1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 以故事性的自然場景探討主角與地點在動態視覺處理上的相互影響
Investigating the Interaction of Character and Surroundings on Dynamic Visual Processing in the Perception of Narrative Natural Scene
作者 張鈺潔
Chang, Yu Chieh
貢獻者 黃淑麗
Huang, Shwu Lih
張鈺潔
Chang, Yu Chieh
關鍵詞 動態視覺處理
主角
地點
一致性效果
促進效果
抑制效果
物體優勢效果
dynamic visual process
character
surroundings
consistency effect
facilitation effect
inhibition effect
object advantage effect
日期 2016
上傳時間 1-Mar-2016 10:40:05 (UTC+8)
摘要 視覺辨識是極其快速而且正確的，逐步揭露作業可展示此一閃而過的動態視覺辨識歷程，本研究目的即在以此作業探討主角與地點在動態視覺辨識過程中相互影響的內涵。實驗一旨在建立主角與地點的視覺辨識基準線，結果發現主角比起地點只需累積較低空間頻率訊息即可完成正確辨識，得到物體優勢效果。實驗二旨在驗證物體與背景之間在視覺處理上的非獨立關係，透過操弄單獨呈現與同時呈現兩種視覺呈現方式，以主角辨識作業與地點辨識作業加以驗證。結果顯示對地點辨識作業而言，同時呈現情況比起單獨呈現情況只需累積較低空間頻率訊息即可完成正確辨識；對主角辨識作業而言，單獨呈現情況與同時呈現情況並無不同。除此之外，在單獨呈現情況下，仍獲得物體優勢效果。但在同時呈現情況下，物體優勢效果並不復見，反而是地點辨識優於主角辨識。實驗二結果支持物體與背景之間在視覺處理上為非獨立關係。實驗三進一步從「一致性效果」在促進層面以及抑制層面上的作用情況，探討物體與背景之間在視覺處理上相互影響的內涵。實驗三a結果顯示，在主角辨識作業中所得到的「一致性效果」，源於地點訊息對主角辨識在抑制層面的作用而來。實驗三b結果顯示，在地點辨識作業中所得到「一致性效果」，則源於主角訊息對地點辨識在促進層面與抑制層面的作用而來。實驗四進一步以同時呈報的作業方式，讓參與者對整張場景進行辨識，對於視覺系統所知覺到的主角內容與地點內容都需加以呈報，藉此再次驗證主角與地點處理的相互影響。其結果顯示在主角內容與地點內容呈報時，皆獲得「一致性效果」。除此之外，在一致情況與不一情況下皆獲得物體優勢效果。本研究以動態視覺處理模型中物體與背景平行處理且密切交換訊息之觀點解釋所得結果，並提出注意力分佈在此動態視覺處理歷程扮演重要角色。
Visual recognition is a fast and accurate process. The present study adopted a progressive revelation task, which mimics the visual dynamics appropriately, to investigate the interaction of character and surroundings in the dynamic visual processing. Experiment 1 aimed to establish visual recognition curves for character and surroundings separately as baselines. The results showed that less amount of cumulated perceptual evidence was required for character than surroundings, so that it showed the object advantage effect. In Experiment 2, the non-independent relationship between the object- and background-related visual processes was verified. The performance of isolation condition with the character and surroundings presented in isolation was compared to the concurrent condition with the two presented concurrently. The results of the surroundings recognition task showed that less amount of cumulated perceptual evidence was required for concurrent condition than isolation condition. In contrast, for the character recognition task, there was no difference between these two conditions. These results supported the non-independent relationship between object- and background-related processes. Object advantage effect was replicated in the isolation condition but not in the concurrent condition, which meant that surroundings required less amount of perceptual evidence than character for visual recognition instead. In Experiment 3, interaction between object- and background-related processes was investigated by consistency effect from both the aspects of facilitation and inhibition effects. Results of Experiment 3a showed that consistency effect was only contributed by inhibition effect in the character recognition task. Results of Experiment 3b showed that both the facilitation and inhibition effects contributed to the consistency effect in the surroundings recognition task. In Experiment 4, participants were asked to report both the contents of character and surroundings. The results showed that consistency effects occurred in both of the content reports. And also the object advantage effect appeared in both of the consistent and inconsistent conditions. Overall, the results of the present study implied that object- and background-related visual processes operate in parallel while interchange information intimately at each level of the visual processing stages. The results also suggest that deployment of attention resource played an important role in the dynamic visual process.
