice;Social Contract;Sociability;Utility | - |
| dc.title (題名) | 休謨是契約論者嗎？對高提也的“David Hume Contractarian”之批判性反思 | - |
| dc.title.alternative (其他題名) | Is Hume A Contractarian? A Critical Reflection on David Gauthier`s ＂David Hume, Contractarian＂ | - |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.6523/168451532015120055001 | - |
| dc.doi.uri (DOI) | http://dx.doi.org/10.6523/168451532015120055001 | - |
