Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 原生廣告位置及內容一致性對廣告效果之影響-以產品及內容涉入程度為干擾變數
The Effects of Native Advertisement Placement and Content Congruity on Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Effects of Product and Content Involvements
作者 陳維謙
Chen, Wei Chien
貢獻者 樓永堅
Luo, Yung Chien
陳維謙
Chen, Wei Chien
關鍵詞 原生廣告
廣告位置
內容一致性
產品涉入
內容涉入
廣告效果
Native advertising
advertisement placement
content congruity
product involvement
content involvement
advertising effectiveness
日期 2015
上傳時間 1-Mar-2016 10:25:20 (UTC+8)
摘要 近幾年廣告主與媒體商為了提升與消費者的溝通效率,推出「原生」概念的廣告服務。由於原生廣告強調視覺整合、低干擾性、高內容價值,因此相較干擾性高的橫幅廣告,原生廣告更能有效攫取消費者對廣告的關注及給予正面評價。目前原生廣告正處於高速成長階段,並且衍生出多元的廣告型態,然而目前國內外對原生廣告的廣告效果的相關研究仍相當稀少。因此,本研究透過系統性的調查與分析,以增進對原生廣告的理解以及降低試誤成本。

本研究以消費者的角度切入,探討原生廣告不同的投放位置(資訊流內/資訊流外)、內容一致性(一致性高/一致性低)在不同的產品涉入(高/低)及內容涉入(高/低)的條件下,對於廣告效果的影響。分析結果顯示,原生廣告 和資訊流的接近程度與廣告效果有正相關性,資訊流內原生廣告的廣告效果高於資訊流外的原生廣告。不過,廣告位置與廣告效果之間的關係並未受到產品涉入或內容涉入程度的干擾。再者,廣告與內容的一致性越高有助於提升廣告效果,而且產品涉入與內容一致性有顯著交互作用,於低產品涉入情境下,高內容一致性組別的廣告效果較佳;高產品涉入情境下,兩組之間的廣告效果無顯著差異。另外,內容涉入程度對於廣告與內容一致性均無顯著的干擾效果。本研究根據分析之發現,提出若干實務建議作為相關企業的參考。
In recent years, marketers and publishers introduced “native advertising” in order to elevate communication efficiency with consumers. Compared to banner ads, native advertising represents the more visual-integrated, less interfering and higher content-valued forms of advertisement, which is capable of drawing more attention and gaining more positive evaluation from consumers. Despite native advertising is in the rapid growth stage of development and evolves diverse formats and techniques, there are few studies focused on its advertising effectiveness. Therefore, this research would like to expand the understandings of native advertising and reduce cost of try-and-error through systematic survey and analysis.

From the angle of customer, this research investigates how the different of advertisement placement (In-stream / Out of stream) and content congruity (High / Low) affects advertising effectiveness in different level of product involvement (High / Low) and content involvement (High / Low). The result shows that the proximity of native advertising to viewer’s activity stream is positively associated with advertising effectiveness. Neither product involvement nor content involvement moderates advertisement placement on advertising effectiveness. Also, content congruity has positive effect on advertising effectiveness. The moderating effect of product involvement exists between content congruity and advertising effectiveness, while content involvement does not.
參考文獻 一、 中文文獻
王君豪. (2003). 行動廣告表現方式對廣告效果影響之探討. 成功大學電信管理研究所學位論文, 1-148.
朱利夫. (2011). 代言配適度, 廣告態度, 品牌態度與代言人態度關係之研究---以王建民代言為例, 臺北市立體育學院休閒與運動管理學碩士論文.
域動行銷. (2015). 域動行銷2015年第一季台灣網路、行動調查數據報告. 域動行銷. Retrieved from http://www.clickforce.com.tw/newspaper/Report/2015Q1.pdf
張欽惠. (2010). 時尚廣告表現類型搭配產品類型對廣告效果影響之研究: 以認知需求為干擾效果. 輔仁大學.
張維仁. (2015, Mar.). 原生廣告5大型態. 動腦, 467, 60-65.