參考文獻 英文文獻
Antes, J. R. (1974). The time course of picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psycholoy, 103, 62-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036799
Bar, M. (2003). A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(4), 600-609. doi:10.1162/089892903321662976
Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews, 5, 617-629. doi:10.1038/nrn1476
Bar, M. (2007). The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 280-289. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005
Bar, M. (2009). The proactive brain: memory for predictions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Socity of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364, 1235-1243. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0310
Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real-world scenes. Science, 177(4043), 77-80. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4043.77
Biederman, I., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, E. W. (1973). Searching for objects in real-world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97(1), 22-27. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0033776
Biederman, I., Rabinowitz, J. C., Glass, A. L. & Stacy, E. W. (1974). On the information extracted from a glance at a scene. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(3), 597-600. doi: 10.1037/h0037158
Biederman, I., Teitelbaum, R. C., & Mezzanotte, R. J. (1983). Scene perception: a failure to find a benefit from prior expectancy or familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(3), 411-429. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.9.3.411
Boyce, S. J., & Pollatsek, A. (1992). Identification of objects in scenes: the role of scene background in object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 18(3), 531-543. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.3.531
Boyce, S. J., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Effect of background information on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 556-566. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.556
Davenport, J. L. (2007). Consistency effects between objects in scenes. Memory and Cognition, 35(3), 393-401. doi: 10.3758/BF03193280
Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15(8), 559-564. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00719.x
Delorme, A., Richard, G., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2000). Ultra-rapid categorization of natural scenes does not rely on colour cues: a study in monkeys and humans. Vision Research, 40(16), 2187-2200. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00083-3
Delplanque, S., N’diaye, K., Scherer, K., & Grandjean, D. (2007). Spatial frequencies or emotional effects? A systematic measure of spatial frequencies for IAPS pictures by a discrete wavelet analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 165(1), 144-150. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.05.030
Dobel, C., Gumnior, H., Bölte, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2007). Describing scenes hardly seen. Acta Psychologica, 125(2), 129-143. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.07.004
Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). Cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293, 2470-2473. doi:10.1126/science.1063414
Enns, J. T., & Lleras, A. (2008). What’s next? New evidence for prediction in human vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(9), 327-333. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.06.001
Fabre-Thorpe, M., Richard, G., & Thorpe, S. J. (1998). Rapid categorization of natural images by rhesus monkeys. NeuroReport, 9(2), 303-308. doi:10.1097/00001756-199801260-00023
Fei-Fei, L., Iyer, A., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2007). What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene? Journal of vision, 7(1), 1-29. doi: 10.1167/7.1.10
Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(3), 316-355. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.316
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11(4), 274-279. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00255
Grossman, E. D., & Blake, R. (2001). Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vision Research, 41(10-11), 1475-1482. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00317-5
Hafri, A., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2012). Getting the gist of events: recognition of two-participant actions from brief displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 880-905. doi:10.1037/a0030045
Hanes, D. P., & Schall, J. D. (1996). Neural control of voluntary movement initiation. Science, 274(5286), 427-430. doi:10.1126/science.274.5286.427
Hegdé, J. (2008). Time course of visual perception: coarse-to-fine processing and beyond. Progress in Neurobiology, 84(4), 405-439. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.09.001
Henderson, J. M. (1992). Object identification in context: The visual processing of natural scenes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 319-341. doi:10.1037/h0084325
Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual review of psychology, 50, 243-271. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243
Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (1998). Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(4), 398-415. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.127.4.398
Joubert, O. R., Rousselet, G. A., Fize, D., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2007). Processing scene context: fast categorization and object interference. Vision Research, 47, 3286-3297. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.09.013
