學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 殊價慾望規範性之探討 作者 游偉迪
Yu, Wei-Di貢獻者 陳聽安
Chen, Ting-An
游偉迪
Yu, Wei-Di關鍵詞 殊價慾望
殊價財
規範性
個人主權
公共財
外部性
慾望
偏好
merit wants
Merit goods
normativity
individual sovereignty
public goods
externality
wants
preference日期 2000 上傳時間 31-三月-2016 15:31:57 (UTC+8) 摘要 在探討殊價慾望的規範性意義時,必先瞭解殊價慾望在規範意義上的爭議,而欲瞭解其爭議所在,則首先需從殊價慾望的定義與特性著手。然而困難之處就在於,殊價慾望的定義不僅有失明確,且有因人而異、各陳己見的情況,甚至Musgrave本人亦數度更改對殊價慾望意義的認定。 參考文獻 中文部分黃世鑫(1979),《殊價財之最適供給》,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。黃世鑫(1998a),《財政學概論》,國立空中大學。黃世鑫(1998b),「老年安全制度與政府財政」,年金制度及其法律規範學術研討會,政治大學法學院、行政院經建會、臺灣法學會、中德文教基金會。蘇慧君(1999),《社會福利與分配正義-論約翰彌爾之社會福利思想》,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。英文部分Addleson, Mark(1995), Equilibrium Versus Understanding, Routledge, Part 1.Atkinson, A. B.(1998), Poverty In Europe, Blackwell, 88, 92-93.Auld, D. A. L. and P. C. Bing(1971), "Merit Wants: A Further Analysis", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 30, No. 2, 257-265.Ballentine, J. G.(1972/73), "Merit Goods, Information, and Corrected Preferences", Finanzarchiv, N.F., Band 30, Heft 2, 298-306.Basu, K.(1976), "Retrospective Choice and Merit Goods", Finanzarchiv, N.F., Vol. 34, No. 2, 220-225.Besley, T.(1988), "A Simple Model for Merit Good Arguements", Journal of Public Economics, 35, 371-383.Boadway, R. W. and D. E. Wildasin(1984), Public Sector Economics, 2nd Edition, HWA-TAI BOOK CO., Taiwan version, 170.Brenna, Geoffrey and Loren Lomasky(1983), "Institutional Aspects of `Merit Goods` Analysis", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 41, No. 2, 183-206.Brown, C. V. and P. M. Jackson(1990), Public Sector Economics, 4th Edition, Blackwell, 47, 51-52.Buchanan, J. M. and R. A. Musgrave(1999), Public Finance and Public Choice-Two Contrasting Visions of The State, The MIT Press, 94-96.Burkhead, J. and J. Miner(1971), Public Expenditure, 125-133.Charles, Susan and T. Westaway(1981), "Ignorance and Merit Wants", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 39, No. 1, 74-78.Culyer, A. J.(1971), "Merit Goods and The Welfare Economics of Coercion", Public Finance, vol. 26, No. 4, 546-572.Head, J. G. (1969), "Merit Goods Revisited", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 28, No. 2, 214-25.Helms, L. J.(1983), "Modern Public Finance: The Neoclassical Approach", in: Political Economy: Recent Views L. L. Wade(ed.), 27-67.Hillman, A. L.(1980), "Notions of Merit Want", Public Finance, Vol. XXXV, No. 2, 213-226.McLure, C. E.(1968), "Merit Wants: A Normatively Empty Box", Finanzarchiv, N. F., vol. 27, No. 3, 474-483.Musgrave, R. A.(1959a), The Theory of Public Finance, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.._______(1959b), "On Merit Goods", in: Public Finance in a Democratic Society(1986), Vol. 1, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 34-40._______(1969), "Provision for Social Goods", in: Public Finance in a Democratic Society(1986), Vol. 1, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 41-58._______(1970), "Allocation, Distribution and The Theory of Public Finance", in: Theorie und Praxis des Finanzpolitischen Interventionsismus, Hrsg. Von H-Haller and a. Tubingen, 29-45._______ and Peggy B. Musgrave(1973), Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 5th Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 55-58._______(1983), "Public Finance, Now and Then", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 41, No. 1, 1-13.Pazner, E. A.(1972), "Merit Wants and The Theory of Taxation", Public Finance, Vol. 27, No. 4, 460-472.Penz, G. P.(1986), Consumer Sovereignty and Human Interests, New York: Cambridge University Press.Pulsipher, A. G.(1971/72), "The Properties and Relevance of Merit Goods", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 30, No. 2, 266-86.Rosen, H. S.(1992), Public Finance, 3rd Edition, IRWIN, 56-57.Roskemp, K. W.(1975), "Public Goods, Private Goods, Pareto Optimum and Social Optimum", Public Finance, Vol. 30, No. 1, 61-69.Sandmo, A.(1983), "Ex post Welfare Economics and The Theory of Merit Goods", Economica, 50, 19-33.Sen, A. K.(1977), "Rational Fools: A Critique of The Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317-344.Shoup, C. S.(1969), Public Finance, Auldine Publishing Company, Ch. 5.Stiglitz, J. E.