楊朝明, & 周郁軒. (2013). 不同認知需求層級與雙關修辭品質對於平面廣告記憶的影響. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 18(1).
楊朝明, & 郭凱婷. (2013). 電視廣告音樂之型態在不同廣告涉入度下對廣告效果的影響. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 18(2).
樊志育. (1999). 廣告效果測定技術: 三民書局經銷.
蔡佩珊. (2003). 網路廣告效果評估方式之探討.
Titan. (2014, Aug. 18). 低頭族一天看手機 150 次,行動原生廣告將崛起. Inside 硬塞的網路趨勢觀察. Retrieved from http://www.inside.com.tw/2014/08/18/yahoo-taiwan-is-going-to-push-native-ads-on-mobile-platforms#fnref:3

二、 英文文獻
Alwitt, L. F., & Prabhaker, P. R. (1992). Functional and belief dimensions of attitudes to television advertising: Implications for copytesting. Journal of Advertising Research.
Andersson, A., & Nilsson, J. (2000). Wireless Advertising Effectiveness. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. The psychology of learning and motivation, 2, 89-195.

Bateman, S. (2014). Online Advertising Models: CPC, CPM or CPA? Promise Media. Retrieved from http://www.promisemedia.com/online-advertising/best-revenue-deals-cpm-cpc-or-cpa
Bergus, G. R., Levin, I. P., & Elstein, A. S. (2002). Presenting risks and benefits to patients. Journal of general internal medicine, 17(8), 612-617.
Brackett, L. K., & Carr, B. N. (2001). Cyberspace advertising vs. other media: Consumer vs. mature student attitudes. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(5), 23-32.
Calisir, F., & Karaali, D. (2008). The impacts of banner location, banner content and navigation style on banner recognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 535-543.
Cho, C.-H. (1999). How advertising works on the WWW: Modified elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 21(1), 34-50.
Cho, C.-H. (2003). The effectiveness of banner advertisements: Involvement and click-through. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 623-645.
Cramer, H. (2015). Effects of Ad Quality & Content-Relevance on Perceived Content Quality. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Dahlén, M., Murray, M., & Nordenstam, S. (2004). An empirical study of perceptions of implicit meanings in World Wide Web advertisements versus print advertisements. Journal of Marketing Communications, 10(1), 35-47.
De Pelsmacker, P., Geuens, M., & Anckaert, P. (2002). Media context and advertising effectiveness: The role of context appreciation and context/ad similarity. Journal of advertising, 31(2), 49-61.
de Sa, M., Navalpakkam, V., & Churchill, E. F. (2013). Mobile advertising: evaluating the effects of animation, user and content relevance. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Dholakia, U. M. (1997). An investigation of the relationship between perceived risk and product involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 159-167.
Drèze, X., & Hussherr, F. X. (2003). Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? Journal of interactive marketing, 17(4), 8-23.
Ducoffe, R. H. (1996). Advertising value and advertising on the web. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(5), 21-35.
Elliott, M. T., & Speck, P. S. (1998). Consumer perceptions of advertising clutter and its impact across various media. Journal of Advertising Research, 38, 29-42.
eMarketer. (2011, Mar. 29). TV Ad Spending Largely Unaffected by Growth Online. eMarketer. Retrieved from http://www.emarketer.com/Article/TV-Ad-Spending-Largely-Unaffected-by-Growth-Online/1008304
eMarketer. (2013, Aug. 22). US Total Media Ad Spend Inches Up, Pushed by Digital eMarketer. Retrieved from http://www.emarketer.com/Article/US-Total-Media-Ad-Spend-Inches-Up-Pushed-by-Digital/1010154
Eyetrack_III. (2004). Eyetrack III. Retrieved from http://www.math.unipd.it/~massimo/corsi/tecweb2/Eyetrack-III.pdf
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Fuentes, L. J., Carmona, E., Agis, I. F., & Catena, A. (1994). The role of the anterior attention system in semantic processing of both foveal and parafoveal words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1), 17-25.
Furnham, A., Gunter, B., & Richardson, F. (2002). Effects of Product–Program Congruity and Viewer Involvement on Memory for Televised Advertisements1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 124-141.