Kanwisher, N. (2010). Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(25), 11163-11170. doi:10.1073/pnas.1005062107
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311. Retrieved from http://www.jneurosci.org/
Kauffmann, L., Ramanoël, S., & Peyrin, C. (2014). The neural bases of spatial frequency processing during scene perception. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 8(37), 1-14. doi:10.3389/fnint.2014.00037
Kim, J-N., & Shadlen, M. N. (1999). Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque. Nature Neuroscience, 2(2), 176-185. doi:10.1038/5739
Loftus, G.R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 4, 565-572. http://dx.doi.org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.565
Mack, M. L., & Palmeri, T. J. (2010). Modeling categorization of scenes containing consistent versus inconsistent objects. Journal of Vision, 10(3), 1-11. doi:10.1167/10.3.11
Mackworth, N. H., & Morandi, A. J. (1967). The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Perception and psychophysics, 2, 547-552. doi: 10.3758/BF03210264
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Oliva, A., & Schyns, P. G. (1997). Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli. Cognitive Psychology, 34(1), 72-107. doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0667
Oliva, A., & Schyns, P. G. (2000). Diagnostic colors mediate scene recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 176-210. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0728
Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory and Cognition, 3, 519-526. doi:10.3758/BF03197524
Pelphrey, K. A., Morris, J. P., & McCarthy, G. (2005). Neural basis of eye gaze processing deficits in autism. Brain, 128, 1038-1048. doi:10.1093/brain/awh404
Pelphrey, K. A., Viola, R. J., & McCarthy, G. (2004). When strangers pass: processing of mutual and averted social gaze in the superior temporal sulcus. Psychological Science, 15(9), 598-603. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00726.x
Peyrin, C., Michel, C. M., Schwartz, S., Thut, G., Seghier, M., Landis, T., …Vuilleumier, P. (2010). The neural substrates and timing of top-down processes during coarse-to-fine categorization of visual scenes: a combined fMRI and ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12), 2768-2780. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21424
Ploran, E. J., Nelson, S. M., Velanova, K., Donaldson, D., Petersen, S., & Wheeler, M. E. (2007). Evidence accumulation and the moment of recognition: dissociating perceptual recognition processes using fMRI. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(44), 11912-11924. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3522-07.2007
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Ogden, W. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: the role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick & I. J. Saltzman(Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Potter, M. C. (1975). Meaning in visual search. Science, 187(4180), 965-966. doi:10.1126/science.1145183
Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 2(5), 509–522. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.2.5.509
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A Theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59-108. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in lexical-decision task. Psychological Aging, 19(2), 278-289. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.278
Rousselet, G. A., Joubert, O. R., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2005). How long to get to the “gist” of real-world natural scene. Visual Cognition, 12(6), 852-877. doi:10.1080/13506280444000553
Rousselet, G., Macé, M. J.-M., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2003). Is it an animal? Is it a human face? Fast processing in upright and inverted natural scenes. Journal of vision, 3, 440-455. doi:10:1167/3.6.5
Schettino, A., Loeys, T., Bossi, M., & Pourtois, G. (2012). Valence-specific modulation in the accumulation of perceptual evidence prior to visual scene recognition. PLoS ONE 7(5), 1-15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038064
Schettino, A., Loeys, T., Delphanque, S., & Pourtois, G. (2011). Brain dynamics of upstream perceptual processes leading to visual object recognition: a high density ERP topographic mapping study. NeuroImage, 55, 1227-1241. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.009
Schyns, P. G., & Oliva, A. (1994). From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science, 5(4), 195-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00500.x
Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2009). Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(9), 403-409. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.003
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381(6), 520-522. doi:10.1038/381520a0
VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultra-rapid visual categorization of natural and artifactual objects. Perception, 30, 655-668. doi:10.1068/p3029
Wurm, L. H., Legge, G. E., Isenberg, L. M., & Luebker, A. (1993). Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(4), 899-911. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.19.4.899

中文文獻
張志三(1999)。漫談碎形。台北：牛頓出版股份有限公司
描述 博士
國立政治大學
心理學系
96752501
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096752501
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 黃淑麗zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Huang, Shwu Lihen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張鈺潔zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chang, Yu Chiehen_US
dc.creator (作者) 張鈺潔zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chang, Yu Chiehen_US