(1988), Economics of The Public Sector, 2nd Edition, Norton, 80-83, 92, 93-94, 334.Tresch, R. W.(1981), Public Finance-a normative theory, Business Publications, Inc., 3-10, 628-629.Ver Eecke, W.(1998), "The Concept of a `Merit Good` The Ethical Dimension in Economics Theory and The History of Economic Thought or The Transformation of Economics Into Socio-Economics", Journal of Socio-Economics, vol. 27, No. 1, 133-153.Wenzel, H. and W. Wiegard(1981), "Merit Goods and Second-Best Taxation", Public Finance, Vol. XXXVI, No. 1, 125-140.Wong, Stanley(1978), The Foundations of Paul Samuelson`s Revealed Preferences Theory-A Study by The Method of Rational Reconstruction, London, Heuley and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 28. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
87255010資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001834 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳聽安 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Ting-An en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 游偉迪 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Yu, Wei-Di en_US dc.creator (作者) 游偉迪 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Yu, Wei-Di en_US dc.date (日期) 2000 en_US dc.date.accessioned 31-三月-2016 15:31:57 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 31-三月-2016 15:31:57 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 31-三月-2016 15:31:57 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) A2002001834 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/83265 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 財政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 87255010 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在探討殊價慾望的規範性意義時,必先瞭解殊價慾望在規範意義上的爭議,而欲瞭解其爭議所在,則首先需從殊價慾望的定義與特性著手。然而困難之處就在於,殊價慾望的定義不僅有失明確,且有因人而異、各陳己見的情況,甚至Musgrave本人亦數度更改對殊價慾望意義的認定。 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 封面頁證明書致謝詞論文摘要目錄第一章 緒論第一節 研究動機第二節 研究方法與架構第三節 研究限制第二章 眾說紛云的殊價慾望-新古典觀點第一節 殊價慾望與殊價財-意義與特性認知之分歧一、殊價慾望與殊價財之區別二、殊價慾望認知之歧異第二節 殊價財的最適供給?一、外部性(效用依存性)二、資訊與學習效果三、社會的偏好四、社會計劃者五、事後的福利經濟學第三章 殊價慾望規範性之力挽-典範的轉移第一節 個人的社會性偏好第二節 制度觀點下的殊價財分析一、選民的選擇與市場的選擇二、p-偏好、m-偏好與殊價財三、本節批評與建議第三節 殊價財的社會經濟學觀點一、問題的溯源二、財貨的分類與殊價財的界定三、可能性條件(conditions of possibility or possibility conditions)四、以可能性條件辯證的數種殊價財五、本節批評與建議第四章 個人主義的真諦與慾望的本質第一節 對新古典個人主義方法論的反動第二節 真正的個人主義(True Individualism)與分析架構之建立一、第三人稱觀點(third-person perspective)vs.第一人稱觀點(first-person perspective)二、捨棄價值中立主義(Relinquishing Wertfreiheit)三、拒絕均衡說(Rejecting Equilibrium)四、摒棄預測功能(Abandoning Prediction)第三節 慾望的本質、分類,與衡量的原則一、慾望的範圍(The Range of Wants)二、能夠代表利益(interest)的慾望三、慾望衡量的原則-最適化問題(Optimization)第四節 消費者主權vs.個人主權(personal sovereignty)一、消費者主權二、私人主權(private sovereignty)三、個人主權四、理性的判定與偏好的形成第五節 殊價慾望的內涵與觀點融合一、殊價慾望之內涵二、不同觀點的融合三、政府介入之規範性第五章 結論參考文獻 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001834 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 殊價慾望 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 殊價財 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 規範性 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 個人主權 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公共財 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 外部性 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 慾望 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 偏好 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) merit wants en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Merit goods en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) normativity en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) individual sovereignty en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) public goods en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) externality en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) wants en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) preference en_US dc.title (題名) 殊價慾望規範性之探討 zh_TW dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分黃世鑫(1979),《殊價財之最適供給》,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。黃世鑫(1998a),《財政學概論》,國立空中大學。黃世鑫(1998b),「老年安全制度與政府財政」,年金制度及其法律規範學術研討會,政治大學法學院、行政院經建會、臺灣法學會、中德文教基金會。蘇慧君(1999),《社會福利與分配正義-論約翰彌爾之社會福利思想》,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。英文部分Addleson, Mark(1995), Equilibrium Versus Understanding, Routledge, Part 1.Atkinson, A. B.