Furnham, A., Gunter, B., & Walsh, D. (1998). Effects of programme context on memory of humorous television commercials. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12(6), 555-567.
Gerrig, R. J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2002). Glossary of psychological terms. Psychology and Life.
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2011). Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Science, 30(3), 389-404.
Google. (2014, November). The Importance of Being Seen. Google. Retrieved from http://think.storage.googleapis.com/docs/the-importance-of-being-seen_study.pdf
Greenwald, A. G., & Leavitt, C. (1984). Audience involvement in advertising: Four levels. Journal of Consumer Research, 581-592.
Ha, L. (1996). Observations: advertising clutter in consumer magazines: dimensions and effects. Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 76-84.
Haugtvedt, C. P., & Wegener, D. T. (1994). Message order effects in persuasion: An attitude strength perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 205-218.
Heo, N., & Sundar, S. S. (2000). Emotional responses to web advertising: the effects of animation, position, and product involvement on physiological arousal. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Phoenix, AZ.

Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. the Journal of Marketing, 50-68.
Houston, M. J., & Rothschild, M. L. (1978). Conceptual and methodological perspectives on involvement. Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and directions, 184(187), 262-270.
Howard, D. J., & Barry, T. E. (1994). The role of thematic congruence between a mood-inducing event and an advertised product in determining the effects of mood on brand attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3(1), 1-27.
Huang, J.-H., & Yang, T.-K. (2012). The Effectiveness of In-Game Advertising: The Impacts of Ad Type and Game/Ad Relevance. International Journal of Electronic BusinessManagement, 10(1), 61.
Huang, M. H. (2006). Flow, enduring, and situational involvement in the Web environment: A tripartite second‐order examination. Psychology & Marketing, 23(5), 383-411.
IAB. (2013, Dec. 4). Native Advertising Playbook. IAB. Retrieved from http://www.iab.net/media/file/IAB-Native-Advertising-Playbook2.pdf
IAB/PwC. (2009, Mar. 8). 2008 Internet Advertising Revenue Full-Year Report. IAB. Retrieved from http://www.iab.net/media/file/IAB_PwC_2008_full_year.pdf
IAB/PwC. (2015, Apr. 22). 2014 Internet Advertising Revenue Full-Year Report. IAB. Retrieved from http://www.iab.net/media/file/IAB_Internet_Advertising_Revenue_FY_2014.pdf
Jeong, Y., & King, C. M. (2010). Impacts of website context relevance on banner advertisement effectiveness. Journal of Promotion Management, 16(3), 247-264.
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. the Journal of Marketing, 1-22.
Ko, H., Cho, C.-H., & Roberts, M. S. (2005). Internet uses and gratifications: A structural equation model of interactive advertising. Journal of advertising, 34(2), 57-70.
Kono, S. (2009). From the marketers` perspective: The interactive media situation in Japan Television Goes Digital (pp. 57-59): Springer.
Kotler, P. (1995). Marketing management: analysis, planning, and control (8th ed.): Prentice-Hall.
Krugman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public opinion quarterly, 29(3), 349-356.
Lavidge, R. J., & Steiner, G. A. (1961). A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Advertising & Society Review, 1(1).
Lee, J., Park, D.-H., & Han, I. (2008). The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(3), 341-352.
Lee, M., & Faber, R. J. (2007). Effects of product placement in on-line games on brand memory: A perspective of the limited-capacity model of attention. Journal of advertising, 36(4), 75-90.
Leigh, J. H. (1992). Modality congruence, multiple resource theory and intermedia broadcast comparisons: An elaboration. Journal of advertising, 21(2), 55-62.
Levi, L. (2015). A`Faustian Pact`?: Native Advertising and the Future of the Press. Native Advertising and the Future of the Press (February 27, 2015).
Lord, K. R., Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (2001). The effects of program-induced mood states on memory for commercial information. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 23(1), 1-15.
MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of marketing research, 130-143.
Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. Paper presented at the Affect and cognition, The seventeenth annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition.
McClung, G. W., Park, C. W., & Sauer, W. J. (1985). Viewer processing of commercial messages: Context and involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 12(1), 351-355.