dc.date (日期) 2016en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Mar-2016 10:40:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Mar-2016 10:40:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Mar-2016 10:40:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0096752501en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81524-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 心理學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96752501zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 視覺辨識是極其快速而且正確的，逐步揭露作業可展示此一閃而過的動態視覺辨識歷程，本研究目的即在以此作業探討主角與地點在動態視覺辨識過程中相互影響的內涵。實驗一旨在建立主角與地點的視覺辨識基準線，結果發現主角比起地點只需累積較低空間頻率訊息即可完成正確辨識，得到物體優勢效果。實驗二旨在驗證物體與背景之間在視覺處理上的非獨立關係，透過操弄單獨呈現與同時呈現兩種視覺呈現方式，以主角辨識作業與地點辨識作業加以驗證。結果顯示對地點辨識作業而言，同時呈現情況比起單獨呈現情況只需累積較低空間頻率訊息即可完成正確辨識；對主角辨識作業而言，單獨呈現情況與同時呈現情況並無不同。除此之外，在單獨呈現情況下，仍獲得物體優勢效果。但在同時呈現情況下，物體優勢效果並不復見，反而是地點辨識優於主角辨識。實驗二結果支持物體與背景之間在視覺處理上為非獨立關係。實驗三進一步從「一致性效果」在促進層面以及抑制層面上的作用情況，探討物體與背景之間在視覺處理上相互影響的內涵。實驗三a結果顯示，在主角辨識作業中所得到的「一致性效果」，源於地點訊息對主角辨識在抑制層面的作用而來。實驗三b結果顯示，在地點辨識作業中所得到「一致性效果」，則源於主角訊息對地點辨識在促進層面與抑制層面的作用而來。實驗四進一步以同時呈報的作業方式，讓參與者對整張場景進行辨識，對於視覺系統所知覺到的主角內容與地點內容都需加以呈報，藉此再次驗證主角與地點處理的相互影響。其結果顯示在主角內容與地點內容呈報時，皆獲得「一致性效果」。除此之外，在一致情況與不一情況下皆獲得物體優勢效果。本研究以動態視覺處理模型中物體與背景平行處理且密切交換訊息之觀點解釋所得結果，並提出注意力分佈在此動態視覺處理歷程扮演重要角色。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Visual recognition is a fast and accurate process. The present study adopted a progressive revelation task, which mimics the visual dynamics appropriately, to investigate the interaction of character and surroundings in the dynamic visual processing. Experiment 1 aimed to establish visual recognition curves for character and surroundings separately as baselines. The results showed that less amount of cumulated perceptual evidence was required for character than surroundings, so that it showed the object advantage effect. In Experiment 2, the non-independent relationship between the object- and background-related visual processes was verified. The performance of isolation condition with the character and surroundings presented in isolation was compared to the concurrent condition with the two presented concurrently. The results of the surroundings recognition task showed that less amount of cumulated perceptual evidence was required for concurrent condition than isolation condition. In contrast, for the character recognition task, there was no difference between these two conditions. These results supported the non-independent relationship between object- and background-related processes. Object advantage effect was replicated in the isolation condition but not in the concurrent condition, which meant that surroundings required less amount of perceptual evidence than character for visual recognition instead. In Experiment 3, interaction between object- and background-related processes was investigated by consistency effect from both the aspects of facilitation and inhibition effects. Results of Experiment 3a showed that consistency effect was only contributed by inhibition effect in the character recognition task. Results of Experiment 3b showed that both the facilitation and inhibition effects contributed to the consistency effect in the surroundings recognition task. In Experiment 4, participants were asked to report both the contents of character and surroundings. The results showed that consistency effects occurred in both of the content reports. And also the object advantage effect appeared in both of the consistent and inconsistent conditions. Overall, the results of the present study implied that object- and background-related visual processes operate in parallel while interchange information intimately at each level of the visual processing stages. The results also suggest that deployment of attention resource played an important role in the dynamic visual process.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與研究動機 1
第二節 自然場景的動態視覺處理 4
一、動態的視覺運算 4
二、從粗略到細緻的視覺處理 5
三、視覺辨識中的知覺累積 7
四、以逐步揭露作業探討動態視覺處理中的知覺累積成分 10
第三節 動態視覺處理中的物體與背景 13
一、Bar模型中背景對物體辨識的影響 13
二、物體對背景分類的影響 15
三、物體與背景之間的相互影響 16
四、物體優勢效果 18
第四節 作業與實驗材料的選用 22
一、內容呈報方式的優點 22
二、故事性自然場景中的主角與地點 22
第五節 研究目的與架構 25
第二章 研究方法 28
第一節 場景圖片的準備與評量 28
一、實驗目的 28
二、實驗方法 28
三、結果分析 30
第二節 實驗一：主角與地點的視覺辨識曲線 36
一、實驗目的 36
二、實驗方法 36
三、結果分析 41
四、討論 46
第三節 實驗二：主角與地點之間乃獨立運作或非獨立關係？ 49
一、實驗目的 49
二、實驗方法 50
三、結果分析 53
四、討論 59
第四節 實驗三a：地點對主角辨識的促進與抑制 61
一、實驗目的 61
二、實驗方法 62
三、結果分析 65
四、討論 69
第五節 實驗三b：主角對地點辨識的促進與抑制 70
一、實驗目的 70
二、實驗方法 70
三、結果分析 72
四、討論 75
第六節 實驗四：同時呈報主角與地點 77
一、實驗目的 77
二、實驗方法 77
三、結果分析 79
四、討論 85
第三章 綜合討論 86
第一節 研究結果綜覽 86
第二節 空間頻率閾值估計的意涵 89
第三節 從Bar的模型到整合模型 91
第四節 以整合模型解釋「一致性效果」 93
第五節 以整合模型解釋「促進效果」與「抑制效果」 94
一、地點訊息對主角辨識的「促進效果」與「抑制效果」 94
二、主角訊息對地點辨識的「促進效果」與「抑制效果」 97
第六節 以整合模型解釋「物體優勢效果」 100
第七節 在促進層面上的相互影響為「不對稱」的意涵 104
第八節 研究貢獻、限制與未來研究方向 105
一、研究貢獻 105
二、研究限制 106
三、未來研究方向 107
第四章 結論 108
參考文獻 109
附錄一：刺激材料一覽表 116
附錄二：刺激材料的內容評估結果 132
附錄三：指導語 148
附錄四：簡介等比優勢模型 151		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 7495351 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096752501en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 動態視覺處理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 主角zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 地點zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 一致性效果zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 促進效果zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 抑制效果zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 物體優勢效果zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) dynamic visual processen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) characteren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) surroundingsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) consistency effecten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) facilitation effecten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) inhibition effecten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) object advantage effecten_US