(1998), Poverty In Europe, Blackwell, 88, 92-93.Auld, D. A. L. and P. C. Bing(1971), "Merit Wants: A Further Analysis", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 30, No. 2, 257-265.Ballentine, J. G.(1972/73), "Merit Goods, Information, and Corrected Preferences", Finanzarchiv, N.F., Band 30, Heft 2, 298-306.Basu, K.(1976), "Retrospective Choice and Merit Goods", Finanzarchiv, N.F., Vol. 34, No. 2, 220-225.Besley, T.(1988), "A Simple Model for Merit Good Arguements", Journal of Public Economics, 35, 371-383.Boadway, R. W. and D. E. Wildasin(1984), Public Sector Economics, 2nd Edition, HWA-TAI BOOK CO., Taiwan version, 170.Brenna, Geoffrey and Loren Lomasky(1983), "Institutional Aspects of `Merit Goods` Analysis", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 41, No. 2, 183-206.Brown, C. V. and P. M. Jackson(1990), Public Sector Economics, 4th Edition, Blackwell, 47, 51-52.Buchanan, J. M. and R. A. Musgrave(1999), Public Finance and Public Choice-Two Contrasting Visions of The State, The MIT Press, 94-96.Burkhead, J. and J. Miner(1971), Public Expenditure, 125-133.Charles, Susan and T. Westaway(1981), "Ignorance and Merit Wants", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 39, No. 1, 74-78.Culyer, A. J.(1971), "Merit Goods and The Welfare Economics of Coercion", Public Finance, vol. 26, No. 4, 546-572.Head, J. G. (1969), "Merit Goods Revisited", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 28, No. 2, 214-25.Helms, L. J.(1983), "Modern Public Finance: The Neoclassical Approach", in: Political Economy: Recent Views L. L. Wade(ed.), 27-67.Hillman, A. L.(1980), "Notions of Merit Want", Public Finance, Vol. XXXV, No. 2, 213-226.McLure, C. E.(1968), "Merit Wants: A Normatively Empty Box", Finanzarchiv, N. F., vol. 27, No. 3, 474-483.Musgrave, R. A.(1959a), The Theory of Public Finance, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.._______(1959b), "On Merit Goods", in: Public Finance in a Democratic Society(1986), Vol. 1, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 34-40._______(1969), "Provision for Social Goods", in: Public Finance in a Democratic Society(1986), Vol. 1, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 41-58._______(1970), "Allocation, Distribution and The Theory of Public Finance", in: Theorie und Praxis des Finanzpolitischen Interventionsismus, Hrsg. Von H-Haller and a. Tubingen, 29-45._______ and Peggy B. Musgrave(1973), Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 5th Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 55-58._______(1983), "Public Finance, Now and Then", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 41, No. 1, 1-13.Pazner, E. A.(1972), "Merit Wants and The Theory of Taxation", Public Finance, Vol. 27, No. 4, 460-472.Penz, G. P.(1986), Consumer Sovereignty and Human Interests, New York: Cambridge University Press.Pulsipher, A. G.(1971/72), "The Properties and Relevance of Merit Goods", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 30, No. 2, 266-86.Rosen, H. S.(1992), Public Finance, 3rd Edition, IRWIN, 56-57.Roskemp, K. W.(1975), "Public Goods, Private Goods, Pareto Optimum and Social Optimum", Public Finance, Vol. 30, No. 1, 61-69.Sandmo, A.(1983), "Ex post Welfare Economics and The Theory of Merit Goods", Economica, 50, 19-33.Sen, A. K.(1977), "Rational Fools: A Critique of The Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317-344.Shoup, C. S.(1969), Public Finance, Auldine Publishing Company, Ch. 5.Stiglitz, J. E.(1988), Economics of The Public Sector, 2nd Edition, Norton, 80-83, 92, 93-94, 334.Tresch, R. W.(1981), Public Finance-a normative theory, Business Publications, Inc., 3-10, 628-629.Ver Eecke, W.(1998), "The Concept of a `Merit Good` The Ethical Dimension in Economics Theory and The History of Economic Thought or The Transformation of Economics Into Socio-Economics", Journal of Socio-Economics, vol. 27, No. 1, 133-153.Wenzel, H. and W. Wiegard(1981), "Merit Goods and Second-Best Taxation", Public Finance, Vol. XXXVI, No. 1, 125-140.Wong, Stanley(1978), The Foundations of Paul Samuelson`s Revealed Preferences Theory-A Study by The Method of Rational Reconstruction, London, Heuley and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 28. zh_TW