McKinsey. (2014, Sept.). Global Media Report 2014. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/client_service/media_and_entertainment/latest_thinking/global_media_report_2014
Mehta, A. (2000). Advertising attitudes and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(3), 67-71.
Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? Journal of marketing research, 318-332.
Moore, R. S., Stammerjohan, C. A., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Banner advertiser-web site context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes. Journal of advertising, 34(2), 14.
Murphy, J., Hofacker, C., & Mizerski, R. (2006). Primacy and recency effects on clicking behavior. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(2), 522-535.

Norris, C. E., Colman, A. M., & Aleixo, P. A. (2003). Selective exposure to television programmes and advertising effectiveness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 593-606.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods: New York: McGraw-Hill.
Park, C. W., & McClung, G. W. (1986). The effect of TV program involvement on involvement with commercials. Advances in Consumer Research, 13(1), 544-548.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: Springer.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 41(5), 847.
Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., Hawkins, C., & Wegener, D. T. (2001). Motivation to think and order effects in persuasion: The moderating role of chunking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(3), 332-344.
Rettie, R., Robinson, H., & Jenner, B. (2003). Does internet advertising alienate users? : Kingston Business School, Kingston University.
Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual review of psychology, 39(1), 475-543.
Richins, M. L., & Bloch, P. H. (1986). After the new wears off: The temporal context of product involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 280-285.
Rothschild, M. L. (1984). Perspectives on involvement: current problems and future directions. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 216-217.
Schlosser, A. E., Shavitt, S., & Kanfer, A. (1999). Survey of Internet users’ attitudes toward Internet advertising. Journal of interactive marketing, 13(3), 34-54.
Shamdasani, P. N., Stanaland, A. J., & Tan, J. (2001). Location, location, location: Insights for advertising placement on the web. Journal of Advertising Research.
Sharethrough. (2015, Mar.). A Neuroscience Perspective: Assessing Visual Focus, Message Processing & The Ability To Strengthen Associations Through Mobile Native Advertising. Sharethrough, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.sharethrough.com/neuroscience/
Sharma, A. (2000). Recall of television commercials as a function of viewing context: The impact of program-commercial congruity on commercial messages. The Journal of general psychology, 127(4), 383-396.
Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66.

Sundar, S. S., & Kim, J. (2005). Interactivity and persuasion: Influencing attitudes with information and involvement. Journal of interactive advertising, 5(2), 5-18.
Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1), 231-270.
Walsh, M. (2011, Sept. 26). Union Square Founder: New Online Ads Will Employ `Native Monetization`. Media Post. Retrieved from http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/159291/union-square-founder-new-online-ads-will-employ.html?edition=
Wang, A. (2006). Advertising engagement: A driver of message involvement on message effects. JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING RESEARCH-NEW YORK-, 46(4), 355.
Yang, K. C. (2004). A comparison of attitudes towards Internet advertising among lifestyle segments in Taiwan. Journal of Marketing Communications, 10(3), 195-212.
Yoo, C. Y. (2008). Unconscious processing of Web advertising: Effects on implicit memory, attitude toward the brand, and consideration set. Journal of interactive marketing, 22(2), 2-18.
Yoon, S.-J., & Kim, J.-H. (2001). Is the Internet more effective than traditional media? Factors affecting the choice of media. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(6), 53-60.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 341-352.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1986). Conceptualizing involvement. Journal of advertising, 15(2), 4-34.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of advertising, 23(4), 12.