dc.title (題名) 以故事性的自然場景探討主角與地點在動態視覺處理上的相互影響zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Investigating the Interaction of Character and Surroundings on Dynamic Visual Processing in the Perception of Narrative Natural Sceneen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文文獻
Antes, J. R. (1974). The time course of picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psycholoy, 103, 62-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036799
Bar, M. (2003). A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(4), 600-609. doi:10.1162/089892903321662976
Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews, 5, 617-629. doi:10.1038/nrn1476
Bar, M. (2007). The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 280-289. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005
Bar, M. (2009). The proactive brain: memory for predictions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Socity of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364, 1235-1243. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0310
Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real-world scenes. Science, 177(4043), 77-80. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4043.77
Biederman, I., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, E. W. (1973). Searching for objects in real-world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97(1), 22-27. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0033776
Biederman, I., Rabinowitz, J. C., Glass, A. L. & Stacy, E. W. (1974). On the information extracted from a glance at a scene. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(3), 597-600. doi: 10.1037/h0037158
Biederman, I., Teitelbaum, R. C., & Mezzanotte, R. J. (1983). Scene perception: a failure to find a benefit from prior expectancy or familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(3), 411-429. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.9.3.411
Boyce, S. J., & Pollatsek, A. (1992). Identification of objects in scenes: the role of scene background in object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 18(3), 531-543. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.3.531
Boyce, S. J., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Effect of background information on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 556-566. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.556
Davenport, J. L. (2007). Consistency effects between objects in scenes. Memory and Cognition, 35(3), 393-401. doi: 10.3758/BF03193280
Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15(8), 559-564. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00719.x
Delorme, A., Richard, G., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2000). Ultra-rapid categorization of natural scenes does not rely on colour cues: a study in monkeys and humans. Vision Research, 40(16), 2187-2200. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00083-3
Delplanque, S., N’diaye, K., Scherer, K., & Grandjean, D. (2007). Spatial frequencies or emotional effects? A systematic measure of spatial frequencies for IAPS pictures by a discrete wavelet analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 165(1), 144-150. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.05.030
Dobel, C., Gumnior, H., Bölte, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2007). Describing scenes hardly seen. Acta Psychologica, 125(2), 129-143. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.07.004
Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). Cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293, 2470-2473. doi:10.1126/science.1063414
Enns, J. T., & Lleras, A. (2008). What’s next? New evidence for prediction in human vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(9), 327-333. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.06.001
Fabre-Thorpe, M., Richard, G., & Thorpe, S. J. (1998). Rapid categorization of natural images by rhesus monkeys. NeuroReport, 9(2), 303-308. doi:10.1097/00001756-199801260-00023
Fei-Fei, L., Iyer, A., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2007). What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene? Journal of vision, 7(1), 1-29. doi: 10.1167/7.1.10
Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(3), 316-355. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.316
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11(4), 274-279. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00255
Grossman, E. D., & Blake, R. (2001). Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vision Research, 41(10-11), 1475-1482. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00317-5
Hafri, A., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2012). Getting the gist of events: recognition of two-participant actions from brief displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 880-905. doi:10.1037/a0030045
Hanes, D. P., & Schall, J. D. (1996). Neural control of voluntary movement initiation. Science, 274(5286), 427-430. doi:10.1126/science.274.5286.427
Hegdé, J. (2008). Time course of visual perception: coarse-to-fine processing and beyond. Progress in Neurobiology, 84(4), 405-439. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.09.001
Henderson, J. M. (1992). Object identification in context: The visual processing of natural scenes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 319-341. doi:10.1037/h0084325
Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual review of psychology, 50, 243-271. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243
Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (1998). Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(4), 398-415. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.127.4.398
Joubert, O. R., Rousselet, G. A., Fize, D., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2007). Processing scene context: fast categorization and object interference. Vision Research, 47, 3286-3297. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.09.013
Kanwisher, N. (2010). Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(25), 11163-11170. doi:10.1073/pnas.1005062107
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311. Retrieved from http://www.jneurosci.org/
Kauffmann, L., Ramanoël, S., & Peyrin, C. (2014). The neural bases of spatial frequency processing during scene perception. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 8(37), 1-14. doi:10.3389/fnint.2014.00037
Kim, J-N., & Shadlen, M. N. (1999). Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque. Nature Neuroscience, 2(2), 176-185. doi:10.1038/5739
Loftus, G.R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 4, 565-572. http://dx.doi.org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.565
Mack, M. L., & Palmeri, T. J. (2010). Modeling categorization of scenes containing consistent versus inconsistent objects. Journal of Vision, 10(3), 1-11. doi:10.1167/10.3.11
Mackworth, N. H., & Morandi, A. J. (1967). The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Perception and psychophysics, 2, 547-552. doi: 10.3758/BF03210264
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Oliva, A., & Schyns, P. G. (1997). Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli. Cognitive Psychology, 34(1), 72-107. doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0667
Oliva, A., & Schyns, P. G. (2000). Diagnostic colors mediate scene recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 176-210. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0728
Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory and Cognition, 3, 519-526. doi:10.3758/BF03197524
Pelphrey, K. A., Morris, J. P., & McCarthy, G. (2005). Neural basis of eye gaze processing deficits in autism. Brain, 128, 1038-1048. doi:10.1093/brain/awh404
Pelphrey, K. A., Viola, R. J., & McCarthy, G. (2004). When strangers pass: processing of mutual and averted social gaze in the superior temporal sulcus. Psychological Science, 15(9), 598-603. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00726.x
Peyrin, C., Michel, C. M., Schwartz, S., Thut, G., Seghier, M., Landis, T., …Vuilleumier, P. (2010). The neural substrates and timing of top-down processes during coarse-to-fine categorization of visual scenes: a combined fMRI and ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12), 2768-2780. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21424
Ploran, E. J., Nelson, S. M., Velanova, K., Donaldson, D., Petersen, S., & Wheeler, M. E. (2007). Evidence accumulation and the moment of recognition: dissociating perceptual recognition processes using fMRI. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(44), 11912-11924. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3522-07.2007
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Ogden, W. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: the role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick & I. J. Saltzman(Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Potter, M. C. (1975). Meaning in visual search. Science, 187(4180), 965-966. doi:10.1126/science.1145183
Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 2(5), 509–522. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.2.5.509
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A Theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59-108. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in lexical-decision task. Psychological Aging, 19(2), 278-289. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.278
Rousselet, G. A., Joubert, O. R., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2005). How long to get to the “gist” of real-world natural scene. Visual Cognition, 12(6), 852-877. doi:10.1080/13506280444000553
Rousselet, G., Macé, M. J.-M., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2003). Is it an animal? Is it a human face? Fast processing in upright and inverted natural scenes. Journal of vision, 3, 440-455. doi:10:1167/3.6.5
Schettino, A., Loeys, T., Bossi, M., & Pourtois, G. (2012). Valence-specific modulation in the accumulation of perceptual evidence prior to visual scene recognition. PLoS ONE 7(5), 1-15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038064
Schettino, A., Loeys, T., Delphanque, S., & Pourtois, G. (2011). Brain dynamics of upstream perceptual processes leading to visual object recognition: a high density ERP topographic mapping study. NeuroImage, 55, 1227-1241. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.009
Schyns, P. G., & Oliva, A. (1994). From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science, 5(4), 195-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00500.x
Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2009). Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(9), 403-409. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.003
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381(6), 520-522. doi:10.1038/381520a0
VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultra-rapid visual categorization of natural and artifactual objects. Perception, 30, 655-668. doi:10.1068/p3029
Wurm, L. H., Legge, G. E., Isenberg, L. M., & Luebker, A. (1993). Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(4), 899-911. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.19.4.899

中文文獻
張志三(1999)。漫談碎形。台北：牛頓出版股份有限公司		zh_TW