Zanot, E. (1981). Public attitudes toward advertising. Advertising in a New Age,. Provo, Utah: American Academy of Advertising.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理學系
101355021
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101355021
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 樓永堅zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Luo, Yung Chienen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳維謙zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Wei Chienen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳維謙zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Wei Chienen_US
dc.date (日期) 2015en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Mar-2016 10:25:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Mar-2016 10:25:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Mar-2016 10:25:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0101355021en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81454-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 企業管理學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101355021zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 近幾年廣告主與媒體商為了提升與消費者的溝通效率,推出「原生」概念的廣告服務。由於原生廣告強調視覺整合、低干擾性、高內容價值,因此相較干擾性高的橫幅廣告,原生廣告更能有效攫取消費者對廣告的關注及給予正面評價。目前原生廣告正處於高速成長階段,並且衍生出多元的廣告型態,然而目前國內外對原生廣告的廣告效果的相關研究仍相當稀少。因此,本研究透過系統性的調查與分析,以增進對原生廣告的理解以及降低試誤成本。

本研究以消費者的角度切入,探討原生廣告不同的投放位置(資訊流內/資訊流外)、內容一致性(一致性高/一致性低)在不同的產品涉入(高/低)及內容涉入(高/低)的條件下,對於廣告效果的影響。分析結果顯示,原生廣告 和資訊流的接近程度與廣告效果有正相關性,資訊流內原生廣告的廣告效果高於資訊流外的原生廣告。不過,廣告位置與廣告效果之間的關係並未受到產品涉入或內容涉入程度的干擾。再者,廣告與內容的一致性越高有助於提升廣告效果,而且產品涉入與內容一致性有顯著交互作用,於低產品涉入情境下,高內容一致性組別的廣告效果較佳;高產品涉入情境下,兩組之間的廣告效果無顯著差異。另外,內容涉入程度對於廣告與內容一致性均無顯著的干擾效果。本研究根據分析之發現,提出若干實務建議作為相關企業的參考。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In recent years, marketers and publishers introduced “native advertising” in order to elevate communication efficiency with consumers. Compared to banner ads, native advertising represents the more visual-integrated, less interfering and higher content-valued forms of advertisement, which is capable of drawing more attention and gaining more positive evaluation from consumers. Despite native advertising is in the rapid growth stage of development and evolves diverse formats and techniques, there are few studies focused on its advertising effectiveness. Therefore, this research would like to expand the understandings of native advertising and reduce cost of try-and-error through systematic survey and analysis.

From the angle of customer, this research investigates how the different of advertisement placement (In-stream / Out of stream) and content congruity (High / Low) affects advertising effectiveness in different level of product involvement (High / Low) and content involvement (High / Low). The result shows that the proximity of native advertising to viewer’s activity stream is positively associated with advertising effectiveness. Neither product involvement nor content involvement moderates advertisement placement on advertising effectiveness. Also, content congruity has positive effect on advertising effectiveness. The moderating effect of product involvement exists between content congruity and advertising effectiveness, while content involvement does not.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、 緒論 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究目的 4
第二章、 文獻探討 6
第一節、原生廣告 6
第二節、廣告效果 10
第三節、廣告投放位置 16
第四節、廣告與內容一致性 16
第五節、涉入理論 18
第三章、 研究方法 24
第一節、研究架構 24
第二節、研究變數之操作型定義 25
第三節、研究設計 30
第四節、資料蒐集與分析方法 34
第四章、 研究結果與分析 35
第一節、樣本結構 35
第二節、信度分析 36
第三節、變數的操弄檢定 37
第四節、研究假設驗證 39
第五節、假設驗證結果之討論 59
第五章、 研究結論與建議 64
第一節、研究結論 64
第二節、管理意涵與實務建議 65
第三節、研究限制與未來研究之建議 66
參考文獻 68
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2137196 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101355021en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 原生廣告zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 廣告位置zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 內容一致性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 產品涉入zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 內容涉入zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 廣告效果zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Native advertisingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) advertisement placementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) content congruityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) product involvementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) content involvementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) advertising effectivenessen_US
dc.title (題名) 原生廣告位置及內容一致性對廣告效果之影響-以產品及內容涉入程度為干擾變數zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Effects of Native Advertisement Placement and Content Congruity on Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Effects of Product and Content Involvementsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文文獻
王君豪. (2003). 行動廣告表現方式對廣告效果影響之探討. 成功大學電信管理研究所學位論文, 1-148.
朱利夫. (2011). 代言配適度, 廣告態度, 品牌態度與代言人態度關係之研究---以王建民代言為例, 臺北市立體育學院休閒與運動管理學碩士論文.
域動行銷. (2015). 域動行銷2015年第一季台灣網路、行動調查數據報告. 域動行銷. Retrieved from http://www.clickforce.com.tw/newspaper/Report/2015Q1.pdf
張欽惠. (2010). 時尚廣告表現類型搭配產品類型對廣告效果影響之研究: 以認知需求為干擾效果. 輔仁大學.
張維仁. (2015, Mar.). 原生廣告5大型態. 動腦, 467, 60-65.
楊朝明, & 周郁軒. (2013). 不同認知需求層級與雙關修辭品質對於平面廣告記憶的影響. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 18(1).
楊朝明, & 郭凱婷. (2013). 電視廣告音樂之型態在不同廣告涉入度下對廣告效果的影響. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 18(2).
樊志育. (1999). 廣告效果測定技術: 三民書局經銷.
蔡佩珊. (2003). 網路廣告效果評估方式之探討.
Titan. (2014, Aug. 18). 低頭族一天看手機 150 次,行動原生廣告將崛起. Inside 硬塞的網路趨勢觀察. Retrieved from http://www.inside.com.tw/2014/08/18/yahoo-taiwan-is-going-to-push-native-ads-on-mobile-platforms#fnref:3

二、 英文文獻
Alwitt, L. F., & Prabhaker, P. R. (1992). Functional and belief dimensions of attitudes to television advertising: Implications for copytesting. Journal of Advertising Research.
Andersson, A., & Nilsson, J. (2000). Wireless Advertising Effectiveness. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. The psychology of learning and motivation, 2, 89-195.

Bateman, S. (2014). Online Advertising Models: CPC, CPM or CPA? Promise Media. Retrieved from http://www.promisemedia.com/online-advertising/best-revenue-deals-cpm-cpc-or-cpa
Bergus, G. R., Levin, I. P., & Elstein, A. S. (2002). Presenting risks and benefits to patients. Journal of general internal medicine, 17(8), 612-617.
Brackett, L. K., & Carr, B. N. (2001). Cyberspace advertising vs. other media: Consumer vs. mature student attitudes. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(5), 23-32.
Calisir, F., & Karaali, D. (2008). The impacts of banner location, banner content and navigation style on banner recognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 535-543.
Cho, C.-H. (1999). How advertising works on the WWW: Modified elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 21(1), 34-50.
Cho, C.-H. (2003). The effectiveness of banner advertisements: Involvement and click-through. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 623-645.
Cramer, H. (2015). Effects of Ad Quality & Content-Relevance on Perceived Content Quality. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Dahlén, M., Murray, M., & Nordenstam, S. (2004). An empirical study of perceptions of implicit meanings in World Wide Web advertisements versus print advertisements. Journal of Marketing Communications, 10(1), 35-47.
De Pelsmacker, P., Geuens, M., & Anckaert, P. (2002). Media context and advertising effectiveness: The role of context appreciation and context/ad similarity. Journal of advertising, 31(2), 49-61.
de Sa, M., Navalpakkam, V., & Churchill, E. F. (2013). Mobile advertising: evaluating the effects of animation, user and content relevance. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Dholakia, U. M. (1997). An investigation of the relationship between perceived risk and product involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 159-167.
Drèze, X., & Hussherr, F. X. (2003). Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? Journal of interactive marketing, 17(4), 8-23.
Ducoffe, R. H. (1996). Advertising value and advertising on the web. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(5), 21-35.
Elliott, M. T., & Speck, P. S. (1998). Consumer perceptions of advertising clutter and its impact across various media. Journal of Advertising Research, 38, 29-42.
eMarketer. (2011, Mar. 29). TV Ad Spending Largely Unaffected by Growth Online. eMarketer. Retrieved from http://www.emarketer.com/Article/TV-Ad-Spending-Largely-Unaffected-by-Growth-Online/1008304
eMarketer. (2013, Aug. 22). US Total Media Ad Spend Inches Up, Pushed by Digital eMarketer. Retrieved from http://www.emarketer.com/Article/US-Total-Media-Ad-Spend-Inches-Up-Pushed-by-Digital/1010154
Eyetrack_III. (2004). Eyetrack III. Retrieved from http://www.math.unipd.it/~massimo/corsi/tecweb2/Eyetrack-III.pdf
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Fuentes, L. J., Carmona, E., Agis, I. F., & Catena, A. (1994). The role of the anterior attention system in semantic processing of both foveal and parafoveal words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1), 17-25.
Furnham, A., Gunter, B., & Richardson, F. (2002). Effects of Product–Program Congruity and Viewer Involvement on Memory for Televised Advertisements1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 124-141.
Furnham, A., Gunter, B., & Walsh, D. (1998). Effects of programme context on memory of humorous television commercials. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12(6), 555-567.
Gerrig, R. J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2002). Glossary of psychological terms. Psychology and Life.
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2011). Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Science, 30(3), 389-404.
Google. (2014, November). The Importance of Being Seen. Google. Retrieved from http://think.storage.googleapis.com/docs/the-importance-of-being-seen_study.pdf
Greenwald, A. G., & Leavitt, C. (1984). Audience involvement in advertising: Four levels. Journal of Consumer Research, 581-592.
Ha, L. (1996). Observations: advertising clutter in consumer magazines: dimensions and effects. Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 76-84.
Haugtvedt, C. P., & Wegener, D. T. (1994). Message order effects in persuasion: An attitude strength perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 205-218.
Heo, N., & Sundar, S. S. (2000). Emotional responses to web advertising: the effects of animation, position, and product involvement on physiological arousal. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Phoenix, AZ.

Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. the Journal of Marketing, 50-68.
Houston, M. J., & Rothschild, M. L. (1978). Conceptual and methodological perspectives on involvement. Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and directions, 184(187), 262-270.
Howard, D. J., & Barry, T. E. (1994). The role of thematic congruence between a mood-inducing event and an advertised product in determining the effects of mood on brand attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3(1), 1-27.
Huang, J.-H., & Yang, T.-K. (2012). The Effectiveness of In-Game Advertising: The Impacts of Ad Type and Game/Ad Relevance. International Journal of Electronic BusinessManagement, 10(1), 61.
Huang, M. H. (2006). Flow, enduring, and situational involvement in the Web environment: A tripartite second‐order examination. Psychology & Marketing, 23(5), 383-411.
IAB. (2013, Dec. 4). Native Advertising Playbook. IAB. Retrieved from http://www.iab.net/media/file/IAB-Native-Advertising-Playbook2.pdf
IAB/PwC. (2009, Mar. 8). 2008 Internet Advertising Revenue Full-Year Report. IAB. Retrieved from http://www.iab.net/media/file/IAB_PwC_2008_full_year.pdf
IAB/PwC. (2015, Apr. 22). 2014 Internet Advertising Revenue Full-Year Report. IAB. Retrieved from http://www.iab.net/media/file/IAB_Internet_Advertising_Revenue_FY_2014.pdf
Jeong, Y., & King, C. M. (2010). Impacts of website context relevance on banner advertisement effectiveness. Journal of Promotion Management, 16(3), 247-264.
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. the Journal of Marketing, 1-22.
Ko, H., Cho, C.-H., & Roberts, M. S. (2005). Internet uses and gratifications: A structural equation model of interactive advertising. Journal of advertising, 34(2), 57-70.
Kono, S. (2009). From the marketers` perspective: The interactive media situation in Japan Television Goes Digital (pp. 57-59): Springer.
Kotler, P. (1995). Marketing management: analysis, planning, and control (8th ed.): Prentice-Hall.
Krugman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public opinion quarterly, 29(3), 349-356.
Lavidge, R. J., & Steiner, G. A. (1961). A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Advertising & Society Review, 1(1).
Lee, J., Park, D.-H., & Han, I. (2008). The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(3), 341-352.
Lee, M., & Faber, R. J. (2007). Effects of product placement in on-line games on brand memory: A perspective of the limited-capacity model of attention. Journal of advertising, 36(4), 75-90.
Leigh, J. H. (1992). Modality congruence, multiple resource theory and intermedia broadcast comparisons: An elaboration. Journal of advertising, 21(2), 55-62.
Levi, L. (2015). A`Faustian Pact`?: Native Advertising and the Future of the Press. Native Advertising and the Future of the Press (February 27, 2015).
Lord, K. R., Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (2001). The effects of program-induced mood states on memory for commercial information. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 23(1), 1-15.
MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of marketing research, 130-143.
Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. Paper presented at the Affect and cognition, The seventeenth annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition.
McClung, G. W., Park, C. W., & Sauer, W. J. (1985). Viewer processing of commercial messages: Context and involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 12(1), 351-355.
McKinsey. (2014, Sept.). Global Media Report 2014. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/client_service/media_and_entertainment/latest_thinking/global_media_report_2014
Mehta, A. (2000). Advertising attitudes and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(3), 67-71.
Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? Journal of marketing research, 318-332.
Moore, R. S., Stammerjohan, C. A., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Banner advertiser-web site context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes. Journal of advertising, 34(2), 14.
Murphy, J., Hofacker, C., & Mizerski, R. (2006). Primacy and recency effects on clicking behavior. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(2), 522-535.

Norris, C. E., Colman, A. M., & Aleixo, P. A. (2003). Selective exposure to television programmes and advertising effectiveness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 593-606.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods: New York: McGraw-Hill.
Park, C. W., & McClung, G. W. (1986). The effect of TV program involvement on involvement with commercials. Advances in Consumer Research, 13(1), 544-548.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: Springer.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 41(5), 847.
Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., Hawkins, C., & Wegener, D. T. (2001). Motivation to think and order effects in persuasion: The moderating role of chunking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(3), 332-344.
Rettie, R., Robinson, H., & Jenner, B. (2003). Does internet advertising alienate users? : Kingston Business School, Kingston University.
Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual review of psychology, 39(1), 475-543.
Richins, M. L., & Bloch, P. H. (1986). After the new wears off: The temporal context of product involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 280-285.
Rothschild, M. L. (1984). Perspectives on involvement: current problems and future directions. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 216-217.
Schlosser, A. E., Shavitt, S., & Kanfer, A. (1999). Survey of Internet users’ attitudes toward Internet advertising. Journal of interactive marketing, 13(3), 34-54.
Shamdasani, P. N., Stanaland, A. J., & Tan, J. (2001). Location, location, location: Insights for advertising placement on the web. Journal of Advertising Research.
Sharethrough. (2015, Mar.). A Neuroscience Perspective: Assessing Visual Focus, Message Processing & The Ability To Strengthen Associations Through Mobile Native Advertising. Sharethrough, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.sharethrough.com/neuroscience/
Sharma, A. (2000). Recall of television commercials as a function of viewing context: The impact of program-commercial congruity on commercial messages. The Journal of general psychology, 127(4), 383-396.
Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66.

Sundar, S. S., & Kim, J. (2005). Interactivity and persuasion: Influencing attitudes with information and involvement. Journal of interactive advertising, 5(2), 5-18.
Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1), 231-270.
Walsh, M. (2011, Sept. 26). Union Square Founder: New Online Ads Will Employ `Native Monetization`. Media Post. Retrieved from http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/159291/union-square-founder-new-online-ads-will-employ.html?edition=
Wang, A. (2006). Advertising engagement: A driver of message involvement on message effects. JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING RESEARCH-NEW YORK-, 46(4), 355.
Yang, K. C. (2004). A comparison of attitudes towards Internet advertising among lifestyle segments in Taiwan. Journal of Marketing Communications, 10(3), 195-212.
Yoo, C. Y. (2008). Unconscious processing of Web advertising: Effects on implicit memory, attitude toward the brand, and consideration set. Journal of interactive marketing, 22(2), 2-18.
Yoon, S.-J., & Kim, J.-H. (2001). Is the Internet more effective than traditional media? Factors affecting the choice of media. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(6), 53-60.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 341-352.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1986). Conceptualizing involvement. Journal of advertising, 15(2), 4-34.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of advertising, 23(4), 12.
Zanot, E. (1981). Public attitudes toward advertising. Advertising in a New Age,. Provo, Utah: American Academy of Advertising.
zh_TW